Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Oh, and before somebody calls me racist: it's racists to shoot only white girls/black men scenes.
Alt_Porn wrote:Aren't we have IV for interracial content?
Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Oh, and before somebody calls me racist: it's racists to shoot only white girls/black men scenes.
Alt_Porn wrote:I understand when IV shoot interracial scenes, but now we have SZ, GIO, NF and almost every studio (except Russians) shoot tons of IR-only scenes. Are there any white guys left?
Mister Ananas wrote:1. Sales, baby. ....
Alt_Porn wrote:Reference to sales is hilarious. It's like saying that interracial porn sales well on Blacked. And now LegalPorno turns into some kind of IR-site. Of course, if you make so much IR-content, if there are no white actors in IR-scenes, BUT black guys are always present in any scenes, and if that's what you offer, than that's what you sale. Did you try different? It's like if Coca-Cola company says that among all the things they made soda sells better. Like if they made anything else.
I'm not a director or actor, just a fan of hardcore porn. But even my dick is bigger than most of actors in LP roster, black or white. So it's hilarious for me to hear about white guys have "pencil-dicks", LOL. More like it's a sterotype you try to push. Guys like FacialAbuse (I've noticed that LP tries to copy them lately, with all that vomit stuff) don't use black actors at all, still they make hardcore stuff with big white dicks.
Iddaoeeok wrote:I suspect you don't like facts getting in the way of whatever point you're trying to make here but LP does not "shoot only porn with black actors only/mostly black guys", so the argument that interracial sells is valid - you might not like it but plenty of other people do, LP is sales driven and, if it there's a demand, they sell it. And, as even a cursory glance at this forum shows, there's a demand.
Iddaoeeok wrote:As for the rest of your post, that's maybe one for a psychoanalyst to make sense of. You seem to be saying that black guys have secretly got small dicks and because of this they encourage the employment of black porn actors with big dicks to somehow compensate for their insecurity over the shame of having small dicks... or something like that?
kh00 wrote:BlueShadow wrote:In the last 20 releases I see 7 scenes with only black.
3 of them are from KS, (practically Interracial Vision...so...it's normal) one is from Natasha Teen productions...and until now I have seen only two male performer there, 2 blacks, (so we can say they shoot only IR, like IV)
2 IR-only from GIO (Interracial TAP and balls deep BBC edition).
1 IR-only from Gonzo.
So,just 1/3 of the scenes are IR-only.
GIO 3 scene (2 are IR only)
Gonzo 3 scene (1 IR-only)
N&F 3 scene (0 IR-only)
KS are all IR of course.
Just looked up the statistics for September and there were 2 scenes for Gonzo. One being Venera Maxima and the other one for Nessaja.
These are full IR if I am not mistaken
Alt_Porn wrote:OMG! This is so hilarious. GL make porn in St. Petersburg, Russia (directed by Nick Rock or Mr. Anderson), where you can hardly find black people at all. Still though their scenes are top sellers.
Alt_Porn wrote:Ahahaha. No, I said that they have average dicks, not small, just like everybody else. Models in interviews confirm that: "black guys have bigger dicks" is nothing more than a stereotype. But if everybode else is fine with that, it seems like in porn with black actors they choose only guys with BBC to create/confirm that stereotype.
Alt_Porn wrote:What I mean from the beggining is that if you already have IV studio to make IR-content why to make it everywhere, in every studio? You don't create a special anal or pissing-content studio because there's no point in doing that, because you can see anal or pissing (from time to time) in every studio's content. But if LP create now, let's say, special BDSM-studio, theres no point in doing BDSM in every other studio. I mean keep IV making their IR-stuff, and keep SZ and GIO making theit non-IR stuff.
netzerkaiser wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study.
Sod the Guardian & their agenda. Poisonous fuckers hellbent on destruction of western civilisation. The original antifa middle-class self-loathing white (but often to call a spade a spade, the religion that though shalt not mention) liberals.
What you talk about leads to zero beautiful blue eyed ladies, not least in my original post, quoting the bard, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4
Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.
Its an elephant in the room. No one likes to touch it - "you're a fucking racist!" etc
Well I can tell you thats all bollocks, 90% - 35 years ago I remember despairing at the racist crowds as they booed John Barnes playing for England. Today the same types who booed, will gladly 'bend the knee'. Like fuck I will, but to God alone. Herd mentality unravels through time.
netzerkaiser wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study.
Sod the Guardian & their agenda. Poisonous fuckers hellbent on destruction of western civilisation. The original antifa middle-class self-loathing white (but often to call a spade a spade, the religion that though shalt not mention) liberals.
What you talk about leads to zero beautiful blue eyed ladies, not least in my original post, quoting the bard, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4
Like he said, & I'll add, its no way in any way, what a child looks like, or its parentage, but don't tell me its the natural way that a child can look like neither of its parents.
Its an elephant in the room. No one likes to touch it - "you're a fucking racist!" etc
Well I can tell you thats all bollocks, 90% - 35 years ago I remember despairing at the racist crowds as they booed John Barnes playing for England. Today the same types who booed, will gladly 'bend the knee'. Like fuck I will, but to God alone. Herd mentality unravels through time.
netzerkaiser wrote:And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?
Nah, fuck that.
Go through what I said properly, & come back with that, including the Ali post.
Fuck, if theres anything I'll defend myself with, its the truth. Hit me with your evidence or fuck off & grow up genius.
netzerkaiser wrote:And 35 years later you're a racist! Funny old world isn't it?
Nah, fuck that.
Go through what I said properly, & come back with that, including the Ali post.
Fuck, if theres anything I'll defend myself with, its the truth. Hit me with your evidence or fuck off & grow up genius.
Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.
Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.
Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.
netzerkaiser wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.
iddaewhatdefuk
do you wanna respond to me, I've about 30 mins before I chalk off... cheers from a 'moron'.. FFS..
Iddaoeeok wrote:Not that this is any great revelation as we've known about inbred morons for centuries, and some of them appear to be posting on this thread.
netzerkaiser wrote:No, my original contribution was on 2 terms:
1) That the guardian is a biased source, which it is
2) Back to to the whole issue of race-mixing, that through no fault off the children who come from it, the beauty of the parentage is lost from both sides, & more pertinently, the fair haired, light eyed side - this is fact. I've nothing to add beyond the Cassius Clay comment for dimension, but basically if you're looking for Elin Nordegren II from a marriage with a Tiger Woods... you're probably 100% going to not get what you pay your pornography licence to see, in terms of fair skinned, blonde, blue eyed beauty.
Keep on going - I'm not letting this go - you came on here, you called me a racist, braindead moron, whereas in truth I've probably more soul to his fellow man, more intelligence certainly - so keep it going, you picked the wrong guy here to be a sanctimonious so & so with.
101mike101 wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children. So, it's natural for some people to be more attracted to partners, who don't just have good genes but also are genetically different from them.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study
netzerkaiser wrote:You handed me my ass there on a number of levels. I was out of order. I don't blame you if you have no respect for me, but in light of morning, I sure have a lot of respect for you. Fair play to you all round.
101mike101 wrote:101mike101 wrote:It's a well know fact among biological scientists that greater genetic diversity of parents leads to better children. So, it's natural for some people to be more attracted to partners, who don't just have good genes but also are genetically different from them.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... sive-study
This Guardian article is based on a scientific study reported in The Nature journal. This article basically explains in lay terms what the research study says.
So, if you disagree with what these scientist have found, then you need to do more than just argue and object. You need to do another study and find some results that contradict previous findings. Because that's how scientific truth works. It's based on scientific evidence, rather than on some ideology and arguments.
The study that the Guardian article is based on is at the link below. You can read it. But it's hard to understand for anyone who doesn't have much post-graduate education in genetics and biology.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14618
Iddaoeeok wrote:The article is about genetic diversity not racial diversity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests