How would your ideal very first porn scene of a girl be?

[dap-addict]

Let's dream since porn is fantasy!


For me its:
STdap = straight to DAP like for May Thai or Nicole Black.
As early as legally possible after her 18th birthday, ideally next day.
7on1 to get old Anabolic gangbang quality, but studs can be mixed.
petite girl, ideally 150cm or below, sure not higher than 162cm
tiny thin frame with tits, natural, can also be tattooed
Slavic girl, maybe Siberian asian
0% pussy with min. 3 or DAP positions incl. cgDAP, >10min
JYL inspired kuckmal gapes
Facial with eye-pops
Heeled
black seemed stockings, tits visible

And for you?
Which ingredients you'd wish and which you'd avoid?

[dap-addict]

May Thais DAPbreakin' in her first GIO scene was close:
GIO170: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/31045

But later it turned out they falsified her age and she was 19yo actually.
And ofc she's too tall.

[dap-addict]

Just wanna add I once had this discussion with Nicole Black about her first GIO scene, which was also a DAPbreakin', just that Nicole wasnt a teen girl anymore. She told me how shocked she was when learning on set basically what kind of porn she was to shoot, while she had expected some romantic Dorcel like scene!

Now fact is agents have to inform girls what they are up to ofc. And also girls have to inquire a bit more, also to prepare better. I just had a case of a girl I help who was also overwhelmed on set, and that was a 1on1. But again, why didnt she ask about her work-to-do? Not her first porn set at all btw.

Anyway, here in OP setting is ideal: Girl knows what she's up to in her first porn shot and payment makes it easier for her to push her envelope further than she maybe planned at first when listing with an adult agency.

[DD_hh_sgp]

Let's dream since porn is fantasy!


For me its:
STdap = straight to DAP like for May Thai or Nicole Black.
As early as legally possible after her 18th birthday, ideally next day.
7on1 to get old Anabolic gangbang quality, but studs can be mixed.
petite girl, ideally 150cm or below, sure not higher than 162cm
tiny thin frame with tits, natural, can also be tattooed
Slavic girl, maybe Siberian asian
0% pussy with min. 3 or DAP positions incl. cgDAP, >10min
JYL inspired kuckmal gapes
Facial with eye-pops
Heeled
black seemed stockings, tits visible

And for you?
Which ingredients you'd wish and which you'd avoid?

Beautiful young girl (slavic, hungarian or italian) in a sexy summer dress ( red high heels) is approached in a street cafe. A bit of XXX road trip style.

Short, trivial small talk with sexy camera angles.

Girl is taken to the apartment under false pretenses.

There are 20 guys who fuck her in analbolic gang bang girl style after an extensive blowbang

Lots of DAP and Kuckmal poses

Massive Bukkake at the end, a lot of sticky cum covers the girls face and even hair

Girl is smiling and walks around in the apartment to present herself at the end

[Chimpy.677]

My ideal scene would be:

A short, very cute 18-year-old Slavic girl who, in her first scene, does her first anal, first DP, and first DAP against a team of monster cocks.
Let it be classic hardcore porn; the only goal here is to destroy the girl's ass. The bigger the gapes, the better.
I absolutely don't want any peeing, vomiting, prolapses, etc. All of these scenes interrupt the scenes and are unpleasant.
As I said, the goal here is to see how far the girl's ass can stretch.

Just wanna add I once had this discussion with Nicole Black about her first GIO scene, which was also a DAPbreakin', just that Nicole wasnt a teen girl anymore. She told me how shocked she was when learning on set basically what kind of porn she was to shoot, while she had expected some romantic Dorcel like scene!

For me, this isn't a problem. For example, if you agreed with the girl to do a DP, but during the scene it becomes clear that a DAP is possible (because the girl is very aroused or because she doesn't mind the DP, etc.), then you should try to do the DAP. If you see that the girl can handle it, the scene continues normally, as if you had agreed from the beginning to a hardcore DAP scene. After that, the cost issue is another matter.
But what I'm getting at with this is that the surprise of the scene is what sells it, just as the best-selling scenes are also scenes like the first anal, first DP, first DAP, because they're new, and that's what drives marketing and thus increases sales.

[Wilsrosl82]

Like the latest Dina cat scene but with Lancelot, Dylan, and big Rasta taking separate 10 min runs at her ass.

[Jimbo8012395]

No first scene in porn should be anal, DP or DAP imo.

1 on 1. Throat fucking, pussy licking, some rimming, and anal play is fine.

[ajqqaj]

Start them like they mean to go on. At least DAP and piss. And a rough throat fucking.

[dap-addict]

Just wanna add I once had this discussion with Nicole Black about her first GIO scene, which was also a DAPbreakin', just that Nicole wasnt a teen girl anymore. She told me how shocked she was when learning on set basically what kind of porn she was to shoot, while she had expected some romantic Dorcel like scene!

For me, this isn't a problem. For example, if you agreed with the girl to do a DP, but during the scene it becomes clear that a DAP is possible (because the girl is very aroused or because she doesn't mind the DP, etc.), then you should try to do the DAP. If you see that the girl can handle it, the scene continues normally, as if you had agreed from the beginning to a hardcore DAP scene. After that, the cost issue is another matter.

The Bp lier APE does it very often like that. Depends on the case but I think takeing this as a default is more than creepy.
But that was not the problem of Nicole Black to be clear here. Her problem was she expected some Dorcel vanilla and GIO told her from the very start that her 1st scene was supposed to be a DAP scene. So studio played transparent, open cards - as opposed to Woodman lier APE - but Nicole wasnt mentally prepared for Gonzo.

[Jimbo8012395]

Just wanna add I once had this discussion with Nicole Black about her first GIO scene, which was also a DAPbreakin', just that Nicole wasnt a teen girl anymore. She told me how shocked she was when learning on set basically what kind of porn she was to shoot, while she had expected some romantic Dorcel like scene!

For me, this isn't a problem. For example, if you agreed with the girl to do a DP, but during the scene it becomes clear that a DAP is possible (because the girl is very aroused or because she doesn't mind the DP, etc.), then you should try to do the DAP. If you see that the girl can handle it, the scene continues normally, as if you had agreed from the beginning to a hardcore DAP scene. After that, the cost issue is another matter.

The Bp lier APE does it very often like that. Depends on the case but I think takeing this as a default is more than creepy.
But that was not the problem of Nicole Black to be clear here. Her problem was she expected some Dorcel vanilla and GIO told her from the very start that her 1st scene was supposed to be a DAP scene. So studio played transparent, open cards - as opposed to Woodman lier APE - but Nicole wasnt mentally prepared for Gonzo.

Chimpy doesn't half come out with some sh*t. Girls are contracted to perform certain acts and any deviation from that shouldn't be tolerated. Girls are there to earn money for specific, contracted acts and that should be respected at all times. Not just ethically, but legally. No girl with an iota of intelligence and self worth would put up with that complete lack of respect for their body automony. Once one unscrupulous director senses weakness, others will follow and exploit. Give someone an inch and they'll take the mile.

Anyone who suggests what Chimpy has enunciated above, really doesn't respect women or even the law in any way whatsoever.

[Chimpy.677]

Chimpy doesn't half come out with some sh*t. Girls are contracted to perform certain acts and any deviation from that shouldn't be tolerated. Girls are there to earn money for specific, contracted acts and that should be respected at all times. Not just ethically, but legally. No girl with an iota of intelligence and self worth would put up with that complete lack of respect for their body automony. Once one unscrupulous director senses weakness, others will follow and exploit. Give someone an inch and they'll take the mile.

Anyone who suggests what Chimpy has enunciated above, really doesn't respect women or even the law in any way whatsoever.

Then you wonder why hardcore porn died. Here's the answer: everyone has become feminists, it seems...

And another thing, the contract can stipulate many things, such as being able to do a scene as long as the girl is willing during filming.

Obviously, this isn't about doing something without consent. On the contrary, the first thing I say is that there must be consent.

And I'm sure the vast majority of porn directors who directed hardcore scenes in the past did things that way.

[Chimpy.677]

Depends on the case but I think takeing this as a default is more than creepy.

but Nicole wasnt mentally prepared for Gonzo.

The truth is, I don't understand what the creepy thing would be; it's something that's discussed and there's consent.

If a girl really doesn't want to do it because she's not ready yet, she won't do it, and that's it. It's very simple.

That's why I don't see any problem; it's totally normal.

Lo que debería haber hecho Nicole es decir que no lo va a hacer y si firmó el contrato para hacer una escena de DAP deberá resarcir a la empresa como lo estipule el contrato.

Quiero decir con esto, acá no hay engaños ni nadie esta obligando a alguien a hacer algo que no quiere.

[paulyshoresituation]

I am really confused why so many guys like it when the girl is barely 18 or 19. Most girls who are that age look young or very young and it doesn't turn me on at all.


There are very few girls that age that look like a woman.


I do think Suzie Diamond's first scene is when she was 19 or 20 though. I think when she was 21-23 is when she looked her absolute best.

[Chimpy.677]

I am really confused why so many guys like it when the girl is barely 18 or 19. Most girls who are that age look young or very young and it doesn't turn me on at all.

There are very few girls that age that look like a woman.

I do think Suzie Diamond's first scene is when she was 19 or 20 though. I think when she was 21-23 is when she looked her absolute best.

Objectively, women's peak beauty is between 18 and 21, then, little by little, they begin to lose their youthful glow. Not only that, if you use older women, let's say those over 25, they're already gaining a lot of experience, and anal sex scenes aren't a challenge for them, which makes the scene boring.

It's like people who ask for women, for example, over 30. Those women already have a lot of experience, and they won't feel anything in an anal sex scene; basically, all they have to do is put on an exaggerated and unrealistic performance. The same thing happens with actresses who have already done many DAP scenes; all they have left to do is put on exaggerated performances of things they don't feel.

[paulyshoresituation]

I am pretty sure there was a study a while back that said peak women's age in terms of looks is 22 or 23. I think 18 or 19 is still too young. How many 18 or 19 year old woman would you say look like supermodels? Very few. Most are in their early to late 20s.


I am really surprised people want to see women 18 or 19 in porn videos compared to a bit older. Lucy Lee still looked like a young girl when she was 18 or 19. When she was 20 to 24 is when she looked real good.

[Jimbo8012395]

Then you wonder why hardcore porn died. Here's the answer: everyone has become feminists, it seems...

And another thing, the contract can stipulate many things, such as being able to do a scene as long as the girl is willing during filming.

Obviously, this isn't about doing something without consent. On the contrary, the first thing I say is that there must be consent.

And I'm sure the vast majority of porn directors who directed hardcore scenes in the past did things that way.

[Jimbo8012395]

Chimpy, hardcore porn hasn't died because of feminists, it's on its death bed for entirely different reasons.

Feminism has nothing to do with this. It's Law and business that's more relevant here and you seem astoundingly ignorant on both topics. I'm not. I'm lawyer who has an LL.B, LL.M, a PGDip in Legal Practice and an M.Phil who practices and has experience of Contract & IP Law.

Girls are contracted and paid to perform certain acts. Contracts create a predictable environment by clearly defining rights, duties, and expectations of both parties. This fosters trust and stability in business dealings. It's deeply unprofessional and legally questionable to start introducing new acts that aren't defined in the contract.

If you're girl who agrees to perform additional acts that aren't stipulated in the contract, then unscrupulous producers will take advantage of this and you don't know your worth. Contrarily, if you're a producer who does this, you run the risk of performers saying they were forced into performing certain acts that weren't stipulated via contract.

Stick to a Contract and rigidly so. It's important for both parties.

[Jimbo8012395]

I am really confused why so many guys like it when the girl is barely 18 or 19. Most girls who are that age look young or very young and it doesn't turn me on at all.

There are very few girls that age that look like a woman.

I do think Suzie Diamond's first scene is when she was 19 or 20 though. I think when she was 21-23 is when she looked her absolute best.

Objectively, women's peak beauty is between 18 and 21, then, little by little, they begin to lose their youthful glow. Not only that, if you use older women, let's say those over 25, they're already gaining a lot of experience, and anal sex scenes aren't a challenge for them, which makes the scene boring.

It's like people who ask for women, for example, over 30. Those women already have a lot of experience, and they won't feel anything in an anal sex scene; basically, all they have to do is put on an exaggerated and unrealistic performance. The same thing happens with actresses who have already done many DAP scenes; all they have left to do is put on exaggerated performances of things they don't feel.

Oh my god, you have NO CLUE what makes women tick at all. I can tell you have no clue about what is pleasurable for a woman and I'd bet my entire life savings you've never had anal sex with a woman. Anal sex shouldn't be a challenge, it should be pleasurable for her. And it is, when it's done right and invariably that involves slow training, lots of lube and time before you can fuck an arsehole like it's a pussy.

You write like a 40 year old virgin with a massive porn addiction. You're totally divorced from any semblance of real life.