Views from farther back (large GIF warning)

[DPraved]

I would like to know the community opinion on camera shots from farther back, where the whole model can be seen?
I personally like them a lot, especially for small girls where the inclusion of guys in the frame better show of the size difference. Giorgio includes these shot from time to time, but I wish they were more frequent and lasted longer.

[Iddaoeeok]

Yes, Giorgio does these, I like them too.

[YumYum74]

Yes, same here.

[knicksfan]

Me too

[magizi87]

+1

Been asking for this since day one. lol

[DPraved]

of course.
IN my reviews that is included under "camerawork." Framing as you ask is called composition.
The thing is to get the girl's face and feet (or nearly so) in the same composition. You don't need the whole guy(s). And then move the camera as little as possible.
I find GG the worst offender of this with Gonzo a close second. I rarely even look at GG's trailers anymore.

Whoever is the so-called cameraman doesn't know shit about what (s)he is producing and the director is too lazy to correct him. He doesn't even realize or care that he can change exposure on the fly, look at the opening scenes of most GG stuff, the white walls are washed out and the girl is overexposed.
Unfortunately, I think you are expecting way too much from that bunch. Everything is hand held and often jerky. The attention of the camera often darts from one small area to another. Composition and a steady camera are concepts they rarely "get" preferring "Blanche Bradburry endures 8 DAP positions SZ2555 ." Is someone other than the crew counting the number of positions?
Yes, I prefer compositions as you describe. I think they do not realize that most people are watching these videos on a big screen and we have the capability to zoom, so show the whole fucking girl.

I think you will find that the Giorgio Lab stuff is better, esp Nick Rock and the Valters

Thank you for your thoughts! I enjoy your reviews, especially regarding camera-work.
I actually prefer when more of the guys are visible than when they just barely fit the whole girl in the frame. I find the action becomes too detached when all you see in the frame is the girl and some dicks fucking her. The sex looks more real and much naughtier when they guys doing the fucking can be seen as well. It's difficult to explain but I often find backstage photos of girls barely visible in a clusterfuck, more erotic than the finished result with frames containing only the girl and the cocks. The backstage shows the "real" fucking of the girl while the end result just shows the girl getting fucked.
If anyone can recommend me some scenes with good BTS, like a secondary camera or something, I would be very grateful!

[Gagandrim]

I watch porn entirely for voyeuristic reasons so I also prefer camerawork that's further away rather than closeups.

[powerful76]

absolutely yes!!!
i love!!!
this first angel smalls gif is absolute fantastic!!
this is just one of the special models that worked for legalporno!!
her body is absolute perfect for porn!!!
what a incredible moment!

[DPraved]

@DPraved
^^^LIKE^^^
I actually somewhat agree with you, but I always want to see the girl, not hidden in a clusterfuck. However, I was suggesting the composition of seeing the girl's feet and face at the same time to "dumb it down" for whoever is holding (poorly) the camera. Scenes farther back are fine also, but I want the focus of the composition to be the girl, an d the midrange showing feet and face would be preferred, but not by any means the only framing.

Thanks for the feedback on the reviews

I tend to exaggerate for effect, but I once came across the scene "Double Blonde Gang Bang At The Gym" on a tube-site, and despite it being a complete train-wreck of a production, the girls get absolutely demolished, with no concern of what looks good whatsoever. I just find that sort of unscripted intensity really exciting to watch and think it would be cool to see that kind of scene shot with modern equipment and with sensible camera angles.