PornBox.com

Hi,

we need your help once again. Quality and FPS is being tested on these videos.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ttwekxmr258b7nb/1098_0-60_1080p_1.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l97rew8wk46txzg/1098_0-60_1080p_2.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uqt21zie1788n68/1098_0-60_1080p_3.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/npggese0mesalvh/1098_0-60_1080p_4.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dte0x937owafo9h/1098_0-60_1080p_5.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/61ua966g8hx82be/1098_0-60_1080p_6.mp4?dl=1

While the picture does looked good when zoomed close to the girl, unfortunately after camera zooms out with all that white light bouncing off the couch, wall and painting, hides detail and its makes it hard for me to see any difference in the videos.

Also hard to judge framerate when no fast motion.

Kapoun:

Public shouldn't judge technical quality of the codec, it should be determined by the intended use of the video, targeted bandwidth and so on.
LP should really invest into some multiscreen streaming facility / CDN and you shouldn't care about these anymore.

I agree, that in order to improve subjective quality of the movie you should focuse more on the production part of the workflow. Work better
with the light, contrast, depth of field, camera point of view to mention a few.

Back to the question, throw in 1080p@50 at 15Mbps High Profile (assuming you are using state of the art professional sw codec pack) and you're always good to go.

Edit: Reading about the average internet connection speed in USA, maybe a drop to 10-12Mbps would be better.
Edit 2: I see codec parameters are all the same, only target bitrate differs, did you try to tweak them as well (some tuning maybe will help
with skin uniformity and detail)?

Option 2 is the best

4,5,6 have framerate issues