Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:18 amHe's in way too many scenes.
PornBox.com
Enough with Erik Everhard
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:18 amRe: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:05 pmI actually agree with this. Erik is not a bad performer, but I already see him in enough US porn without having to see him in so many scenes at LP too!
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:10 pmEven tho I find Everhard to be one of the more tolerable guys in porn these days I do have agree about him being in too many scenes. But then again, you could say exactly the same about Ian Scott, Tony Brooklyn and Mike Angelo (to name a few).
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 11:33 pmVawkes wrote:I actually agree with this. Erik is not a bad performer, but I already see him in enough US porn without having to see him in so many scenes at LP too!
+1
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:17 amKind of agree, but EE is exclusive as far as I know, the others hoover around a bit, thus we see him most.
No way round, only dump US porn watching and watch more LP than you see less EE!
No way round, only dump US porn watching and watch more LP than you see less EE!
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 12:00 pmdap-addict wrote:No way round, only dump US porn watching and watch more LP than you see less EE!
New EE releases have become a big no-no for me. Luckily I can easily spend almost all my tickets on GG and Sineplex releases these days, that's my way round.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:15 amAgreed, if I see Erik in a scene, I am more likely to pass unless the girl is in my top 5. Even then it sucks
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:28 amDisagree. Everhard is too vocal but he fucks hard, he's one of the better ones here.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 1:25 pmdangl wrote:Everhard is too vocal
Yes I confirm this, his:
Yes, yes, yes ohhhhhhh shit. Ohhh yeeeeeees ohhhhhhhh yeeeeeeees
are absolutely annoying and he is louder than the girls, isn't he?
Another no go is when he rubs the clit of the girl he fucks, this happens the most when he fucks the girl reverse cowgirl. So you see his stupid hands from this position, is this sexy? Most of the girls dislike it but this guy do it over and over again.
Other things I dislike are when he take off the girls with his eyes, he looks so fucking needy then or his face is always visible when he fucks.
Legalporno should pay him an one way ticket home to USA or pay him money so that he can go to a bordello and he isn't in need to make pornos to fuck young girls.
Please stop this "She is half my age" or "I was 18 thirty years ago" porn, it's disgusting for younger persons. Nobody wants to see women who make 20 years or longer porn but why we must see guys that make for so long porn?
My personal hall of fame of the most disgusting still active porn "talents":
1. Steve Holmes (age 55, started 1996)
2. Erik Everhard (age 40, started 1998)
3. John Strong (age 47,started 1998)
4. David Perry (age 46, started 1993)
5. Marco Banderas (age 49, started 2003)
6. Mark Wood (age 48, started 1998)
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:35 pmDon't forget Mike Chapman...58!
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:59 pm^ show us a photo of yourself and we´ll see if you´re driven by envy 
You agenda is ridiculous. You seem to have the same character as Lochte, that stuff the rest of the world loves so much about your country!
You agenda is ridiculous. You seem to have the same character as Lochte, that stuff the rest of the world loves so much about your country!
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 5:03 pm
stemcell wrote:^ show us a photo of yourself and we´ll see if you´re driven by envy
You agenda is ridiculous. You seem to have the same character as Lochte, that stuff the rest of the world loves so much about your country!
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:34 pmtwistedvincent wrote:Don't forget Mike Chapman...58!
I didn't know him yet, he is a new face for me and he looks younger. According to iafd (why is this a not allowed word?) he is since 1999 active but has shot only 76 movies. In contrast to the others on my list where each has 1500 - 2000+ movies. Erik Everhard has made 1797 movies without the scenes her from legalporno.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 10:19 pmstemcell wrote:^ show us a photo of yourself and we´ll see if you´re driven by envy
You agenda is ridiculous. You seem to have the same character as Lochte, that stuff the rest of the world loves so much about your country!
K, I get your point, but really what kind of loser/idiot would post a picture of himself on a porn forum? Also, in your attempt to regulate someone you also insulted over 320 million people, which kinda makes you sound like a total asshole - so much for character, eh? But hey, I'm not going to go as far as to insult everyone in whatever country you come from. Because really, how ridiculous would that be?
And the fact you quoted one person, but not the one above who made the same point about more performers makes it fairly clear that while you don't like someone for having an agenda, it's quite obvious that you have your own.
Getting back to the main discussion - I actually don't mind Everhard as a performer, but agree he's in WAY too many scenes. But really he's not the only one on this site, so I'm not sure why he's being singled out in this particular thread. Could say the exact same thing about Ian Scott, Mike Angelo or Vinny and several others. They're all just over-worked, but I don't know if it's their fault. No other porn site has this problem of underperforming/overworked male talent.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:14 pmstemcell wrote:^ show us a photo of yourself and we´ll see if you´re driven by envy
leroiosoleil83 wrote:but really what kind of loser/idiot would post a picture of himself on a porn forum?
I was almost that loser and was going to post a pic with my face cropped but you guys wouldn't believe it was me anyway so what's the point.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 2:18 amErik is cool , me i am tired of mike angelo's agressive behaviour
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2016 6:51 pmgannicus wrote:Erik is cool , me i am tired of mike angelo's agressive behaviour
Mike is not agressive in all scenes. In some scenes he did romantic things. To date the only ones I saw doing romantic things in more than one scene were Mike Angelo and Ian Scott.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:06 amgannicus wrote:Erik is cool , me i am tired of mike angelo's agressive behaviour
I agree with you regarding Mike Angelo. I get enough of that crap ruining scenes in US porn.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:48 amDamn... I thought I was the only one who thought the same thing about Erik!
He performed lot of DAP's to Diabolic in the past with John Strong.
He performed lot of DAP's to Diabolic in the past with John Strong.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:05 pmEE is a reliable pro and the women seem to have no problem working with him.
maybe as a viewer you should stop ruminating on cocks and instead look at female ass, pussy, face and tits. Thighs, bellies, curves, feet....
Cause dude, if all you're worried about is seeing the same cock, you're missing the bigger picture.
Or perhaps your cock fetish reveals you're not really concerned about the beautiful women at all.
maybe as a viewer you should stop ruminating on cocks and instead look at female ass, pussy, face and tits. Thighs, bellies, curves, feet....
Cause dude, if all you're worried about is seeing the same cock, you're missing the bigger picture.
Or perhaps your cock fetish reveals you're not really concerned about the beautiful women at all.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:38 pmYou've been here what, less than a day... lol
At least Juelz is a favorite of yours but EE is fucking awful, especially when he's in what seems like every scene @ LP
At least Juelz is a favorite of yours but EE is fucking awful, especially when he's in what seems like every scene @ LP
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:24 pmMizar5 wrote:EE is a reliable pro and the women seem to have no problem working with him.
Ask Linda Sweet if she has enjoyed working with him and if Everhard is the reason why she doesn't want to work anymore for LP. In my eyes Everhard is a completely loser, moved to a country which language he doesn't speak, because this mature gringo wants to fuck young girls and has no money for a bordello. You can give Everhard a mask or even a burqa but that would still change nothing, you would identify Everhard on the basis of his pink dick or his stupid speech.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:52 pmErik and other "old" preformers proves that you don`t need to be young and beautiful to fuck young and beautiful girls. That is cool to me.
They also got experience. I would rather watch an old guy then a prettyboy also cuz i`m not gay...
They also got experience. I would rather watch an old guy then a prettyboy also cuz i`m not gay...
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:08 pmBrurek wrote:Mizar5 wrote:EE is a reliable pro and the women seem to have no problem working with him.
Ask Linda Sweet if she has enjoyed working with him and if Everhard is the reason why she doesn't want to work anymore for LP. In my eyes Everhard is a completely loser, moved to a country which language he doesn't speak, because this mature gringo wants to fuck young girls and has no money for a bordello. You can give Everhard a mask or even a burqa but that would still change nothing, you would identify Everhard on the basis of his pink dick or his stupid speech.
You are spreading wrong rumours about Linda and EE. That says all about you
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:15 pmFor me porn is about the naked female form and that's what excites me the most but if a guy is handsome, or if he is cute, or has a nice cock or a tight pert ass then its a bonus. The most important credential in a porn 'stud' for me however is their technique. Being able to sustain a hard rhythmic motion is what gets me off and if I was being fucked on screen, that's the sort of performer who would excite me. Age is irrelevant providing they know how to have sex well. I have been watching Erik for over ten years ago and to his credit I think he technically good and can deliver sustained thrusts. He is pretty handsome also so thats a bit of a bonus.
In essence he does a good job I think. There are far worse and far less attractive male performers on here x
In essence he does a good job I think. There are far worse and far less attractive male performers on here
xRe: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:38 amThe fucking point is that there's HAS GOT TO BE more fucking performers out there then the same used up idiots over and over and over and over.....
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 8:18 amExcesses are bad. Erik Everhard is a good actor, but his dick is not so great and the color of skin of a your cock specific region it does not please me. Even for a young person, it's hard to participate so many times and still will maintain the quality and level of horniness. Imagine for a guy who is 40 age. Another thing, he wants to be always in control and do not remember him allowed the actress riding.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:04 amstemcell wrote:You are spreading wrong rumours about Linda and EE. That says all about you
Wrong rumours? How do you know that?
The fact is that the last two scenes of her were with Erik Everhard and right there you can see at several points how she disgusts it to be fucked by this crappy guy. This fits in with what she wrote on Twitter:
@DAPaddicted i don't think that I want come back. Now is LP completely change and I don't like it. Isn't like few years ago. I'm sorry
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:17 pmfunny stuff.
i don't pretend to know about EE and Linda what's her name. I didn't mean to offend. My point was that I watch porn for the females, but that's just me.
Although I do have to say, wouldn't it be cool if the babes we watch were boned by a different guy(s) every single scene. No repeats. A new and different guy each time.
That might give wankers hope that she might eventually make her way down the list to them. I think it'd be a great marketing strategy.
I first thought of it for Anikka Albrite. Assfucked by a different guy every time. Cause who wouldn't want to leave their mark on her starfish?
i don't pretend to know about EE and Linda what's her name. I didn't mean to offend. My point was that I watch porn for the females, but that's just me.
Although I do have to say, wouldn't it be cool if the babes we watch were boned by a different guy(s) every single scene. No repeats. A new and different guy each time.
That might give wankers hope that she might eventually make her way down the list to them. I think it'd be a great marketing strategy.
I first thought of it for Anikka Albrite. Assfucked by a different guy every time. Cause who wouldn't want to leave their mark on her starfish?
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:17 pmBrurek wrote:stemcell wrote:You are spreading wrong rumours about Linda and EE. That says all about you
Wrong rumours? How do you know that?
The fact is that the last two scenes of her were with Erik Everhard and right there you can see at several points how she disgusts it to be fucked by this crappy guy. This fits in with what she wrote on Twitter:@DAPaddicted i don't think that I want come back. Now is LP completely change and I don't like it. Isn't like few years ago. I'm sorry
Not very convincing, try again.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:37 pmI actually like Erik. For well over a decade now I've been seeing him in porn and I don't believe I've ever seen him under-perform in any of the many hundreds of scenes I've seen him in and, more importantly, I don't believe I've ever seen him act cuntish towards any of the women I've seen him fuck on screen. I'm a fan of rough sex and gangbangs, but I'm very much against anything that I feel steps into true violent territory.
Also, I think he'd be a pretty cool guy to hang out with in person.
Also, I think he'd be a pretty cool guy to hang out with in person.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 4:36 pmIddaoeeok wrote:Not very convincing, try again.
Haha, if you want more all you need is to show these scenes. Everyone should able to see what I'm saying, if you look at the expression on the face of Linda.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 12:32 amBrurek wrote:dangl wrote:Everhard is too vocal
Yes I confirm this, his:Yes, yes, yes ohhhhhhh shit. Ohhh yeeeeeees ohhhhhhhh yeeeeeeees
are absolutely annoying and he is louder than the girls, isn't he?
Another no go is when he rubs the clit of the girl he fucks, this happens the most when he fucks the girl reverse cowgirl. So you see his stupid hands from this position, is this sexy? Most of the girls dislike it but this guy do it over and over again.
Other things I dislike are when he take off the girls with his eyes, he looks so fucking needy then or his face is always visible when he fucks.
Legalporno should pay him an one way ticket home to USA or pay him money so that he can go to a bordello and he isn't in need to make pornos to fuck young girls.
Please stop this "She is half my age" or "I was 18 thirty years ago" porn, it's disgusting for younger persons. Nobody wants to see women who make 20 years or longer porn but why we must see guys that make for so long porn?
My personal hall of fame of the most disgusting still active porn "talents":
1. Steve Holmes (age 55, started 1996)
2. Erik Everhard (age 40, started 1998)
3. John Strong (age 47,started 1998)
4. David Perry (age 46, started 1993)
5. Marco Banderas (age 49, started 2003)
6. Mark Wood (age 48, started 1998)
Funny. I cant stand these guys anymore either. EE is at least still tolerable though.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 3:42 pmErik for me is what one of the best actor, he know how to fuck, he has a nice cock, he has charisma.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:34 pm^ The dick of Everhard is small for standard LP.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:32 amtiktak16977 wrote:He's in way too many scenes.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:56 pmWish I wouldn't see him in every second scene!!!! 
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:25 pmI don't agree with that at all.
I think Erik is one of the best male models on this site, he's good at giving hard poundings, fucking the girls in any positions, never any wood problem.
I think it's good that he is so many scenes, I like Chris Diamond and Bo Sinn very hung and they are very energetic so it would be cool to see them more often.
Some male models have passed their expiration date, Mike Angelo, Franco Roccaforte, Ed Junior. I think that Mike especially is overused, he's too loud, not that hung and he always want to sit down on the girls' face to get rimmed (which isn't a pretty sight) Nothing wrong with Ian Scott, but I think he's overused he has a terrible body, too hairy his bush covers the girls face when they are giving him blowjobs that isn't either a pretty sight.
Bring in some younger really hung "duracell rabbits" that can bring new energy to the scenes, and retire some of the old men..
I think Erik is one of the best male models on this site, he's good at giving hard poundings, fucking the girls in any positions, never any wood problem.
I think it's good that he is so many scenes, I like Chris Diamond and Bo Sinn very hung and they are very energetic so it would be cool to see them more often.
Some male models have passed their expiration date, Mike Angelo, Franco Roccaforte, Ed Junior. I think that Mike especially is overused, he's too loud, not that hung and he always want to sit down on the girls' face to get rimmed (which isn't a pretty sight) Nothing wrong with Ian Scott, but I think he's overused he has a terrible body, too hairy his bush covers the girls face when they are giving him blowjobs that isn't either a pretty sight.
Bring in some younger really hung "duracell rabbits" that can bring new energy to the scenes, and retire some of the old men..
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:11 pmevery porn guy has his haters, especially when they are around a LONG time.
It is very hard to get guys who can perform on camera, on command, under all those conditions. So, they just call the same guys over and over.
I like Erik, most female porn viewers like him too. Yes, he has been around for a long time and probably has done over 3000 scenes. It is fun to see fresh talent but that is not always so easy
The girls also like him for the most part too.
It is very hard to get guys who can perform on camera, on command, under all those conditions. So, they just call the same guys over and over.
I like Erik, most female porn viewers like him too. Yes, he has been around for a long time and probably has done over 3000 scenes. It is fun to see fresh talent but that is not always so easy
The girls also like him for the most part too.
Re: Enough with Erik Everhard
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 1:24 pmgeralt_ wrote:I think that Mike especially is overused, he's too loud, not that hung and he always want to sit down on the girls' face to get rimmed (which isn't a pretty sight) Nothing wrong with Ian Scott, but I think he's overused he has a terrible body, too hairy his bush covers the girls face when they are giving him blowjobs that isn't either a pretty sight.
I noticed that too. I would be glad to get rid of Mike and his antics, too.