PornBox.com

I am well aware that "fake" cum exists in LegalPorno and I am not that bothered to be honest because they make up for it in the fucking but WHY is "fake" cum used? Lack of studs? Studs can't cum? Work Load? Looks better on Camera? I don't know I'm just guessing...you also see a lot more "fake" cum in creampies than facials is there a reason for that? Is it common place among the Porn Industry? Maybe someone who has been around longer than me and who is Educated on how it works can let me know?

LegalPorno2016 wrote:I am well ...

these means that the cum of men in these scenes are fake???

christielee951 wrote:

LegalPorno2016 wrote:I am well ...

these means that the cum of men in these scenes are fake???

No! It means that sometimes it may be fake as in most porn.

LegalPorno2016 wrote:

christielee951 wrote:

LegalPorno2016 wrote:I am well ...

these means that the cum of men in these scenes are fake???

No! It means that sometimes it may be fake as in most porn.

absolutely real cum! 1080p videos dosnt lie

How it works? Several ways, you can use it as a lube, or put it in a syringe and use where needed, ie in the ass for ass creampie.
Some guys even inject it in their urethra before cumming.

man, is this real??
i saw some scenes and found some cumshots a litle strange but i cant imagine that its fake cum.
is it confirmed here?
its on the giorgio scenes?

You have to judge for yourself, nobody's gonna confirm anything I guess

Some scenes look more "fake" than others especially some creampie scenes when there is a quick cut to the models face then back to the creampie. I think the majority of cumshots on the faces are 100% legit unless they do something I have no clue about. Sometimes the cum in creampies looks a little weird and is probably fake at times.

Someone who knows more about the porn industry than I do will hopefully let us know? Maybe it is all just speculation and unless your are in the biz you cant know for sure?

I'd rather see no cum than fake cum.

Ofcourse me and all fans want to see the real deal.

But with fake cum I kinda guess using fake kinda adds to the fantasy of seeing a girl getting her whole mouth overfilled with cum, or some other of her orificies stuffed with hum....

geralt_ wrote:Ofcourse me and all fans want to see the real deal.

But with fake cum I kinda guess using fake kinda adds to the fantasy of seeing a girl getting her whole mouth overfilled with cum, or some other of her orificies stuffed with hum....

but this should be possible without the fake.
add a little more guys just to cum maybe...
similar to premiumbukkake.
i don´t know but fake cum is not a good thing in my opinion

I think most people want a real experience. This is the reason why it’s interesting to see BTS footage or interviews. The moment a director is going the fake route, you will loose credibility and customers.

I have a suspicion. Giorgio is known "clean freak" on his scenes and whilst they are all very very anal he vigorously edits out any footage that is not 100% sanitised. Now he also shoots many many anal creampies.
Now if an anal creampie comes out not 100% clean you either leave the footage in (he wouldn't), make a scene with no cumshot (never!) or you FAKE the cumshot on the grounds the viewer would be horrified if they ever found out women shit out their assholes.
My guess is that such creampie accidents and Giorgios desire for totally sanitised porn that accounts for some of the fakery.

I think the sole reason for fake is the guys are shooting 2-3 scenes daily and "dry".

What I don't understand is how a male performer, who earns his living off his cock, would risk a serious urinary tract, bladder or penile infection injecting fake cum into his urethra.

Sir Noel wrote:I have a suspicion. Giorgio is known "clean freak" on his scenes and whilst they are all very very anal he vigorously edits out any footage that is not 100% sanitised. Now he also shoots many many anal creampies.
Now if an anal creampie comes out not 100% clean you either leave the footage in (he wouldn't), make a scene with no cumshot (never!) or you FAKE the cumshot on the grounds the viewer would be horrified if they ever found out women shit out their assholes.
My guess is that such creampie accidents and Giorgios desire for totally sanitised porn that accounts for some of the fakery.

An interesting point of view that I can see might well be true. Personally I have no issue whatsoever with a less 'sanitised' view of anal sex, as I strongly suspect the majority here wouldn't have either.

I'm sure the guys either being unable to come or only doing so in small amounts are other factors. Personally I'm MUCH more interested in seeing the girls come, and although it does seem a little odd if the guys don't come at all I'm not bothered about the volume of semen they produce.

Ultra-Gape wrote:

Sir Noel wrote:I have a suspicion. Giorgio is known "clean freak" on his scenes and whilst they are all very very anal he vigorously edits out any footage that is not 100% sanitised. Now he also shoots many many anal creampies.
Now if an anal creampie comes out not 100% clean you either leave the footage in (he wouldn't), make a scene with no cumshot (never!) or you FAKE the cumshot on the grounds the viewer would be horrified if they ever found out women shit out their assholes.
My guess is that such creampie accidents and Giorgios desire for totally sanitised porn that accounts for some of the fakery.

An interesting point of view that I can see might well be true. Personally I have no issue whatsoever with a less 'sanitised' view of anal sex, as I strongly suspect the majority here wouldn't have either.

I find it quite strange that anal should always be super clean. If there are small traces of brownish, who bothers. If I have anal, it isn’t also clean every time. Stop doing anal, if you are afraid.