PornBox.com

Looks a bit like DPP could be in the rise a bit, although production was cut by about half from 2017 to 2018.
But lobbying here is strong recently and its some really knowledgeable and dedicated fans. Same a bit as wet, barefoot ornprolapse, some other fetishes I also can't fully grasp.

Anyway, for now just let me try to find out what is attracting you to DPP?

I phrase it as a poll.
Please try to decide for the most appropriate 1-2 options!
But if you have many choices, please write them into a post.
I am also interested in any post-ins, any examples, also pics and gifs of course.
Up to now I skipped 99,9% of all DPP footage in LP because I deemed it just as "lame, useless and softcore pussy only sex". This said, I started watching porn with b/g anal and got pretty soon won also for DP back than by fellow users hyping DP so much I gave it a try as well eventually. Which just shows that focus may change over time of course!

Thanks for educating me about what I am missing when I skip DPP!
...and disclaimer: Please nobody write bs like which orifice was meant by creator/karma/nature for sex and which not! This is not the Bible Belt forum!

Btw, also I included an opt out option for DPP haters who still always feel an urge to vote. May this keep you away from writing in here hate posts against other fetishes than yours.

DVP creampie is very interesting for me. I like it, but for sure anal and DAP is better.

I clicked on none of the offered reasons , bcuz my feigned " interest " in DPP is only a political maneuver :

I want gorgeous pussy-only models to come to LP and take their DPP if they don´t want to do some beautiful , classic and aesthetically appealing DP .
I dislike DPP as I dislike DAP , but I will watch these scenes imagining it to be DP ...
( I resisted this tactic for decades and refused to buy scenes with any of these acts , but ... )

I have stated this many times , and I will do it again and again .
There are some threads with heated debates over this and I am already grabbing my Popcorn ; and when the gladiators are all dismembered I will come in nonchalantly and suggest some models who should take their DPP gangbang on LP including double-blowjobs , foot-loving , and multiple facial clean-ups .

I just think DPP looks great ? As does DAP and then there can be TP with either- also good.

I Voted No Holes barred, for no other reason than an Anal ONLY scene (with an over abundance of guys who just end up standing in the background stroking their dicks, because the girl is already maxed out) is kind of pointless.

An anal only scene should have 4 or 5 guys (when DAP) max. If you are going to go over that amount (with a single girl in the scene), then all holes (and hands) need to be filled, this way the least amount of guys are standing there stroking it, and are in the action with the girl!

JayJams wrote:I Voted No Holes barred, for no other reason than an Anal ONLY scene (with an over abundance of guys who just end up standing in the background stroking their dicks, because the girl is already maxed out) is kind of pointless.

An anal only scene should have 4 or 5 guys (when DAP) max. If you are going to go over that amount (with a single girl in the scene), then all holes (and hands) need to be filled, this way the least amount of guys are standing there stroking it, and are in the action with the girl!

Reads good, but I dont get this exactly: So core idea why you want DPP is because you want to avoid studs standing useless around stroking their dicks in a scene? How is that linked to DPP? - Look both main orififices accommodate 3 dicks max anyway (dap+p, dpp+a, tap, tpp) and not more because 4 isn't possible logistically. So 3 down there, 1-2 in her mouth, 1 in each of her hands (airplane pos) makes 6-7 studs maximum. Does DPP help here to accommodate more? Don't see it, maybe lacking fantasy on my side.