Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?
powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?
PrinceOfGapes wrote:powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?
Anal is king here, and sells really well. Many people prefer DAP, and 0% pussy scenes.
powerful76 wrote:Theres some reason for that?
at least in some scenes, would be really cool to see DVP in GIO scenes.
powerful76 wrote:For the girls, pussy stretching is more diffciult/painful than anal stretching?
grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.
SimplyStunning wrote:grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.
These statements always bring a smile to my face because they absolutely make no sense. How does ANAL as a primary feature mean no pussy or DVP ? Am I the only that laughs at this. So should the primary ANAL crowd also complain about kissing, teasing, stripping, footjobs, handjobs, blowjobs, bukkake, etc ? After all it is not primarily ANAL.
SimplyStunning wrote:only worried about profit and the easiest way to make it with the least cost
grey00owl wrote:SimplyStunning wrote:grey00owl wrote:Giorgio Grandi however has always heralded ANAL as primary and mandatory feature of his productions: it would be contradictory now if he would shoot DVP, that basically is a feature of pussy porn excluding anal.
These statements always bring a smile to my face because they absolutely make no sense. How does ANAL as a primary feature mean no pussy or DVP ? Am I the only that laughs at this. So should the primary ANAL crowd also complain about kissing, teasing, stripping, footjobs, handjobs, blowjobs, bukkake, etc ? After all it is not primarily ANAL.
You misunderstand me. I'm not saying I don't like DP (not DVP), kissing, blowjobs..., just that GG won't shoot a scene basically based on pussy penetration. As well as GONZO, by the way, but at GG it's even clearer.
lp89 wrote:His trademark is anal, double anal and 0 pussy. And it’s a very succesful trademark, like building up a brand.
When you think of his studio, you think of anal, rough anal and double anal. That’s what the audience expects, thats what the models sign up for. With piss now being added to the formula. Although it’s still an extreme porn act, switching from 0 pussy to double pussy would be inconsistent.
I think Giorgio is an artist with a clear vision. And that vision doesnt accomodate pussy fucking.
lp89 wrote:His trademark is anal, double anal and 0 pussy. And it’s a very succesful trademark, like building up a brand.
When you think of his studio, you think of anal, rough anal and double anal. That’s what the audience expects, thats what the models sign up for. With piss now being added to the formula. Although it’s still an extreme porn act, switching from 0 pussy to double pussy would be inconsistent.
I think Giorgio is an artist with a clear vision. And that vision doesnt accomodate pussy fucking.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests