Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

[zeusanalfreak299]

I was wondering why the studios (Sineplex, Gonzo and Giorgio Grandi) don't share their pornstars? There are a few exceptions, but there are still a lot of great bestseller-pornstars who work for only one studio.

What is there against it?

I ask because I think there are not any logical basis. Sharing pornstars more often can bring synergy effects for all studios. The more movies pornstars have, the more fans fall in love with them. In the end they buy instantly almost all movies from different studios. Also, there would be more diversity when pornstars work with different guys, different locations and different styles.

What do you think about it? Do anybody have a clear and objektive answer?

[laura.]

I agree with you but not sure what the answer is? Maybe contractural obligations? I am trying to think which stars have appeared across all 3 sites, Arwen has for sure, Dominica also? x

[zeusanalfreak299]

Laura, these beauties are perfect examples for "how it shoud be".

Sure, its all about money, but I dont think one studio make a loss when a girl shot some scenes with another studio, to earn money, stay active and get more fame. Because, back to the "first" studio she would bring more/new fans with her.

Also, there are not studios with pornstars who work 24/7 for them like a machine in a factory. Free capacities should be used efficiently to bring the maximum profit for all parties - studios and pornstars. Its a very simple economical fact.

[laura.]

I certainly agree on the fame and money aspect. Having the opportunity to work as much as possible to earn a decent crust from the industry has to be paramount in my eyes and by doing this we are killing more than one bird; the girls get more opportunities, the studio more revenue due to the increased popularity through repeat exposure, and of course we as the fan get more opportunities to watch the girls we love. Its a no brainer for me. But i think that sadly politics dictate too much in this industry x

[zeusanalfreak299]

Its a no brainer for me. But i think that sadly politics dictate too much in this industry x

Yes, and I am wondering why actors in this million business don't manage these issues more professional?! All Studios work for LP, they profit from each other.

[laura.]

I think Russia not being in the EU has an influence also, and they never will be in the EU, so it will always mean the red tape of having to obtain visas which probably is why we don't get as many Sine girls coming to Prague, although of course there are exceptions. I guess I don't know the full ins and outs of it. Certainly no reason why Gonzo and GG can't interchange performers more frequently and I expect the working relationship between Jana and Tarra is a positive one to allow this to happen freely. x

[Ass2Die4464]

+1, for model sharing between LP Studios! Fans win with this arrangement.

[GG_Zealot]

Yes! I agree too.

I hope they will share the girls with other LP studios, If there is no reason not to do so.

It will be good for both the girls and LP studios like zeusanalfreak299 said.

[dpconnoisseur1]

I want to resurrect this thread because more and more we are seeing what looks like exclusive models at LP Studios. The only studio that seems to share models is Interracial Vision which is a studio I very rarely buy scenes from. I know when customers start to complain that the content is not what they like the easy comeback is that you only buy scenes that you want at LP so what is the problem. Well the problem with that easy retort is that although theoretically true what if you buy scenes based on an ordered selection process ? For instance for me a purchase of a scene is made based on these requirements:

• I find the model attractive
• The model is performing fetishes I like

Following these requirements there is a short list of models that I would love to see shoot by my favorite director Luis but either

• Luis has no interest in them (I refuse to believe it is true)
• The models don't want to shoot for Luis (it doesn't make any sense why they wouldn't want to make more money)
• The models are held to an exclusive LP studio contracted deal or are blacklisted if they shoot for another LP studio

The reason I bring this up is there are currently 5 models that I want to see shoot for LP Gonzo (Luis) but instead they shoot the same basic scene for Giorgio over and over again.

• Nicole Black (25 of 25 scenes for Giorgio)
• Jolee Love (12 of 12 scenes for Giorgio)
• Natalie Cherie (18 total scenes, 10 scenes since her return to hardcore, all 10 new scenes to Giorigo)
• Avi Love (9 of 9 scenes for Giorgio)
• Barbie Sins (7 of 8 scenes for Giorigo)
• Lauren Phillips (5 of 5 scenes for Giorgio)
• Monika Wild (35 of 39 scenes for Giorgio)

[shark1]

^ Yep, I purchase IV scenes as well that are not DAP only. I love interracial DP where she actually gets fucked, but hate softcore tip fucking DAP!

[mvsklo]

Haha, I really thought LP was one studio and the other names (Sineplex etc) were only differences in style.

[dpconnoisseur1]

To: shark1 & bake0213
I don't buy IV scenes for one reason and one reason only the repetitive TIP FUCKING they shoot. I just can't understand how they could shoot this scene (https://www.legalporno.com/watch/32860/ ... nterracial) then release all these tip fucking scenes! By the way I love interracial scenes but because of the shooting styles of the studios can only support:

Gonzo & American Anal: Yes
IV: No because of the TIP FUCKING
Giorgio: No because of the constant DAP focus. Even when the scene has DP it is only about 5 minutes of 60 minutes scene.

[dap-addict]

The reason I bring this up is there are currently 5 models that I want to see shoot for LP Gonzo (Luis) but instead they shoot the same basic scene for Giorgio over and over again.
[list]

Thanks for re-activating, dpc!
I wanted to do the same among from the other side, missing gonzo girls at GIO.
First there is sort of a gentlemen agreement of Luis and Giorgio not to shoot the same girls. Giorgio has explained that swh. If I remember right it was LP owners wish. Only girls very regular with one of the studios were shot a few times for the other studio. Kristy Black is an example, or Anna Rey for the other side.
Recently however this seems to have turned into some kind of aversity almost like exclusivity contracts. Several gonzo girls have started they would never shoot for GIO. Never!
Not the other way round as far as I am aware.
All in all its a strange policy sure neither benefitting fans nor girls.

[magizi877]

I would love to see Ciara Riviera working for Luis and his monster cock team.
You know, petite model from France + monster cocks = instant success, IMO.
it could be an all time best seller if the performance it's awesome, hardcore balls deep action.

Neyla Smalls it's a collection of best seller scenes waiting to happen. (Also uber cute and tiny)
If she can get used to working with Gonzo guys, long term, it could be a new Timea/Lita IMO.
Her first two scenes are pretty chilled in the performance and still managed to capture a lot of fans.

Also, Nicole Black for Luis would be great, I would love to see how she develops in a full on DP scene.
Plus, we would get high-res pictures of her awesome face and body.
I don't understand how Giorgio has managed to shoot her in so many films and not taken a single picture.

I don't want to ask for too many imports because I think Gonzo recruited a bunch of newbies
who are super interesting to me. I want to see those careers develop long term, like Blanche, Linda, Timea, etc. before them.

[error01x]

IR and Gonzo share Nataly why not GIO?

[blublubeacha]

mia Linz gio DAP needs to happen asap

[dpconnoisseur1]

If I had to limit myself to one model to share it would be impossible as I can narrow my selection to only two:

Nicole Black (she needs a full set of HD pics and many DP focus scenes like Luis and American Anal shoot well.)

Natalie Cherie (She needs her pussy fucked in DP and TP! No matter how much Giorgio tried to get her to say she loved anal only she kept insisting she likes getting her pussy fucked too)

[dpconnoisseur1]

First there is sort of a gentlemen agreement of Luis and Giorgio not to shoot the same girls. Giorgio has explained that swh. If I remember right it was LP owners wish. Only girls very regular with one of the studios were shot a few times for the other studio. Kristy Black is an example, or Anna Rey for the other side.

I don't think that is the case of LP ownership, because I remember the controversy with Sineplex and how the complaint was that they kept their talented models exclusive. That is why it was such a big deal when Sofi Goldfinger started shooting with Giorgio and Gonzo and later brought her friend Arwen too.

Recently however this seems to have turned into some kind of aversity almost like exclusivity contracts. Several gonzo girls have started they would never shoot for GIO. Never!
Not the other way round as far as I am aware.

I believe that those statements are based on the requirement of DAP focused scenes at Giorgio studios. Giorgio scene content seems to be 95 to 100% focused on anal/DAP and maybe the models making those statements don't want to go through these silly endurance challenges. Anyway I thought the only models that made that statements was Legends Linda Sweet and Gina Gerson (Where is Gina ?).

All in all its a strange policy sure neither benefitting fans nor girls.

Yeah, if there is such a policy it is the most stupid thing I have ever heard. Why force models to have to go outside an LP Studio when there are plenty of studio that can shoot the content they want to shoot and quench the appetite of the diverse LP membership. It always pissed me off to see Crystal Greenvelle get her pussy fucked in an outside LP Studio when she refused to do it at LP. We know Giorgio only likes shooting anal/DAP/TAP so when Giorgio finds some great models like Nicole Black, Natalie Cherie(the new hardcore version) and Jolee Love the rest of LP fanbase would not get to see her shoot other types of fetishes like Pussy/DP/DVP/TP/TVP.

[SimplyStunning]

+1, Agree! As long as the girl wants to shoot for the other studios they should be encourage to shoot with all directors. This is the easiest way to offer them more scenes without one director incurring all the risk of bringing a new talent to LegalPorno. Also the members get to benefit from seeing these women shoot with their favorite directors. It is a win win for all.

[Giorgio Grandi]

Imho, Sineplex did not want their talent to work elsewhere because they did not want the models to discover how much we pay for a scene in Czech Republic. If you consider that the first payout of Arwen in Prague was almost 3 time higher than her last payout in Russia, you understand it was just a matter of time for them to leave Sinplex. Said that, to work only in Russia and only for Sinplex limitated the incoming. Arwen did in 2 weeks in Prague the double of what she did in russia since the beginning of her career
There are probably other reason, though.

-

There are few girls that prefer do not perform for me, specially in Czech Republic, I did pretty good even without them and it doesnt bother me

-

Its not true that a model would gain more money performing for all the studios, she would gain less. LP will not publish the same model until 14 days (in average at at least) are passed after her previous release. So, if she works for only one studio is more easy to keep more frequent updates with the same model because the "studio release program" doesnt go never in conflict with the program of other studios.

-

Who say that a model that makes good sales with the studio "A" would also make good sales with the studio "B"? In fact my experience tells me its the other way around. See Monika for example and Selvaggia. In effect I consider completely useless to schedule a scene with a model that does good with another studio, what its interesting is to find a another model that can compete with the previous one.

-

Personal note about "Gonzo": I rarely comment content of other directors/studio, but in this case I am going to do it (so you may understand the point). Recentely Luis (and his team of actors) with Petra shot very interesting content. Good selection of girls, good action, nice "visual impact" of the content (colors of the location, outfits of the model etc) and a good way to schedule the updates. Its a huge improvement and imho we (other studios) should let him continue with his own way (mean also do not force shooting with the girls he is releasing now as it will fuckup their program) but eventually to shoot only models where sales are not great.
I make you a dam example: Florare Russels has 4 scenes from gonzo, all with great sales. 3 scenes DO NOT HAVE DOUBLE ANAL but sales are still high, so what the reason to shoot a scene with her if she does good even with DP for another studio?
None.

-

A short last point: recruiting.
Share models is the more easy way to make money for a studio, but the hardest way for LP to grow. On the other way around, when every studio focus on "take the risk and try new girls", LP will have more variety of girls, so attack a larger audience and generate more new members (that will spead more money).

-

Monster cocks, because Im a bit annoied of this: on LP there are not actors with monster cocks, fyi Julio Gomez is a "small" monstercocks.

[Iddaoeeok]

Great post, Giorgio... as always!

[blublubeacha]

Great post, Giorgio... as always!

fanboy .

[dpconnoisseur1]

I have a couple of rebuttals to some of your comments which I do appreciate you getting involved and with members and answering questions or correcting misstatements:

Imho, Sineplex did not want their talent to work elsewhere because they did not want the models to discover how much we pay for a scene in Czech Republic. If you consider that the first payout of Arwen in Prague was almost 3 time higher than her last payout in Russia, you understand it was just a matter of time for them to leave Sinplex.

1st I'm glad Arwen made more money it doesn't matter where to me. Arwen is an incredible talent and deserved every penny she earned. My issue I have as a fan though is, do you think it matters to me the reason I don't get to see the model i prefer do the fetishes I prefer? No I don't! So if the reason is:

(1) because Sineplex does it want them to find out how much more money they could really make
(2) some 14-day LP policy
(3) directors trying to horde models like PW

has the same effect on me makine me an unsatisfied pissed customer.

There are few girls that prefer do not perform for me, specially in Czech Republic, I did pretty good even without them and it doesnt bother me

Nothing I can add to statement other than the few I have read saying that are models that don't want to do Anal/DAP only scenes which frankly stated is the main focus of your studio comprising of 95% minimum of the content you release. As an example I give you Gina Gerson.

Its not true that a model would gain more money performing for all the studios, she would gain less. LP will not publish the same model until 14 days (in average at at least) are passed after her previous release. So, if she works for only one studio is more easy to keep more frequent updates with the same model because the "studio release program" doesnt go never in conflict with the program of other studios.

I can't dispute the 14 day same model rule and I know you have no reason to lie about it, so I accept it. The issue I have though is the statement that they won't make more money. It is simple math isn't it, if for example:
(1) Avi Love comes to work in Prague for Girogio and shoots 3 scenes at $4,000 a scene she leaves making $12,000
BUT
(2) Avi Love comes to work in Prague for Giorgio and shoots 3 scenes at $4,000 and shoots 3 scenes for Luis 1 x $4,000 and 2 x $3,000 she leave making $22,000
which is almost double what she would have made in the same possible time frame. So I don't understand how the models wouldn't make more money. It just doesn't make sense to me or I'm misunderstanding your point.

Who say that a model that makes good sales with the studio "A" would also make good sales with the studio "B"? In fact my experience tells me its the other way around. See Monika for example and Selvaggia.

I'm only going to focus on Monika because Selvaggia is not my type. As you can tell her best selling scenes are with Interracial Studio which shot her only 3 times and Giorgio shot her 36 times with mix results some good and some bad. The one I'm going to concentrate on is the Gonzo scene which is not her worst finishing in 33 out of 40 scenes. The reason I think it bombed is because for some reason Luis tried to mimic a Giorgio scene instead of doing his own greatness. The scene was pretty much Monika pissing and prolapsing all over herself plus sh did only 3 minutes of DP in a 42 minute scene. I was so angry Instant Buying this scene. If I wanted to see this Giorgio like content I would have just bought one of the many scenes of Monika scenes I have skipped of Giorgio.

I make you a dam example: Florare Russels has 4 scenes from gonzo, all with great sales. 3 scenes DO NOT HAVE DOUBLE ANAL but sales are still high, so what the reason to shoot a scene with her if she does good even with DP for another studio?
None.

The reason to shoot it is because many of your fans want to see how she performs under your direction. If all the studios shot the same exact content I would agree it makes no sense but all the studios offer something different.
IV offers all Interracial content with nothing but TIP FUCKING for members that like that
Giorgio offers primarily (95%) 0% Pussy scenes
AA offers inspiring tunnel vision angles with focus on intense DP
Gonzo offers No Holes Barred scenes with equal treatment to DP, DA and sometimes DV

A short last point: recruiting.
Share models is the more easy way to make money for a studio, but the hardest way for LP to grow. On the other way around, when every studio focus on "take the risk and try new girls", LP will have more variety of girls, so attack a larger audience and generate more new members (that will spead more money).

I understand your point but what I'm suggesting is not for studios to stop taking risk but mitigate their risk by sharing the model. So instead of one studio taking a hit on attracting a gorgeous model like Lilu Moon to LP all the studio that wanted to shoot her could make her a combined better offer. So no one takes a huge hit on whether the LP members love her or hate her.

Anyway that is my two cents opinion

[Giorgio Grandi]

DPcon, Im not going to further argue with you about this, but your point is wrong.
3 - if a model get 6 scenes now, she will get other six in 3 months. If she gets 3 she will get other 3 in 45 days. Also, a model cant perform properly 6 LPs scenes in row. Believe me is like I say.

4 - Even my grandma paired with Veronica would sell. Also, I tell every time that Monika is like parsley: she makes every other taste (girls) better. I rarely shoot her alone as she doesnt sell properly.

5 - I dont shoot content for the members I shoot content for LP, I try to do the interest of LP (which I believe is also my interest and the interest of LP)

6 - You can take anytime a hit for hundreds (even thousands) of dollars if you release a girl that doesnt sell of if the scene doesnt sell because its not as it should. your point is that we should combine a larger offer for a model assuming she will sell, instead the way to do is eventually overpay the model for have 1 scene (if the model is hesitant) and test the market. Would you shoot 5-6 scenes with a model without to know what the audience (on LP) think about her?
Said that, if a model doesnt want to work for LP, money wont change her point of view, money talk only would probably make it even worse.

[dpconnoisseur1]

^Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to interact Giorgio. I found some of your points very informative to me.

[Giorgio Grandi]

I try to interact any time a post make sense or when someone assumes something not correct. Its not my intention to bust people because they write something not correct, but just clarify the points in the way the user are able to understand our choices and the industry in general (and how the "LP industry" works as the LP system is really unique).

I would like for example to replay to another post I briefly read in the weekend (a user telling smt like we should shoot better content and increase the price), but today I really did not have time, I will try to do it tomorrow.

^Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to interact Giorgio. I found some of your points very informative to me.

[Sir Noel]

I get what Giorgio is saying, from a business perspective, but still two points.

1) It is still hard to take. Different studios have different styles. AA produce very vigorous scenes with the very best lighting; Giogio produces super classy looking scenes that contrast with the very hard action to produce a sort of super hard glamcore; Luis (recently, he seems to have gotten his shot together) has some well hung guys who showcase great single anal and DP.
It is natural to want to see the models in these different studios because It gives us variety. It raises the excitement. Provides anticipation.
2) +1 for Giorgio's grandma in a scene! (probably best filmed by Luis..... otherwise too weird even for me)

[magizi877]

SOOOOOOOOOOOO

I guess that means Giorgio is not sharing Nicole Black with Luis.

BUMMER!



At this point I have 10 Nicole Black scenes. ALL her solo scenes.

AND NOT A SINGLE PICTURE

I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW GIORGIO GRANDI HAS NOT RELEASED PICTURES OF THE PRETTIEST MODEL under his studio.

[Iddaoeeok]

Great post, Giorgio... as always!

fanboy .

I'm not actually much of a fan of Giorgio's work, surprisingly, but I appreciate that he takes the time to show up here and interact.

[blublubeacha]

I appreciate too. The fanboy comment was only a joke anyway

[Giorgio Grandi]

I think all following scenes with Nicole will have already pictures..

[9lovinlon]

Great post, Giorgio... as always!

fanboy .

Haha, maybe. But it’s a detailed answer that provides some context. Unlike most of the usual hot air around here :-)

[kidloco2]

I'd definitely say there more girls that made better, more intensive anal hardcore scenes with Giorgio after shooting previously for Gonzo (Bree Haze, Amina Danger, Arwen, Katie Gold and many more).

Selvaggia & Monica are the best examples that moving from Giorgio to other studios might not be the best decision.

[dpconnoisseur1]

Jolee Love is a Must Shoot for Gonzo so fans can enjoy all her holes fucked by Monster Cocks

[dpconnoisseur1]

I wanted to reopen this discussion here because of the Florane news that she is shooting for Giorgio. I know Giorgio said he doesn't like shooting popular models at other studios but he has now shot Kristy Black (24 Gonzo scenes), Holly Hendrix (8 Gonzo scenes) and Florane Russell (8 Gonzo scenes) which are extremely popular models in Gonzo studio. I don't really care that these models are shooting for Giorgio because Giorgio and Luis shoot totally different content on LP. For example I have really enjoyed Kristy Black Waka Waka scenes and I hope Florane shoot at least one Waka Waka scene for Giorgio. This type of content isn't available at Gonzo so they are Instant Buys for me even though they will be most likely Anal Only scenes that I dislike watching. It seems that Giorgio Anal only fan base has demanded the above models and here they are finally shooting for Giorgio.

The complain I have is that there also many No Holes Barred customers that support Gonzo and want to see some of Giorgio popular models but they still remain exclusive to Giorgio only. Like I said in a previous post I just can't believe that:

Gonzo does not want to shoot them
and/or
The models don't want to shoot for Gonzo

I can only speak for myself but I have heard other members also wish to see these below modes shoot with Gonzo:

• Nicole Black (31 exclusive scenes to Giorgio)
• Natalie Cherie (12 exclusive scenes to Giorgio), she has shot with Gonzo before but not this wilder version of Natalie with the beautiful breast enhancement willing to try all LP fetishes! In one of the BTS footage she even tries to tell Giorgio she enjoys her pussy being fucked while he is trying to get her to say she prefers anal more but she stands strong that she likes them both! Natalie would be a perfect candidate for No Holes Barred scenes.
• Jolee Love (15 exclusive scenes to GIorgio)
• Barbie Sins (12 exclusive scenes to Giorgio)

Is unimaginable to me that Gonzo does not want to shoot these talented beauties so I continue to think the models named above have signed some exclusivity agreement with Giorgio studio. I'm just a fan though so what do I know.

Please Nicole Black, Natalie Cherie, Jolee Love and Barbie Sins shoot for Gonzo so that they can finally meet Luis Monster Cock Team in No Holes Barred scenes with TP

[Ultra-Gape]

1) Different studios have different styles. AA produce very vigorous scenes with the very best lighting; Giogio produces super classy looking scenes that contrast with the very hard action to produce a sort of super hard glamcore; Luis (recently, he seems to have gotten his shot together) has some well hung guys who showcase great single anal and DP.

For me I wonder if this hints at not only why many would like more model sharing but also at how more money/interest could be generated without model sharing. That is, for one studio to shoot a video that is a little more like that of another in either style or content, for those models that otherwise wouldn't appear in such scenes.

For myself I'd be interested is seeing some of the models currently apparently GG exclusive in scenes without DAP/TAP/DVP for example, but still all other elements of what makes the best scenes intense/hard. I know from forum comments that I'm not the only one who just doesn't particularly like seeing guys rubbing their cocks together, but otherwise still very much enjoys Giorgio's scenes. Others I know would have opposite thoughts of wanting to see models currently only on Gonzo to have more DAP etc.

I realise of course that such thinking may well have already been explored and discounted for various reasons!

[Giorgio Grandi]

Did you ever consider that a model doesnt want to shoot for multiple studio? (Case of Nicole that doesnt even want to perform for other production external to LP) and somehow Nathalie Cherie.
Jolee and Barbie are planned with Gonzo, but it takes time.

Also you need also to consider that Gonzo sells a membership from some month, this makes a scene available for 1/4 or even 1/5 of the normal price and no one really understand yet if to share a model is an advantage (because she gets more audience) or counterproductive (because make available a similar content that cost a small part of what would cost if released from another studio).
I had this thought just today morning, and this is going to make me even less willing to shoot models that performed many successful scenes for gonzo.

Also, remember that sales from Gonzo are directly and immediately influenced from users that own a membership. Even is membership are a minority, the rank of the scene would be different is the membership plan would not be available.

To find good models, with the absolute disinterestedness of agency to make scouting of fresh talents, bring obviously to exploit the new model as more as possible before to share it.
Overall, with Gonzo having a membership plan, maybe the competition between studio will increase more and everyone will have to dig new talents even more than before, for LP audience is probably something positive (also for sales in general). We will see.

I wanted to reopen this discussion here because of the Florane news that she is shooting for Giorgio. I know Giorgio said he doesn't like shooting popular models at other studios but he has now shot Kristy Black (24 Gonzo scenes), Holly Hendrix (8 Gonzo scenes) and Florane Russell (8 Gonzo scenes) which are extremely popular models in Gonzo studio. I don't really care that these models are shooting for Giorgio because Giorgio and Luis shoot totally different content on LP. For example I have really enjoyed Kristy Black Waka Waka scenes and I hope Florane shoot at least one Waka Waka scene for Giorgio. This type of content isn't available at Gonzo so they are Instant Buys for me even though they will be most likely Anal Only scenes that I dislike watching. It seems that Giorgio Anal only fan base has demanded the above models and here they are finally shooting for Giorgio.

The complain I have is that there also many No Holes Barred customers that support Gonzo and want to see some of Giorgio popular models but they still remain exclusive to Giorgio only. Like I said in a previous post I just can't believe that:

Gonzo does not want to shoot them
and/or
The models don't want to shoot for Gonzo

I can only speak for myself but I have heard other members also wish to see these below modes shoot with Gonzo:

• Nicole Black (31 exclusive scenes to Giorgio)
• Natalie Cherie (12 exclusive scenes to Giorgio), she has shot with Gonzo before but not this wilder version of Natalie with the beautiful breast enhancement willing to try all LP fetishes! In one of the BTS footage she even tries to tell Giorgio she enjoys her pussy being fucked while he is trying to get her to say she prefers anal more but she stands strong that she likes them both! Natalie would be a perfect candidate for No Holes Barred scenes.
• Jolee Love (15 exclusive scenes to GIorgio)
• Barbie Sins (12 exclusive scenes to Giorgio)

Is unimaginable to me that Gonzo does not want to shoot these talented beauties so I continue to think the models named above have signed some exclusivity agreement with Giorgio studio. I'm just a fan though so what do I know.

Please Nicole Black, Natalie Cherie, Jolee Love and Barbie Sins shoot for Gonzo so that they can finally meet Luis Monster Cock Team in No Holes Barred scenes with TP

[magizi877]

Florane Russell at Giorgio is gonna be super interesting to me.

IMO she is one of the models who most quickly adapted to the 'performance' of the Gonzo male actors.

I'm gonna do direct comparisons.

[powerful76]

-

Monster cocks, because Im a bit annoied of this: on LP there are not actors with monster cocks, fyi Julio Gomez is a "small" monstercocks.

holy hell gio!!!
i only read this now!!!
of course that i only watch this guys by screen, so, is a totally different perspective but, from what i see in tv, julio gomez had the biggest cock i ever seen ( volume wise ).
the biggests cocks i think i saw in porn are julio gomez, dredd, rasputin, shane diesel, jack napier, mandingo and shorty mac.
but you tell me that julio has a small monster cock? damn!!!
who are the really huge ones?
we call the guys of gonzo the monstercock team because it seems that from what we have in the moment in porn, they look way above average (again, volume - combination girth + lenght ).
chris diamond and charlie mac looks impressive from todays standards and luca ferrero, alberto, potro, clay, nacho looks very nice girth wise for todays standard.

[Ultra-Gape]

are the studios (GONZO,GG,IV) in the same building ?

Based on what I've read on this forum, no.