Not enough Euro/White men on this European site

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Dude liking black men in porn does not make you gay. By far the largest number of men like girls, and by far the largest number of men like sex with girls. Now sex with girls in a male's fantasy almost inherently requires a guy to be there. Whether that guy is black or white or asian to each their own. I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene.

You are no different under your own terms, if liking black guys in your scenes makes you gay, because you like white guys in your porn, and guess what? Skin color doesn't change that. So no I don't think you're gay for that, but of course I don't apply a different brush to anyone else because they have no problem with a different color of skin on a guy.

Bolded a straw man argument here.
"Liking black men in porn" does not make you gay. Of course not, but that's not what I said. I specifically said the "bbc queens" here who are White and prefer or demand to see "bbc" not Black men. These guys are homosexuals. It's been noted by others before me.

On top of that, I notice that quite a few of them came to the shemale thread, saying they liked it and wanted to see it in LegalPorno.

I also point back to one of my earliest posts where a study of internet search terms showed that "black" is among the top 5 search terms for gay men, while it is far less common among straight men.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bi ... raight-men
Here's the article that started it all.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-alve ... 03674.html
A feminist critique of all this shit.
http://gaildines.com/2009/09/the-white-mans-burden/

They are probably the ones clamoring for silly stuff like 0% pussy porn too!

[james95]

Dude liking black men in porn does not make you gay. By far the largest number of men like girls, and by far the largest number of men like sex with girls. Now sex with girls in a male's fantasy almost inherently requires a guy to be there. Whether that guy is black or white or asian to each their own. I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene.

You are no different under your own terms, if liking black guys in your scenes makes you gay, because you like white guys in your porn, and guess what? Skin color doesn't change that. So no I don't think you're gay for that, but of course I don't apply a different brush to anyone else because they have no problem with a different color of skin on a guy.

Bolded a straw man argument here.
"Liking black men in porn" does not make you gay. Of course not, but that's not what I said. I specifically said the "bbc queens" here who are White and prefer or demand to see "bbc" not Black men. These guys are homosexuals. It's been noted by others before me.

but even if that was true, who cares?
I mean, let's say that if I want to watch black actors with big cocks it's because I'm gay (I don't see the logic, because porn actors are usually very well endowed so I frankly can't see why if I watch Rocco Siffredi should be straight and if I'm watching Mandingo I'm gay), do you have any problem with that?

[pornjedi]

Dude liking black men in porn does not make you gay. By far the largest number of men like girls, and by far the largest number of men like sex with girls. Now sex with girls in a male's fantasy almost inherently requires a guy to be there. Whether that guy is black or white or asian to each their own. I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene.

You are no different under your own terms, if liking black guys in your scenes makes you gay, because you like white guys in your porn, and guess what? Skin color doesn't change that. So no I don't think you're gay for that, but of course I don't apply a different brush to anyone else because they have no problem with a different color of skin on a guy.

Bolded a straw man argument here.
"Liking black men in porn" does not make you gay. Of course not, but that's not what I said. I specifically said the "bbc queens" here who are White and prefer or demand to see "bbc" not Black men. These guys are homosexuals. It's been noted by others before me.

On top of that, I notice that quite a few of them came to the shemale thread, saying they liked it and wanted to see it in LegalPorno.

I also point back to one of my earliest posts where a study of internet search terms showed that "black" is among the top 5 search terms for gay men, while it is far less common among straight men.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bi ... raight-men
Here's the article that started it all.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-alve ... 03674.html
A feminist critique of all this shit.
http://gaildines.com/2009/09/the-white-mans-burden/

They are probably the ones clamoring for silly stuff like 0% pussy porn too!

As far as straw man arguments, you have it here. First that a site should cater to what you think the market is. No. A site should cater to the market they choose. So bukkake sites cater to people who like that. So vintage porn sites cater to people who like that. LP caters to the market of their choice, and doesn't need to change for you.

Second, that liking trans means gay. Trannies are not other men, and most especially seeing them with girls is not a gay thing. Really I'm surprised you have that much interest to do all that research, but hey your time to use how you want to.

Lastly, black being a search term for gay men, does not mean the people who like fantasies with white girls and black men, are also gay. It means they like girls, and seeing them with other men. Let me bold a point I made which you didn't bold.

"I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene."

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Dude liking black men in porn does not make you gay. By far the largest number of men like girls, and by far the largest number of men like sex with girls. Now sex with girls in a male's fantasy almost inherently requires a guy to be there. Whether that guy is black or white or asian to each their own. I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene.

You are no different under your own terms, if liking black guys in your scenes makes you gay, because you like white guys in your porn, and guess what? Skin color doesn't change that. So no I don't think you're gay for that, but of course I don't apply a different brush to anyone else because they have no problem with a different color of skin on a guy.

Bolded a straw man argument here.
"Liking black men in porn" does not make you gay. Of course not, but that's not what I said. I specifically said the "bbc queens" here who are White and prefer or demand to see "bbc" not Black men. These guys are homosexuals. It's been noted by others before me.

On top of that, I notice that quite a few of them came to the shemale thread, saying they liked it and wanted to see it in LegalPorno.

I also point back to one of my earliest posts where a study of internet search terms showed that "black" is among the top 5 search terms for gay men, while it is far less common among straight men.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bi ... raight-men
Here's the article that started it all.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-alve ... 03674.html
A feminist critique of all this shit.
http://gaildines.com/2009/09/the-white-mans-burden/

They are probably the ones clamoring for silly stuff like 0% pussy porn too!

As far as straw man arguments, you have it here. First that a site should cater to what you think the market is. No. A site should cater to the market they choose. So bukkake sites cater to people who like that. So vintage porn sites cater to people who like that. LP caters to the market of their choice, and doesn't need to change for you.

Second, that liking trans means gay. Trannies are not other men, and most especially seeing them with girls is not a gay thing. Really I'm surprised you have that much interest to do all that research, but hey your time to use how you want to.

Lastly, black being a search term for gay men, does not mean the people who like fantasies with white girls and black men, are also gay. It means they like girls, and seeing them with other men. Let me bold a point I made which you didn't bold.

"I already explained the normal, STRAIGHT fantasies that can come to the mind of a typical heterosexual male, who is not black, if there are black actors in the scene."

Taken in the aggregate, it does indicate homosexual leanings. Gay men also buy a substantial amount of straight porn.
What we have here is not the site catering to the market per se, but a vocal minority seeking to create the appearance of market desire...to the detriment of the website. As was previously stated, LegalPorno is vastly underperforming relative to its peers. Why is that? Because they are turning off White men in droves, the largest segment of the market.

Why are they turning those men off in droves? Because they are being led astray by homosexuals/bisexuals. They buy a disproportionately high share of straight porn, but clearly not enough to match what straight White men are buying from their competitors.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... ent=safari
Took me just a Google search to find. This is a forum for Black men who love IR porn (BM/non-Black women) and they are discussing the influence of gay White men on their favorite genre. It's clear that they consider them the source of the ever increasing homosexual themes of that niche.

Apologies if the link doesn't work on your computer.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

pornjedi. Correct, trannies with women does not necessarily mean gay. But here again, I was replying specifically to the 'bbc queens" who have already shown their love of dick.
If we were to find search terms on shemale (offensive to most transgender people but we'll use it here) porn fans, it would likely indicate that they want to see the guy getting fucked or some other gay search phrases clustered at the top.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Note to gay White "bbc queens" who are here. There are anti-White, racist Muslims that share your fetish. Though for other reasons.

Maybe think about the mass gang rape of these European girls by Muslims who thought White girls are all toys for Muslim men to use, the next time you ask LegalPorno to placate your fetish.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/opini ... pe=article
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... d-eye.html
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-com ... -rotherham
http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/wp-c ... 3-2014.pdf

Here's the report, if you think the media is exaggerating the extent of the damage done.
http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/f ... _rotherham

Also, don't forget that gangs like this have been doing the same thing to White, Black , Sikh and the non-Muslim girls for decades in other British cities.

[pornjedi]

Just when I was happy that this thread was finished :/

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Just when I was happy that this thread was finished :/

After seeing what an Arab Muslim fan of LegalPorno's IR content had to say about White people, I felt "inspired" to share a few of those links about Muslim gangs raping children (as young as 11 year olds) because they were seen as easy targets and that 'White girls are whores anyway.'

[Pineapples Studio]

No racism here. Nope. None at all.

[gapefan]

In all the years I've been a member here, or even of forums elsewhere, I can never remember nearly so much of it until this guy showed up. He's full of it.

[pornjedi]

No racism here. Nope. None at all.

+1

Rape is rape, regardless of the color of the skin involved. Hate crime laws are a crime in themselves.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

No racism here. Nope. None at all.

+1

Rape is rape, regardless of the color of the skin involved. Hate crime laws are a crime in themselves.

It's flying over your heads. They admitted they specifically targeted White girls because they viewed them as promiscuous and that no one would do a thing about it. The "bbc queens" contribute to that image by demanding that fetish. Men of other ethnicities take that into consideration. I asked that Arab Muslim guy if he would share any porn of Arab Muslim women getting fucked and he got immediately defensive, even though he had just expressed his love of seeing White women getting fucked by non-White men.

Lastly, I'm not surprised that "bbc" queen Evil-Pineapples stopped by and didn't even care to comment on the rape of children. BBC queens like him don't give a shit about kids.

[pornjedi]

No racism here. Nope. None at all.

+1

Rape is rape, regardless of the color of the skin involved. Hate crime laws are a crime in themselves.

It's flying over your heads. They admitted they specifically targeted White girls because they viewed them as promiscuous and that no one would do a thing about it. The "bbc queens" contribute to that image by demanding that fetish. Men of other ethnicities take that into consideration. I asked that Arab Muslim guy if he would share any porn of Arab Muslim women getting fucked and he got immediately defensive, even though he had just expressed his love of seeing White women getting fucked by non-White men.

Lastly, I'm not surprised that "bbc" queen Evil-Pineapples stopped by and didn't even care to comment on the rape of children. BBC queens like him don't give a shit about kids.

Once again you think you know other people that you actually don't know at all. EP is not a BBC Queen, I know him personally. And for the rest, you don't know if it's flying over our heads or not.

We just don't bother with your crap over and over about skin color. Everything you think about with any issue, whether crimes, porn, or probably even in every other subject you look and think about skin color over and over and over. I first defended you not as a racist, but now I think you are a bit of a racist.

I know muslims, I know Asians, I know Latinos and black people, PERSONALLY in my life. I don't care whether a crime has some thing with race. I don't care about skin color rapes white girls. I care because only a girl got raped. I will care just as much if the men were white, Asian, black, or Middle Eastern. That's not racism.

But caring and attacking just because of someone's race or religion, that is a racism.

I can't remember any real time talking about race in this forum for years. Maybe there was a bit her or there, but so little I can't even remember it.

Yet now you come, and almost all your posts I see is about race and skin color. Don't let that go over your head.

[Pineapples Studio]

Lastly, I'm not surprised that "bbc" queen Evil-Pineapples stopped by and didn't even care to comment on the rape of children. BBC queens like him don't give a shit about kids.

I'm not even going to dignify that with a rebuttal.

Do we need any more proof that this thread is about racism?

Congratulations, pal, you're on ignore.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. The "bbc" queens out there just validate it. They thought that White people would do nothing to protect their children. Guess what, for 14+ plus years...they didn't. White men gay or not, clamoring to see White women getting gang fucked by a bunch of non-White men only validates the opinions of that anti-White, Arab Muslim guy who commented here and those Muslim pedophile gangs that raped 1400 girls in one small city.

Nobody did a damn thing about it, for fear of being labeled a racist.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Oh, and for your buddy Evil-Pineapples, he's been sending me private messages and reducing karma.

He's a mad little BBC queen.

[Pineapples Studio]

I sent you one PM:

I reduced your karma because you are a racist, toxic addition to this community. You are free to reduce mine as retaliation, if you so desire.

[james95]

Oh, and for your buddy Evil-Pineapples, he's been sending me private messages and reducing karma.

He's a mad little BBC queen.

you should change your nickname in WhynotmoreNazis.

[Iddaoeeok]

Why is anyone bothering to reply to this person? He is obviously mentally disturbed.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

Oh, and for your buddy Evil-Pineapples, he's been sending me private messages and reducing karma.

He's a mad little BBC queen.

you should change your nickname in WhynotmoreNazis.

You should change your name to Alternateaccounts95, since you like to attack people using different names.

[james95]

Oh, and for your buddy Evil-Pineapples, he's been sending me private messages and reducing karma.

He's a mad little BBC queen.

you should change your nickname in WhynotmoreNazis.

You should change your name to Alternateaccounts95, since you like to attack people using different names.

You should change your name to Paranoidwhynotmorenazis then, I haven't any other names, at least on this board.

[pornjedi]

I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. The "bbc" queens out there just validate it. They thought that White people would do nothing to protect their children. Guess what, for 14+ plus years...they didn't. White men gay or not, clamoring to see White women getting gang fucked by a bunch of non-White men only validates the opinions of that anti-White, Arab Muslim guy who commented here and those Muslim pedophile gangs that raped 1400 girls in one small city.

Nobody did a damn thing about it, for fear of being labeled a racist.

I heard you the first time, Mr. Brief LOL.

Yes those pedophile gangs might see color, and guess who else does? YOU LOL

But I think it's time to put you on ignore too. I average 4 posts a day, with 10 percent being in this thread. You average over 10 posts a day, with more than half being in here. It is you that sees skin color in everything. This is clear to everyone in this thread, and you know it. It's a shame you don't want to look in the mirror.

You want to protect only white children? Only what children attacked by dark-skinned men? Because that's the only reason to care what color skin the child or the men have. Othewise, stand with everyone else in this forum, take skin color out of it, and protect every child from every predator. The rest is irrelevant, unless of course you have a race agenda.

Btw, where does EP's message to you indicate some kind of BBC obsession. I have never heard one person use BBC more than you. I have never heard skin color was a problem more than from you. Yeah ignore is in order. Hopefully if everyone does this, he will be posting in a vacuum.

[Tastes Like Ass]

No racism here. Nope. None at all.

So much for your theory that banning piss scenes would get rid of the nutcases. There's more of them now than ever. It's almost enough to make me long for the days of Opium and the "Rape-n-Gape" guy!

[Pineapples Studio]

Opium never dies. He's just missing in action.

[WhynotmoreEuros]

I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. I'll be brief. YOU might not see color, but those pedophile gangs did. The "bbc" queens out there just validate it. They thought that White people would do nothing to protect their children. Guess what, for 14+ plus years...they didn't. White men gay or not, clamoring to see White women getting gang fucked by a bunch of non-White men only validates the opinions of that anti-White, Arab Muslim guy who commented here and those Muslim pedophile gangs that raped 1400 girls in one small city.

Nobody did a damn thing about it, for fear of being labeled a racist.

I heard you the first time, Mr. Brief LOL.

Yes those pedophile gangs might see color, and guess who else does? YOU LOL

But I think it's time to put you on ignore too. I average 4 posts a day, with 10 percent being in this thread. You average over 10 posts a day, with more than half being in here. It is you that sees skin color in everything. This is clear to everyone in this thread, and you know it. It's a shame you don't want to look in the mirror.

You want to protect only white children? Only what children attacked by dark-skinned men? Because that's the only reason to care what color skin the child or the men have. Othewise, stand with everyone else in this forum, take skin color out of it, and protect every child from every predator. The rest is irrelevant, unless of course you have a race agenda.

Btw, where does EP's message to you indicate some kind of BBC obsession. I have never heard one person use BBC more than you. I have never heard skin color was a problem more than from you. Yeah ignore is in order. Hopefully if everyone does this, he will be posting in a vacuum.

I've said from the beginning, if you don't agree with what I'm saying you are free to block me. I've blocked a bunch of people already (including several who still visit and post on this thread and post after me on other threads.

You have a nasty habit of putting up straw men arguments. Quote me where I said I only want to protect White children? I was making the point that those sexual predators ADMITTED they targeted White children because they felt no one would do anything about it...they were right! Social workers complained for nearly two decades about what was going on, and the White authorities intimidated them and called them racist....enabling those Muslim pedophile gangs to rape 1400 girls over the years. Including incidents where girls were doused in lighter fluid and threatened with incineration.

So being called racist when I see something fucked up happening is a small price to pay.

[18cm Cock]

By the way a lot of Arabs are white and some of them are blond so white skin is not only European so stop being paranoid about people like to fuck white asses.

[Iddaoeeok]

This is all very fascinating, but what is it doing on Legalporno's forum?

[pornjedi]

This is all very fascinating, but what is it doing on Legalporno's forum?

Well I'd like to say once in a while, but in my years on the forum, I never saw it really before...

But people with race issues, who look at issues through the lens of skin color, rather than the person inside, come in and tell LP they should change their site to suit them. Then people jump in to say skin color doesn't matter to them, or they're ok with LP doing whatever they want (that was my point), and they just go on and on and on.

Thus why I blocked notmoreEuros. That way I don't see his repetitive and pointless dribble anymore. When you block someone, you don't see their posts anymore. It's great!

[gapefan]

Take a look at the top 10 most watched scenes, how many of them are with European White men primarily or exclusively? Almost all of them.

When you say 'the top 10 most watched scenes', I can only assume you mean based on 'views', which has absolutely no bearing on actual sales.

How about something meaningful...

Take a good look at the top 10 best sellers located at the bottom 1/3 of the homepage ---> http://legalporno.com/

Your argument is false.

Not to mention the fact that you are trying to attach success or failure, to one variable. If you know anything about statistics you'll realize that there are MANY variables at play here.

A true statistician would also realize that correlation of one variable, does not imply causation of the other (i.e. sales).

No, my argument is correct and thanks for making it even more valid. Best sellers only 2 out of 10 are primarily with non-Euro, non-White men and they are both with Arwen Gold. LegalPorno needs to stop listening to people LIKE YOU Gape Fan.

Look again

But not at the bottom of the homepage. Click on the best sellers link at the top

http://legalporno.com/best-videos



It looks to me like the stats have been updated to exclude downloads obtained using free tickets. As it should be

[JediMasterBates]

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/29989/n ... _rs068http:

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30029/a ... anal_rs055