PornBox.com

Please keep Bi male actors away from these young lovely European females, Bi men do not deserve to be fucking them much less be in their presence at all.
Dudes like: Thomas Lee, Larry Steel, Black Prince, Ricky Optimal, Oscar Batty and whoever else.
They should never be seen in straight scenes again. Why? because it ruins the authenticity of the scene (if there ever was any) and it puts the health of female performers in danger.
And nobody wants that. Listen to the fans before deleting the post

You can avoid to buy content with such performers if you cant stand they are fucking a pretty girl.

But you can not tell this, as it is not true: "it puts the health of female performers in danger"

In the last 10 year in Europe (Budapest and Prague) who carried Syphilis in the industry were female performer, not male. The patient zero has been a girl, every time.

So far are the female performers that put in danger male performers, not the other way around.
-
With the actual standard of testing, there is no difference between the exam done for Hetero and Bsx movies. The only difference between male and female is actually that 95% of the girls are working as prostitute, and even using condom, makes than more dangerous from than male, as the male actually working in prostitution are a small minority and for sure with a much lower customer pace

Giorgio Grandi wrote:
But you can not tell this, as it is not true: "it puts the health of female performers in danger"

In the last 10 year in Europe (Budapest and Prague) who carried Syphilis in the industry were female performer, not male. The patient zero has been a girl, every time.

So far are the female performers that put in danger male performers, not the other way around.
-
With the actual standard of testing, there is no difference between the exam done for Hetero and Bsx movies. The only difference between male and female is actually that 95% of the girls are working as prostitute, and even using condom, makes than more dangerous from than male, as the male actually working in prostitution are a small minority and for sure with a much lower customer pace

Thank you for the correction sir, you are right i did not know the facts. However, What if you saw your favorite comedian in a horror film? It wont move you the same right?? That's the point i'm making. What's the use of watching a porn scene if the male actors don't care if its a female or an animal or a hole in the wall? If the guys don't like females only they shouldn't be fucking them.

ryanfury wrote:

Giorgio Grandi wrote:
But you can not tell this, as it is not true: "it puts the health of female performers in danger"

In the last 10 year in Europe (Budapest and Prague) who carried Syphilis in the industry were female performer, not male. The patient zero has been a girl, every time.

So far are the female performers that put in danger male performers, not the other way around.
-
With the actual standard of testing, there is no difference between the exam done for Hetero and Bsx movies. The only difference between male and female is actually that 95% of the girls are working as prostitute, and even using condom, makes than more dangerous from than male, as the male actually working in prostitution are a small minority and for sure with a much lower customer pace

Thank you for the correction sir, you are right i did not know the facts. However, What if you saw your favorite comedian in a horror film? It wont move you the same right?? That's the point i'm making. What's the use of watching a porn scene if the male actors don't care if its a female or an animal or a hole in the wall? If the guys don't like females only they shouldn't be fucking them.

This is a personal opinion I do not know what to answer you unless I think there are many actors that switch between Comedy and Drama and in both cases they do a great job.

This is not rocket science. A person being "Bi" means they like both men and women. Operative word = "like".
Not that they "don't care if its a female or an animal or a hole in the wall" which is such a stupid thing to say.
And nobody seems to get all indignant when two girls kiss in a scene.

Thanks Giorgio for your patience.

Has the OP never heard of 'gay for pay'?

avanfurwet wrote:This is not rocket science. A person being "Bi" means they like both men and women. Operative word = "like".
Not that they "don't care if its a female or an animal or a hole in the wall" which is such a stupid thing to say.
And nobody seems to get all indignant when two girls kiss in a scene.

Thanks Giorgio for your patience.

Fully agree!

Im a simple man I want to see big stud cock fucking the shit out of female assholes and throats. What they do otherwise doesn't affect me!

Giorgio Grandi wrote:..... 95% of the girls are working as prostitute ....

Thanks for this info. I've always thought there there wasn't much difference between porn-stars getting paid to have sex with guys, and other sex-workers also having sex for money with guys.

But I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes. Apparently, these women are often one and the same in Prague and in Budapest. Which doesn't surprise me at all. Because having sex for money is legal both Prague and in Budapest. These porn-stars aren't breaking any laws, when they also have sex for money with ordinary guys.

Perhaps this misunderstanding about porn-stars and other sex-workers is the result of sexual hypocrisy in USA, where it's legal for porn-stars to have sex for money, but it's illegal for other sex-workers to have sex for money in other circumstances. Because according to US lawyers and judges, having sex for money in porn is freedom of expression. It's not really sex for money, the way it is, when people do it in private.

This is a strange distinction to make. But when strange is all around you, then most people eventually get used and don't see it as strange anymore. They see it as normal, and they are surprised that other people don't see it this way. That's how misunderstandings arise as a result of cultural, legal, and political differences.

It.

More likely no than yes.
If I want to look at bisexuals I will select this category specifically

No one had to say it.

Bi means they like both. Sounds like someone’s projecting because they don’t get to have all the fun.

I'm really hearing funny things in forum lately. And i was pretty sure people watching porn had to be open minded.
What a fool!
What i'm reading lately seems more directly coming from middle ages

The OP has serious issues, i feel sorry for him. I don't want to watch BI or Gay porn but it doesn't bother me in the slightest if those actors are fucking women.

You did not "have to say it" because it's an absolutely braindead comment. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt. Just say you're biphobic, at least it would actually be honest.

Why does this matter?
Plenty of guys have done gay porn in their past
They also have personal lives and who knows what they do

They are hard dicks and bodies fucking the women you want to see... why would it matter who they fucked another day?

This is just another guy who cant handle human sexuality because of his own insecurities. You are buying a scene, it shouldnt matter what they do in other scenes.

I can vote nopro.
But OP post makes it difficult to do so.
This poster has issues. Lets hope he is just too young still and will wise up. Sounds pretty old, I know.

101mike101 wrote:

Giorgio Grandi wrote:..... 95% of the girls are working as prostitute ....

Thanks for this info. I've always thought there there wasn't much difference between porn-stars getting paid to have sex with guys, and other sex-workers also having sex for money with guys.

But I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes./quote]
Its still a big difference, but thats a complete other discussion for other threads.

So this again is why I have so many posts.
Because we can't edit anymore, even not with first 5min after posting.

dap-addict wrote:

101mike101 wrote:

Giorgio Grandi wrote:..... 95% of the girls are working as prostitute ....

Thanks for this info. I've always thought there there wasn't much difference between porn-stars getting paid to have sex with guys, and other sex-workers also having sex for money with guys.

But I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes.

Its still a big difference, but thats a complete other discussion for other threads.

dap-addict wrote:

101mike101 wrote:...I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes.

Its still a big difference, but thats a complete other discussion for other threads.

I don't see what is there to discuss, when many porn-stars are both prostitutes and porn-stars.

It's true that not all porn-stars are prostitutes, and not all prostitutes are porn-stars. But they have so much in common, that they are often one and the same. The diagram below illustrates this reality even better than words. S in this diagram are stars or porn-stars, and P in this diagram are prostitutes, and the shaded area between the two circles is where the ladies are both porn-stars and prostitutes.


I think the main reason why so many porn-stars don't also have sex for money with ordinary guys is because the police and the government don't do anything against female porn-stars and male porn-studs, but they persecute and prosecute women and guys who do it just to make money and to enjoy, without making porn. This is an artificial difference created by the government and the legal system.

101mike101 wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

101mike101 wrote:...I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes.

Its still a big difference, but thats a complete other discussion for other threads.

I don't see what is there to discuss, when many porn-stars are both prostitutes and porn-stars.

It's true that not all porn-stars are prostitutes, and not all prostitutes are porn-stars. But they have so much in common, that they are often one and the same. The diagram below illustrates this reality even better than words. S in this diagram are stars or porn-stars, and P in this diagram are prostitutes, and the shaded area between the two circles is where the ladies are both porn-stars and prostitutes.


I think the main reason why so many porn-stars don't also have sex for money with ordinary guys is because the police and the government don't do anything against female porn-stars and male porn-studs, but they persecute and prosecute women and guys who do it just to make money and to enjoy, without making porn. This is an artificial difference created by the government and the legal system.

We need more of these diagrams.

101mike101 wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

101mike101 wrote:...I've had people even in this forum argue with me that there was some big difference between porn-stars and so-called prostitutes.

Its still a big difference, but thats a complete other discussion for other threads.

I don't see what is there to discuss, when many porn-stars are both prostitutes and porn-stars.

It's true that not all porn-stars are prostitutes, and not all prostitutes are porn-stars. But they have so much in common, that they are often one and the same. The diagram below illustrates this reality even better than words. S in this diagram are stars or porn-stars, and P in this diagram are prostitutes, and the shaded area between the two circles is where the ladies are both porn-stars and prostitutes.


I think the main reason why so many porn-stars don't also have sex for money with ordinary guys is because the police and the government don't do anything against female porn-stars and male porn-studs, but they persecute and prosecute women and guys who do it just to make money and to enjoy, without making porn. This is an artificial difference created by the government and the legal system.

The thing to discuss is the shaded area of your Venn Diagram. I think there is a LOT more gray than you illustrate.

cyberhog59170 wrote:The thing to discuss is the shaded area of your Venn Diagram. I think there is a LOT more gray than you illustrate.

It's hard to know what the reality is, when a part of it is illegal, and people are trying to hide it from the authorities.

But I agree that it makes a lot of sense for so-called prostitutes to make some amateur porn, post it on Pornhub, and then show it to their potential clients on their phones.

Because it's common for police-women in USA and some other countries to pose as prostitutes and then arrest cocky guys, who approach them and offer them money for sex. But a police-woman probably won't make a porn-clip of herself and show it to potential clients. So, ladies who are for real with guys, can make porn-clips of themselves and show it to guys who approach them to assure them that they aren't police-women trying to entrap them and arrest them.

Both women and guys making porn-clips of themselves can actually be a good way for them to assure each other that they aren't the police. Because the police is unlikely to do this kind of thing, when they pose as prostitutes or clients to entrap guys and women. So, a guy showing a porn-clip of himself to the lady can totally assure her that he isn't the police. And the lady can assure the guy too by showing him a porn-clip of herself. And they can both do this, before they talk about money and sex.

Porn clips can be used as credentials to prove that you aren't the police. But you still need to be careful even with porn-clips to make sure that they aren't heavily edited. You need to be sure that it's the same person in the porn-clip as the one showing it to you.