No Pussy or 0% pussy porn shouldn't exist!!

[Kriss1986]

^ Or maybe is only writing without any moment of thinking. Who knows

[avanfurwet]

Who knows? Now, I think the whole thread was a bigger wind-up than Dzentungen's, and without the humour.

Fucked with my tranquility. Oh well, another poster added to the "ignore" list.

[Vawkes]

I want more pussy fucking!

0% pussy is nearly always a disappointment. The pussy is crying out to be fucked!

[analsexonly]

Well, that's how the rest of us feel about pussy fucking—disappointing to see it used instead of ignored like it should be in favor of pure anal attention.

[tmadras88]

No pussy porn is the best. Quivering pussy from anal pounding.

[TheVulture]

I hadn't read this thread until now but I'm glad I have as I'm pleased that the injury aspect has been raised. I was gushing in praise for the recent Francys Belle/Evelina Darling scene (on Evelina's own page), which at that point I had only watched on my PC, where I only have a standard or jump viewing facility. As such it was only when I burned the scene to DVD to watch that way (I'm old school like that) and thus saw the scene in full that I saw the numerous incidents of blood from Francys' bum. This was pretty shocking I must say, not least the way the guys just wipe it away with their hands and carry on the scene. WTF? What's also noticeable is that there are numerous later shots of Francys where rather than the obvious hold for the gape a sharp, very un-LP like cut to other action is applied. This tends to suggest that there was worse/more obvious damage and that the "injury" bits left in were the most palatable. Good grief! Then much later in the scene Evelina fists (yes, fists) Francys' bum! Seriously, what on Earth is going on here? Naturally the DVD has gone in the bin and I won't be able to enjoy the great DP section at its outset again. Oh well.

I haven't bought any scenes since - not out of protest or anything but because I bought a big batch at that same time. However, now that I'm burning them to DVD I'm watching them all with a kind of grim sense of scrutiny, which (a) I shouldn't have to do, and (b) obviously takes the horny edge off the viewing a bit.

A thread in the Giorgio forum suggests there are 2 more recent incidents of bleeding in other scenes. So again - what is going on here? Surely to goodness if there is even the slightest hint of anal injury to a girl in a scene the cameras should stop rolling, all participants be paid in full and the scene written off as either bad luck or careless misadventure. How LP deals with this moving forward will certainly play a factor in whether I stick around or not. I think personally that some kind of statement should be made.

Related to this, I do get the impression that some girls might be unwisely trying DAP in order to "keep up with the Joneses" (others have said this in this thread already I believe). A good example is the recent scene with Francesca Dicaprio and Nikky Dream. Both do lots of DAP and whilst Francesca is a bit of a veteran of it and her bum seems easily elastic enough to take it, there is for me something about Nikky's body shape (and the shape of her bum specifically) that just screams to me "not DAP-able". She does it and doesn't appear to be in any particular discomfort but her bum just seems to be stretching well beyond its comfort zone and it looks (to me at least) both pretty stilted and pointless (as I tend to find DAP generally but hey ho) as well as dangerous. I guess previously I could watch this kind of thing and be like "Hey LP know what they're doing - it looks grim but it can't be causing her injury" but now, of course, I'm much less sure. It just seems like they're winging it and girls are taking tremendous (and really unnecessary) risks.

Finally, injuries or no injuries I do find with a lot of LP scenes that there is an unhealthy obsession with very close examination of the girls' bums. Believe me when I say that I love to see a girl take an anal pounding as much as anyone here but for me the pleasure in that is seeing the dick sliding between the bum cheeks and (in the main) the act of fucking. Yes gapes of course are great and I'm not saying I want to watch from 50 feet away or anything but the obsession with getting the camera right up close post-fucking and asking the girls to push their bums out is just, well, unpleasant. Often you see that the girl's bum lining is very red and swollen and whilst I'm sure this isn't in itself a sign of injury I cannot fathom why a director or audience would want to see it and revel in it. It's not sexy is it? I'm not really one of these who applies an "each to their own" in every scenario. I think that practice is downright grotty and a black mark on current anal porn. A good example here is an old-ish scene with Afina Kisser, which I bought recently. It's a great scene in the main and finishes with a truly outstanding DP, which Afina is clearly loving. But for me the scene is tempered a bit as before the DP we get one of these horrible clinical anal investigations and her bum is clearly very red and thus very sore. Not injured but almost certainly at the point of "enough of a good thing for now thanks". Maybe I'm being selfish and saying nothing more than that ignorance is bliss (ie protecting my DP enjoyment) but I don't see why as a director you would show that when you know there is still strong anal to come. Or really at all. It just seems, again, too much.

Long post so I'll wind up. Fascinating stuff though. A definite crossroads moment for anal porn I think.

[andre.grande]

The girls were all over 18 years old and are professionals.
This site is based precisely on forced anal sex, the girls sign a contract before filming and are aware of everything.
Fruitless discussion.

[kuaheyden513]

Pussy is for pussies, condoms are for pussies. Give me a break!

[cinnah]

I don't like no pussy videos. I am not anal maniac and I wish to watch vaginal videos at least both vaginal and anal

[mistress_cindy2008]

I don't like no pussy videos. I am not anal maniac and I wish to watch vaginal videos at least both vaginal and anal

This site is tailored for anal maniacs. You may find it frustrating to be here and it may not be the right place for you.

[mistress_cindy2008]

Why do those against anal not have concerns about vaginal injuries? You are guys so you may not realize that porn girls get a lot of vaginal injuries from being pounded by big dicks there. Vaginas can tear, bleed, get swollen, and really get sore when doing porn level sex.

You seem to be hypocrites.

[Boshanks]

Are you seriously comparing a vaginal tear to a rectal one ? Do you not think there is a significant difference in the danger of one over the other ?

[avanfurwet]

Why do those against anal not have concerns about vaginal injuries? You are guys so you may not realize that porn girls get a lot of vaginal injuries from being pounded by big dicks there. Vaginas can tear, bleed, get swollen, and really get sore when doing porn level sex.

You seem to be hypocrites.

Or maybe just don't think it through.
Or in the case of Visigoth & co just choose not to think at all.
I also think Boshanks has a point that anal tearing seems likely to create (even) more risk of bacteria and viruses entering the woman's bloodstream.

Is everyone who watches a high-wire act a hypocrite?
Most of us don't actually want to see the high-wire performers fall, but nobody would pay to watch if they performed the same act at ground level.

[Kriss1986]

Why do those against anal not have concerns about vaginal injuries? You are guys so you may not realize that porn girls get a lot of vaginal injuries from being pounded by big dicks there. Vaginas can tear, bleed, get swollen, and really get sore when doing porn level sex.

You seem to be hypocrites.

Or maybe just don't think it through.
Or in the case of Visigoth & co just choose not to think at all.
I also think Boshanks has a point that anal tearing seems likely to create (even) more risk of bacteria and viruses entering the woman's bloodstream.

Is everyone who watches a high-wire act a hypocrite?
Most of us don't actually want to see the high-wire performers fall, but nobody would pay to watch if they performed the same act at ground level.

Same bullshit again and again... And if we start talking about risk of bacteria and viruses entering - DP is the most risk. Just look in most scenes males are putting cock from one hole to other and it's the fastest way to transmit various infections, between the two sites. Bacteria that are normally found in the rectum could potentially cause serious problems in the vagina and vice versa. So based on that 0% pussy is less dangerous for our stars than DP. I'm waiting now until somebody will create poll to stop DP . Fucking hypocrites at every turn...

[hjohjole]

Are you seriously comparing a vaginal tear to a rectal one ? Do you not think there is a significant difference in the danger of one over the other ?

Why is that risk insignificant?
Sure, maybe you could argue that an average scene with 100% anal is more high risk than an average scene with 100% vaginal. That is certainly not true in every cases since the risks depends on a lot of factors.
But even if we accept this to be true, 100% vaginal scenes is not what the people that are voting to ban 0% pussy are looking for. They want to see dp, dvp and ass to pussy. And no matter how you look at it all of those things carries with them MORE health risks not less than a scene with just regular anal.

[mistress_cindy2008]

Are you seriously comparing a vaginal tear to a rectal one ? Do you not think there is a significant difference in the danger of one over the other ?

No, I am not comparing one to the other, why would I? I just find it absurd that people have all this concern for one particular injury and zero concern about any other injury from porn. It basically seems they don't care about injury if the performer is doing sex acts they want to see

I find it hypocritical to say the least.

[Ass2Die4464]

^+1

[Boshanks]

Why is that risk insignificant?
Sure, maybe you could argue that an average scene with 100% anal is more high risk than an average scene with 100% vaginal. That is certainly not true in every cases since the risks depends on a lot of factors.
But even if we accept this to be true, 100% vaginal scenes is not what the people that are voting to ban 0% pussy are looking for. They want to see dp, dvp and ass to pussy. And no matter how you look at it all of those things carries with them MORE health risks not less than a scene with just regular anal.

I don't think you've understood my point at all. I don't happen to agree with this thread and I'm not in favour of anything being banned. The issue I raised was my concern with visible blood in a lot of Giorgio's scenes, and this is more prevalent in 0% and DAP scenes. When was the last time you saw blood from a models pussy on here by the way ? because for me it was never.

When I see a young girl clearly bleeding from the arse during a strong DAP scene, and then is told she will perform in a 0% pussy scene days later, that to me is absolute stupidity, and it demonstrates a complete lack of regard for her welfare from the director.

I didn't suggest either tear to be insignificant, I said one is far more dangerous than the other. If you and Kriss would like to be my guinea pig I can prove this to you beyond any reasonable doubt. Make a small cut in the palm of your hand and rub some shit in to it daily, post back and tell me how it's looking next week

No, I am not comparing one to the other, why would I? I just find it absurd that people have all this concern for one particular injury and zero concern about any other injury from porn. It basically seems they don't care about injury if the performer is doing sex acts they want to see

I find it hypocritical to say the least.

The op's points at this stage should be disregarded, his post history has proven this to be the case. You will struggle to find any contribution from myself that fits your point. If I was watching scenes where the girls were clearly bleeding from the pussy I would be raising the same points, but once again, I haven't seen this once since I've been a member here.

[Kriss1986]

Well my friend I have read few weeks ago on Ape's board that one of members earnestly tried convince others that Viola Baileys shouldn't pefrom scenes for ZZ with Danny D because some other model had strong pussy injuty during act with him and the bleeding from her vag was so strong that hospitality was needed. So based on that we can assume that vag sex is also dangerous for healt, of course if this story is true. Why we are focusing only on 0% pussy? Is it mean that 80% anal is completely safe? That 100% non stop DP is much safer than 100% anal? I would like to admit that in DP ass is also involved, sometimes at the same level as in case 0% pussy. So summarizing most of all statements and "facts" in this topic to stop 0% pussy are completely balloney and girls health has mariginal meaning. I don't like hypocrisy. If all of you trully worry about porn actresses, the next step should be bann DP, anal, vag, blowjob, cumshot etc, - because all of mentioned could cause injury. And yes of course after this rumor with beeding ass girl shouldn't be involved with any further scenes for some time it's true and obvious. But from other side please consider - porn is job for those girls and they are making money using their bodies, so no act's means no money. To clarify I'm not fucking sadist or something like taht and I don't want to see suffering girls, blood and other shit. But I'm pissed off when some are using "health" argument to ban something they don't like. Just be honest and told the true - I don't want to see 0% pussy because I don't like it - and it will be fair for me.

[Boshanks]

There is nothing in your post for me to consider, reading it proves that you've completely misunderstood what my stance on this topic is. I'm fully aware of all the risks involved with any act and I haven't asked for anything to be banned. My point is very easy to comprehend, and whether or not you agree with it is up to you, it doesn't bother me either way.

[hjohjole]

I don't think you've understood my point at all. I don't happen to agree with this thread and I'm not in favour of anything being banned. The issue I raised was my concern with visible blood in a lot of Giorgio's scenes, and this is more prevalent in 0% and DAP scenes. When was the last time you saw blood from a models pussy on here by the way ? because for me it was never.

You dont agree with this thread? The very first thing you say in your first post here is that you "loathe 0% pussy scenes". And then you continue to do your best to support biZZlers argument that 0% pussy is particularly harmful to actresses.
If you actually dont want to see 0% pussy get banned and you just have concerns about Giorgios work as a director then perhaps you should post a thread in his part of the forum where you bring this up.

Giorgio is the director that makes the most "no pussy" and dap scenes here on LP and i only know of 2 cases where there have been visible anal bleeding (might be more that i dont know about). And although that is definitely 2 times to many the vast majority of his scenes has none. There has also been countless 0% pussy scenes released by Gonzo and a few by Sineplex over the years and non of them had any anal bleeding as far as i can remember.
I do however recall a recent Sineplex scene with anal bleeding, the one with Megan Rain and Jenn Stefani. And that scene feature both dp and regular vaginal sex but no dap.

When I see a young girl clearly bleeding from the arse during a strong DAP scene, and then is told she will perform in a 0% pussy scene days later, that to me is absolute stupidity, and it demonstrates a complete lack of regard for her welfare from the director.

Would it have been any better if she was told she would perform in a dp scene next?
And if you are worried about the harms of dap then why not start a thread about that or post in one of the many that already exists. It is entirely possible to have dap in scenes that also feature dp and vaginal sex. And it is possible to have 0% pussy scenes without any dap at all.

[Boshanks]

Can you read ? What did I say directly after saying I loathe 0% pussy scenes ?

My points about bleeding had nothing to do with supporting op's argument, they were a response to somebody talking about the resilience of that part of the body.

What I said about injury has no direct link to this topic, if you'd bothered to read any of it properly you would have seen me state my conversation with another member was derailing this thread, but people keep making the same nonsense comparisons to other things trying to justify injury in that part of the body, so I keep responding.

And I've seen blood in a lot more than two, based on your reading skills perhaps it's your eyesight that has restricted it to so few.

When I see a young girl clearly bleeding from the arse during a strong DAP scene, and then is told she will perform in a 0% pussy scene days later, that to me is absolute stupidity, and it demonstrates a complete lack of regard for her welfare from the director.

Would it have been any better if she was told she would perform in a dp scene next?

It would have been better if she was told to rest her arse for a while, but if you want to argue this point: Are you suggesting that a DP scene would have been just as taxing on her arse as a 0% DAP scene with 5 guys ?

[Kriss1986]

There is nothing in your post for me to consider, reading it proves that you've completely misunderstood what my stance on this topic is. I'm fully aware of all the risks involved with any act and I haven't asked for anything to be banned. My point is very easy to comprehend, and whether or not you agree with it is up to you, it doesn't bother me either way.

Nope I'm quite sure I understood everything. You said that you like anal but at the same time you loathe 0% pussy scenes. Which is a little bit weird for me but ok everyone has some tastes.

I also get the point about the resilience of ass. But I don't get why we are still focusing on 0% pussy scenes instead generally? Because in only anal scene risk is bigger than in DP scene? Completely balooney! The risk is equal in both cases because in both ass is involved. But OK I can assue you didn't siad that directly regarding to 0% pussy.

I'm fully aware of all the risks involved with any act and I haven't asked for anything to be banned.

Maybe you didn't explict said "it should be banned" but you can't forgot about title and purpose of this topic and all those statement's are grist to the mill for all haters, trolls and morons.

I can only agree with you that not every 18 y.o girl is ready for hard anal action - as you said and also after "bleeding" action model should rest until she recovers.

And fuck this topic made a big rumor here.

[avanfurwet]

... And fuck this topic made a big rumor here.

But IMO better to argue than just to shout "I bought my tickets and now it is my god-given right to require that girls be destroyed" like some idiots.
IMO the girls get paid to make hard movies with some risks, which should be managed carefully by professional co-workers. That's all.

[hjohjole]

Thats what got me confused right there. I thought what you said in this topic was actually related to this topic. My bad!

It would have been better if she was told to rest her arse for a while, but if you want to argue this point: Are you suggesting that a DP scene would have been just as taxing on her arse as a 0% DAP scene with 5 guys ?

I think it would be exactly as taxing as a dp scene with DAP and 5 guys.

[Kriss1986]

... And fuck this topic made a big rumor here.

But IMO better to argue than just to shout "I bought my tickets and now it is my god-given right to require that girls be destroyed" like some idiots.
IMO the girls get paid to make hard movies with some risks, which should be managed carefully by professional co-workers. That's all.

lol . Of course it is always better to talk in civilized manner . I don't like statements "bitched should be destroyed" etc. it makes me angry . It clearly looks some morons have serious mental issues. Of course it is nice to see hard action but ONLY if girl agreed and enjoy the act. As you said porn is a risky job for girls but it's still a job for $$. Just look at footballers, f1 racing drivers, rally drivers and other folks all of them risk and earn $$ and also are aware of dangerous. I assume LP is pro company with proper persons who manage girls to make their work safe.

[Boshanks]

Nope I'm quite sure I understood everything. You said that you like anal but at the same time you loathe 0% pussy scenes. Which is a little bit weird for me but ok everyone has some tastes.

I understand why this would seem weird Simply put, I love anal sex, but when I watch a scene where the pussy is completely neglected I'm always disappointed. As you say, that's just my personal taste. Even with that mindset I don't believe in anything being removed, just that the option be available for fans of both, i.e balance.

I also get the point about the resilience of ass. But I don't get why we are still focusing on 0% pussy scenes instead generally? Because in only anal scene risk is bigger than in DP scene? Completely balooney! The risk is equal in both cases because in both ass is involved. But OK I can assue you didn't siad that directly regarding to 0% pussy.

Correct, I never said that.

Maybe you didn't explict said "it should be banned" but you can't forgot about title and purpose of this topic and all those statement's are grist to the mill for all haters, trolls and morons.

I made it very clear in my first post, I don't agree with this topic. I don't think anything else I've said is factual untrue. if you choose to take exception to any of it, that's up to you.

I think it would be exactly as taxing as a dp scene with DAP and 5 guys.

So do I but that's not what I asked you. I was talking about a specific scenario involving Selvaggia where a strong DAP scene was followed up days later with a DAP 0% scene. You said "Would it have been any better if she was told she would perform in a dp scene next?", and my question was, do you think a DP scene would have been as demanding as what she was asked to do ?

[Kriss1986]

I understand why this would seem weird Simply put, I love anal sex, but when I watch a scene where the pussy is completely neglected I'm always disappointed. As you say, that's just my personal taste. Even with that mindset I don't believe in anything being removed, just that the option be available for fans of both, i.e balance.

Ok it's more clear now and I respect it .

Correct, I never said that.

It's also evident now. All communications issues were because of title and purpose of this topic. I'm glad we explained each other most misunderstandings .

I made it very clear in my first post, I don't agree with this topic.

I loathe 0% pussy scenes, this format didn't exist when I joined LP, but I certainly don't think they should be removed, balance is key.

Ok I missed it somehow, sorry my bad.

[hjohjole]

So do I but that's not what I asked you. I was talking about a specific scenario involving Selvaggia where a strong DAP scene was followed up days later with a DAP 0% scene.

I am just trying my best to stay on topic here. It might not matter much to you since you dont like 0% pussy scenes but to me and a lot of other people this is a serious issue.

So i will just repeat myself here:

If you actually dont want to see 0% pussy get banned and you just have concerns about Giorgios work as a director then perhaps you should post a thread in his part of the forum where you bring this up.

[Boshanks]

You asked me the original question but now you don't want to answer it ? That's okay, it was somewhat rhetorical anyway seeing as we both know what the blatantly obvious answer is.

[iro44n]

I personally hate No Pussy scenes. Have never & will never buy them. But this is just my preference. I don't think the scenes should be got rid of entirely but fewer of them would be nice to even things out for everyone' tastes. Lately seems like 80% of the scenes I prefer like gangbang / 5on1 / 3on1 scenes are 0% pussy.

[buttguy]

No Pussy sex is by far the best sex there is. Especially in porn. Not much hotter than a sexy girl with nice Ass getting Anal and ATM Only for 30minutes to an hour! Total control, Pinning her to her stomach, and a load or 2 or 3 up her Ass and the scene should be up for an Oscar!

[Kriss1986]

I personally hate No Pussy scenes. Have never & will never buy them. But this is just my preference. I don't think the scenes should be got rid of entirely but fewer of them would be nice to even things out for everyone' tastes. Lately seems like 80% of the scenes I prefer like gangbang / 5on1 / 3on1 scenes are 0% pussy.

Yyyy 80% of the latest gangbang / 5 on 1 / or 3 on 1 were 0% pussy - really?


Dap Destination Angel Piaf 5on1 Dp/ Dap /Multi Facial (see description) GIO295 - scene released 2016-12-20 - pussy involved

Sandra Luberc shoves gummy bears up her ass and pushes them out. assfucked & DP'ed after that SZ1584 - scene released 2016-12-19 - pussy involved

Linda Sweet takes the DAP challenge again and wins IV026 - scene released 2016-12-19 - pussy involved

Clock Work Gang for Brittany & Selvaggia. Dp /Dap /Gapes /ATM /Monster Prolapse /Femdom with Belle Claire GIO286 - scene released 2016-12-18 - pussy involved

Timea Bella double anal & internal cum inside pussy and ass SZ897 - scene released 2016-12-18 - pussy involved

Vampires: Resurrection of the Princes 2of2 (See Description) GIO291 - scene released 2016-12-17 - pussy involved

Vampires: Resurrection of the Princes 1of2 (See Description) GIO290 - scene released 2016-12-15 - pussy involved

Frida Sante tries double penetration & double pussy for the first time SZ1574 - scene released 2016-12-15 - pussy involved

5on1 welcome in Porn Tera Link with first anal /dp /gapes /multiple facial GIO293 - scene released 2016-12-13 - pussy involved

Chanel Lux 4on1 mini gangbang with DP & cum swallow SZ1508 - scene released 2016-12-10 - pussy involved

Ally Breelsen ass smashed by 3 cocks & DAP'ed RS221 - scene released 2016-12-12 - pussy involved

Lola Bulgari interracial anal fucking & Airtight DP SZ1585 - scene released 2016-12-13 - pussy involved

Lola Shine 4on1 with DP /DAP /TP /TAP (more info in Description) GIO288 - scene released 2016-12-06 - pussy involved

Erika Korti first time in studio: 3on1 Airtight DP & double pussy SZ1594 - scene released 2016-12-07 - pussy involved

American MILF Veronica Avluv no holes barred fuck session SZ1600 - scene released 2016-12-11 - pussy involved

Hot teen Caterine Love gets destroyed by two big blacks cocks IV022 - scene released 2016-12-09 - pussy involved

Sisters Eveline Dellai & Silvia Dellai discover the black DP feeling IV023 - scene released 2016-12-12 - pussy involved

Ria Sunn gets both holes filled. Interracial DP and DAP IV018 - scene released 2016-12-04 - pussy involved

How did you count then, that 80% of all latest gangbang/5 on 1/ 3on 1 scenes were 0% pussy? It's some kind of new maths?

[aquin]

I LIKE 0% PUSSY. Greatest among them all. I like performers who give in and practice it. It's the purest way of porn. Everything else is vanilla.

aquin

[Perenini]

Before I would prefer that LP was 95% of anal scenes and 5% of vaginal scenes, but today I like vaginal sex porn (+ IR), I understand that lp should continue to do more anal scenes than vaginal, since they already exist other sites specializing in vaginal sex, but a little more vaginal scenes would be nice. I really wish Joaquim Kessef would do one-on-one IR vaginal scenes, because I saw that he did some scenes, but they were few. That way LP would continue to make money and most fans would be satisfied. Darkx and Blacked are swimming in cash and LP could enjoy and swim in cash as well.

[avanfurwet]

... Darkx and Blacked are swimming in cash and LP could enjoy and swim in cash as well.

Could you please share your source for this intelligence? Thanks.

[Kriss1986]

I LIKE 0% PUSSY. Greatest among them all. I like performers who give in and practice it. It's the purest way of porn. Everything else is vanilla.

aquin

.

[Perenini]

^^ This is no secret to anyone.

[Kriss1986]

Perenini wrote:
... Darkx and Blacked are swimming in cash and LP could enjoy and swim in cash as well.

Especially when we considering below statement:

Record sales!

Postby xxx » 05 Sep 2014 09:48

http://legalporno.com/player/watch/cid/28557

"Margo pussy only GG141 (exclusive)" is looking strong to be the least sold scene ever on LP. I guess we're not changing production to vaginal only anytime soon.

[TheVulture]

I LIKE 0% PUSSY. Greatest among them all. I like performers who give in and practice it. It's the purest way of porn. Everything else is vanilla.

aquin

With respect, that is total rubbish. I've just rejoined Private and I'm going through a number of their newer scenes, which are much better than I expected. The scenes tend to be about 20 mins in length max, there is no DAP/TAP etc. and almost all start with pussy fucking (but of course have anal and DP). And most of them are explosive and brilliant. Much younger studs, harder dicks, much more energy and intensity to the scenes, no excessive throat-grabbing/other macho bullshit and 90% ending with massive cum explosions the like of which you simply won't find on LP.

If that is "vanilla" porn then I would suggest you're in a bit of an extreme place.

Don't get me wrong, LP's longer scenes with more intense acts have their place. But the whole idea that anything less is "vanilla" is contemptuous and in many ways the reason that LP is IMHO currently a little out of control (as the debate in this thread testifies).