PornBox.com

The man who isn't attracted to the girls who made LPs - 2020 edition



- Pierre Woodman 2019


Taylee Wood





Siya Jey





Lana Bunny





Polina Maxim





Barbie Esm





Bella Angel




Scarlet Domingo/Rebel


- Pierre Woodman 2020

2 minutes silence for woodman very wrong judgement and stupid reaons... I am happy that all models doing great in legalporno site ...more popular more love from fans more scenes and more profit ...

Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?

Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...

WTF???

sarsastrid wrote:Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?

Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...

WTF???

You already said it.
Use this topic for making joke of him when he book girls that di LP...

BlueShadow wrote:

sarsastrid wrote:Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?

Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...

WTF???

You already said it.
Use this topic for making joke of him when he book girls that di LP...

This is hilarious!

sarsastrid wrote:Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?

Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...

WTF???

He doesn't need to. He looks as he does, is a millionaire and sexually exploits attractive women.

I’m not really sure what all the woodman bashing is about. He’s the only one who has done dirty ass to mouth which is a top thread here since 2015 but LP haven’t had the balls to do it.
This is Goldie (also ex LP)

Anythingbutt wrote:I’m not really sure what all the woodman bashing is about. He’s the only one who has done dirty ass to mouth which is a top thread here since 2015 but LP haven’t had the balls to do it.
This is Goldie (also ex LP)

You clearly missed the first post with his quote, right?

PS
You can "enjoy" shit-games somewhere else. Is not question of balls, is question of been sick.

PPS
Yes, Goldie fit in the category "I don't work with girls that did first LP and blah blah blah. Even if 2015.

Bullshit.

BlueShadow wrote:



Bullshit.

Absolutely ridiculous.

BlueShadow wrote:

Anythingbutt wrote:I’m not really sure what all the woodman bashing is about. He’s the only one who has done dirty ass to mouth which is a top thread here since 2015 but LP haven’t had the balls to do it.
This is Goldie (also ex LP)

You clearly missed the first post with his quote, right?

PS
You can "enjoy" shit-games somewhere else. Is not question of balls, is question of been sick.

PPS
Yes, Goldie fit in the category "I don't work with girls that did first LP and blah blah blah. Even if 2015.

Well every taste is respectable and, as always, de gustibus non est disputandum, but I'm pretty sure that the most porn users don't like to see "dirty" Anal. And what can be seen in that Woodman's footage with lovely Goldie is undoubtedly too much.

grey00owl wrote:

BlueShadow wrote:
Bullshit.

Absolutely ridiculous.

But if his websites were (for example, idle speculation)

(a) a sideline for him to hire hot girls and get laid
(b) an ego trip for him to boast about getting laid in his echo chamber forum
(c) a promotional tool to recruit and publicise new girls for somebody's escort business

then it makes sense that he wouldn't invest time editing and publishing old scenes for girls long gone from the meat market.

One LP girl he'll never shoot is called Angel Princess. French lier is eager to bring her to some ugly cheap hotel room no matter what he writes about her.

Princess Mihaylik aka Lady Gang

Oh, he left an open door now...
We want to bet that in the end she will book her? Maybe we have another girl to add to the 2020 list (ok, she worked for him 3 years ago, but lets consider her a ''new'' girl, new stage name, and she (re) started (seriously this time, with no pressure on being exclusive) with LP. His ego can't stand this even if he say otherwise.

BlueShadow wrote:Princess Mihaylik aka Lady Gang

Oh, he left an open door now...
We want to bet that in the end she will book her? Maybe we have another girl to add to the 2020 list (ok, she worked for him 3 years ago, but lets consider her a ''new'' girl, new stage name, and she (re) started (seriously this time, with no pressure on being exclusive) with LP. His ego can't stand this even if he say otherwise.

The turbo-jet is ready for take-off.

grey00owl wrote:

BlueShadow wrote:



Bullshit.

Absolutely ridiculous.

Of course he can release the way he want and do what he want with his content, don't care, just those member that still ask for update of 5 years old scene... and believe all what he say...
The fact that she did all ''those things'' on LP has nothing to do...otherwise he wouldn't even have booked all those girls that did LP, no sense (the list is above, and there are only those of this year).
But yes, maybe my logic is not their logic.

BlueShadow wrote:The man who isn't attracted to the girls who made LPs - 2020 edition



- Pierre Woodman 2019


Taylee Wood





Siya Jey





Lana Bunny





Polina Maxim





Barbie Esm





Bella Angel




Scarlet Domingo/Rebel


- Pierre Woodman 2020

-Melina May
https://www.legalporno.com/model/7596/melina_may

why do you all spend so much time talking and posting about this piece of shit? He should just be ignored

I don't understand why this kind of topics are not immediately closed. This kind of toxic content is the grist for Pierre Woodman's mill to criticise LP. LP does not need such toxic threads. As You wisely stated, the best way to show contempt is to lower the veil of silence. Nothing hurts more than indifference.

PW is an ugly fat and old fuck who shoots only porn to bang the hottest girls to satisfy his own ego. That guy couldn't date or even fuck pretty girls outside of porn. He has a big mouth against other studios or even performers. I think that it is plain jealousy. It is to bad that agents like Brill babes in Hungary offer all their girls to such an evil guy. Must be all about the money!

I watch PW precisely because of the shit stains

Besides that, I'm gobsmacked how the moderator is tolerating these repetitive obnoxious threads that are polluting the website all over the place
This is downright unacceptable

OKCTwister wrote:I watch PW precisely because of the shit stains

Besides that, I'm gobsmacked how the moderator is tolerating these repetitive obnoxious threads that are polluting the website all over the place
This is downright unacceptable

Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.

Eloise wrote:

OKCTwister wrote:I watch PW precisely because of the shit stains

Besides that, I'm gobsmacked how the moderator is tolerating these repetitive obnoxious threads that are polluting the website all over the place
This is downright unacceptable

Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.

Affirmative on that

Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.

You've already said your opinion many times (exact dame words), and that's okay, but I'll repeat the thing said in the other thread, we doesn't discuss that.
What does it have to do with the fact that he denigrates the girls who did and do LPs, but then later, incoherently as usual, he book them?

BlueShadow wrote:

Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.

You've already said your opinion many times (exact dame words), and that's okay, but I'll repeat the thing said in the other thread, we doesn't discuss that.
What does it have to do with the fact that he denigrates the girls who did and do LPs, but then later, incoherently as usual, he book them?

And you wanna go on like forever with this obviously personal thing with this guy.
Sort it out between the two of you and please save us from this endless thing.

Eloise wrote:

BlueShadow wrote:

Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.

You've already said your opinion many times (exact same words), and that's okay, but I'll repeat the thing said in the other thread, we doesn't discuss that.
What does it have to do with the fact that he denigrates the girls who did and do LPs, but then later, incoherently as usual, he book them?

And you wanna go on like forever with this obviously personal thing with this guy.
Sort it out between the two of you and please save us from this endless thing.

Personal thing? I have an opinion and I say it. In this specific case there are not opinions but simple facts. Whats wrong?
But it's not the point... in any case it is you who entered here. No one forced you.

And it's curious that about how a producer behaves with models by bashing them on his forum, just because they don't want to work with him, the false promises and fake advertisement you didn't have an opinion about it (you probably don't care, and it's ok) but you enter to say I have to stop to speak about this. You not have an opinion (or you don't want to say, it's ok)? But it's a forum you know, we discuss things...
And if you have not intervened before... I do not see why you have intervened now... you (like everyone) don't have to read a topic that doesn't interest you. I guess.

You can't have a thread that expresses pages of self-absorbed frustrations about a competitor... it is not only pointless and irrelevant but above all unprofessional
You not only have this one thread but another one other here :https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567
I mean who are we kidding here

It's like having several pages of Microsoft rants on an Apple Support Community which is forbidden in any decent, respectful and professional forum guideline

Write a book about it, at least you'll make tangible productive use of your time, but that personal thing you've got going on and only you can understand here is the sort of drama queen bitching you've got to feed to a shrink or a bunch of muppets round a table during a tea party

OKCTwister wrote:You can't have a thread that expresses pages of self-absorbed frustrations about a competitor... it is not only pointless and irrelevant but above all unprofessional
You not only have this one thread but another one other here :https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567
I mean who are we kidding here

It's like having several pages of Microsoft rants on an Apple Support Community which is forbidden in any decent, respectful and professional forum guideline

Write a book about it, at least you'll make tangible productive use of your time, but that personal thing you've got going on and only you can understand here is the sort of drama queen bitching you've got to feed to a shrink or a bunch of muppets round a table during a tea party

Many words, but still not opinion about the topic.
If you have nothing to say, you can move forward you know...
And with 'unprofessional' you are speaking about me? I'm not in the biz.

PS
And btw, the same they do in the other forum, so... whats the real problem?

If you don't want to expose yourself with your opinions, that's fine.
But please don't tell me when to talk and what to do, there are moderators for that already.
I respect what you say but spare us from saying 'save us from...' (@Eloise) because you have all the tools to ignore people and you can enter or not enter topics freely.

At the end of the day, blueshadow is right, but maybe for a different reason. Pierre is exploitative - he cares nothing if his 'smooth talking' leads to a situation which basically ruins a young impressionable girls life. Instead of help, exploit. Thats Pierres mantra, & personally, I find it despicable.

Its been like this since invasion of Hungary in mid-90's... where you could've said "fair enough, she wants industry", or "I can advise her, go home, 12 months from now if you look hard enough, you'll get job & be able make ends meet". He never had this class to be man enough or empathetic enough to do this.

BlueShadow wrote:
PS
And btw, the same they do in the other forum, so... whats the real problem?

You are obsessing on PW
Could you at least send a link to a thread on Woodman Forum dedicated to Legalporno

You know what is funny with these - now 2 - topics "against" Woodman?

It makes publicity for him! Completely counter-productive...

Today Woodman is far, very far from being the "big name" he used to be, he doesn't count much in the porn biz...
If you hadn't set up these topics about him, the younger LP members (most members under 30-35) wouldn't even have heard of Woodman even once in their life.

Look around, on porn sites, nowhere you hear about Woodman! (except here on these topics here on this forum!)

----

And now, my opinion about the topic, because otherwise I will be like Eloise, I will be accused of not giving my opinion... My opinion is that if it is true that he speaks bad of LP models, and if it is true that even so, they go to work with him... whose problem is it? it is not perhaps the models' problem? Why should it be our problem?
If now your point is just to underline that he contradicts himself, well, ok, noted, he contradicts himself, thanks for the info... really an interesting piece of info ;)

viewer2 wrote:You know what is funny with these - now 2 - topics "against" Woodman?

It makes publicity for him! Completely counter-productive...

Today Woodman is far, very far from being the "big name" he used to be, he doesn't count much in the porn biz...
If you hadn't set up these topics about him, the younger LP members (most members under 30-35) wouldn't even have heard of Woodman even once in their life.

Look around, on porn sites, nowhere you hear about Woodman! (except here on these topics here on this forum!)

----

And now, my opinion about the topic, because otherwise I will be like Eloise, I will be accused of not giving my opinion... My opinion is that if it is true that he speaks bad of LP models, and if it is true that even so, they go to work with him... whose problem is it? it is not perhaps the models' problem? Why should it be our problem?
If now your point is just to underline that he contradicts himself, well, ok, noted, he contradicts himself, thanks for the info... really an interesting piece of info ;)

No-one can deny he's been one of the great players, like Castel or Clark. But his mysogny & lack of empathy with female subjects is deplorable, in my opinion.