PornBox.com

I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Oh, and before somebody calls me racist: it's racists to shoot only white girls/black men scenes.

In the last 20 releases I see 7 scenes with only black.
3 of them are from KS, (practically Interracial Vision...so...it's normal) one is from Natasha Teen productions...and until now I have seen only two male performer there, 2 blacks, (so we can say they shoot only IR, like IV)
2 IR-only from GIO (Interracial TAP and balls deep BBC edition).
1 IR-only from Gonzo.

So,just 1/3 of the scenes are IR-only.

GIO 3 scene (2 are IR only)
Gonzo 3 scene (1 IR-only)
N&F 3 scene (0 IR-only)
KS are all IR of course.

Aren't we have IV for interracial content?

Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Oh, and before somebody calls me racist: it's racists to shoot only white girls/black men scenes.

It by definition isn't.

Alt_Porn wrote:Aren't we have IV for interracial content?

Yes, but you can't pretend that others studios don't shoot some IR-only contents. It's business.

BTW, lets not consider KS/IV - Natasha Teen, they shoot only black. Lets not consider russian studio, they shoot only white.

We have GIO, Gonzo, N&F. In the last 20 releases they have 9 scenes. 3 of them are IR-only. So, still 1/3 of the scenes.
So it's just a feeling, it doesn't match the facts.

Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Oh, and before somebody calls me racist: it's racists to shoot only white girls/black men scenes.

Haven't counted actually and at first I was thinking of a "size does matter" thing personally I really don't like to see the white pencil-dick-crew at all but as I said: it's personal.
Thank you Blue Shadow for getting those facts and figures.

I mean, every porn productions shoot some IR-only scene, I don't mean the specialized one like Blacked, but also the more ''generic'', Bangbros, Brazzers, Jules Jordan etc. etc.
So, I don't see anything wrong if GIO / Gonzo releasing IR-only content too. And no, they are not tons as it seems.
I can agree with you that in the recent period we see more and more black performers, but until the scene is a mix, it's cannot be considered IR-only.


PS
Also if I don't like the term, but...

Mohammed Ali was asking same question decades ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?

Is ID-ing with the stud(s) your problem?

Me, I'd like black or white stud only to be a question of performance and reliability. I actually liked the way old gonzo and also old GIO mixed black and white actors some years ago. I dont specially like this graduation kind of thing like white 1on1 anal > black 1on1 anal > white DP > black DP > white DAPbreakin' > black DAP etc.
Its basically performance of actors that makes it more or less difficult for the girl, not color of studs skin!

1. Sales, baby.

2. "Interracial" isn't a real category.

If you want to know why there are so many interracial scenes try reading this forum - people want them, a lot of people seem to be obsessed with them. So, yes, it's all about sales sales sales!

"Sales" is just as much BS as "black actors has bigger dicks". From many interviews with many models I watched I can tell (from their words) that this is nothing more than just a stereotype. Pornmakers choose to shoot only black guys with big dicks to match this stereotype. If white people had any complexes about dick size, they would probably rooting for shooting only guys with dicks like Ian Scott's, just to represent them all and big dick stereotypes. And there's just as much white actors with big dicks, like Ian Scott, as Mandingo and black actors with their black dicks. Did you ever saw porn actor John Rasputin? Google it. That's what I'm talking about. Bigger dick than Dredd's. I feel like black actors probably have some complexes about their dick size, so that's why they want only guys with big dicks to represent them all. In fact, I heard that scandinavians have the biggest average dick size, as well as height. So if dick size really was the matter, we'd see most of them in porn. But I don't know any Finnish, Swedish or Norwegian porn actors.

Somone asked how is white girls/black guys is racist? Well… Try to shoot black girls/white guys or tell something about black people have smaller dicks - and you know. I bet there will be a backlash. And don't tell something like "white people are cuckolds, so they likes to watch it", because this is even beyond racist. It's a humiliation of white men not being "man enough". Better find an actor like Ian Scott, shoot a scene where he fucks black girl who's complaining about her black boyfriend dick size - and I bet it makes a lot of black guys furious. But somehow "black guys gangbanged white girl" is OK.

Sales? Oh, of course if you shoot only porn with black actors only/mostly black guys it would be top sellers. Try to shoot someting like "white gang bang with pissing etc." and it tops any "1 on 1 interracial". Those scenes are top sellers not because actors are black, but because directors gave those guys best scenes to participate in. Besides, if not count "black actors only" scenes, there are also many scenes with a lot of black actors and just one or two white guys in a company.
I bet scenes like "white guy with enormous huge cock fuck black bitches" (like Ian Scott or Rasputin, or many other white guys with huge cock) would make some black people angry, because it's offensive. But somehow "10 black bulls on white girl" scenes, released day by day, is OK.

Besides, me and a lot of other porn forums (I mean not LP forum, but many other forums) users have noticed that many black actors have problem with making their dicks hard. Dicks are big, but soft and it can hardly stand up. Compare John Rasputin's dick with Dredd's. The last one's, you can hardly call it hard. It's more like semi-hard. And that's what many people don't like. It's like wood vs. rubber. That's why I also don't like Mandingo scenes: you expect that he torn a girl apart, intp small pieces, but he can hardly put his sem-hard rubber dick in vagina.

I suspect you don't like facts getting in the way of whatever point you're trying to make here but LP does not "shoot only porn with black actors only/mostly black guys", so the argument that interracial sells is valid - you might not like it but plenty of other people do, LP is sales driven and, if it there's a demand, they sell it. And, as even a cursory glance at this forum shows, there's a demand.

As for the rest of your post, that's maybe one for a psychoanalyst to make sense of. You seem to be saying that black guys have secretly got small dicks and because of this they encourage the employment of black porn actors with big dicks to somehow compensate for their insecurity over the shame of having small dicks... or something like that? And, in fact, some white guys have bigger dicks but they're not employed as porn actors because having a big dick is less important in porn than making white men feel inferior to black men? The implication being that the people who make porn are trying to humiliate white men? Though, you may well ask, why are they trying to humiliate white men when most of them are white men themselves?

Seriously, though, who do you think is asking for all these interracial scenes? I'll tell you who - white guys!

There are far too many black only scenes. As somebody said it is better to have mixed groups but having only Blacks like IV is unwatchable and it is a shame because the girls are often gorgeous
So if I understand some of the comments here: the sales figures indicate customers buy only Black only videos meaning videos with any white studs (white only or mixed) has poor demand

Mister Ananas wrote:1. Sales, baby. ....

I think Interracial porn is popular for the same reason that Anal porn is also popular. Which is that forbidden fruit is more desirable.

Both Interracial sex and Anal sex used to be a big taboo in the past. And even now not all women do it, and many people still frown on it. Which still makes it a bit of a forbidden fruit.

But I think there is more to it, than just the forbidden fruit thing.

It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children. So, it's natural for some people to be more attracted to partners, who don't just have good genes but also are genetically different from them.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study

And Anal sex with women is attractive for many guys, because it's a way to get to know the chick with your dick, before you commit yourself to her. Pussy sex has led to reproduction in the past. And even now it can lead to unwanted pregnancies. And once the lady is pregnant, then you owe something to her. So, having some fun inside her bum is just a way to get to know the chick and enjoy some intimacy with her, without the risk of complications for both you and her.

That's why some guys want to see 0% pussy for the lady. It has to be all anal for the lady from start to finish. When society makes you responsible for any children you produce, then going for the lady's ass, rather than her pussy is the way some guys deal with it.

Reference to sales is hilarious. It's like saying that interracial porn sales well on Blacked. And now LegalPorno turns into some kind of IR-site. Of course, if you make so much IR-content, if there are no white actors in IR-scenes, BUT black guys are always present in any scenes, and if that's what you offer, than that's what you sale. Did you try different? It's like if Coca-Cola company says that among all the things they made soda sells better. Like if they made anything else.

I'm not a director or actor, just a fan of hardcore porn. But even my dick is bigger than most of actors in LP roster, black or white. So it's hilarious for me to hear about white guys have "pencil-dicks", LOL. More like it's a sterotype you try to push. Guys like FacialAbuse (I've noticed that LP tries to copy them lately, with all that vomit stuff) don't use black actors at all, still they make hardcore stuff with big white dicks.

Alt_Porn wrote:Reference to sales is hilarious. It's like saying that interracial porn sales well on Blacked. And now LegalPorno turns into some kind of IR-site. Of course, if you make so much IR-content, if there are no white actors in IR-scenes, BUT black guys are always present in any scenes, and if that's what you offer, than that's what you sale. Did you try different? It's like if Coca-Cola company says that among all the things they made soda sells better. Like if they made anything else.

I'm not a director or actor, just a fan of hardcore porn. But even my dick is bigger than most of actors in LP roster, black or white. So it's hilarious for me to hear about white guys have "pencil-dicks", LOL. More like it's a sterotype you try to push. Guys like FacialAbuse (I've noticed that LP tries to copy them lately, with all that vomit stuff) don't use black actors at all, still they make hardcore stuff with big white dicks.

All this is hilarious. I nowhere said all white guys have pencil-dicks. I said: the pencil dick crew on this site. And I agree: there must be more than enough white guys in Europe and Russia with far better looks, bigger dicks, which can do a far better job than the current pencil-dick-crew where all we see is out of shape bodies, standing around the girl moaning harder all together than the girl in the scene (fuck's sake! -> we don't wanna hear YOU lot, we want to hear the girl!) maximum fucks per turn with a maximum of 10 seconds, tipfucking and all that. THIS is what I'm saying.

Iddaoeeok wrote:I suspect you don't like facts getting in the way of whatever point you're trying to make here but LP does not "shoot only porn with black actors only/mostly black guys", so the argument that interracial sells is valid - you might not like it but plenty of other people do, LP is sales driven and, if it there's a demand, they sell it. And, as even a cursory glance at this forum shows, there's a demand.

OMG! This is so hilarious. GL make porn in St. Petersburg, Russia (directed by Nick Rock or Mr. Anderson), where you can hardly find black people at all. Still though their scenes are top sellers.

Iddaoeeok wrote:As for the rest of your post, that's maybe one for a psychoanalyst to make sense of. You seem to be saying that black guys have secretly got small dicks and because of this they encourage the employment of black porn actors with big dicks to somehow compensate for their insecurity over the shame of having small dicks... or something like that?

Ahahaha. No, I said that they have average dicks, not small, just like everybody else. Models in interviews confirm that: "black guys have bigger dicks" is nothing more than a stereotype. But if everybode else is fine with that, it seems like in porn with black actors they choose only guys with BBC to create/confirm that stereotype.

What I mean from the beggining is that if you already have IV studio to make IR-content why to make it everywhere, in every studio? You don't create a special anal or pissing-content studio because there's no point in doing that, because you can see anal or pissing (from time to time) in every studio's content. But if LP create now, let's say, special BDSM-studio, theres no point in doing BDSM in every other studio. I mean keep IV making their IR-stuff, and keep SZ and GIO making theit non-IR stuff.

kh00 wrote:

BlueShadow wrote:In the last 20 releases I see 7 scenes with only black.
3 of them are from KS, (practically Interracial Vision...so...it's normal) one is from Natasha Teen productions...and until now I have seen only two male performer there, 2 blacks, (so we can say they shoot only IR, like IV)
2 IR-only from GIO (Interracial TAP and balls deep BBC edition).
1 IR-only from Gonzo.

So,just 1/3 of the scenes are IR-only.

GIO 3 scene (2 are IR only)
Gonzo 3 scene (1 IR-only)
N&F 3 scene (0 IR-only)
KS are all IR of course.

Just looked up the statistics for September and there were 2 scenes for Gonzo. One being Venera Maxima and the other one for Nessaja.

These are full IR if I am not mistaken

Just to point out that I was talking about the last 20 release as a reference for that statistic. Not all september.

So, if we want consider september (until now) 2 IR-only scene on Gonzo? Yes...on 9 released. So, from 1/3 it will become almost 1/5.
and if we want to go deeper... 2 of 9 scene are White-only (so, 2 black only, 2 white only...more democrat than that LOL) In the remaining 5 there is at least one white or one black in the scene (Although the reason why it should be of interest or important, or a reason for discussion, escapes me).

Returning to the main point of the first post. No, there aren't a ton of IR-only scene. Fact.




Now sorry for the intrusion, you can continue talking about the size of cocks.

Alt_Porn wrote:OMG! This is so hilarious. GL make porn in St. Petersburg, Russia (directed by Nick Rock or Mr. Anderson), where you can hardly find black people at all. Still though their scenes are top sellers.

What is hilarious is you can't seem to understand the concept that when people say IR scenes sell that is not the same as saying ONLY IR scenes sell. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that English is not your first language otherwise I'd have to conclude you're just stupid.

Alt_Porn wrote:Ahahaha. No, I said that they have average dicks, not small, just like everybody else. Models in interviews confirm that: "black guys have bigger dicks" is nothing more than a stereotype. But if everybode else is fine with that, it seems like in porn with black actors they choose only guys with BBC to create/confirm that stereotype.

So what if they do? Why does that bother you?

Alt_Porn wrote:What I mean from the beggining is that if you already have IV studio to make IR-content why to make it everywhere, in every studio? You don't create a special anal or pissing-content studio because there's no point in doing that, because you can see anal or pissing (from time to time) in every studio's content. But if LP create now, let's say, special BDSM-studio, theres no point in doing BDSM in every other studio. I mean keep IV making their IR-stuff, and keep SZ and GIO making theit non-IR stuff.

Well, I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that IV is superfluous but it's Joachim Kessef's project and all of the studios work independently of each other: what Gonzo decides to shoot or what Giorgio decides to shoot is their own choice.

It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study.

Sod the Guardian & their agenda. Poisonous fuckers hellbent on destruction of western civilisation. The original antifa middle-class self-loathing white (but often to call a spade a spade, the religion that though shalt not mention) liberals.

What you talk about leads to zero beautiful blue eyed ladies, not least in my original post, quoting the bard, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.

Its an elephant in the room. No one likes to touch it - "you're a fucking racist!" etc

Well I can tell you thats all bollocks, 90% - 35 years ago I remember despairing at the racist crowds as they booed John Barnes playing for England. Today the same types who booed, will gladly 'bend the knee'. Like fuck I will, but to God alone. Herd mentality unravels through time.

netzerkaiser wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study.

Sod the Guardian & their agenda. Poisonous fuckers hellbent on destruction of western civilisation. The original antifa middle-class self-loathing white (but often to call a spade a spade, the religion that though shalt not mention) liberals.

What you talk about leads to zero beautiful blue eyed ladies, not least in my original post, quoting the bard, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.

Its an elephant in the room. No one likes to touch it - "you're a fucking racist!" etc

Well I can tell you thats all bollocks, 90% - 35 years ago I remember despairing at the racist crowds as they booed John Barnes playing for England. Today the same types who booed, will gladly 'bend the knee'. Like fuck I will, but to God alone. Herd mentality unravels through time.

Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage* is that little child's issue, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.

netzerkaiser wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study.

Sod the Guardian & their agenda. Poisonous fuckers hellbent on destruction of western civilisation. The original antifa middle-class self-loathing white (but often to call a spade a spade, the religion that though shalt not mention) liberals.

What you talk about leads to zero beautiful blue eyed ladies, not least in my original post, quoting the bard, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.

Its an elephant in the room. No one likes to touch it - "you're a fucking racist!" etc

Well I can tell you thats all bollocks, 90% - 35 years ago I remember despairing at the racist crowds as they booed John Barnes playing for England. Today the same types who booed, will gladly 'bend the knee'. Like fuck I will, but to God alone. Herd mentality unravels through time.

And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?

And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?

Nah, fuck that.

Go through what I said properly, & come back with that, including the Ali post.

Fuck, if theres anything I'll defend myself with, its the truth. Hit me with your evidence or fuck off & grow up genius.

netzerkaiser wrote:And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?

Nah, fuck that.

Go through what I said properly, & come back with that, including the Ali post.

Fuck, if theres anything I'll defend myself with, its the truth. Hit me with your evidence or fuck off & grow up genius.

I''m off for the night, work in the morning. But still waiting, genius... or for an other antifa genuises..

netzerkaiser wrote:And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?

Nah, fuck that.

Go through what I said properly, & come back with that, including the Ali post.

Fuck, if theres anything I'll defend myself with, its the truth. Hit me with your evidence or fuck off & grow up genius.

How about learning to read, moron? Then you might be able to read the article that was posted and find out it has no mention of race and, in fact, has absolutely nothing to do with race, or mixing the races or whatever it is that's making your balls shrivel up in their sac. Genetic diversity in this case means that parents are more distantly related, so it could very well be the case that a white guy from Inverness and a white woman from Penzance are likely to be more genetically diverse than a white guy from Liverpool and black woman from Liverpool. The truth? I'm surprised you can spell it.

Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

As I said, I'll respectfully respond tomorrow.

Maybe we'll all learn something from it.

Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

You can fuck off with your morons, how's your Grame Greene, or Dostoyevsky, or Malcolm Muggeridge? I'll repsond to you too.. if I might respectfully say, having called me an inbred moron... ya prick...

Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

iddaewhatdefuk

do you wanna respond to me, I've about 30 mins before I chalk off... cheers from a 'moron'.. FFS..

netzerkaiser wrote:

Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

iddaewhatdefuk

do you wanna respond to me, I've about 30 mins before I chalk off... cheers from a 'moron'.. FFS..

Not particularly, but if you insist. You come into the thread with a lot of irrelevant bullshit about Antifa and the Guardian and the Death of Western Civilization (which is all down to the Jews, of course, not that you're a Nazi cunt or anything), like some fucking pre-programmed trollbot, all because of an article you either didn't read or didn't understand. What do you want me to say? Thanks for you thoughtful contribution to a thread about interracial scenes on Legalporno? I don't think so.

Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.

From you: the above.

No, my original contribution was on 2 terms:
1) That the guardian is a biased source, which it is
2) Back to to the whole issue of race-mixing, that through no fault off the children who come from it, the beauty of the parentage is lost from both sides, & more pertinently, the fair haired, light eyed side - this is fact. I've nothing to add beyond the Cassius Clay comment for dimension, but basically if you're looking for Elin Nordegren II from a marriage with a Tiger Woods... you're probably 100% going to not get what you pay your pornography licence to see, in terms of fair skinned, blonde, blue eyed beauty.

Keep on going - I'm not letting this go - you came on here, you called me a racist, braindead moron, whereas in truth I've probably more soul to his fellow man, more intelligence certainly - so keep it going, you picked the wrong guy here to be a sanctimonious so & so with.

netzerkaiser wrote:No, my original contribution was on 2 terms:
1) That the guardian is a biased source, which it is
2) Back to to the whole issue of race-mixing, that through no fault off the children who come from it, the beauty of the parentage is lost from both sides, & more pertinently, the fair haired, light eyed side - this is fact. I've nothing to add beyond the Cassius Clay comment for dimension, but basically if you're looking for Elin Nordegren II from a marriage with a Tiger Woods... you're probably 100% going to not get what you pay your pornography licence to see, in terms of fair skinned, blonde, blue eyed beauty.

Keep on going - I'm not letting this go - you came on here, you called me a racist, braindead moron, whereas in truth I've probably more soul to his fellow man, more intelligence certainly - so keep it going, you picked the wrong guy here to be a sanctimonious so & so with.

If you'd read the article instead of going into full-on frothing at the mouth mode at the mention of the Guardian I might have had more respect for you. But you decided to come across like some tedious outrage-bot programmed to start spouting crap they learned on the internet five minutes ago when they see certain trigger words, in this case, The Guardian. And I'm not sanctimonious at all, you have no idea what my political or cultural beliefs are because, unlike you, I am able to understand context and don't have the urge to shout out my pea-brained political viewpoints at random, like a fucking toddler with Tourettes. Apologies for not being very good at hiding my irritation with halfwits, who having learned a new word, like "Antifa", are determined to shoehorn it into every possible debate, whether it belongs or there or not. No apologies for calling an anti-Semitic cunt an anti-Semitic cunt though.

If you'd read the article instead of going into full-on frothing at the mouth mode at the mention of the Guardian I might have had more respect for you. But you decided to come across like some tedious outrage-bot programmed to start spouting crap they learned on the internet five minutes ago when they see certain trigger words, in this case, The Guardian. And I'm not sanctimonious at all, you have no idea what my political or cultural beliefs are because, unlike you, I am able to understand context and don't have the urge to shout out my pea-brained political viewpoints at random, like a fucking toddler with Tourettes. Apologies for not being very good at hiding my irritation with halfwits, who having learned a new word, like "Antifa", are determined to shoehorn it into every possible debate, whether it belongs or there or not. No apologies for calling an anti-Semitic cunt an anti-Semitic cunt though.[/quote]

You handed me my ass there on a number of levels. I was out of order. I don't blame you if you have no respect for me, but in light of morning, I sure have a lot of respect for you. Fair play to you all round.

101mike101 wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children. So, it's natural for some people to be more attracted to partners, who don't just have good genes but also are genetically different from them.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study

This Guardian article is based on a scientific study reported in The Nature journal. This article basically explains in lay terms what the research study says.

So, if you disagree with what these scientist have found, then you need to do more than just argue and object. You need to do another study and find some results that contradict previous findings. Because that's how scientific truth works. It's based on scientific evidence, rather than on some ideology and arguments.

The study that the Guardian article is based on is at the link below. You can read it. But it's hard to understand for anyone who doesn't have much post-graduate education in genetics and biology.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14618

netzerkaiser wrote:You handed me my ass there on a number of levels. I was out of order. I don't blame you if you have no respect for me, but in light of morning, I sure have a lot of respect for you. Fair play to you all round.

That is very magnanimous of you. Now I feel bad about going off on one.

101mike101 wrote:

101mike101 wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children. So, it's natural for some people to be more attracted to partners, who don't just have good genes but also are genetically different from them.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study

This Guardian article is based on a scientific study reported in The Nature journal. This article basically explains in lay terms what the research study says.

So, if you disagree with what these scientist have found, then you need to do more than just argue and object. You need to do another study and find some results that contradict previous findings. Because that's how scientific truth works. It's based on scientific evidence, rather than on some ideology and arguments.

The study that the Guardian article is based on is at the link below. You can read it. But it's hard to understand for anyone who doesn't have much post-graduate education in genetics and biology.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14618

The article is about genetic diversity not racial diversity.

That is very magnanimous of you. Now I feel bad about going off on one.[/quote]

No, thank you, friend. A guy should never go online when he's come back from pub. Its not the first time either, so I've gotta sort that out . Hope next time we encounter it'll be far more pleasant for both of us.

For a moment I was thinking to have read the worst thing here... but then I read the most racist thing on the French toad forum


And from a French...France is one of the country that has the highest number of black people in the EU. And if you look at the national football team ... they are all black. And they are French, not migrants... idiot...

And make think that one of the few countries that does not divide his population by '' races '' is Germany.
https://qz.com/1078032/can-germany-combat-inequality-when-it-has-no-data-on-race/

Iddaoeeok wrote:The article is about genetic diversity not racial diversity.

Race is a social concept that's only partly related to genetics. Because in USA for example, who is seen as African American and who is Caucasian is arbitrary in many ways.

Former president Obama for example had a white mother and a black father, who left and never participated in his life. Obama was raised in a white family and in a white neighborhood. But everybody says that he is black, including himself.

Many so-called black people in USA have have more European ancestry than African ancestry. But they call themselves black, and so does everybody else.

So, race might be truly and fully related to genetics only for people who have mostly ancestry from one place or another, rather than a mixed ancestry.

It's not a direct relationship between race and genetics. But it has a substantial relationship, and genetics are relevant in this discussion. Because even with social construct, people who look physically different from each other because of their racial ancestry and more genetically diverse from each other, than those who look similar to each other.

Porn is based on looks. And looks are related to genetics. Which makes genetics relevant in this discussion.

When people are attracted to and choose someone genetically diverse from them, then they do it by looks. And it works, because looks are related to genetics.