PornBox.com

Can we go back to wear scenes actually looked good so bored of either slut heels on then immediately come off or heels with with fucking garbage leggings or fishnets and keep outfits on or ripped and more eye makeup and lipstick literally the simplest request

Literally no one else on this one?
I think that's odd seeing all those threads popping up once and a while about things going downhill and new models being below par.

I can't even parse what the OP is trying to say. Not easy to agree or disagree then.
I do agree on many scenes looking the same, but I think that is the result of the quantity > quality mentality of the producers here in general. They have sacrificed creativity on the altar of efficiency.

Foot fetishists are the nerdiest I know. Never pleased.

Jocke wrote:Foot fetishists are the nerdiest I know. Never pleased.

How very dare you. We foot fetishists are filled with sweetness and reason.
I have no idea what the OP was trying to say.

avanfurwet wrote:

Jocke wrote:Foot fetishists are the nerdiest I know. Never pleased.

How very dare you. We foot fetishists are filled with sweetness and reason.
I have no idea what the OP was trying to say.

Sure, but I lose track if you want with or without shoes or heels or partly on and off etc. Are there different branches of foot fetishism?

I'm personally waiting to see more special scenes with special locations, stories, outfits, bystanders... Like we used to have 3 years ago.
But sadly now, even when the action is good, it looks the same scheme repeated over and over with all the girls available.

pastaga wrote:But sadly now, even when the action is good, it looks the same scheme repeated over and over with all the girls available.

Doenst performance, -ability and how convincing they perform it the difference?
If only difference are outside factors like setting and place they fuck there's something mixed up in my book.

Ok, everybody has different priorities.
For me the interesting part is to compare the performance of my fave girls and I am glad they all do the same set of acts because LP studios pushed that level up in recent years.

Jocke wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:

Jocke wrote:Foot fetishists are the nerdiest I know. Never pleased.

How very dare you. We foot fetishists are filled with sweetness and reason.
I have no idea what the OP was trying to say.

Sure, but I lose track if you want with or without shoes or heels or partly on and off etc. Are there different branches of foot fetishism?

Everyone's different. Everyone has their own individual likes and dislikes. Applies to bodies, clothing, actions, everything.

Calling it "fetishes" and "branches" is just generalisation for the sake of categorisation. Maybe it helps producers. But they'll never please all of the people all of the time.

avanfurwet wrote:Everyone's different. Everyone has their own individual likes and dislikes. Applies to bodies, clothing, actions, everything.

Calling it "fetishes" and "branches" is just generalisation for the sake of categorisation. Maybe it helps producers. But they'll never please all of the people all of the time.

Yes, it's impossible to please all tastes. Maybe we should be more tolerant and concede something to the others, also when it's not our taste and doesn't satisfy our fetishes.

grey00owl wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:Everyone's different. Everyone has their own individual likes and dislikes. Applies to bodies, clothing, actions, everything.

Calling it "fetishes" and "branches" is just generalisation for the sake of categorisation. Maybe it helps producers. But they'll never please all of the people all of the time.

Yes, it's impossible to please all tastes. Maybe we should be more tolerant and concede something to the others, also when it's not our taste and doesn't satisfy our fetishes.

I would like to think that there are enough customers on this platform to allow any fetish to sell well. The main source to our whining, I think, is because of the studios' tendency to stop booking a model after her first underperforming scene, sales wise. That makes us intolerant towards the fetishes we don't prefer, since we may never see a model we like perform a scene to our tastes.
Perhaps studios should try to shoot a wider range of fetishes with new models than just increasing the number of men in the scene? But then again, I guess most customers wont be satisfied unless all scenes are their perfect match. I know I would probably complain with regards to my favorite models...

I don't mind co-existing with others or tolerating their weird (to me) fetishes, as long as no models are harmed.

But if I don't like a scene enough, I won't buy it. Even if I like the model.

I think the recent price shocks might make some other customers more picky too, since now their money buys less.
And if customers change their buying behaviour, that could make it harder (near-term) for studios to predict what will sell.
Which, in turn, could make studios more conservative about which models they will cast and what scenes they will shoot.
So it comes full circle, back to studios repetitively following tried and tested formulae.

I don't mind nice outfits but once the girl starts getting penetrated I want to be able to see her body so I prefer all the clothing off.
As to the site "going downhill" there are things I agree on but LegalPorno is still delivering content I want to see on an ongoing basis so I am still here. LP is filming new beautiful models all the time. Parish is absolutely wonderful, so is Flick as recent examples. They are exactly what satisfies my particular fetish: young, slim with small breasts being double penetrated.
If the picture the OP posted is an example of what he finds "boring" I disagree. I think she looks fantastic and since she loves a good DP it is great to see that happening.

dap-addict wrote:

pastaga wrote:But sadly now, even when the action is good, it looks the same scheme repeated over and over with all the girls available.

Doenst performance, -ability and how convincing they perform it the difference?
If only difference are outside factors like setting and place they fuck there's something mixed up in my book.

Ok, everybody has different priorities.
For me the interesting part is to compare the performance of my fave girls and I am glad they all do the same set of acts because LP studios pushed that level up in recent years.

Performance is sur a cool thing, but not all the girls can stretch their asses to the infinite.
So it's good to have other ways to make things look different.

I would love to see more scenes where one or more ladies are "in control", which means they decide what to do and not wait for the director orders.
Monika Wild was quite good at this.

ultimo wrote:I don't mind nice outfits but once the girl starts getting penetrated I want to be able to see her body so I prefer all the clothing off.
As to the site "going downhill" there are things I agree on but LegalPorno is still delivering content I want to see on an ongoing basis so I am still here. LP is filming new beautiful models all the time. Parish is absolutely wonderful, so is Flick as recent examples. They are exactly what satisfies my particular fetish: young, slim with small breasts being double penetrated.
If the picture the OP posted is an example of what he finds "boring" I disagree. I think she looks fantastic and since she loves a good DP it is great to see that happening.

No I want scenes like the picture probably one of my top scenes of all time a masterpiece

pastaga wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

pastaga wrote:But sadly now, even when the action is good, it looks the same scheme repeated over and over with all the girls available.

Doenst performance, -ability and how convincing they perform it the difference?
If only difference are outside factors like setting and place they fuck there's something mixed up in my book.

Ok, everybody has different priorities.
For me the interesting part is to compare the performance of my fave girls and I am glad they all do the same set of acts because LP studios pushed that level up in recent years.

Performance is sur a cool thing, but not all the girls can stretch their asses to the infinite.
So it's good to have other ways to make things look different.

I would love to see more scenes where one or more ladies are "in control", which means they decide what to do and not wait for the director orders.
Monika Wild was quite good at this.

Monika Wild was great, so unrestrained and wild.
Yes, more women in control, more cosplay, more fantasy.

I personally think it finally prevails the content (sex acts & fetishes) and the girl/s on scene over of how looks the scene (location, outfits, "storyline").

A good example is what its happening: same locations, lingerie & heels as regular way to dress the girls (actually is one of the most ways to show sexy the ladies) but there arent a variations on outfits.

Later when you got this formula, what change is between scenes is the content: sex acts and fetishes.

If all this still works is because finally the costumers are here for the girls, content & fetishes on the scene over the rest, thats my perception and opinion.

In summary; the content, style and perfomance in LP is what make us be here, everyone can be more purist/critic but if your tastes/preferences are satisfied and the performance is what you expected you can get a lot of this here.

pastaga wrote:I would love to see more scenes where one or more ladies are "in control", which means they decide what to do and not wait for the director orders.
Monika Wild was quite good at this.

I agree and I am missing Monika Wild, too. The old one I mean.
Problem is you have to find a girl able to be in charge while able to perform the basic sex set up to wet DAP first. And of course your still need a director setting the framework of all this, maybe even drawing some highlights.
But who can do it today? - Brittany Bardot could, but she's limited by her clear MILF looks. Anna de Ville could do it maybe. Sure neither Polly Pons, Jollee Love or Kristy Black. Mia Sanders could probably do it... its a psycho and physically very demanding job, only a girl really feeling it inside in that exact stage of her life can do it fine.

dap-addict wrote:

pastaga wrote:I would love to see more scenes where one or more ladies are "in control", which means they decide what to do and not wait for the director orders.
Monika Wild was quite good at this.

I agree and I am missing Monika Wild, too. The old one I mean.
Problem is you have to find a girl able to be in charge while able to perform the basic sex set up to wet DAP first. And of course your still need a director setting the framework of all this, maybe even drawing some highlights.
But who can do it today? - Brittany Bardot could, but she's limited by her clear MILF looks. Anna de Ville could do it maybe. Sure neither Polly Pons, Jollee Love or Kristy Black. Mia Sanders could probably do it... its a psycho and physically very demanding job, only a girl really feeling it inside in that exact stage of her life can do it fine.

Including the girls that you mentioned i can say others like: Angel Wicky, Syren de mer, Dee Williams, Lisey Sweet, Tina Kay or Barbie Sins, surely other ones too