Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Moderators: aleksey_k, admin

SimplyStunning
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Postby SimplyStunning » Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:10 pm

dap-addict wrote:Anyway, you asked to 3 to 5, but than I am already sure you'll pick on 'recently', just to feed your conspiracy theories or just because if was me pointing you to them. What the heck! :confused:

Are you fucking blind, I gave you credit for giving me models within the range I asked but I also called you out on listing 9 of them when you knew it was only 3 or 4. Only conspiracy here is you inflating the numbers to try and boost your false narrative.

dap-addict wrote:We have different fetishes for our porn obviously and its not the first time we clash. Problem is while I am really trying to be flexible, support fetish catering of all kinds and get tolerant myself be it with NHB obsessed Luis/gonzo, you seem unable to understand why I still do side most with the studio catering for my own user needs, i.e. 0% pussy DAPs.

I don't give a fuck who you side with. What I do give a fuck about is you in every thread whining about the scene not being a 0% Pussy. Dude you are not fucking important , why would I care who you side with.

dap-addict wrote:You in turn seem to have only 1 compassion: Your own egoist hate towards those who dont agree with you! :mad: :confused: :(

Oh Woe is me, he hurt my feeling. This coming from the idiot that complains in every thread about Vanilla porn being anything not 0% Pussy and LP should stop making any scene that he considers Vanilla porn. I can feel the compassion, dumbass! You attacks other members for actually having the audacity of liking something other than what you like. Also giving unwelcomed and unsolicited advice to find their porn interest somewhere other than LP has the nerve to talk about compassion. Then come her and post this quote like you are a victim.

dap-addict wrote:Porn actors are payed to do their job, if they wanna fuck for their own pleasure they can do it at home.

Anything to disrupt dap-addict pleasure is unacceptable but he is Mr. Compassionate, fucking laughable. Delusional asshole!
South American girls!
Yenifer, Rosario Antoline, Min Ninfetinha, Daniela Garcia, Eva Perez
Emily Pink, Daniela Ortiz, Alicia Trece, Kelly Oliveira

Real hardcore performers have no limitations, so fuck all her their holes! Stop the O% Pussy bullshit.

SimplyStunning
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Postby SimplyStunning » Fri Dec 13, 2019 5:22 pm

for @Giorgio Grandi: I wanted to wait and respond to you when I had more time to give you a proper and respectful response. So here it is.

1st: I didn't bring up Nicole Black because you already explained her unique situation at the start of the thread.

2nd: I do understand, people are free to do whatever they want but others can also form a opinion whether right or wrong on those decisions right ? For example, I thought your decision to not shoot Megan Rain because she would only shoot DP not DAP was wrong as Megan was a young upcoming beautiful superstar with many forum request but hey I'm just a paying customer.

3rd: I understand that some agents and girls refuse to work with studios based on the fetishes they shoot and reputation of the studio or director. So a agent or girl not wanting to work with LP because of the extremity of its fetishes I fully understand. The confusion I have is the girl or agent that didn't initially want to work with LP for their extreme fetishes why would the girl or agent decide to only shoot with your studio which is responsible for the most extreme fetishes on LP (prolapse, 0% pussy and DAP, piss drinking, fisting and footing focus) ? I would think they would avoid your studio not Gonzo and IV which shoot more diverse fetish scenes than you do. When I interact with models on [spam] and [spam] the reason they give is DAP with some bringing up pissing and manhandling on LP. They feel that in order to shoot for LP it is mandatory to shoot DAP scenes.

4th: I get that Aletta Black just got back but threw her name in because seeing her with Monster Cock or Waka Waka Team would make my brain explode if she managed to take them balls deep since she is too damn petite and skinny to handle them.

5th: If your PR team is so much better than Gonzo and IV PR team maybe you can put in a good word for them so that LP customers that would love to see Sofi Smile, Nikki Hill, Alita Angel, Pinky Breeze and Aletta Black being shot in front of some other studio camera than yours would be appreciated. Although my preference is Gonzo, reading Joachim thread from IV studio he mentions constantly being turned down by girls not even stars that have no problem shooting with your studio just makes me think it is more than the girl or agent choice to do whatever the fuck they want.

Anyway that is my response. I really don't care what fetishes individual directors decide to focus on what frustrates me is the PW like behavior of studios where only certain studios shoot certain girls. The LP umbrella should have a more helpful policy to share girls from one LP studio to another LP studio. Even with Euro girls going over seas to American Anal and Assablanca.
South American girls!
Yenifer, Rosario Antoline, Min Ninfetinha, Daniela Garcia, Eva Perez
Emily Pink, Daniela Ortiz, Alicia Trece, Kelly Oliveira

Real hardcore performers have no limitations, so fuck all her their holes! Stop the O% Pussy bullshit.

User avatar
dap-addict
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 44900
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:57 am
Karma: 1

Re: Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Postby dap-addict » Fri Dec 13, 2019 6:48 pm

SimplyStunning wrote:I can feel the compassion, dumbass! You attacks other members for actually having the audacity of liking something other than what you like. Also giving unwelcomed and unsolicited advice to find their porn interest somewhere other than LP has the nerve to talk about compassion. Then come her and post this quote like you are a victim.

Victim? :confused:
Wasn't I clear enough about what compassion I am talking about? :mad:
dap-addict wrote:And its nothing of your added cartoon and if you read my posts carefully you see I call out GIO for bugs like that cage, detached Aleksey filming style or missing compassion with girls etc. You in turn seem to have only 1 compassion: Your own egoist hate towards those who dont agree with you! :mad: :confused: :(


Swear and shout as long as you want on me, I better leave and give our lovely LP girls some true respect instead! :)
ex-Eurobabeforum DAPlist responsible - PM contact: dap-a@seznam.cz
TWO DAP SCENES PER DAY! - More true fast balls deep DAP! More 0% pussy! - Dress them to fuck and pop their eyes - Heels on! No condoms!!! - EKS do more 8 DAP Porn Stress Test bookings!!!

Giorgio Grandi
Studio
 
Posts: 2397
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:32 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Postby Giorgio Grandi » Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:31 pm

SimplyStunning
I appreciate you last response, but it is full of black holes due to the fact you do not know how our industry work.

1st
ok

2nd
I dont remember the specific case

3rd
The answer here is very complex, there are really many factors. I try to make it short: some girl think some fetish are mandatory and maybe it is true for them. Some model cant simply make it with a simple DP scene, it wont sell enough. Its a matter of beauty and performing skills. So Im personally very clear on this, I am ok with DP if I think it can sell, otherwise I need DAP or even DAP and pissing. In italy we say "I know my chickes", it mean I know how the user will react with some model doing only DP: low sales.

4th
I shot her with BBC

5th
Studio are turned down for many reason and believe me that what I say doesnt count anything, it can even make worse my own relationship with people. I do know Petra from Gonzo does good as PR, but as I have people that dont want to work with me, I assume she has someone that doesnt want to work with her. It is very common.

Also one studio could be ok to pay the model "X" a certain amount of money, but not the model "Y". For example a couple of girls working for Gonzo pretty often asked me an amount of money I do not consider interesting, but clearly it is ok for Gonzo.
And of course model and agents do what the fuck they want, we try to go along as more as we can
My work: https://www.giorgiograndi.com/

Girls here -> https://www.giorgiograndi.eu/

My toys at https://www.thewondertoys.com/

Do you want to review my scenes (and not only)?
I would refund you the cost
Ping me on twitter @giorgiograndi76

SimplyStunning
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:07 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Sharing pornstars between studios (question)

Postby SimplyStunning » Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:55 pm

Giorgio Grandi wrote:4th
I shot her with BBC

And of course model and agents do what the fuck they want, we try to go along as more as we can


Thanks for shooting Aletta in a BBC scene, I will buy it immediately when it is released and for your time in explaining your position on some of my assumptions.
South American girls!
Yenifer, Rosario Antoline, Min Ninfetinha, Daniela Garcia, Eva Perez
Emily Pink, Daniela Ortiz, Alicia Trece, Kelly Oliveira

Real hardcore performers have no limitations, so fuck all her their holes! Stop the O% Pussy bullshit.

Previous

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: russardo1 and 58 guests