PornBox.com

I don't visit PW's site because I have no interest in him, his forum, or his content. But other people are free to do as they please, and if he's delivering a product they feel they can't get somewhere else and better, then he is for them.

But... (and I'm not going to bring member names or model threads into it, because recently there has been a peak, but there has always been unwelcome to and fro)... often when I visit models' thread these days I find myself scrolling through a lot of 'PW said this or that today' posts, which means although I want to avoid PW's site (and life) it becomes unavoidable.

Let's be frank. PW has elephantiasis of the ego anyway. He would benefit from far less attention anywhere, let alone here.

So although I feel hesitant putting this suggestion forward, because I consider most posts about PW come from a sincere desire from other LP forum members to keep LP people up to date on what's going on there (It's certainly not to flatter him), it's more a frequency and scale thing.

Again, I'm not going to include any names, because it's not fair to put other LP forum members with good intentions in the frame for pressure from others. For that reason it would be good to keep discussion of this general rather than particular.

It might be a case the we dedicate a running thread in General to those who want to keep up with the pantomime of his career. Call it 'Lame Sh*t PW Did Today' or something. That may even be a thread worth visiting for comedy relief.
But when it's all over models' threads in a way that you feel news about him is eclipsing news about the model herself, that's a negative.

It's an idea for discussion. I considered a YES/NO poll but that could potentially be used as a tool for bullying (the totalitarian sledgehammer of 'The Will Of The People!') against anyone who makes a passing mention of PW in a thread, which happens.
I'm not suggesting 'Forum Laws'. It's a free forum. Just an optional 'shared protocol to consider' when we post.

Thought? Other suggestions?

Totally agree. Well written Sir.

bdsmpretty wrote:
Thought? Other suggestions?

I usually post on 'model' section what he do and the shit he say (and my though) simply because it's regarding the specific girls. For me is more fair like this. In this way there is more visibility. So, the focus for me is on the girl, more than PW.
But if it is more appropriate for someone to open a separate thread, I have absolutely nothing against.

daptap wrote:Totally agree. Well written Sir.

+100000

Totally agree with trying not to pollute the models' fan threads with off-topic 'controversies' (i.e. usually fighting between posters).

On the other hand, if a model appears to have been "guided" by PW and this may be affecting her appearance/non-appearance at LP, I guess that news is on-topic for her fan thread. Trouble is, the mere mention of the wannabe "budapest svengali" is liable to trigger other posters to join in.

I wouldn't worry about a forum poll representing anyone's will, let alone a totalitarian sledgehammer.
Participation is by negligible numbers of self-selecting posters.
I don't think either LP or other posters take any notice of forum polls. They're just a bit of fun, sometimes.

bdsmpretty wrote:I don't visit PW's site because I have no interest in him, his forum, or his content. But other people are free to do as they please, and if he's delivering a product they feel they can't get somewhere else and better, then he is for them.

But... (and I'm not going to bring member names or model threads into it, because recently there has been a peak, but there has always been unwelcome to and fro)... often when I visit models' thread these days I find myself scrolling through a lot of 'PW said this or that today' posts, which means although I want to avoid PW's site (and life) it becomes unavoidable.

Let's be frank. PW has elephantiasis of the ego anyway. He would benefit from far less attention anywhere, let alone here.

So although I feel hesitant putting this suggestion forward, because I consider most posts about PW come from a sincere desire from other LP forum members to keep LP people up to date on what's going on there (It's certainly not to flatter him), it's more a frequency and scale thing.

Again, I'm not going to include any names, because it's not fair to put other LP forum members with good intentions in the frame for pressure from others. For that reason it would be good to keep discussion of this general rather than particular.

It might be a case the we dedicate a running thread in General to those who want to keep up with the pantomime of his career. Call it 'Lame Sh*t PW Did Today' or something. That may even be a thread worth visiting for comedy relief.
But when it's all over models' threads in a way that you feel news about him is eclipsing news about the model herself, that's a negative.

It's an idea for discussion. I considered a YES/NO poll but that could potentially be used as a tool for bullying (the totalitarian sledgehammer of 'The Will Of The People!') against anyone who makes a passing mention of PW in a thread, which happens.
I'm not suggesting 'Forum Laws'. It's a free forum. Just an optional 'shared protocol to consider' when we post.

Thought? Other suggestions?

So when was the last PW polution post? I've missed it appearently.

avanfurwet wrote:
On the other hand, if a model appears to have been "guided" by PW and this may be affecting her appearance/non-appearance at LP, I guess that news is on-topic for her fan thread. Trouble is, the mere mention of the wannabe "budapest svengali" is liable to trigger other posters to join in.

Exactly.
Like Polina Maxim for example.
One of the most beautiful models, and has already made excellent scenes.
It should interest everyone who would like to see that model again here.
It would be a shame not to see new scenes here just because she is conditioned.

GG said she had to shoot new scenes in mid-January. The fact that she has met PW again for a new scene worries me. (obviously a producer can replace her with another model. But I speak from a fan point of view.)
For that I mention it in the model's topic, because I'm interested in the model, certainly not in PW.