Contact XXX

[the_french_journalist]

Hi,
I'm a french journalist, trying to reach M. XXX, to talk about his truth.
Can he contact me ?
Thanks

[xxx]

A journalist with no name, on a burner email and a Tor nigerian IP.

[the_french_journalist]

I can assure you, I'm a real journalist. I've try to contact you with the from contact (and I write to you by the post mail !), and finally I try my luck here.
I work for L'Obs, weekly news magazine, and I'm really interesting on your business. I think lots of things and fantasies were written about it and you, and I think it's time to hear your truth, the facts. And, it's not everyday than a french is at the top of an industry (cocorico).
I'm not used to burner mail, I'll be happy to communicate with you by phone or else. And I'm on Tor, because the network in my office block your website .
Thanks.

[the_french_journalist]

M. XXX ?

[xxx]

Why don't you ask a couple questions here? The forum is made for discussions.

[xxx]

Ok. You have a very long list of questions, many of which don't really have their place here. Let's do a couple of them that are relevant to this forum.

EN What do you think of the claim that "tube sites killed porn"?
FR Que pensez-vous de l'affirmation que "les tubes ont tué le porno" ?"
EN What future do you see for online porn?
FR "Quel avenir voyez-vous pour le porno en ligne ?"

Our understanding is that porn production is bigger and more diverse than it ever was. It is also our understanding that the porn business is bigger than it ever was. Of course internet and smart phones are probably responsible for this growth. Would the business be better if "tubes" didn't exist? Most certainly. But we didn't invent them (nor did "Youporn"). When tube sites appeared (following Youtube, and in the porn industry, Pornotube), we had sites with 0% UGC and piracy. It was "adapt or die" for everyone in the industry. Journalists love to point fingers at certain sites while using Twitter on a daily basis but your beloved Twitter, just like us, as well as the entire modern internet rely on allowing a certain degree of trust and good will to function.

Porn has a bright future because there is clearly a huge demand for it, that is never acknowledged in the press, by the way. I would say that a solid 75% of the population wants porn. Western societies have failed to properly integrate the sexuality of their people - instead they made sex a dirty thing - creating a gaping hole and generating a lot of suffering.
But it (especially on internet) is also a dream job for many millions of people (and expect this to grow). It is absolutely idiotic for country leaders to want to ban it because it is an activity that is always tied to the people from that country. For example : french people much prefer to see french girls/boys. So this industry cannot be fully exported.

-
EN Denik N reported testimonies of actresses who were victims of mistreatment during filming under the Legal Porno banner. I saw your clarification, that it is not your own production. However, these shootings were made in your building in Prague, "under your roof". Are the practices described real? Have they changed?
FR "Denik N a rapporté des témoignages d'actrices victimes de mauvais traitement lors de tournages réalisés sous la bannière Legal Porno. J'ai vu votre éclairage, que ce n'est pas votre production en propre. Néanmoins, ces tournages ont été réalisé dans votre bâtiment de Prague, "sous votre toit". Les pratiques décrites sont-elles réelles ? Ont-elles changé ?"

It is clear that you have not read what I wrote on this topic as I have said much more than this. You are asking if the practices are real. What about asking if the alleged events are real to begin with? You even claim that some things occurred under our roof but no such claim was even made. Instead the allegations are a bunch of vague attacks that could have happened at any place, including the many that are not ours.
If you had read our forum then you would also know that Denikn was fed "information" by Pierre Woodman, who is demonstrably a huge liar, extremely manipulative and has been attacking us for many years. You also know that the same Pierre Woodman was in court not so long ago for the very same claims and had a wonderful opportunity to have his voice heard in a very relevant place. Instead the judge told him to stop telling lies and threatened him. You could have read all this right here in our forum.
Understand that Denikn was desperate to damage the xvideos brand. They were hungry to gain popularity by reproducing the Pornhub scenario (it is a very small paper). Unfortunately it wasn't working as they couldn't find anything (they attacked us saying they were able to upload an episode of the Simpsons...). You also know very well why Denikn published garbage-tier "information" from extremely and obviously unreliable sources : the press wants scandals, drama, and it is not going to let the truth get in the way.

For our readers who probably don't know I'll tell you how bad press works : you have a person who decided even before any proper investigation that you are guilty of something and it will make for great drama and will enjoy very much dragging you into the mud while posing as a white knight. They then proceed to look for every person you have ever interacted with, and send them messages asking for dirt while reassuring them than they can remain perfectly anonymous and trash us as much as they want. They gather this crap for a while and dismiss everything that doesn't fit the narrative, then pack it into a trash article with a catchy offensive title and call that "work".
It always does a lot of damage because 1/ most people just read titles or headers, 2/ anything is spread far and wide with Google news + other journalists copying or citing the "work" (they really don't care to verify anything when all they have to do is just write "this paper found this and that"), 3/ a good portion of the others who will read will believe anything anyway, and 4/ the press is very protected (which would be a good thing, if they didn't abuse their powers so much).

[101mike101]

....
Porn has a bright future because there is clearly a huge demand for it, that is never acknowledged in the press, by the way. I would say that a solid 75% of the population wants porn. Western societies have failed to properly integrate the sexuality of their people - instead they made sex a dirty thing - creating a gaping hole and generating a lot of suffering....

I think there will always be a place for porn in any society. But the popularity of porn isn't necessarily guaranteed. Because for porn-viewers, porn a substitute for sex, rather than the real thing.

The only reason why porn is so popular in the West now is because so many people are alone and so many people have no easy way to satisfy their sexual feelings and desires, except through porn and masturbation.

Men and women in the West aren't doing well together in terms of having good relationships and satisfying each other's sexual needs and desires. And that's what makes porn so popular. But it doesn't have to be this way. And perhaps some future generations will change western culture and improve it to make it better in this regard. No living culture stays the same from one generation to the next. It always changes over time. Although there is no guarantee that the culture will change for the better, rather than become worse.

[the_french_journalist]

Thanks M. XXX.
Don't you want tell anything about your business, how it's working so far ?

[greenfunk727]

There is zero benefit for him answering your questions.
Everyone is interested in Pacaud. The guy is a is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, as Churchill once said about Russia

Of course as a journalist XXX is a very interesting story and lots of people would be very interested to see behind the veil.

But in this profession anonymity is the key to success.

He has nothing to win and everything to lose talking to you.

Thanks M. XXX.
Don't you want tell anything about your business, how it's working so far ?

[greenfunk727]

A journalist with no name, on a burner email and a Tor nigerian IP.

[dap-addict]

FR "Denik N a rapporté des témoignages d'actrices victimes de mauvais traitement lors de tournages réalisés sous la bannière Legal Porno. J'ai vu votre éclairage, que ce n'est pas votre production en propre. Néanmoins, ces tournages ont été réalisé dans votre bâtiment de Prague, "sous votre toit". Les pratiques décrites sont-elles réelles ? Ont-elles changé ?"[/i]

It is clear that you have not read what I wrote on this topic as I have said much more than this. You are asking if the practices are real. What about asking if the alleged events are real to begin with?

Well, sadly we dont see all questions of that "French Journalist", but going back half-wittingly to that Bp lier APE instigated slander of DevnikN is repeating that slander again for French press!
I dont know even what to say; its beyond my understanding of fairness and good practices.
"French journalist" might have his questions and doubts, fair enough, but why not ask to attend a porn shooting instead of repeating slander again and again in his questions.