Page 1 of 1
The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:17 am
by teschio
Sorry, but I write this post because i am very disappointed for a particular:
why many models turn scenes with clothes horrible????
I just bought the latest videos of Timea Bella, Lola Taylor and Susan Ayn (3 beautiful girls ... !!!) and i am very angry and disappointed

:
for me their clothes have ruined the scenes, because they are horrible and not very sexy
All this is absurd for me.
Girls have a body beautiful, and it really exciting to see them all naked and without clothes (or little else ... ). I look at the porno because i like a woman's body, the breast, the seats, the hips, the belly and the back, legs, etc… but if the body is covered by clothing (horrible) then for me it is no longer interesting watch videos porno.
But who decides the clothes the models wearing on stage?
Please LP - xxx

if the girls are naked are much more beautiful to see, and the video also… enough with these dresses, a woman is beautiful naked!
And you members, what do you think?
Greetings.
Teschio

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:53 pm
by nec5150
teschio wrote:Sorry, but I write this post because i am very disappointed for a particular:
why many models turn scenes with clothes horrible????
I just bought the latest videos of Timea Bella, Lola Taylor and Susan Ayn (3 beautiful girls ... !!!) and i am very angry and disappointed

:
for me their clothes have ruined the scenes, because they are horrible and not very sexy
All this is absurd for me.
Girls have a body beautiful, and it really exciting to see them all naked and without clothes (or little else ... ). I look at the porno because i like a woman's body, the breast, the seats, the hips, the belly and the back, legs, etc… but if the body is covered by clothing (horrible) then for me it is no longer interesting watch videos porno.
But who decides the clothes the models wearing on stage?
Please LP - xxx

if the girls are naked are much more beautiful to see, and the video also… enough with these dresses, a woman is beautiful naked!
And you members, what do you think?
Greetings.
Teschio

I agree. Make an edit so girl can get naked. I've seen whole scenes with tits covered up. This is unacceptable.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:31 pm
by dap-addict
teschio wrote:And you members, what do you think?
Greetings.
Teschio

Cloths, jewlery and make-up/body paint/tattoos have always been part of girls to attract men.
Its the same in porn, the same during on-stage sex. Thus I have it quite the opposite I want my porn girls presented attractively while they get fucked, i.e. in lingerie, stockings, heels, wearing jewellery etc.
With tits covered up I understand your frustration, but than some tits look just better hidden. Depends...I am less of a booby man, thus more tolerant I guess.
In the end porn is fantasy and all legal fantasies should get catered for. With cloths vs naked we never reach any peace, some like it this way, some the other way.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:28 pm
by Baiken
Naked ???
like this :

Cloths, jewlery and make-up/body paint/tattoos have always been part of girls to attract men.
Its the same in porn, the same during on-stage sex. Thus I have it quite the opposite I want my porn girls presented attractively while they get fucked, i.e. in lingerie, stockings, heels, wearing jewellery etc.
+1

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:38 pm
by magizi877
I can happily say I like women in both presentations.

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:48 pm
by lesserfirefox
teschio wrote:Sorry, but I write this post because i am very disappointed for a particular:
why many models turn scenes with clothes horrible????
I just bought the latest videos of Timea Bella, Lola Taylor and Susan Ayn (3 beautiful girls ... !!!) and i am very angry and disappointed

:
for me their clothes have ruined the scenes, because they are horrible and not very sexy
All this is absurd for me.
Girls have a body beautiful, and it really exciting to see them all naked and without clothes (or little else ... ). I look at the porno because i like a woman's body, the breast, the seats, the hips, the belly and the back, legs, etc… but if the body is covered by clothing (horrible) then for me it is no longer interesting watch videos porno.
But who decides the clothes the models wearing on stage?
Please LP - xxx

if the girls are naked are much more beautiful to see, and the video also… enough with these dresses, a woman is beautiful naked!
And you members, what do you think?
Greetings.
Teschio

+100000 specially about covered tits
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:15 pm
by teschio
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Oct 28, 2015 12:33 pm
by Kuchiyaku
Couldn't agree more. I hate when the girls are tarted up with neon fishnets or take off everything but pull their tops down to thier torsos and leave them there. In addition to looking trashy, it just breaks up the beauty of their form. Let the girls be fully nude!
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Oct 28, 2015 1:26 pm
by tapdab
As many people like different stuff I'm not completely against having those scenes, in a considerate amount (maybe 1in10 or 1in20 scenes).
But I have a feeling the percentage, especially at this time, is much higher!
I understand not all gals have a fantastic body, (especially stomach is usually a problem zone, except for kinda skinny women). That makes many starlets look better with the right lingerie on.
But the breasts should really, I mean really, be visible always!
Protuding, oversized corsets (-> Timea's XXXmas DAP monster-scene) should be avoided, as they hide to much. On screen it looks like a liver sausage pressed out from the middle, the guys humping the meat-ends. Sorry, to be so grapic. You just don't see enough of the girl!
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Oct 28, 2015 6:25 pm
by Habshi13
It's probably not worth much

, but in my opinion the action is much hotter when the girls are dressed in sexy outfits!!!
I agree with the sentiment expressed by dap-addict that scenes are much better when the girls are all glammed up and semi-clothed. I quite like boobs to be visible but only if the girl has a naturally large pair. But girls with tiny boobs or a horrible fake set should keep them covered! It completely ruins the scene for me if a girl has had a bad boob job; natural rules!
If a girl has an absoluetly smokin' body like Angel Dark then maybe fully nude works but I've got a bit of a shoe fetish so I love scenes where girls at least keep their high heels on if nothing else.
The truth is that most of the girls in porn are out of shape and very few of them have really good bodies. As in real-life, too many girls in porn have fatty stomachs with loads of horrible fat lines, whilst the slimmer girls usually have tiny tits or awful fake ones. That's not sexy! Porn for me is about fantasy, so I want to see hot girls that look like supermodels being naughty and nasty but if they don't have the figures to match then I say keep them covered up!
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Oct 28, 2015 6:40 pm
by magizi877
"Most girls".... Porn... Out of shape...
Are we looking at the same porn website?
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:46 pm
by teschio
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Thu Oct 29, 2015 7:24 pm
by james95
it's a matter of taste,and a very polarizing thing. There are those who likes to see only naked bodies, personally I prefer to see scenes with sexy lingerie, pantyhose, bodyhose, high heels, corsets, gloves because to me it enhances the beauty of a woman. Big fan of nylon and pantyhose in particular.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:39 am
by Deborn
I agree to topic, but stockings and high heals shoes should stay on.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 01, 2015 10:05 pm
by fracassato
Deborn wrote:I agree to topic, but stockings and high heals shoes should stay on.
Agree.
Something like this:
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30592/c ... h_bj_gl011
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 4:07 am
by Deborn
Yes, but I also like the white short stockings and socks with embroidery on, the teen look. Like this:

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:13 pm
by teschio
Deborn wrote:Yes, but I also like the white short stockings and socks with embroidery on, the teen look. Like this:

Yes ok, I agree with this
but perhaps only at the beginning, but after all the naked girl

...
and just don't cover the body of the girl, especially culo, boobs, hips and back

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Nov 02, 2015 11:15 pm
by Deborn
teschio wrote:Yes ok, I agree with this
but perhaps only at the beginning, but after all the naked girl

...
and just don't cover the body of the girl, especially culo, boobs, hips and back

There is off course always a compromise to get all tastes in to a scene. If they are foot naked I think the girls at least have to point her toes straight mostly.

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 08, 2015 2:42 am
by teschio
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:38 am
by teschio
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:43 am
by laura.
ALWAYS preferred this.. What do you want to see? gorgeous toned naked flesh or nylon? i know which i will choose - birthday suit

x
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:51 am
by teschio
laura. wrote:ALWAYS preferred this.. What do you want to see? gorgeous toned naked flesh or nylon? i know which i will choose - birthday suit

x
Sorry????

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:55 am
by laura.
teschio wrote:laura. wrote:ALWAYS preferred this.. What do you want to see? gorgeous toned naked flesh or nylon? i know which i will choose - birthday suit

x
Sorry????

Lol, its English slang for 'totally naked' - sorry x

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:15 am
by Daplaya88
Guys! More clothed females please!
The best porn is like these whores want so horny to be fucked up in their dirty assholes, that they don't have time to take off their clothes, stockings and shoes

Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:34 pm
by teschio
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:38 pm
by hankandhank
Disagree
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Dec 16, 2015 1:36 pm
by Zeok
I propose that if a girl appears in a scene type "X On 1" (two performers one girl, three performers one girl ... ten performers one girl) dressed all the time, should have a scene as soon as possible "X on 1 "where the same girl appears completely naked from the start.
True, it's boring. Only totally nude girls, what the hell! But as a user of LP, I think it's also boring that girls appear dressed from start to finish
Many fetishes are lost along the way in both extreme cases. For example:
Camera shots in which the performers undress the girl, complete streptease (better in my opinion that 15 minutes of simple slow masturbation), bra remove passionately, tights totally broken, more interaction with tits and ass hindered by the clothes, sexy moves when a girl takes off her clothes, chance to see gradually all body of a girl...
As a user of LP I only ask more variety in this aspect.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:38 pm
by TheVulture
For me it's always partly-clothed - especially a tight dress or skirt pulled up around the girl's waist. It just looks naughtier and more spontaneous. To some extent watched naked porn stars fuck to me is just like watching a boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife fucking - a little boring, no matter how good the positions etc.
And yes, always heels and always for the whole scene for me.
1 of my few (relative) LP disappointments so far is the recent Mea Melone/Amirah Adara scene, mainly because it promised more than it delivered. The girls both start out with beautiful (and slightly slutty) blue dresses with white heels and gorgeous tight white panties and early in the scene they get their asses nice and high on the sofa. If 2 guys had walked up to them, pulled their panties to one side and plugged their asses there's no way I would ever get to see the rest of the scene!

That would just be total porn perfection for me. It's not just how good the dresses, heels etc. look but the very quick escalation from tease/soft porn to hardcore, which I always find really hot.
But sadly (for me anyway) everything (even the heels) came off before the sex started so whilst it was still a good scene (very good even in places) it never ignited for me as it would have done with the clothes still on. Oh well.
As others have said, horses for courses and let's have both styles.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:11 pm
by laura.
I also like to see knickers pulled to one side or wrapped around the thighs, its spontaneous and quite feral and is a turn on. Although for me, its all about the feet, i personally prefer bare feet, assuming they are spotlessly clean, nothing more of a turn off then seeing yellow soles! That said, a nice pair of Louboutin's is always easy on the eye. I prefer bare naked from the waist down but less choosy on waist above. I quite like to see a girl with her bra on but her boobs hanging out

x
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:33 pm
by Dan7373
I think clothing can make it easy for the viewer to identify the lady in a close-up shot, when there is more than one lady in the scene.
It's a bit of a turn-off not to know who is who in a close-up shot. And the lady having some clothing that's visible in the shot solves this problem.
But I'd say that more often it's the guy whom you can't identify. And this can be a turn-off too. Because it makes a difference whether it's the same guy who keeps nailing the pretty lady's ass in various positions, or if several guys are taking turns between her cheeks. If you are a fan of the way some guy nails the pretty lady's bum, then he is the one you want to see go between her cheeks every time.
Perhaps guys should start wearing some colored bands or belts to help the viewers keep track of who is nailing whom.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:24 pm
by spunker
I like Anina Silk but, judging from the trailer to today's 10 on 1 gang bang, she keeps her dress on throughout the scene. In yesterday's Ria Sunn update, her tits appear to be covered throughout. I don't mind some variety but there has been far too much clothing in the recent updates. Women are most beautiful as nature intended. Please, more naked sex.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:53 pm
by ronk
Yup,
This is one complain of mine. The girls can start with cloths on but should get fully naked before midpoint. We have Susan Ayn, Ria Sunn, etc. with their tops on the entire scene without the babes ever getting to show their tits except for 2 second glimpses. What a waste of gorgeous bodies.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:49 pm
by utopiaa
I Feel like the number of scenes where the boobs stay covered is increasing all the time. Shame.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:11 pm
by slut_lover
Totally naked.
I hate the scenes where the girls are clothed. I don't even bother to look at the trailers. Clothes are a complete turn off for me. No matter whether they have no boobs or huge boobs, big asses or small asses, it makes no difference. Total nudity is the only thing that stimulates me.
I recognize that some guys do need to see sexy clothing. A woman who worked for me asked me if I thought it was normal that her husband asked her to dress up in skimpy clothing. She clearly didn't think it was normal and was worried enough about it to ask my opinion. She was clearly disappointed that her husband needed more than her naked body to stimulate him. I was candid. I told her that for me a woman's body was beautiful and should never be covered up.
There's probably a disproportionate number of guys who like clothing at LP simply because there are not many places where they can find porno with girls clothed, but I see porno with clothing as a minority taste. Strip-clubs would not exist if the majority of guys wanted to see girls with their clothes on! I only need to go to my local beach to see girls in skimpy clothing.
So total nudity for me, even down to being able to watch her toes curl and wriggle.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:14 pm
by Dan7373
^
I'd say that one possible reason for the lady having some clothing is that she is hiding some scars or stretch-marks.
Which means that having the lady remove all of her clothing might make her look worse and not better, even for guys who like total nakedness.
I've been with a lady who had some major stretch-marks on her boobs, probably as a result of breastfeeding several children and not just one. And actually I liked the look and the feel of her boobs. Because boob-sucking is something I like, and she was really good for this. And of course, when you are sucking on the lady's tits, then it's all about how she feels in your mouth. You don't see much, when you have a mouthful of her boob, and you are nailing her with your cock.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:41 pm
by teschio
At the beginning of the video the model goes well dressed with heels, socks, pants and a small shirt... but then only naked
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeease LP - xxx ......
ONLY NAKED WITH BODY LIKE VICTORIA DANIELS, LOLA TAYLOR, SUSAN AYN, RIA SUNN, ...... ECT
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:41 pm
by slut_lover
Dan7373 wrote:^
I'd say that one possible reason for the lady having some clothing is that she is hiding some scars or stretch-marks.
Which means that having the lady remove all of her clothing might make her look worse and not better, even for guys who like total nakedness.
I've been with a lady who had some major stretch-marks on her boobs, probably as a result of breastfeeding several children and not just one. And actually I liked the look and the feel of her boobs. Because boob-sucking is something I like, and she was really good for this. And of course, when you are sucking on the lady's tits, then it's all about how she feels in your mouth. You don't see much, when you have a mouthful of her boob, and you are nailing her with your cock.
I totally agree, and I think that the vast majority of men feel the same way. I love women as nature made them.
Naked every time.
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:46 pm
by Dudemeister
Well, for some of us "the models are better dressed, with (some) clothes!"."
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:59 pm
by tapdab
Re: The models are better naked, without clothes!

Posted:
Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:44 am
by iro44n
100% agree. I didnt even get the latest Susan Ayn scene because of this & usually she is just an automatic buy. There seems to be too many scenes lately that cover the woman's' tits. Why? I hope LP listens to their fans in this matter.