Page 1 of 2

DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:46 pm
by dap-addict
If we compare the 2016 bookings of DDF in Budapest and LP in Prague you realize that both studios, owned by the same company meanwhile, share a lot of models. Now DDF is light glamour porn, really nice vanilla stuff if you are into that kind of erotica and I am glad they are here and belong to the same company, LP on the other hand produces the hardcore porn I enjoy best as a user - thus my main concern is LP.

Working for DDF is sure less demanding for the girls, which is fine, too, as it creates a mix of options. But I get the impression some historic LP girls like Karina Grand for instance got sucked into DDF in 2016 while LP had to live without her excellent hardcore anal performances. :( :( :(

I hope in 2017 there is a fair solution for both porn user communities for this!
Maybe some interlinked DDF-LP booking for instance, excluding only DDF works for the truely capable girls. Just an idea. :)

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:43 pm
by avanfurwet
I prefer LP scenes too. Although I also think DDF have some nice photography and some nice locations (apartments, pools, etc).
Overall I imagine working for LP is a harder job with better pay, and if a girl is in demand (e.g. Karina Grand) then she can choose her own preferred assignment.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:46 pm
by dap-addict
LP is more demanding sex acts for sure, but than DDF shots do take a lot of time to be in the box on the other hand.
Girls can choose of course, but if the owner of both studios is the same combined bookings would prevent a draught of certain models here or there.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:10 pm
by Kriss1986
dap-addict wrote:LP is more demanding sex acts for sure, but than DDF shots do take a lot of time to be in the box on the other hand.
Girls can choose of course, but if the owner of both studios is the same combined bookings would prevent a draught of certain models here or there.


I get your point. It's such a waist for LP that e.g. Karina Grand left LP. I'm not a fan of DDF shoots, I prefer better action like LP-style. Of course girls can choose and I bet some of them will go for less demanding acts. The point is to avoid situation when LP will lost some girls for DDF.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:13 pm
by avanfurwet
^ But if a girl wants to work for DDF, nobody can pressure her to work for LP. All LP can do is offer work to the models they want.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:34 pm
by Kriss1986
It seems a little bit like conflict of interest. All of us would like to see fav models here right? But also as you said each model can decide where she wants to working and it's obvious.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:48 pm
by avanfurwet
^ But appearing at DDF doesn't prevent a girl from working for LP. The models are independent contractors and each assignment they take is for one scene at a time, taking maybe half a day to shoot. The girls have as many half day slots available as they want to work, and LP, DDF, and others can offer them work if they want. Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:21 pm
by Kriss1986
Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?


It should be a question to Dap-a. Don't know maybe booking for DDF and LP is somehow connected or something?

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:28 pm
by mr mystica
My outlook on companies "stealing" from each other: There`s a lot of drama i observe, between Woodman. DDF. LP and whoever and i think one thing should be consithered as a possibility. The possibility that models/actresses may have free will?

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:50 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
A model with free will is a kid with a bazooka (for her own career)

LP doesnt keep any model "as exclusive to LP" (at least for my knowledge), so no one is stealing to LP.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:00 pm
by Kriss1986
Giorgio Grandi wrote:A model with free will is a kid with a bazooka (for her own career)

LP doesnt keep any model "as exclusive to LP" (at least for my knowledge), so no one is stealing to LP.


Thank you Mr Giorgio for comment in this case.

BTW your statement - I mean this about bazooka, from one side is so funny illustration, from other side a little bit tragic...

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:12 pm
by avanfurwet
1024x1024.jpg

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:20 pm
by Kriss1986
avanfurwet wrote:
1024x1024.jpg


lol :D. Better don't mess with this girl ;).

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 1:03 am
by Iddaoeeok
I kinda like seeing girls work with other companies, often their whole look changes, due to different make-up and photography. I saw something Roxy Dee shot for another company recently and she looked much better than she ever did at LP.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:13 am
by Angel Eyes
Iddaoeeok wrote:I kinda like seeing girls work with other companies, often their whole look changes, due to different make-up and photography. I saw something Roxy Dee shot for another company recently and she looked much better than she ever did at LP.


DDF shoots are very slick and polished. The models makeup and dress also present them never looking more beautiful and desirable. That said, I really only look for their DP shoots. Unless I have a full on porn crush on a model, I ignore the more vanilla scenes. I also find their scenes to be too short. I like longer scenes...IMHO no scene should be shorter than 45 minutes.

I see a lot of crossover in porn shoots with the LP studio sets and talent appearing in other companies releases (i.e. TeenErotica, Nubiles, Wicked Pictures). This is an industry. If LP can make use of their sets shooting and providing scenes under contract and tailored to the other companies niche (i.e. use condoms for Wicked Pictures), then that is good for both companies bottom line. In other words, it helps LP which facilitates LP to continue producing the hard material we all desire.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:31 am
by dap-addict
Kriss1986 wrote:
Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?


It should be a question to Dap-a. Don't know maybe booking for DDF and LP is somehow connected or something?

Both companies have the same owner, thus best option seems DDF & LP bound contracts, i.e. any girl wanting to work for DDF should also work for LP and bice versa, IF the girl is capable of offering something for both companies. If bookings had been done that way in 2016, we'd had much more Karina Grand scenes on LP. And users of both studios would be happy, not only DDF vanilla porn users.

I suggest bound DDF-LP bookings in 2017 only since both studios have the same owner and share a lot of models already.


Btw, free will of course they have, but a) as Giorgio says and b) if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:58 am
by avanfurwet
dap-addict wrote:
Kriss1986 wrote:
Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?


It should be a question to Dap-a. Don't know maybe booking for DDF and LP is somehow connected or something?

Both companies have the same owner, thus best option seems DDF & LP bound contracts, i.e. any girl wanting to work for DDF should also work for LP and bice versa, IF the girl is capable of offering something for both companies. If bookings had been done that way in 2016, we'd had much more Karina Grand scenes on LP. And users of both studios would be happy, not only DDF vanilla porn users.

I suggest bound DDF-LP bookings in 2017 only since both studios have the same owner and share a lot of models already.


Btw, free will of course they have, but a) as Giorgio says and b) if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else.


So, if I understood correctly. This proposal is that any girl who wants to work for DDF would also be somehow "required" to work for LP and vice versa.
My personal opinion is that a company which tried this tactic would become the "kid with a bazooka".

"if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else" - well, I think that is true and LP and DDF would both lose out.

On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.

Presumably TWM and United Models and Marko, etc. will work these contacts already. But I guess LP and DDF could maybe be more pro-active in coordinating activities to make it more attractive for girls to work for their studios.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:03 pm
by drevokocur66
I love the different schools of thought, but somehow in the wishful thinking of our minds we forget that like most things, this is about money.
The girls will go, as long as they feel safe and not threatened, to the place that pays the most for as little work as possible.
There may turn up an exception or two along the way, but bottom line... money
The studios... money
The distributors... money
The girls... money
You can sit there and wish it was something else, but it is not.
It's just business.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:15 pm
by drevokocur66
Speaking of vanilla, LP is more vanilla every day.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:07 pm
by Kriss1986
So, if I understood correctly. This proposal is that any girl who wants to work for DDF would also be somehow "required" to work for LP and vice versa.
My personal opinion is that a company which tried this tactic would become the "kid with a bazooka".

"if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else" - well, I think that is true and LP and DDF would both lose out.

On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.

Presumably TWM and United Models and Marko, etc. will work these contacts already. But I guess LP and DDF could maybe be more pro-active in coordinating activities to make it more attractive for girls to work for their studios.


I think Dap-a meant only girls capable to offering acts in DDF and also LP style, but in my opinion it still should be decision of a model and not trade bound. You jus't can force anyone to do something against his will. Better option would be some kind of proposal e.g. if particular girl was booked for DDF could be asked if also would work for LP.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:52 am
by dap-addict
avanfurwet wrote:On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.

Ok, thats better than makeing bookings for both studios compulsary. But belonging to the same porn imperium now both studios should collaborate much better in 2017 with bookings and schedules. Some girls like Karina Grand just took an easy road and started forcusing on DDF only. Of course is their free will and free choice, but with an appropriate payment policy both studios could prevent a draught at one of them - and regarding the different users that move would be just fair!

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:59 am
by dap-addict
drevokocur66 wrote:I love the different schools of thought, but somehow in the wishful thinking of our minds we forget that like most things, this is about money.
The girls will go, as long as they feel safe and not threatened, to the place that pays the most for as little work as possible.
There may turn up an exception or two along the way, but bottom line... money
The studios... money
The distributors... money
The girls... money
You can sit there and wish it was something else, but it is not.
It's just business.

Exactly, its about the money!
And rates in Bp are still too high! :(
Its inherited from mid 2000, but since LP could change Prague it may also start to change Budapest in 2017.
Its just a right price policy needed - and a bit less autonomy for Golden Age loveing Denys!

DDF and LP can make a strong combo in Europorn, but coop cant end with just sharing the talent pool!


Btw, look at this and draw your conclusions:
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/54 ... a+denville - http://www.legalporno.com/model/3351/lucia_denville
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/4497/karina+grand

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:49 am
by Kriss1986
dap-addict wrote:
avanfurwet wrote:On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.

Ok, thats better than makeing bookings for both studios compulsary. But belonging to the same porn imperium now both studios should collaborate much better in 2017 with bookings and schedules. Some girls like Karina Grand just took an easy road and started forcusing on DDF only. Of course is their free will and free choice, but with an appropriate payment policy both studios could prevent a draught at one of them - and regarding the different users that move would be just fair!


I agree collaboration between DDf and LP should be better. But from other side sometimes even collaboration between different studios of LP is limited - we can again and again see the questions "why the studios are not sharing the models". So if LP has issues to manage it internal how it would be working external? The idea of appropriate payment policy could be a good solution anyway.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:52 am
by Kriss1986
dap-addict wrote:
drevokocur66 wrote:I love the different schools of thought, but somehow in the wishful thinking of our minds we forget that like most things, this is about money.
The girls will go, as long as they feel safe and not threatened, to the place that pays the most for as little work as possible.
There may turn up an exception or two along the way, but bottom line... money
The studios... money
The distributors... money
The girls... money
You can sit there and wish it was something else, but it is not.
It's just business.

Exactly, its about the money!
And rates in Bp are still too high! :(
Its inherited from mid 2000, but since LP could change Prague it may also start to change Budapest in 2017.
Its just a right price policy needed - and a bit less autonomy for Golden Age loveing Denys!

DDF and LP can make a strong combo in Europorn, but coop cant end with just sharing the talent pool!


Btw, look at this and draw your conclusions:
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/54 ... a+denville - http://www.legalporno.com/model/3351/lucia_denville
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/4497/karina+grand


Of course it's all about the money :). I looked above links you gave us and all it's clear now. I know what you mean and I get the point :(.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:40 am
by VBT_2
avanfurwet wrote:So, if I understood correctly. This proposal is that any girl who wants to work for DDF would also be somehow "required" to work for LP and vice versa.
My personal opinion is that a company which tried this tactic would become the "kid with a bazooka".

+1

In this already delicate area such idea is pure extortion.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:25 pm
by dap-addict
Arnt you shooting back a bit to fast and sharp, VBT? :mad: :confused:
What extortion are we talking about when in 2016 it turned out that whoever managed to get booked for LP could also go to DDF in Budapest because the owner of both studios is one and the same? But vice versa LP cant ask for a favour, no? :mad: Combined multi-studio bookings are a chance for the girls, not extorsion!
of course it would favour those girls working for both studios and thus also both kinds of porn users, it would also provide lighter porn work for a break for those travelling to EU from far Russia while they can still work for the same imperium.

All I am thinking about is dwelling more on the LP - DDF common owner situation in the booking dept.
Maybe OP is too fuelled by my Karina Grand LP turkey, thats all I concede. But extortion?! - Common!, seriousely!

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:26 pm
by VBT_2
I said what I think in pretty clear maner.

Not "shooting" on you, but I don't like that idea. Asking is one thing, but demand is completely other.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:37 pm
by VBT_2
I said what I think in pretty clear maner.

Not "shooting" on you, but I don't like that idea. Asking is one thing, but ultimatum-demand as request is completely other.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:23 am
by dap-addict
Giorgio Grandi wrote:LP doesnt keep any model "as exclusive to LP" (at least for my knowledge), so no one is stealing to LP.

I didnt mean it literally. ;)

Btw, and as already stated, a flexible approach is needed, but more booking coop for sure - as well as fairer Bp rates.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:38 am
by Boobsrealm.com644
LP bought DDf, so they are the same company. That is why the girls are featured on both sides. They are for different audiences

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:30 pm
by Kriss1986
Btw, and as already stated, a flexible approach is needed, but more booking coop for sure - as well as fairer Bp rates.


That was the main reason of this topic to pay attention for better cooperation between LP and DDF, that's all. Any improvments are welcome.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:27 pm
by dap-addict
Next testing point might be Angel Rivas.
;)

Its still all about money, but DDF has to function in the Budapest context of course. Prague is less spoiled, more real in terms of buying value of the money payed.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:57 pm
by magizi877
LP bought DDF?

I hope Gonzo borrows Misha Cross then. ;)
And occasionally do some gangbangs house of taboo style.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:09 pm
by lorpan188
Yes, its really weird for example see Linda Sweet in some pussy toy play when you a few hours ago saw her take 5 BBC.
I don't mind though, DDF is not really good but could be better.
The trend now seems to be Glamcore like Tushy that has Anal,DP, Rimming, ATM. All in real high produced scenes, the scenes have good angles extremely good closeups mixed with distance, the actors and the location.
But compared to Legalporno its like a kids show.
I think 21Sextury have something similar but they just take a Anal video, put a filter on it and slow it down 25%.
Have also seen more and more legalporno girls on other sites.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:54 pm
by rollin_dubs187
It drives me insane how you claim anything that is not DAP as vanilla porn. When in reality DAP slows everything down, and is far less intense. Just because its not DAP doesnt make it vanilla.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 11:00 am
by Iddaoeeok
Newsflash, it is possible to like LP AND vanilla porn. A bit of glamour is not a crime.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:37 pm
by dap-addict
Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course. :)
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.

With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:07 pm
by Kriss1986
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course. :)
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.

With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.


LP should stay focused on hard action, other way with vanilla stuff theh will become inexpressive site like many others...

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:11 am
by rollin_dubs187
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course. :)
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.

With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.


Um no vanilla porn means conventional/ordinary. DP is hardly conventional.

https://www(dot)kinkly(dot)com/definition/42/vanilla-sex

Re: DDF vanilla porn stealing LP models?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:11 am
by rollin_dubs187
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course. :)
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.

With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.


Um no vanilla porn means conventional/ordinary. DP is hardly conventional.

https://www(dot)kinkly(dot)com/definition/42/vanilla-sex