NO fake tits

[Tastes Like Ass]

But it is something I keep in mind, just like I keep in mind how harmful constant anal sex can potentially be for a woman's body, or how stigmatizing pornography can be later in life for the people who choose to do it. Nothing in this life is ever simple. There's a dark side to everything. For me, plastic surgery and body modification is just a step too far. I suppose it's because once you've done it, you can't go back, and it seems to me that so many girls do it for the wrong reasons. But again, that is speculative on my part.

All true, although I think if there's one thing that many of these girls will end up regretting, even more than doing porn or getting breast implants, it's covering large portions of their bodies with tattoos.

[Pineapples Studio]

You do not know the definition of "ad hominem."

If that were true, then that would obviously make two of us that don't know it.

Explain. I still don't think you get it, but spell it out for me. Perhaps I'm wrong.

Semantics. The comparison is tantamount to you calling them monsters, which is exactly what you did.

It's not semantics nor is it tantamount to anything, but I'm through arguing this point, so let's just move on.

I see. So making girls feel like shit for having small tits is wrong, but making them feel like shit for having fake tits- e.g., comparing them to "lab experiments," fictitious monsters, along with all the other insults hurled against them in this thread- is perfectly OK? You'll get all on a soapbox about how men shouldn't make girls with small natural tits feel like shit, but you're doing the exact same thing to girls with fake tits. Do you not see the hypocrisy there?

a) Plastic surgery is a choice. That's the difference.
b) I'm mostly criticizing plastic surgery as an institution and the cultural pressure for women to modify their bodies, not the women themselves. I didn't really make that clear, so that's my bad. The comparisons to lab experiments and Frankenstein's monster are meant to evoke an analogy that men think they can build perfect women in a lab, not to shit on the women themselves. I'm sure it's just semantics to you anyway, so let's move on.

What evidence, either empirical or observational, is there to suggest that most men are opposed to boobjobs? I am not saying most men agree with me on this just for the sake of saying it, or to just brag about being right. I'm saying it because, based on the general consensus that I have observed, it is true. If you feel that it isn't, feel free to state why. If you choose to ignore common sense reality that is right there in front of your face, then I'm afraid that makes you the moron.

Well, if we're just sticking to anecdotal evidence, most of my friends are not big fans of boobjobs, or of plastic surgery in general. But I don't claim to know the minds of most men, so I don't really have an answer for you here. My point was that you don't know either, but you just won't admit it for whatever reason.

That makes absolutely no sense. How does having the likely majority opinion invalidate anyone else's opinion?

Because you don't know that your opinion is the "likely majority opinion." That word "likely" is telling. You just assume it must be the majority opinion because it's what you believe. You can always rationalize what you believe. It's confirmation bias.

I never said that my opinion was fact, unlike you who uses authoritative terms like "natural is ALWAYS better than fake."

I think it's pretty clear in the context of my original comment that I was stating my opinion, not speaking for other people. I don't feel like I have to add a disclaimer to the bottom of every post I write to make that known.

I just simply said that most men likely agree with my opinion. If you feel that is not true and that most men disagree with my opinion, then again, present logical reasons to explain why you believe that, just as I have done. Thus far, you have not presented anything to contradict the reasons I have given, or even respond to them.

You have only provided anecdotal evidence and your own conclusions based on that evidence. I cannot provide anything better than that either, but I don't claim to know the majority opinion, unlike you.

*DISCLAIMER: Any opinion expressed in this post is the personal opinion of Mr. Evil Pineapples and does not represent the opinion of the human race. Mr. Evil Pineapples cannot speak for the human race as an collective and makes no claims that he can. Thank you for your time.

[tgcfc26]

Am I saying that girls with big fake tits are always hotter than natural girls? Of course not! I'm not like some of these guys here who make crazy outrageous statements saying that natural girls are ALWAYS better, and stupid shit like that. One is not ALWAYS better than the other.

This new diplomatic tact seems to have come about after opposition from various members to some of your inane and one dimensional comments. You don't make crazy or outrageous statements ? What about this one regarding fake tits that you said last week

They should hire them all the time over a girl with small tits.

As many have said, it's fine to have a personal preference and share an opinion, but don't speak for others, and at least have the conviction to not contradict yourself in an attempt to appear neutral. This thread is riddled with examples of you doing this, this one being my favourite

Slippery Pete wrote:
^ Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but no one is entitled to their own facts.

To which you replied "I completely agree" YOU MAKE MORE POSTS THAN ANYONE ELSE ON HERE THAT SPEAK ON THE BEHALF OF MEN AND WOMEN AS IF THEY'RE FACT! To agree with what Pete said contradicts almost every post you make, and yet through sheer ignorance it went straight over your head.

You've also made it quite clear on several occasions that a fake look is hotter than natural, as an example you said this in regards to Bibi Noel

She looks like how a pornstar is supposed to look, like a Barbie doll. That's why I want to see her on here.

This isn't a crazy or outrageous statement either I suppose ?

realtip wrote:
As long as people can respect my views, then I can respect theirs.

This isn't true is it, countless times you have spoken as if your view is the only one that matters, continuously claiming that most of society feel the same way as you, despite evidence on this forum to the contrary every time. I especially enjoyed how you respected other peoples views on Bibi, when some of us stated we found her unattractive since the surgeries, you told us "we lacked good taste in women, didn't know sexiness when we saw it and that we get off on flat chested broads with bodies like little boys." You don't seem to respect any ones views unless they're in full agreement with yours.

Your paragraph on Amsterdam is also complete tunnel visioned bullshit. I have been there four times in my life, it's always packed around every window in the red light district, it's the busiest part of the city at night. The reasons why somebody would be staring at a particular girl is subjective for each individual, how can you state that the most popular women over there all had huge fake tits and this was the reason behind the increased male attention ? Worse still, this is once again not an opinion you've put forth, it's another one of your facts of the day.

[realtip]

Plastic surgery is a choice. That's the difference.

Entering the sex industry is also a choice. If a woman decides to work in an industry in which her body and sexual appearance are her main commodities, then you can't reasonably complain when that decision comes with criticism about her appearance, since her job is based on her appearance and the amount of sexual attraction to her. It is expected that people will criticize her appearance if they dislike it, and give her suggestions on how to improve it (e.g., lose weight, dye her hair, shave her pussy, etc.) Platic surgery is often among those suggestions. If women find this disagreeable, then perhaps they should not work in an industry in which their physical appearance is their main asset.

Well, if we're just sticking to anecdotal evidence, most of my friends are not big fans of boobjobs, or of plastic surgery in general. But I don't claim to know the minds of most men, so I don't really have an answer for you here. My point was that you don't know either, but you just won't admit it for whatever reason.

You're right that I don't know the minds of other people. But even though the evidence is only anecdotal, it still suggests that larger breasts serve as the prevailing standard of beauty throughout society. I have seen nothing to suggest the contrary.

I think it's pretty clear in the context of my original comment that I was stating my opinion, not speaking for other people. I don't feel like I have to add a disclaimer to the bottom of every post I write to make that known.

If you can apply that logic to yourself, then why can't you apply it to other people? I guess I do need a disclaimer.

This new diplomatic tact seems to have come about after opposition from various members to some of your inane and one dimensional comments.

It's not new. Some people just are not worthy of diplomacy or tact. As I've already stated, I give it where it is deserved, and where it is mutual. Just like respect in general, you only get it if you give it. Opposition from others doesn't bother me as long as, to use your words, they can exercise "diplomatic tact" about it.

As many have said, it's fine to have a personal preference and share an opinion, but don't speak for others, and at least have the conviction to not contradict yourself in an attempt to appear neutral.

"Many" have said this? How many? It seems like I'm always getting into these ridiculous arguments with the same crazy couple of people, and you happen to be one of them. But in any case, I never said that I speak for everyone else. Speaking for most, or for a particular group in general, is not the same as speaking for everyone.

[tgcfc26]

"Many" have said this? How many? It seems like I'm always getting into these ridiculous arguments with the same crazy couple of people, and you happen to be one of them. But in any case, I never said that I speak for everyone else. Speaking for most, or for a particular group in general, is not the same as speaking for everyone.

Read back over this thread and most of the other threads you've posted in if you like, you'll see exactly how many people have pulled you up for speaking on behalf of others and your narrow minded views, if you believe it to be just two people, you're in denial. I also never said you spoke for everyone, didn't you read what you quoted ? My point, and what seems to be at the crux of every back and forth you have, is that you're incapable of tolerating any other opinion that conflicts with yours. You continuously attempt to counter them with the most absurd responses that you often claim reflect the majority, whether that's men, women, or society in general. Why are you unable to express an opinion without always stating that most people think and feel the same way ?

In regards to always getting in to arguments with me, this is the first time, so that sentence is news to me; if you're referring to me calling you a cunt for the way you spoke to a woman, I would hardly call that an argument.

[realtip]

In regards to always getting in to arguments with me, this is the first time, so that sentence is news to me; if you're referring to me calling you a cunt for the way you spoke to a woman, I would hardly call that an argument.

I wouldn't call name-calling an argument either, but it immediately sent forth the impression that you were intellectually incapable of making a real argument. So in your case, it had to suffice.

[tgcfc26]

Why did it have to suffice ? In your own words you didn't regard our first conversation as an argument, so why would you refer to me as somebody you're always getting in to arguments with. Did you mean in light of your first comment having no merit, your second comment will have to suffice and make no sense ?

[dap-addict]

Plastic surgery is a choice. That's the difference.

Entering the sex industry is also a choice. If a woman decides to work in an industry in which her body and sexual appearance are her main commodities, then you can't reasonably complain when that decision comes with criticism about her appearance, since her job is based on her appearance and the amount of sexual attraction to her. It is expected that people will criticize her appearance if they dislike it, and give her suggestions on how to improve it (e.g., lose weight, dye her hair, shave her pussy, etc.) Platic surgery is often among those suggestions. If women find this disagreeable, then perhaps they should not work in an industry in which their physical appearance is their main asset.

realtip, you quote evil out of context. There was also part b about society pressure.
Still, I do agree with your above statement.
Now with fake tits in porn over the past 2-3 years I see a clear tendency that girls get them when planning to get more active escorting.
But porn viewers and escort clients are not the same group - even some are both of course.

Besides I think the poll results really show there is demand also in porn for both. And plastic fans would be very happy if LP booked that 1/3 of fake tits the poll asks for, I guess. Its less and for me thats fine, I am a natural tit fan, I even dont mind flat chested girls like Alysa. The only reason for me to ask a girl to consider getting her tits fixed are if they are saggy.

So please, dont ask LP to not take a poll into acount!

[Skinmeister]

My 2 cents...in pictures - Ava Addams, Jill Kelly

Wow...IMHO Ava Addams had really gorgeous tits before the boob-job! What a shame she fucked herself up with plastic!

[legalcool]

Why no fake tits?
This is not interest when not see all nice body girls and her tits.
Galina Galkina i see her ass, face, legs, fucking her hottest "titties" masked in bondage corset.
Lilith Virago fantastic body, fantastic fuck and scenes... only clothers. Her amzing with "micro" tits
And one of the nicest girl, Nike Sweet, i can see half her ferfect tits and quater her perfect body.


For example Billie Star, Scarlet & Tiffany Shine Triple Stacked Video SZ299
What need made with this video?


IMHO No to "no fake tits". No to clothing girls scenes. No to bombshells tits on LP. Dislike "Panzer scenes"

PS I am inkling under clother little nice titties, freak and other.Why dont see it?

[DP-Lover]

No fake tits, just cant stand when hot young girls with perky natural tits getting horrible plastic balloons, just CRAZY.

[realtip]

No fake tits, just cant stand when hot young girls with perky natural tits getting horrible plastic balloons, just CRAZY.

The problem with that is that not all girls have perky natural tits. Some have ugly tits. Some have saggy tits. Some have no tits at all. In those cases, it's much better to see a girl with big tits, even if they're fake. What's "just CRAZY" is trying to tell LP that they shouldn't girls with boobjobs just because some people like seeing girls with miscroscopic tits. If LP listened to you guys, then we would never have gotten to see hot girls like Billie Star, or Lola Wan, or Tiffany Sine, or Jordan Pryce.

I also find it funny how some of you guys complain about LP shooting the same girls over and over again, but then turn around and tell them that they shouldn't shoot girls with boobjobs, which would obviously eliminate them from shooting a whole bunch of hot girls. That's what's just CRAZY.

[DP-Lover]

^ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[realtip]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

That's exactly what you're tyring to turn LP into. A borefest.