I open this thread instigated by magizi87 Nataly Gold SZ1856 discussion in his .gif thread here: https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=17268&start=40 (mid page)
Really hope I do not quote him out of context here, but I find his remarks so useful for a GIO vs. gonzo DAP quality comparison:
magizi87 wrote:Nataly Gold SZ1856 highlights.
Scene runtime 50 minutes.
Intro duration 11 minutes.
(...)
Something that Gonzo does better that Giorgio on all things DAP,
is that Gonzo studs penetrate the models, more distinctively,
the motion of penetrating, moving in and out is more evident and clear.
Also during that Doggy segment, she was also deepthroating at times!
Going back to what I was saying about DAP and gonzo studs doing a better looking penetration
This is another example:
Also, what is currently my favorite thing to see happen during reverse cowgirl parts
The inclusion of a guy penetrating her mouth, directly in front of her face.
Now Nataly Gold is of course a very seasoned and DAP-able performer not to be compared with some of the GIO and gonzo rookies performing their 1st or even 3rd DAP.
Still some basic observations hold for me:
- gonzo anchor is often better - moving more instead of just lazy fixing her position, banging the girls ass while anchoring it for DAP
- gonzo uses often bigger cocks for anchoring as well as DAP-ing from above
- GIO has more DAP positions
- GIOs DAP footage is usually longer
- GIO offers up to 3-fold simultaneous DAPs
- GIO often savors the girls HIT better than gonzo
Well, please lets discuss who does what better and why!

No destructive critique please, but just to make DAP better on LP!
And please no secondary fetishes like *DAP is best with piss* or *heeled DAP over barefoot DAP* etc.
Just the porn sex act first!
Haters stay away please!