Page 1 of 1

past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 1:19 pm
by stardusterX
just went through my archive of lp from the very beginning until today, and have to say there is a drastic change between then and now, girls and the intensity of scenes used to be so much better back in the day, today, honestly, it is kinda boring, when you have a taste of the money, dont ruin the original taste as it is easy to do so, hardest part is keeping the same taste, lp is losing its good touch, dont know if anyone else thinks/feels the way i do!

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:38 pm
by xxx
Show us some examples?

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 4:02 pm
by tekaneo
To XXX

Choose any scene from SZ250 to SZ850 and there you have the answer. Markus, Jon Jon, Kid Jamaica... and if you include the old style when Gonzo was using Sineplex style then...

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 5:56 pm
by stardusterX
hey triple x,

how about you buy some movies from last year, 2015, 2014, and 2013 and as back as you can go,,, then tell us what you think!!!

as my friend tekaneo said you can browse through the ones suggested

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 7:02 pm
by IIdarksoulII
I don't care about the male models the slightest. Fresh, cute girls is what I joined for years ago. Now, if you get new cute models they are gone after one/two scenes. Girls like Mina, Anya Krey, or Jemma. I can only guess why you can't hold them but it seems you don't care anyway.

It's all about extremes now and yet the scenes are not better than the ones years before. I can watch any scene with Cayenne, Linda, Timea etc. countless times but every DAP I skip over. I consider this gay porn and I'm fine with it, I guess LP has a huge gay fan base. Diversity is all that I wish for. Good hard anal sex, gapes, cream pies, gape farting. One girl, 3 boys max and fuck her pussy too because why shouldn't she enjoy it too.

I know it's wasted words here anyway but I needed to get it out of my system.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 8:03 pm
by rollin_dubs187
ahmetbakmis wrote:just went through my archive of lp from the very beginning until today, and have to say there is a drastic change between then and now, girls and the intensity of scenes used to be so much better back in the day, today, honestly, it is kinda boring, when you have a taste of the money, dont ruin the original taste as it is easy to do so, hardest part is keeping the same taste, lp is losing its good touch, dont know if anyone else thinks/feels the way i do!


Been barking up this tree for the past year. Be prepared to be ridiculed and mocked for not loving everything coming from LP lately.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 9:07 pm
by JohnMcSpunkencock
xxx will likely just quote the sales of scenes you'd highlight compared with very good selling scenes of recent times which are not to your taste. There are essential babes who may not sell REALLY well but they are an important cog in the wheel while others, who will probably have a minority following on their forum threads, do better in sales. There's something for everyone here and when I find someone I think may do well I will suggest them even if they are not my type. Business is business

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:00 pm
by stardusterX
cycle of women are only around certain ones today whereas in the past there were far more variety,,,

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:48 pm
by xxx
Looks like another piss/cream nostalgia thread.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:54 pm
by xxx
If you are an actual paying member, I strongly recommend to use the new suggestion page. If our other members agree with you, you can get things to change. However, forum complains from a minority won't do anything.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:01 pm
by xxx
For example, I invite you to suggest cream scenes there, and see how much support you get.

Another example : we often see forum users complain that we have too many guys and never do scenes with multiple females instead. "A Reverse Gangbang with the guy popping at least 2-3 times." was hugely down voted in the GG suggest area.

I have been telling you all this time that we simply focus on what people buy. Verbal requests don't pay the workers.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:09 am
by magizi877
I do miss a few things from the past, for instance Timea Bella has 73 released scenes.
Where as most girls nowadays maybe get 1-4 scenes and that's it.

Other girls of her era were pretty popular in the scene count area as well.
This is what I miss the most from the past. Girls you could expect every other week.

Back then, thinking about "favorite pornstars" was an easy thing to do.
This made it so easy for me to buy scenes that were not really what I wanted from porn.
I got so many scenes with Timea that were orgies, just because it had Timea on it.
But orgies is a thing I genuinely dislike for different reasons.
I just impulsively bought them because it featured a favorite model.

At present I find very easy to muster the will power to skip such orgies scenes,
simply because I don't have a strong connection to any model performing this year.
So I only buy the scenes of the models I like the most, doing gangbang type things.

Managing my monthly 40 tkt has become so easy for me, even though
scenes have become noticeably more expensive and better.
Back then when scenes with a 2.5 tkt price was the norm I was struggling to not expend my entire budget in week 1
and had to reload every now and then.

Is not that now I'm economizing or trying to expend less here,
I'm simply not compelled to buy as much as before. Because there are no regulars babes.

:confused:

I'm not the type of person who goes to a restaurant and orders something new every time.
I honestly drink the same thing almost always and have a selection of maybe 5 meals that are my favorite. lol
The rest of the menu is utterly ignored :o

When you are drinking beer, do you try something new often or do you go back to your old favorite 95% of the time?
I choose the old favorite, and I do the same with porn.

I can happily live without any new Timea scenes, as porn actresses move on with their lives.
Totally OK with that, but if we, are really paying for the cost of the scenes, why not offer the best girls,
the ones that combine best looks with great performance, an incentive to keep you guys close?.

P.D. I still can't get past the anti spam filter that was implemented sometime last week, for a post I wrote for the gif thread,
in fact even in this post I had to remove some words.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:58 pm
by stardusterX
xxx wrote:If you are an actual paying member, I strongly recommend to use the new suggestion page. If our other members agree with you, you can get things to change. However, forum complains from a minority won't do anything.


sorry i told my part, i cant go around posting all the time as i have done in the past in many other different places/models. if this wants to be listened to, fine. guess power of money has raised people to a level where they dont care anymore, suppose once you start losing customers or ignore them, will be when it hits ya!

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:16 pm
by dap-addict
Sales show the new harder direction of LP is right.
Some old piss/cream fans may have left, its a pity, but cant have all, can you?

magizi87 wrote:most girls nowadays maybe get 1-4 scenes only.

(...)

I am simply not compelled to buy as much as before. Because there are no regular babes.

(...)

Totally OK with that, but if we, are really paying for the cost of the scenes, why not offer the best girls,
the ones that combine best looks with great performance, an incentive to keep you guys close?

+ 1

Asked for new leading stars after The BIG THREE (Timea, Linda and Arwen) left a long time ago.
Now we sort of have July Sun, Kira Thorn and Katrin Tequila - but its not the same and they perform too little scenes. :(

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:19 pm
by dap-addict
Mid Sept 2016:
https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13029&hilit=leading

Looks we are a bit further now as July Sun and Kira Thorn are really established. Still they could be cared more for.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:10 pm
by stardusterX
right now i am not buying anything as there is absolutely none i like, one day if things go back to normal like in the old days perhaps i can re-apply for membership, who knows! sure i am not a big loss for a studio like lp.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:16 pm
by JohnMcSpunkencock
I'm sure there isn't NOTHING that interests you but there is now more scope than ever before but with the emphasis on what sells better.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 6:24 pm
by stardusterX
sorry john theres nothing, all the old stuff are good but oh well, guess i accept being the minority and have no problem with it, been pushing dogfart to do some good stuff and some recent stuff they got are pretty good, theres some competition for you

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:17 pm
by Bjergmand
Old LP was the best but times change.. Companies have to go with what sells best and I'd rather have LP here than ot at all! ;)

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:18 pm
by stardusterX
im not saying they are bad because they dont do what they used to,,, just not as appealing as it once was for me,,, enjoy tho

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 10:28 pm
by Boshanks
xxx wrote:Looks like another piss/cream nostalgia thread.


I agree with op and it has nothing to do with either of those niches. LP used to offer variety, variety in sex acts, variety in fetishes, variety in women, but now the main focus is rushing models in to DAP, that's it. The direction the site is going in is abundantly clear, model selection these days is basically who can perform this act asap, and the sad part about that is, the majority of women can't perform this type of content on a regular basis, or have any interest to, so you end up limiting your model pool.

People here have mentioned some of the more beautiful models who've done a scene or two and then disappeared, ask yourself why that might be. Magizi you mention Timea and the massive amount of content she performed for this website, I guarantee if she had come on the scene today she probably would have been burnt out after a few months. I remember her first scene with Ian and Jamaica, she clearly struggled with both of them, they were probably a lot bigger than what she was used to and she needed time so settle in to the industry and become the star she eventually did. If she joined LP today, they would have been asking her to do double anal for her second scene and she probably would have vanished like so many others. Girls don't just get 1 to 4 scenes these days, that's all they end up doing because of what's now required to work here.

Case in point: The beautiful model Amanda Hill is one of the more attractive newbies to recently appear here. Her first ever porn scene was a 1on1 with Mike and it was great, her second ever was a 3on1 DP with some of the bigger guys and you could see the step up was a bit of a struggle for her. So what do we do now, do we give her some time to get used to the industry and maybe flourish in to the next big thing ? NOPE, let's get her doing DAP in her third scene in porn, I'm sure it's going to be fantastic :rolleyes: I can't wait to see how many scenes this girl ends up doing here before what's required takes its toll.

Now there's a market for this tunnel visioned harder style, I won't even try to argue against that, and if you're making more money than ever before then it's clearly working and I wish you all the best. Personally though, I think the majority of what LP puts out today is the same rehashed shit porn over and over again, and the site is a shadow of it's former self.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:02 am
by stardusterX
apparently the so many hot women is of no interest to the fans of todays boring scenes...

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:52 am
by Sweep11
I loved the old LP and I still love the current LP.
But I agree there is a different feel[i] to scenes today.
Seems like the old scenes were somehow more relaxed with [i]amateur
type girls having fun but hardcore sex. Today it feels more serious, professional and somehow less fun because of that. Even predictable or formulaic.

But I get that this is a professional business and do appreciate having a structured way to get requests from members as to what they want from scenes. Bravo for that. Lets hope members suggestions can inject some of the fun back into porn!

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 3:58 am
by dap-addict
Boshanks wrote:Case in point: The beautiful model Amanda Hill is one of the more attractive newbies to recently appear here. Her first ever porn scene was a 1on1 with Mike and it was great, her second ever was a 3on1 DP with some of the bigger guys and you could see the step up was a bit of a struggle for her. So what do we do now, do we give her some time to get used to the industry and maybe flourish in to the next big thing ? NOPE, let's get her doing DAP in her third scene in porn,

Gosh, Amanda Hill is already 2 months into her porn career!
Either she does DAP finally or she isnt for LP.
Times have changed, akhmet, yes.
Those girls who sell with DP only can be counted on one hand.
Get it or leave it!

or just go to DDF, please!

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:58 am
by Boshanks
dap-addict wrote:Either she does DAP finally or she isnt for LP.


Which is precisely why this site is increasingly producing nothing but the same tunnel visioned repetitive dog shit. As long as it's performed that's all that matters, the models capability doesn't matter in the slightest anymore. Get the girls in, rush them in to DAP, if the quality, intensity or ability is lacking, who cares, we can put DAP in the title and that will do.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 6:56 am
by stardusterX
dap-addict wrote:Times have changed, akhmet, yes.


you said my name wrong

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:53 am
by gapefan
LegalPorno is like a fine wine. It gets better with age :D

The entire industry is beginning to shift, in the wake of the mighty LP :eek:


The Great Recession absolutely destroyed the hardcore porn scene a decade ago :(

But thanks to LegalPorno, it is back! With a vengeance! :cool:


Keep up the outstanding work! I for one, simply cannot get enough of it! :)

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 8:54 am
by JohnMcSpunkencock
Boshanks wrote:
dap-addict wrote:Either she does DAP finally or she isnt for LP.


Which is precisely why this site is increasingly producing nothing but the same tunnel visioned repetitive dog shit. As long as it's performed that's all that matters, the models capability doesn't matter in the slightest anymore.


As a fan, I get that point and of course others have made it before. I hope there will always be those hot newbies who do well without the rush to dap. What sells well will never COMPLETELY rule out other babes but business dictates that dap, and anal fisting, outsells most other things, at the moment

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:51 am
by stardusterX
so people wanna see the same girls over and over again,,, not boring at all!!!!!

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:53 am
by dap-addict
[quote="JohnMcSpunkencock"]I hope there will always be those hot newbies who do well without the rush to dap.[quote]
There is and was no rush to DAP for Amanda Hill and many many other newbies.
Amanda shot in Prague 1st time slowly, some anal and DPs and nothing more.
Only her 2nd stay she decided to try DAP.
We dont even know yet how good she performed it, but guys like ahmet and boshanks already try to force the view she didnt do it fine. :( While its common knowledge that DAP needs to be trained on set a bit and most girls get better after 3-4 such demanding porn scenes. After this we get true stars like Kira Thorn, Katrin Tequila, Crystal Greenvelle etc. Even Arwen Gold didnt perform DAP fine at the beginning.
Calling a DAPbreakin after 2mt in porn a rush in the framework of todays1-2y porn careers is bs.

Some people get eaten up by nostalgy.
But LP changed hardcore porn!
And good so! :D :D :D

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:30 am
by Boshanks
I like how you try to use time frames as if that somehow negates my point. The girl has done about 5 or 6 scenes so far according to pornteengirl, this one in question being her third anal scene, and you don't think doing DAP at this point is a rush ? Furthermore, you don't think two months in to a hypothetical 2 year career is a rush either ?

You're right I don't know how well she'll perform it, but here's what I do know: she visibly struggled to perform DP in various different positions in her last scene, an educated guess would tell me that trying to accommodate the exact same stunt cocks in a far more demanding act isn't going to produce great results, but like I said, it doesn't matter because the site isn't concerned with that anymore. They'll be able to label it as a DAP scene and that's the bottom line, quality is irrelevant.

LP has indeed changed "hardcore porn", and for me it's for the worse, but there's a market for it and I'll reiterate what I said above

if you're making more money than ever before then it's clearly working and I wish you all the best. Personally though, I think the majority of what LP puts out today is the same rehashed shit porn over and over again, and the site is a shadow of it's former self.

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:46 am
by dap-addict
You pick what you want from my post, too. ;)

Anyway, every rookie coming to work for LP now in 2017 knows she's expected to try DAP.
Its the way LP changed Prague porn and is now changeing Europorn as well as slowly also the US anti-anal porn strongholds.

Girls can choose not to work for LP, but only for DDF, the soft studio of the same owner, and many other studios. Nobody forces them, but haveing worked at LP sure helps with more bookings and higher other entertainment and sex work rates.

Boshanks (and ahmet), I wish you to find the same as in your old LP days if you need that. :)
But you wont find it at LP anymore, because times change.
Maybe you can convince SOS to shoot it for you - he sure will take your >100k investments with a kiss and even play humble. ;)

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:48 am
by stardusterX
dap-addict wrote:
JohnMcSpunkencock wrote:I hope there will always be those hot newbies who do well without the rush to dap.
There is and was no rush to DAP for Amanda Hill and many many other newbies.
Amanda shot in Prague 1st time slowly, some anal and DPs and nothing more.
Only her 2nd stay she decided to try DAP.
We dont even know yet how good she performed it, but guys like ahmet and boshanks already try to force the view she didnt do it fine. :( While its common knowledge that DAP needs to be trained on set a bit and most girls get better after 3-4 such demanding porn scenes. After this we get true stars like Kira Thorn, Katrin Tequila, Crystal Greenvelle etc. Even Arwen Gold didnt perform DAP fine at the beginning.
Calling a DAPbreakin after 2mt in porn a rush in the framework of todays1-2y porn careers is bs.

Some people get eaten up by nostalgy.
But LP changed hardcore porn!
And good so! :D :D :D


i dont understand your point (i really dont and not making fun of anything by any means)

Re: past vs present

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:52 am
by stardusterX
dap-addict wrote:You pick what you want from my post, too. ;)

Anyway, every rookie coming to work for LP now in 2017 knows she's expected to try DAP.
Its the way LP changed Prague porn and is now changeing Europorn as well as slowly also the US anti-anal porn strongholds.

Girls can choose not to work for LP, but only for DDF, the soft studio of the same owner, and many other studios. Nobody forces them, but haveing worked at LP sure helps with more bookings and higher other entertainment and sex work rates.

Boshanks (and ahmet), I wish you to find the same as in your old LP days if you need that. :)
But you wont find it at LP anymore, because times change.
Maybe you can convince SOS to shoot it for you - he sure will take your >100k investments with a kiss and even play humble. ;)


let us hope the updates on lp do not go down to only a few days during the week as certain (once good) sites like hardcoregangbang now only updates every two weeks...