ahmetbakmis wrote:just went through my archive of lp from the very beginning until today, and have to say there is a drastic change between then and now, girls and the intensity of scenes used to be so much better back in the day, today, honestly, it is kinda boring, when you have a taste of the money, dont ruin the original taste as it is easy to do so, hardest part is keeping the same taste, lp is losing its good touch, dont know if anyone else thinks/feels the way i do!
xxx wrote:If you are an actual paying member, I strongly recommend to use the new suggestion page. If our other members agree with you, you can get things to change. However, forum complains from a minority won't do anything.
magizi87 wrote:most girls nowadays maybe get 1-4 scenes only.
(...)
I am simply not compelled to buy as much as before. Because there are no regular babes.
(...)
Totally OK with that, but if we, are really paying for the cost of the scenes, why not offer the best girls,
the ones that combine best looks with great performance, an incentive to keep you guys close?
xxx wrote:Looks like another piss/cream nostalgia thread.
Boshanks wrote:Case in point: The beautiful model Amanda Hill is one of the more attractive newbies to recently appear here. Her first ever porn scene was a 1on1 with Mike and it was great, her second ever was a 3on1 DP with some of the bigger guys and you could see the step up was a bit of a struggle for her. So what do we do now, do we give her some time to get used to the industry and maybe flourish in to the next big thing ? NOPE, let's get her doing DAP in her third scene in porn,
dap-addict wrote:Either she does DAP finally or she isnt for LP.
dap-addict wrote:Times have changed, akhmet, yes.
Boshanks wrote:dap-addict wrote:Either she does DAP finally or she isnt for LP.
Which is precisely why this site is increasingly producing nothing but the same tunnel visioned repetitive dog shit. As long as it's performed that's all that matters, the models capability doesn't matter in the slightest anymore.
if you're making more money than ever before then it's clearly working and I wish you all the best. Personally though, I think the majority of what LP puts out today is the same rehashed shit porn over and over again, and the site is a shadow of it's former self.
dap-addict wrote:JohnMcSpunkencock wrote:I hope there will always be those hot newbies who do well without the rush to dap.There is and was no rush to DAP for Amanda Hill and many many other newbies.
Amanda shot in Prague 1st time slowly, some anal and DPs and nothing more.
Only her 2nd stay she decided to try DAP.
We dont even know yet how good she performed it, but guys like ahmet and boshanks already try to force the view she didnt do it fine.While its common knowledge that DAP needs to be trained on set a bit and most girls get better after 3-4 such demanding porn scenes. After this we get true stars like Kira Thorn, Katrin Tequila, Crystal Greenvelle etc. Even Arwen Gold didnt perform DAP fine at the beginning.
Calling a DAPbreakin after 2mt in porn a rush in the framework of todays1-2y porn careers is bs.
Some people get eaten up by nostalgy.
But LP changed hardcore porn!
And good so!![]()
![]()
dap-addict wrote:You pick what you want from my post, too.![]()
Anyway, every rookie coming to work for LP now in 2017 knows she's expected to try DAP.
Its the way LP changed Prague porn and is now changeing Europorn as well as slowly also the US anti-anal porn strongholds.
Girls can choose not to work for LP, but only for DDF, the soft studio of the same owner, and many other studios. Nobody forces them, but haveing worked at LP sure helps with more bookings and higher other entertainment and sex work rates.
Boshanks (and ahmet), I wish you to find the same as in your old LP days if you need that.![]()
But you wont find it at LP anymore, because times change.
Maybe you can convince SOS to shoot it for you - he sure will take your >100k investments with a kiss and even play humble.
Users browsing this forum: Latinloverf1 and 47 guests