analaficionado wrote:Where are the 0% pussy fans at?
SimplyStunning wrote:Damn nothing for me to vote for on this stupid poll, like the OP said it is 2020 why even have girls. All scenes released should be of QAP with 5 Transsexual taking turns fucking the shit out of each other. Literally and figuratively it just depends on what float your boat right.
Porn fetishes listed from common to rare in the industry:
00. Teasing / Flirting - BANNED
01. Masturbation - BANNED
02. Handjob / Fingering - Banned
03. Fellatio / Cunnilingus - BANNED
04. Pussy Fucking - BANNED
05. Anal Fucking - BANNED
06. Double Penetration - BANNED
07. Double Anal - BANNED
08. Double Vaginal - BANNED
09. Triple Penetration (DV+A, DA+V) - BANNED
10. Triple Anal - Banned
11. Triple Vaginal - Banned
12. ??? QAP ??? - still okay with females but why disgust us with having to see a PUSSY. We should be disgusted just having to think of it when we can watch 5 Transsexuals destroying each other.
Now if the OP had included item 12 as an option, I think there would be many more votes...
avanfurwet wrote:2020 is not almost over.
There is no "we" here.
Different fans prefer different things.
There will always be a profitable market for some pussy porn.
Analvids,com is focussed on selling anal vids. That is all.
dap-addict wrote: Generally LP imho should stay firmly at hardcore anal porn, but cover different user needs. Not producing pussy-friendly anal porn at all anymore would alienate a lot of NHB fans, buying a lot of scenes actually still. Streamlining gonzo to 0% pussy option only would make little sense, the same as it makes little sense to open up GIO for pussy-friendly anal porn again. Such moves have in GIO's case already proofed pretty useless economically, but just studio founders ambition. Both studios are like Ying and Yang in this respect and that has benefited LP as a whole.
IndyPleco wrote:Strongly depends on how you read the results.
0% pussy: 14 votes
any% pussy: 33 votes
dap-addict wrote:So far result it still clearly leaning towards more anal porn.
powerful76 wrote:A scene without pussy makes 0 sense to me...
why waste such a wonderful place?
Iddaoeeok wrote:dap-addict wrote:So far result it still clearly leaning towards more anal porn.
LOL, no it isn't!
avanfurwet wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:dap-addict wrote:So far result it still clearly leaning towards more anal porn.
LOL, no it isn't!
Yes it is.
Unsurprisingly.
avanfurwet wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:dap-addict wrote:So far result it still clearly leaning towards more anal porn.
LOL, no it isn't!
Yes it is.
Unsurprisingly.
And the poll design favours anal. But really, it's such a silly topic.
dap-addict wrote:Here I feel a growing tendency towards 0% pussy. This however is counter-balanced by the more-pussy-porn-please fraction.
avanfurwet wrote:I meant because there's no line for 80% pussy which skews the options.
And the responses so far show more preference for anal.
(But it's still silly and trivial.)
Iddaoeeok wrote:dap-addict wrote:Here I feel a growing tendency towards 0% pussy. This however is counter-balanced by the more-pussy-porn-please fraction.
You feel a growing tendency towards 0% pussy? What does that mean? You can't feel a tendency.
avanfurwet wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:dap-addict wrote:So far result it still clearly leaning towards more anal porn.
LOL, no it isn't!
Yes it is.
Unsurprisingly.
And the poll design favours anal. But really, it's such a silly topic.
BlueShadow wrote:What we are talking about?
The main question of the topic was 'still need pussy porn?' 70% say yes.
There are too many superfluous and redundant options:
If the options had been
-0% pussy
-both anal and pussy
-only pussy
the results would have been the same, that is, these ones:
-0%pussy: 30%
-both anal and pussy: 65%
-only pussy: 4%
dap-addict wrote:And yep, variety is needed and will always be. But variety partly embedded into clear anal hardcore porn, not the other way round.
BlueShadow wrote:And what exactly mean DP 80/20?![]()
Technically a DP is always a 50 anal and 50 pussy. A lot of unnecessary options.
Users browsing this forum: Antiquarian, hunter026 and 51 guests