101mike101 wrote:There are a lot more women than guys in the porn industry.
Indeed. And the reason that was always given for this (correctly) is that it's very hard for any male to perform sex to order on a regular basis (even with incredibly beautiful women) so only a small number of guys could do it reliably. There has never been a shortage of guys prepared to give it a go, for obvious reasons. The fact that there is now the short cut of stimulus both widens the options for producers but also basically kills the art of the male porn star stone dead. It's lose-lose really apart from the sheer amount of content you can make assuming you can find enough guys who accept the health risks involved.
Whichever way you look at it, the only conclusion can be that this will kill porn (if it hasn't already). It's like the guitar that plays pre-programmed classics note perfect. So I can go on stage and I don't need to do anything, whilst my inability to play the guitar no longer matters. Brilliant (in a way). But what a dull, sterile spectacle for the observer. I can only satisfy the easily-pleased and even then probably not for long.
I was vaguely aware of this practice for quite a while and sort of tried to ignore it but now it does explain a lot (not least all the male dom aggression, which presumably results from a lack of sexual arousal). I'm afraid I'm not on board. Is there any way back? Or do we think porn producers will now simply not be prepared to take the risk of old fashioned natural arousal?
Do
any current AV/LP scenes not include male stimulant?
More non-manhandle scenes please. Hands away from face/neck/shoulders. Keep the girls loose, free and expressive. Don't overpower them - let them sizzle! Keep the heels on. More panties pulled to one side. More skirts/tight dresses. More 0% pussy scenes.