Hotflash wrote:Yeah, as soon as i see "piss drinking" in the scene title, i don't even have a look at it.
They compensate for private movies to offer to the rest of the customers but it's old fashioned.
I regret that with all the money power LP has, they are not more creative in fantaisies.
At least, trans, piss drinking, 0 % pussy are not mine unfortunately.
I think that one day, the summum will be shit eating on this site
Sophiel777 wrote:Let's take today as an example.
Out of the 8 new scenes released today, 6 have piss in them or are piss related.
And yes, I know that along with the "wet" version a "dry" version is always released, but this mean nothing because the girls in these videos are still wet from all that piss. So even if the pissing act is not included, the implication that the girl was just pissed on still remains.
So maybe dial down on all that piss? It's unbecoming. Or just rename yourself to pissporno so that everyone will know what they are getting themselves into.
dap-addict wrote:I am actually getting into wet a bit after so many years of porn use, thus I dont mind as long as there is a dry version. Sometimes I still buy the dry version, especially if there is a significant price difference.
However, please studios consider that with piss dominance most girls just let it happen, but they dont take actively part in it. Often it really feels like just water during from some taps, a bit like in a spa or aqua park.
Girls do it because its payed around 200e more if she does wet.
Good for them? But good for real piss fans? (not like me!)
grey00owl wrote:dap-addict wrote:I am actually getting into wet a bit after so many years of porn use, thus I dont mind as long as there is a dry version. Sometimes I still buy the dry version, especially if there is a significant price difference.
However, please studios consider that with piss dominance most girls just let it happen, but they dont take actively part in it. Often it really feels like just water during from some taps, a bit like in a spa or aqua park.
Girls do it because its payed around 200e more if she does wet.
Good for them? But good for real piss fans? (not like me!)
Actually 200 EUR is not that much, I figured more. As you say, the most of the girls are not really into it, some look actually disgusted: this isn't hot, I don't like to see it.
Reducing the number of the wet scenes, reserving them to the models who like it, would be welcomed by wet and dry lovers as well.
ryukenmaster666 wrote:as long as piss sells it will be produced.
luvs2_wank wrote:The price differential isn't fair on the non-piss consumer.
SZ2501 - Cherry Kiss & Rebecca Sharon - top performers.
11.8tkt for piss
11.7tkt for non-piss
The scene price differential is 0.8%.
Are we saying it only costs 0.8% more to get a girl to drink piss from 4 guys 3 times (or however many times) in an hour? I doubt that to be the case.
I don't see why a non-piss fan should subsidise the piss fans indulgences.
kh00 wrote:If someone wants piss then charge him the extra. Don't charge us just 0.1 tkt less when we never asked for it.
dap-addict wrote:kh00 wrote:If someone wants piss then charge him the extra. Don't charge us just 0.1 tkt less when we never asked for it.
As much as I am on the dry user side still, I can imagine that small 0,1tkt price difference being the consequence of the previous big price difference. First, because if you check sales in lets say 2019 than you realize that (more expensive) wet always outsold (cheaper) dry by large. Means wet fans are prepared to pay much more. This idea could also have lead to the overall price increase btw. Second, one could argue that models have to be payed for wet scene no matter whether later there is also a dry cut. Its like saying I want to watch only solo dildo intro, thus I dont pay for 3on1 DP/DVP or even more expensive 3on1 DAP.
What you wanna watch is irrelevant as long as there are enough users who pay for more expensive porn sex acts, including side-fetishes like wet, fist or 4+ studs asking for some extra $$$ added to base fee.
Elodie wrote:https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=27972
WTF?
I don't wanna see piss and I SURELY don't wanna READ about it.
Hotflash wrote:Yeah, as soon as i see "piss drinking" in the scene title, i don't even have a look at it.
They compensate for private movies to offer to the rest of the customers but it's old fashioned.
I regret that with all the money power LP has, they are not more creative in fantaisies.
At least, trans, piss drinking, 0 % pussy are not mine unfortunately.
I think that one day, the summum will be shit eating on this site
BlueShadow wrote:
Sophiel777 wrote:Let's take today as an example.
Out of the 8 new scenes released today, 6 have piss in them or are piss related.
And yes, I know that along with the "wet" version a "dry" version is always released, but this means nothing because the girls in these videos are still wet from all that piss. So even if the pissing act is not included, the implication that the girl was just pissed on still remains.
So maybe dial down on all that piss? It's unbecoming. Or just rename yourself to pissporno so that everyone will know what they are getting themselves into.
Sophiel777 wrote:Let's take today as an example.
Out of the 8 new scenes released today, 6 have piss in them or are piss related.
And yes, I know that along with the "wet" version a "dry" version is always released, but this means nothing because the girls in these videos are still wet from all that piss. So even if the pissing act is not included, the implication that the girl was just pissed on still remains.
So maybe dial down on all that piss? It's unbecoming. Or just rename yourself to pissporno so that everyone will know what they are getting themselves into.
ayrtight wrote:With so many piss content it makes me doubt whether I should tag models on Twitter for LP .
There was already some reservation years ago , but now with the increased piss .....
ayrtight wrote:^
But there are many potential candidates who like anal and might want to do their first DP and Gangbang , but who don´t like piss and the other extreme stuff .
Many potential models ( famous and upcoming ) are getting kicked away in this way .
TomHardick wrote:Honestly, i don't understand the piss fetish; i just don't get it. What i understand is that there's a market for all this kind of stuff; and Giorgio and the rest are running a business here, and they want to make money; but it's going a little bit too far; too much scenes with piss, piss and more piss, even if you go with the "dry" scene, you know the girl was drowning in piss, that's a big turn down.
grey00owl wrote:ayrtight wrote:With so many piss content it makes me doubt whether I should tag models on Twitter for LP .
There was already some reservation years ago , but now with the increased piss .....
Don't know whether the models want to have links bringing to LP or not, but let's talk clear: this site dues its success to hardcore anal and piss. This is a fact.
ryukenmaster666 wrote:Well seems you've been heard, no many piss since 2-3 days
Jocke wrote:Totally unfair to not have a wet version of the dry scenes!
Gmoney18 wrote:Well the wet content sells the best, so this is why the producers make it frequently. I own plenty of both piss and non piss scenes, but agree with the above point of "you can't film TOO many wet scenes, otherwise it loses the novelty". For models that seem to legit enjoy pee (elen million, kristy, nicole love, susan), I would go a maximum of 1/2 of new scenes with wet content. For models willing to do it but not enjoy it, maybe you throw it in at 10%-20% of new scenes.
I get that some weeks lots of wet stuff is released, but the producers are just responding to what sells - if this is a problem I think non-wet fans should purchase more dry content If they want more produced, instead of berating the producers on the forum. And lets also remember that the majority of new scenes produced by lp studios are still "real" dry scenes (ie, not just "dry" versions of wet scenes)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests