PornBox.com

Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?

powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?

Anal is king here, and sells really well. Many people prefer DAP, and 0% pussy scenes.

PrinceOfGapes wrote:

powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?

Anal is king here, and sells really well. Many people prefer DAP, and 0% pussy scenes.

Completely agree. I can't really get this attraction for DVP, but seems that a conspicuous amount of customers are into it. Therefore the boss's instruction to shoot it in the GONZO productions.
Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.

powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.

Easy he is only worried about profit and the easiest way to make it with the least cost, risk or creativity.

powerful76 wrote:For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?

Ouch, that is a reason not to offer DVP not a benefit.

grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.

These statements always bring a smile to my face because they absolutely make no sense. How does ANAL as a primary feature mean no pussy or DVP ? Am I the only that laughs at this. So should the primary ANAL crowd also complain about kissing, teasing, stripping, footjobs, handjobs, blowjobs, bukkake, etc ? After all it is not primarily ANAL.

SimplyStunning wrote:

grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.

These statements always bring a smile to my face because they absolutely make no sense. How does ANAL as a primary feature mean no pussy or DVP ? Am I the only that laughs at this. So should the primary ANAL crowd also complain about kissing, teasing, stripping, footjobs, handjobs, blowjobs, bukkake, etc ? After all it is not primarily ANAL.

You misunderstand me. I'm not saying I don't like DP (not DVP), kissing, blowjobs..., just that GG won't shoot a scene basically based on pussy penetration. As well as GONZO, by the way, but at GG it's even clearer.

SimplyStunning wrote:only worried about profit and the easiest way to make it with the least cost

DVP fee is manyfold lower than DAP fee.
Just saying!

grey00owl wrote:

SimplyStunning wrote:

grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.

These statements always bring a smile to my face because they absolutely make no sense. How does ANAL as a primary feature mean no pussy or DVP ? Am I the only that laughs at this. So should the primary ANAL crowd also complain about kissing, teasing, stripping, footjobs, handjobs, blowjobs, bukkake, etc ? After all it is not primarily ANAL.

You misunderstand me. I'm not saying I don't like DP (not DVP), kissing, blowjobs..., just that GG won't shoot a scene basically based on pussy penetration. As well as GONZO, by the way, but at GG it's even clearer.

but it doenst need to be based on DVP.
Just have DVP as part of the sex.
Gonzo scenes are not about DVP or pussy penetration. They are just part of the sex!!
Like a normal thing.
Not direct related to your post, but for i sometimes it looks that some DAP fans look a bit offended by pussy penetration in this scenes.
For me its really strange but as i always say, thats ok by me.
People has preferences but i think GIO could do his 0 pussy scenes but the scenes that has DPs , he could include some DVPs.
Anyway, just my opinion!

In my opinion: The Gio studio shoots, mostly no pussy scenes, sells pretty well and balanced, he said sometimes that their scenes with DP used to sells worse but this changes in some scenes of the last months but is not the tendence.

Maybe is wasnt his "purpose" turn him studio in a full anal studio with a low changes in the sex acts (DP, TP, DVP) but he said a lot of times that their 0% pussy scenes sell well and balanced

By other hand him studio have that "mark" or "fame" of shoot mostly no pussy porn and have a lot of costumers supporting that content so.. Why he "should" try to add pussy sex more often if currently their formula works?

In fact currently he offer more piss and TS porn too but the sexs acts are mostly the sames.

Anyway that kind of sex acts are avaliable in others studios here, i always say that every studio here have their style and sex acts, thats the variety and what makes every studio unique

His trademark is anal, double anal and 0 pussy. And it’s a very succesful trademark, like building up a brand.

When you think of his studio, you think of anal, rough anal and double anal. That’s what the audience expects, thats what the models sign up for. With piss now being added to the formula. Although it’s still an extreme porn act, switching from 0 pussy to double pussy would be inconsistent.

I think Giorgio is an artist with a clear vision. And that vision doesnt accomodate pussy fucking.

lp89 wrote:His trademark is anal, double anal and 0 pussy. And it’s a very succesful trademark, like building up a brand.

When you think of his studio, you think of anal, rough anal and double anal. That’s what the audience expects, thats what the models sign up for. With piss now being added to the formula. Although it’s still an extreme porn act, switching from 0 pussy to double pussy would be inconsistent.

I think Giorgio is an artist with a clear vision. And that vision doesnt accomodate pussy fucking.

Aint that the truth. Porn is art. Sure it's primal, and fees are base desires, but it's art nonetheless. I think it's great that GG does his best not to compromise his hardcore vision. For me without a doubt the greatest porn director currently in the biz.

lp89 wrote:His trademark is anal, double anal and 0 pussy. And it’s a very succesful trademark, like building up a brand.

When you think of his studio, you think of anal, rough anal and double anal. That’s what the audience expects, thats what the models sign up for. With piss now being added to the formula. Although it’s still an extreme porn act, switching from 0 pussy to double pussy would be inconsistent.

I think Giorgio is an artist with a clear vision. And that vision doesnt accomodate pussy fucking.

Exactly. 0% Pussy is GG's trademark, therefore Giorgio won't shoot DVP as long as his productions sell well. Otherwise, he would disappoint the great majority of his fan base he has built in many years.

They've only just changed all the video branding to 'Anal Vids'. It's all about the ass - not the pussy.

I still worship pussy though

Because he is the King of DAP.