PornBox.com

i hope you have enough paying customers to keep from going under.
cuz all the fisting crud you're shooting lately (as well as the idiot prolapse scenes) is enough to turn off any legit porn watcher, permanently.

fisting features aren't even worth pirating.

it would seem that you have enough top-notch, hot girls who'll do hardcore anal, dp, dap, gangbangs and swallowing to satisfy the urges of most anyone who wants good porn, that you wouldn't need to resort to an extreme niche like fisting.

it's just not sexy. it's a far out niche, way, way outside the fringe.

keep doing it and it'll be very, very easy for me to pass LP by on my index of subscriptions to re-up. you guys are overpriced anyway.

This people is doing more things wrong lately, like what you say and more like now some of the studios, starting for GG and IV is making 2 parts clips, another bad idea, there is many good resourses they can make to do better porn scenes and they choose the worsts It is sad but true.

Absolutely nothing wrong with fisting.

Always someone crying about something. Whats wrong with some fisting, prolapse, piss, so and and so forth. If you look at porn throughout the world this stuff is like 5% of whats out there. So gtfo with your cry babying and go watch brazzers.

I disagree with the fisting and pissing for that matter. This latest scene with Lyna Cypher and Anna Deville was fucking hot.

Slayer21 wrote:more like now some of the studios, starting for GG and IV is making 2 parts clips, another bad idea, there is many good resourses they can make to do better porn scenes and they choose the worsts It is sad but true.

The scene splitting is getting on my nerves, too.
Problem is a bit it all comes by waves at LP. One studio starts with somethning and than the others copy. Usually avantguard is GG, IV is just a really cheap copycat - but they try to charge the same or even more tickets.
I have no problem with fisting as long as it doenst replace b/g anal sex.
Prolapse I dont dig, it was interesting just the first few films, now its repulsing for me. But fact is it sells fine currently.

Mizar5 wrote:cuz all the fisting crud you're shooting lately (as well as the idiot prolapse scenes) is enough to turn off any legit porn watcher, permanently.

How do you define "legit porn watcher" ? I would be curious to know. Are they only legit of they share your tastes?

I love watching anal fisting. The Jureka / Dominica scene had a lot of anal fisting and it was the #2 selling title of the June releases. I think plenty of people enjoy it.

Why does it bother you? You pay per scene so you don't have to pay for scenes with fisting.

I don't like girl on girl fisting.
First is a gay act and second , girls never get the other girl to respond like this:



male on girl fisting is so much better
those were just his fingers

And the thicker male arm, makes it look more extreme and better

magizi87 wrote:male on girl fisting is so much better
those were just his fingers

And the thicker male arm, makes it look more extreme and better

+ 1

Giorgio could easily shoot that, he is the only one prepareing the girls appropriately and paying due repect to anal capacity.
He could also shoot two parts of a scene, 1st with lots of fisting, some anal fucking and a dues climax, 2nd a DAP gb round.


On contrary all that fist & no holes barred splitting recently done by IV (Joachim Kessef) is abuseing a good fair concept.

a man fisting a woman is a "gay act"? How does that compute? Does that mean a man fucking a woman in the ass is gay too?

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:a man fisting a woman is a "gay act"? How does that compute? Does that mean a man fucking a woman in the ass is gay too?

Yeah that was a wtf moment, lol. I'm not a fan of fisting but plenty of people are so give the people what they want.

Girl on Girl anal fisting is my favorite kind



It's much more aesthetically pleasing, in my opinion

gapefan wrote:Girl on Girl anal fisting is my favorite kind



It's much more aesthetically pleasing, in my opinion

Nice. Which video has this scene?

I offer my proposed solution once again: multiple edits of a scene, varying in strength and acts included/excluded, price adjusted accordingly. GG did it for piss, why not for prolapse, fisting, dap, tp...
The extreme end of the sex act menu is driving some customers away. And what constitutes "extreme" is different for everyone.
You have a digital product that can be modified for different markets and tastes to keep everyone happy. Why not take advantage of that?? At least give it a try?

Pros:
potentially sell many more copies of essentially the same scene with relatively little additional cost
You could even trial releasing uncut footage to dedicated members to edit for you to see how it could work?
Longer term this model could enable lower ticket prices overall
Avoids bitching from members of the pro/anti camps of the diversive acts

Cons:
maybe it won't work and you've wasted some time in editing
Purists might complain about edits and ruining the flow of a scene

Thoughts?

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:a man fisting a woman is a "gay act"? How does that compute? Does that mean a man fucking a woman in the ass is gay too?

girl on girl is the gay act I was talking about

hmmm

I'm a dude I like girls

somehow girl on girl action doesn't attract me.

Who knows why

Girl on girl fisting is a thing that makes me want to skip a scene, because it's gay, lesbian or whatever is called.
It's repulsive.

Just clarifying

dap-addict wrote:

Slayer21 wrote:more like now some of the studios, starting for GG and IV is making 2 parts clips, another bad idea, there is many good resourses they can make to do better porn scenes and they choose the worsts It is sad but true.

The scene splitting is getting on my nerves, too.
Problem is a bit it all comes by waves at LP. One studio starts with somethning and than the others copy. Usually avantguard is GG, IV is just a really cheap copycat - but they try to charge the same or even more tickets.
I have no problem with fisting as long as it doenst replace b/g anal sex.
Prolapse I dont dig, it was interesting just the first few films, now its repulsing for me. But fact is it sells fine currently.

Creating two seperate trailers for each would mostly solve this problem for me. According to GG, this is impossible to do. I couldnt imagine why. Sounds like an excuse to me. One thing I have learned is part 1 generally will contain all the pre sex fucking around before a scene gets good. Almost half the time wasted with bs. When in doubt I generally go with part 2.

rollin_dubs187 wrote:When in doubt I generally go with part 2.

Me, too.
But GG does a fine work, proposing 2 concluded scenes ending with cum-shots always. Part 1 is usually lighter and cheaper, part 2 is the hot part in my book. GG also really explained why he started doing split setups - with Belle Claire.

With IV (Kessef studio), however, its just an abusive immitation.
IV it seems do it only to press 10tkts out for a scene worth 5.