sarsastrid wrote:Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?
Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...
WTF???
BlueShadow wrote:sarsastrid wrote:Goddamnnn..... does this guy even care a tiny bit for his appearance?
Hair out of control on his back... in his neck.... backside upperarm...
WTF???
You already said it.
Use this topic for making joke of him when he book girls that di LP...
Anythingbutt wrote:I’m not really sure what all the woodman bashing is about. He’s the only one who has done dirty ass to mouth which is a top thread here since 2015 but LP haven’t had the balls to do it.
This is Goldie (also ex LP)
BlueShadow wrote:
Bullshit.
BlueShadow wrote:Anythingbutt wrote:I’m not really sure what all the woodman bashing is about. He’s the only one who has done dirty ass to mouth which is a top thread here since 2015 but LP haven’t had the balls to do it.
This is Goldie (also ex LP)
You clearly missed the first post with his quote, right?
PS
You can "enjoy" shit-games somewhere else. Is not question of balls, is question of been sick.
PPS
Yes, Goldie fit in the category "I don't work with girls that did first LP and blah blah blah. Even if 2015.
grey00owl wrote:BlueShadow wrote:
Bullshit.
Absolutely ridiculous.
BlueShadow wrote:Princess Mihaylik aka Lady Gang
Oh, he left an open door now...
We want to bet that in the end she will book her? Maybe we have another girl to add to the 2020 list (ok, she worked for him 3 years ago, but lets consider her a ''new'' girl, new stage name, and she (re) started (seriously this time, with no pressure on being exclusive) with LP. His ego can't stand this even if he say otherwise.
grey00owl wrote:BlueShadow wrote:
Bullshit.
Absolutely ridiculous.
BlueShadow wrote:The man who isn't attracted to the girls who made LPs - 2020 edition
- Pierre Woodman 2019
Taylee Wood
Siya Jey
Lana Bunny
Polina Maxim
Barbie Esm
Bella Angel
Scarlet Domingo/Rebel
- Pierre Woodman 2020
OKCTwister wrote:I watch PW precisely because of the shit stains
Besides that, I'm gobsmacked how the moderator is tolerating these repetitive obnoxious threads that are polluting the website all over the place
This is downright unacceptable
Eloise wrote:OKCTwister wrote:I watch PW precisely because of the shit stains
Besides that, I'm gobsmacked how the moderator is tolerating these repetitive obnoxious threads that are polluting the website all over the place
This is downright unacceptable
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.
Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.
BlueShadow wrote:Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.
You've already said your opinion many times (exact dame words), and that's okay, but I'll repeat the thing said in the other thread, we doesn't discuss that.
What does it have to do with the fact that he denigrates the girls who did and do LPs, but then later, incoherently as usual, he book them?
Eloise wrote:BlueShadow wrote:Eloise wrote:
Besides all that I've said it before:
we can all bash that Woodman character but by now I wouldn't be bragging too much since there are many scenes on his website that beat the scenes on this site
in terms of duration of the actual fucking turns, intensity and models.
Sad but true.
You've already said your opinion many times (exact same words), and that's okay, but I'll repeat the thing said in the other thread, we doesn't discuss that.
What does it have to do with the fact that he denigrates the girls who did and do LPs, but then later, incoherently as usual, he book them?
And you wanna go on like forever with this obviously personal thing with this guy.
Sort it out between the two of you and please save us from this endless thing.
OKCTwister wrote:You can't have a thread that expresses pages of self-absorbed frustrations about a competitor... it is not only pointless and irrelevant but above all unprofessional
You not only have this one thread but another one other here :https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567
I mean who are we kidding here
It's like having several pages of Microsoft rants on an Apple Support Community which is forbidden in any decent, respectful and professional forum guideline
Write a book about it, at least you'll make tangible productive use of your time, but that personal thing you've got going on and only you can understand here is the sort of drama queen bitching you've got to feed to a shrink or a bunch of muppets round a table during a tea party
BlueShadow wrote:
PS
And btw, the same they do in the other forum, so... whats the real problem?
viewer2 wrote:You know what is funny with these - now 2 - topics "against" Woodman?
It makes publicity for him! Completely counter-productive...
Today Woodman is far, very far from being the "big name" he used to be, he doesn't count much in the porn biz...
If you hadn't set up these topics about him, the younger LP members (most members under 30-35) wouldn't even have heard of Woodman even once in their life.
Look around, on porn sites, nowhere you hear about Woodman! (except here on these topics here on this forum!)
----
And now, my opinion about the topic, because otherwise I will be like Eloise, I will be accused of not giving my opinion... My opinion is that if it is true that he speaks bad of LP models, and if it is true that even so, they go to work with him... whose problem is it? it is not perhaps the models' problem? Why should it be our problem?
If now your point is just to underline that he contradicts himself, well, ok, noted, he contradicts himself, thanks for the info... really an interesting piece of info ;)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests