My 5 favourite kings

[ZiziMinuscule]

As this forum is keen on all kinds of TOPs, I decided to put my TOP 5 of statesmen. As I’m a convinced monarchist, all of them are kings

Joseph II Habsburg (Austria) – a very intelligent monarch who abolished Jesuit order in Austria and who introduced different financial and educational reforms aimed to transform the Hasburg monarchy into a modern state; sadly, his succesors abandoned his reforms.

Alfonso XIII Bourbon (Spain) – he was co-founder of Royal Films, one of the first Spanish film producing companies that shot, among others, pornographic movies ordered by the king himself; when it comes to his politics, he did his best to strenghten the country, but just like Stanislas August Poniatowski in Poland, he was rather a „bankrupcy administrator” who, in spite of his efforts, could not change the fate of his country.

Stanislas August Poniatowski (Poland) – the last Polish king of Poland; very criticised by official historiography as the country’s gravedigger, he was however an enlighthened monarch who did his best (it’s during his reign that the first Polish constitution was voted and that first Polish ministry of education was created) to develop the kingdom that had been left in a pitiful state by his predecessors; I would compare him to a very intelligent and diligent „bankrupcy administrator” who makes his best, but who can’t save the company.

Alexander I Romanoff (Russia) – an enlightened king who not only defeated the monster from Corsica, but who granted partitioned Poland the stauts of kingdom as well; if he didn’t die young, he would certainly be a very good emperor for Russia and king for Poland.

Henri IV Bourbon (France) – an enligthened king who brought to an end religious wars in France and who was wise enough to abandon his confession for the sake of his kingdom and his people.

[netzerkaiser]

[quote="ZiziMinuscule"]As this forum is keen on all kinds of TOPs, I decided to put my TOP 5 of statesmen. As I’m a convinced monarchist, all of them are kings

Brother, this is very intellectual stuff, & thanks, because I've heard of none of these guys.
2 words of warning though:

1. I'm surprised no-ones come along & said, 'whats this got to do with pornography?!'.. & I can see their point TBH.

2. People like Churchill have had no idea of how it was to drag themselves up from nothingness to power. They couldn't have done what so many, e.g. Tito did in past century. Ok, born into wealth means often the snake-like psychopath trait prevalent amongst todays politicos, from the Clintons to Merkel, isn't there... but a man like Kurt Schumacher, with what he went through, was a legend (& I'm no intellectual leftist - their vision is so narrow with limited agenda, LGBT, BLM, Israel... I think they're fucking morons.. what about caste system in India - nah, better not touch that etc)... you know what I mean? So many, 80% of the liberals of today, would've been conservatives 50 years ago. They're idiots who follow the flow.

[netzerkaiser]

Kurt Schumacher called Nazism: "a continuous appeal to the inner swine in human beings" and stated the movement had been uniquely successful in "ceaselessly mobilizing human stupidity."

Kurt Schumacher called communists: "red-painted Nazis."

This is a MAN. & he died too, of the brutal mistreatment he received, at hands of Nazi's, but he would've got same from post-45 Soviet invaders, if he'd lived in East Prussia, from these Bolshevik bastards, against Polish patriots.

[greenfunk727]

ZiziMinuscule a lot of these kings have redeeming qualities but sometimes I like to root for the bad guy. Darth Vadar is far more interesting than Luke Sky walker and hence I'm going for:

Henry VIII (28 June 1491 – 28 January 1547) was King of England from 1509 until his death in 1547.

6 wives, beheaded a few and even started his own religion that the majority of English christians follow today because the pope in Rome wouldn’t given him a divorce.

[netzerkaiser]

ZiziMinuscule a lot of these kings have redeeming qualities but sometimes I like to root for the bad guy. Darth Vadar is far more interesting than Luke Sky walker and hence I'm going for:

Henry VIII (28 June 1491 – 28 January 1547) was King of England from 1509 until his death in 1547.

6 wives, beheaded a few and even started his own religion that the majority of English christians follow today because the pope in Rome wouldn’t given him a divorce.

Cool. Sometimes humour is just the fucking answer!

[davebowman]

Is this where I put in my request for a scene of Henry VIII banging all six of his wives at once?

[netzerkaiser]

[quote="davebowman"]Is this where I put in my request for a scene of Henry VIII banging all six of his wives at once?

No list of kings can be made without Steve Holmes as contender?!

[Iddaoeeok]

As this forum is keen on all kinds of TOPs, I decided to put my TOP 5 of statesmen. As I’m a convinced monarchist, all of them are kings

Brother, this is very intellectual stuff, & thanks, because I've heard of none of these guys.
2 words of warning though:

1. I'm surprised no-ones come along & said, 'whats this got to do with pornography?!'.. & I can see their point TBH.

2. People like Churchill have had no idea of how it was to drag themselves up from nothingness to power. They couldn't have done what so many, e.g. Tito did in past century. Ok, born into wealth means often the snake-like psychopath trait prevalent amongst todays politicos, from the Clintons to Merkel, isn't there... but a man like Kurt Schumacher, with what he went through, was a legend (& I'm no intellectual leftist - their vision is so narrow with limited agenda, LGBT, BLM, Israel... I think they're fucking morons.. what about caste system in India - nah, better not touch that etc)... you know what I mean? So many, 80% of the liberals of today, would've been conservatives 50 years ago. They're idiots who follow the flow.

What's this got to do with pornography?

There wouldn't be too much of a problem if people could keep it light and didn't try and drag contemporary politics in, but people have so little self-control these days they feel they have to let the entire world know what they're thinking about when the entire world doesn't care.

[ZiziMinuscule]

1. I'm surprised no-ones come along & said, 'whats this got to do with pornography?!'.. & I can see their point TBH.

Basically nothing to do with pornography. But the large majority of posts on this forum, even if porn-related, are even more useless than mine (repetitive Woodman bashing, pointless "request" [do you really believe XXX, Giorgio and others pay attention to what a bunch of forumers is willing to watch in their productions], all kind of "lists" and "Tops 10" etc. [why should I care if X or Y prefers Linda Sweet or Arwen Gold to someone else ?]).

if anyone of You retain that Alfonso XIII wrote porn scenarios and sponsorised porn production, I've attained my goal.

[dap-addict]

Please, please both of you, open porn girl nostalgia threads instead!
LP 2015 a.o.
Red Light Pictures 2005
Rocco 1995, Rocco in Prague I and II etc.

Ta!

[dap-addict]

Alfonso XIII Bourbon (Spain) – he was co-founder of Royal Films

What would Alphonso have said to this film?
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/31353
And what would Zizi say to it nowadays 4 years after debut?
And netzer?
Or dap-a?

[CanadianCouple]

Is this where I put in my request for a scene of Henry VIII banging all six of his wives at once?

No, because that is not LP style. You need henry's guards giving triple anal and pissing on all of his wives

[netzerkaiser]

Is this where I put in my request for a scene of Henry VIII banging all six of his wives at once?

No, because that is not LP style. You need henry's guards giving triple anal and pissing on all of his wives

[netzerkaiser]

There wouldn't be too much of a problem if people could keep it light and didn't try and drag contemporary politics in, but people have so little self-control these days they feel they have to let the entire world know what they're thinking about when the entire world doesn't care.[/quote]

Brother, you're completely right in what you say. But in some ways you're wrong. Sometimes people end up in corners or phases in their life, & they'll post their latest shopping list online for a few months, often tired or drunk. But then they'll snap out of it, & they'll never even log onto discussions etc again. Do you understand this? Don't take it so seriously. I don't anyway. And I say this with great respect for you. Peace & love, Brother.

[Wotan29]

Is this where I put in my request for a scene of Henry VIII banging all six of his wives at once?

No, because that is not LP style. You need henry's guards giving triple anal and pissing on all of his wives

[Iddaoeeok]

Brother, you're completely right in what you say. But in some ways you're wrong. Sometimes people end up in corners or phases in their life, & they'll post their latest shopping list online for a few months, often tired or drunk. But then they'll snap out of it, & they'll never even log onto discussions etc again. Do you understand this? Don't take it so seriously. I don't anyway. And I say this with great respect for you. Peace & love, Brother.

The internet is a big place there's no shortage of places to post political crap, why post it here? You might even find people who agree with you.

[ZiziMinuscule]

Alfonso XIII Bourbon (Spain) – he was co-founder of Royal Films

What would Alphonso have said to this film?
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/31353
And what would Zizi say to it nowadays 4 years after debut?

I'm sure that Su Majestad El Rey Alfonso XIII would appreciate such a lovely piece of porn art. When it comes to me, when I watch this scene - as well as all the other scenes featuring Roxy - I feel simultaneously aroused and saddened. On one side, Roxy still remains one of my all time favourites I and will never stop watching her scenes but, on the other, I feel disappointed by the fact she will probably never return. That being said, I just hope she is - as far as possible - happy in her current life. If she doesn't need to come back, all the better for her. If - however - she was willing to shoot more scenes, but was despised by producers, that is criminal.

[Lotto]

Alexander I Romanoff (Russia) – an enlightened king who not only defeated the monster from Corsica, but who granted partitioned Poland the stauts of kingdom as well; if he didn’t die young, he would certainly be a very good emperor for Russia and king for Poland.

Good to see Romanovs represented - though it's quite common for my fellow Russians to be in various LP TOPs
But personally I'd put Alexander II above, for his numerous liberal reforms and almost sucessful attempt at impelemting a (albeit still really conservative) Constitution - he was killed 2 hours after approving the project.

[ZiziMinuscule]

^ I was considering to put Alexander II in my list. If my fellow Polish countrymen would have not insurrected against imperial Russia in 1863 and - thus - attract Poland (or, to be precise, the part of ex-kngdom of Poland that was belonging to Russia at that time) harsh tsarist repression, I'm pretty sure Alexander II would have granted Poland some liberal reforms and would have been remembered as a relatively good monarch even in Poland. Unfortunately, because of the fact he defeated the January Uprising and expelled many Poles on Siberia, in my country he is considered - as basically every other tsar - as a tyrranic monster. What is an utter nonsense. Many of my fellow countrymen just can't accept the fact that if Poland had been partitoned by its neighbours, it's because our kings had been utterly inefficient and because our noblemen had been more interested by their personal interests than by the Polish raison d'etat.

That being said, I'm a convinced monarchist and I prefer a Russian tsar than some more or less "democratically elected" scoundrels, like those who gouvern Poland currently.

One of the greatest Polish politicians of XIX century, the count Aleksander Wielopolski, have accurately pointed out that "You can do everything for the sake of the Poles, but there is nothing you can do together with them".

[OKCTwister]

Queen Elizabeth II being triple penetrated by her inbred moronic sons... she's a cunt that killed Diana, despise Meghan and is still responsible for major atrocities across the world (Malvinas, Gibraltar...) and she is related to another psycho / mass murderer Leopold II
I hate Monarchs
Very bad and misleading thread because I thought it referred to the best LP studs

[Iddaoeeok]

Cromwell had the right idea when it came to kings.

[netzerkaiser]

Cromwell had the right idea when it came to kings.

Cromwell was a revolutionary - he was a significant man of his time. However, though it is well known that he was brutal in his treatment of Ireland, I grew up with this, it becomes tiresome, but when you revisit it years later, you get some insights from a distance, & its still horrendous. In the 30 years war which just predated Cromwell landing on our shores, not even taking into account what his genocidal policies put into effect, it was horrible, so I'm gonna put him in there with Adolph & Stalin & Lenin as a butcher:

"The death toll of the conflict was huge. William Petty, a Cromwellian who conducted the first scientific land and demographic survey of Ireland in the 1650s (the Down Survey), concluded that at least 400,000 people and maybe as many as 620,000 had died in Ireland between 1641 and 1653. The true figure may well be lower given Petty's outmoded methodology, but the lowest suggested is about 200,000. At the time, according to William Petty, the population of Ireland was only around 1.5 million inhabitants. It is estimated that about two-thirds of the deaths were civilian. The Irish defeat led to the mass confiscation of Catholic owned land and the English Protestant domination of Ireland for over two centuries".

[netzerkaiser]

Cromwell had the right idea when it came to kings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6rX-q7lQY

Same thing going on today. I knew an Aussie officer who tried training the Afghan lads post-Taliban, & he had to go to the back row to tell the lads to stop touching each other up. Tragi-comedic, but true.

[netzerkaiser]

Cromwell had the right idea when it came to kings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DDLyNS9rxw

[Iddaoeeok]

Cromwell had the right idea when it came to kings.

Cromwell was a revolutionary - he was a significant man of his time. However, though it is well known that he was brutal in his treatment of Ireland, I grew up with this, it becomes tiresome, but when you revisit it years later, you get some insights from a distance, & its still horrendous. In the 30 years war which just predated Cromwell landing on our shores, not even taking into account what his genocidal policies put into effect, it was horrible, so I'm gonna put him in there with Adolph & Stalin & Lenin as a butcher:

"The death toll of the conflict was huge. William Petty, a Cromwellian who conducted the first scientific land and demographic survey of Ireland in the 1650s (the Down Survey), concluded that at least 400,000 people and maybe as many as 620,000 had died in Ireland between 1641 and 1653. The true figure may well be lower given Petty's outmoded methodology, but the lowest suggested is about 200,000. At the time, according to William Petty, the population of Ireland was only around 1.5 million inhabitants. It is estimated that about two-thirds of the deaths were civilian. The Irish defeat led to the mass confiscation of Catholic owned land and the English Protestant domination of Ireland for over two centuries".

I think you should look into what various English and later British kings did in Ireland.

[netzerkaiser]

I think you should look into what various English and later British kings did in Ireland.[/quote]

I always got on great in UK. I think too often people can carry a complex on their shoulders based on historical stuff, whereas their own lives were comfortable. I've no time for that mentality, myself.

[netzerkaiser]

I think you should look into what various English and later British kings did in Ireland.[/quote]

Brother, its like you see all these well-heeled Irishmen & they're at posh rugby events & they're singing rebel songs against '800 years of oppression' & these fuckers would walk down street & look other way from a commoner like me. I'd have much more in common with a down to earth English, Irish, Scots, Welsh, or Northern Irish non-sectarian of either tribe than these gobshites.

[netzerkaiser]

I think you should look into what various English and later British kings did in Ireland.[/quote]

I'd like to make another point here Brother, that you might find interesting. The English could never work out the difference between my working class Irish accent & the attempts of those speaking in so-called posh Irish accent - that infuriated the latter, & since these types control media etc, I'm convinced its led to an anti-Brit bias. But me, as intelligent (I hope) working class Paddy, I respect you lot as my own, & thats meant as real compliment.