Invisible criteria of which babe makes a great selling scene

[JohnMcSpunkencock]

This is a very tough-to-know-beforehand thing. If you look at the babes who sell generally well irrespective of who they shoot for there seems no pattern. I'd be very surprised if xxx doesn't think this too. Take randomly Lyna Cypher, Nicole Love, Angel Smalls and Sasha Zima. I could also mention the clearly talented Helena Moeller too. Four of the LP babes with nothing whatsoever in common but while 1 has arrived recently and sold even better than expected, but was still expected to sell at least good, the others have (Nicole) blossomed into a top youngster, (Lyna) surprised many with her ability and sales, and (Sasha) won over many people to be a top performer.

So, and I won't name names, why have others not done as well as you'd think? First off, bush is a killer. Granted. But why do some energetic, enthusiastic, willing, talented and attractive babes, with or without a huge Twitter following, not do so well? There is nobody here who won't be puzzled on occasion at a babe's lack of sales sometimes despite them ticking all the right boxes. LP hits the spot more often than misses but as highlighted above there seems no obvious reason

Trial and error seems the only way to know

[magizi877]

My theory is that it all depends on how click baity is the thumbnail preview on the main page.

[magizi877]

Actually I have been thinking about this for a long time and I have other theories. lol

One of my most recent ideas spawned when Giorgio said he uses a $20,000 USD camera to record the pornos.

Something a friend who works at a store told me a couple years ago was that SAMSUNG TV's outsell the other brands by a significant amount.
And the reason is that when you want to purchase a TV, you go to a store, and once there, you see all TV's are playing the same movie, at the same time,
so you can compare the image quality of all the brands, side by side, and it so happens to be that the panels
that Samsung uses, produce very punchy colors. So most people think those panels look prettier.

In Legalporno something similar happens. And this is debatable.
But if you watch the scenes from the various sources that they offer,
GIO scenes look sharper.
GIO 4K scenes look better.
His scenes don't have as much noise as Gonzo scenes.
In Gonzo scenes you can see the pixels.

A few weeks ago I was thinking if is worth it to download Gonzo videos at 4k,
because the difference in image quality between 1080 and 4K is not easily noticeable. lol.

[JohnMcSpunkencock]

It's natural that quality, reputation, performers etc are factors in sales but I was more thinking about the individual babes themselves. There doesn't seem any obvious reason why some babes sell well across studios while others who are, for example, more attractive, consistently perform dap and do so enthusiastically and vigorously and yet never seem to sell better than average. Using Lyna as the example, she's not the only older lady going the whole hog and yet has a cult following, isn't heavy on Twitter activity and her account is protected which can always at the very least minimise the sale of a scene. When I first made contact with Lyna I thought she'd do well for a lady of her age but I've been pleasantly very surprised by how popular she's proven to be. There are other babes who look as if they will get good sales to start with but it never panned out that way. GG doesn't have success with every babe, and no doubt some surprise him too. As I mentioned, bush seems to be an absolute scene killer for many. That aside I can see no formula at all

For me the formula seems to be simply trial and error. Unless a babe shoots we simply aren't going to know.