PornBox.com

Because of the requirements for dry versions the wet action is lame as fuck.

In fact, the wet version almost never is REALLY soaking wet with wet hair, wet body etc.

No, mostly it´s just "open your mouth, but be careful the rest of your body stays dry".

Fuck dry versions!

I agree. the wet version is too constrainted in certain limits. some models just touch piss only with their tongue, not really swallow much of anything. Make it more of a play with piss with some ORGANIC flavor to it, then this dry wet games rehearsel! That is MOSTLY the same.
Sometimes it is different. But it really seems to depend on the model it seems. Maybe some models just can't get themselves to get into it.

Wotan29 wrote:Because of the requirements for dry versions the wet action is lame as fuck.

In fact, the wet version almost never is REALLY soaking wet with wet hair, wet body etc.

No, mostly it´s just "open your mouth, but be careful the rest of your body stays dry".

Fuck dry versions!

Totally agree: the "dry" version is totally unnecessary and unfair. It will never be really dry, it only prevents the wet version to be really wet and amazing.

This is a great reply to the only dry thread that was also created. I like the sentiment here, why not go for full wet. Wet scenes should go all out.

Yes, IMO wetter is better.

I think both wet and dry would benefit from a separation.

I don't know how much dry versions sell, but yeah it would be nice to have a 100% wet scene for something like once a week.

Agree!
I find the best water sport to be random pissing during the scene. A bit of Piss/squirt from the ladies like veronica Leal use to and then a bit of face pissing from the guys. I especially remember a Rebecca Sharon scene with ass pissing and pull out continuing to piss in her face. Lovely!

Yes! This is what I'm saying, wet scenes need to have more than just pissing in a model's mouth... considered thismy signature!

Agree. Always get a little sad when there's a cut and the girl is dry again.

I'd be more inclined to feel for people who hate wet stuff if I didn't have to try and avoid prolapse every five seconds of every other scene.

I feel like the dry version is more for the people in the US who don't even know there's a wet version. Like me, pre-VPN three or so years ago.
(still waiting on that "upgrade" option )

The dry version is always at the very very bottom of the seller list, I find it hard to believe they sell enough to justify all the effort to make them.

g1ndude wrote:Agree. Always get a little sad when there's a cut and the girl is dry again.

I'd be more inclined to feel for people who hate wet stuff if I didn't have to try and avoid prolapse every five seconds of every other scene.

I feel like the dry version is more for the people in the US who don't even know there's a wet version. Like me, pre-VPN three or so years ago.
(still waiting on that "upgrade" option )

The dry version is always at the very very bottom of the seller list, I find it hard to believe they sell enough to justify all the effort to make them.

Gio is stubborn, he has this theory that there is larger dry scene market out there vs wet. That may be true, but the wet fans turn up and support the content. The regular sex folks watch free content.

g1ndude wrote:The dry version is always at the very very bottom of the seller list, I find it hard to believe they sell enough to justify all the effort to make them.

Exactly, I don't see how can it be profitable to produce a "dry" version. Admittedly some cuts wil not cost so much, but you have every time to work a lot to cancel traces of piss, preventing the scene to look truly wet.

grey00owl wrote:

g1ndude wrote:The dry version is always at the very very bottom of the seller list, I find it hard to believe they sell enough to justify all the effort to make them.

Exactly, I don't see how can it be profitable to produce a "dry" version. Admittedly some cuts wil not cost so much, but you have every time to work a lot to cancel traces of piss, preventing the scene to look truly wet.

I guess it doesn't cost much for someone to cut out (most of) the wet parts. They probably have a standard workflow for shooting and editing to make this process go smoothly.
Then, whatever sales they make for the "dry-ish" version are all profit. So maybe it is worth it commercially?

avanfurwet wrote:They probably have a standard workflow for shooting.

And exactly that´s the problem!
Standard workflow leads to standard scenes.
Each scene looking the same.

Wotan29 wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:They probably have a standard workflow for shooting.

And exactly that´s the problem!
Standard workflow leads to standard scenes.
Each scene looking the same.

It's what it's looking like lately. The piss scenes should be called pissi in mouth scenes. Same scene with not much difference between them. The basined scenes mixed that up a little but only a few of those. There lack of soaking wet hair sucks lately that's for sure.