100% Hell is the BEST thing ever to happen to legalporno

[hatejerkloser]

Thankyou AGO

[liko19]

Thankyou AGO

This project from the hands of the socks and knee socks manufacturer AGO has little to do with porn. 20% is fucking, but in the style that the actor changes every 4 to 5 seconds and the position of the hooker is max 20 seconds. The rest is pissing, vomiting, drooling, hairy male legs and asses, drool, mucus, snot, slapping, beating, squeezing the actress's face into picturesque shapes, screaming, chaos, constant discussions about how to continue because no one knows what to do, domination of stuffed animals, socks, knee socks with Hello Kitty and Paw Patrol motifs, beating the woman's breasts and back, stomping on her head. The idea was good, it could have been the best series of porn films, but this sock fanatic turned it into total shit.

[xxxVIPERxxx]

It would be nice to see different things to socks, and knee socks e.g. classic lingerie, latex suits, different types of body stockings, naked except high heeled leather boots. The list of possibilities are quite open. Whilst the overall concept of 100% Hell is great, the technical aspects of shooting the scene, as well as the glamourising and styling could be a lot better.

[jjwhite1985]

I like the series, mostly because there is the possibility to create a crazy good scene. Generally they're hit and miss for me, some of them have been outstanding and others not so good. Where they lose me is when the actual penetration (cocks or fists) takes a backseat to the more ridiculous stuff. Male feet shoved in chicks faces, and male assholes constantly being shoved into the center of the frame is shit that I know not many want to see. And I've not seen another director so desperate to cover female bodies up (see the bs with Giada back in Feb), his taste in clothes for women is pretty disastrous.

I mean, the dude used to shoot a ton of gay porn, so the focus on male assholes and covering up the girls makes it seem like there's a certain gay vibe creeping through at times.

[dap-addict]

For me 100% Hell is definitely not the best thing to happen to LP.
Because it means a lot of male feet, asses and mouth play to fast-forward.

But cutting those Sofia Smith 100% Hell gifs I realized I can still enjoy this new AGO line. I would however enjoy him filming scenes dwelling less on over-powering girls but more on their lust. Here: viewtopic.php?f=104&t=59335&hilit=Sofia+Smith&start=80#p1374979

Clothing style is desasterous in most cases. But luckily I have learned to ignore that aspect and just focus on the girl(s) body and face. Sometimes I wonder what AGO learned working @ GIO 2015-22. Sure not how to dress-up a girl for porn!

[hyapet]

Yeah, the clothing is horrible, but more so than that ...

It's like the lighting and the tanned skin of like every model that walks in there creates this weird glow-y effect akin to a 1970's film about hard drug users.

And the girls - like - who do you expect to walk through those doors, really. But still. It's like they all come out of the same machine - with the preferences all set to "generic."

Fake tits? Check.

Anorexic stretched skin that seems like there's a gigantic chip clip on their back holding all their flesh together? Check.

Shitty tattoos plastered around like she just don't care? Check.

Plastic bimbo clothing that will never come off for the entire duration of the set? Check.

Tight, scrawny, oval head (with hair clawed back) like an alien put their face mask on wrong? Check.

Two-dimensional "I'm about to go on a rollercoaster" personality? Check.

Awful fake tan sprayed skin that gives off "my whole body came out of a bottle" vibes? Check.

Unshaven gas station hooker aesthetic? Check.

Face that has the female-look equivalent of a guy that douses himself in Axe body spray? Check.

Sometimes I honestly think the reason all the guy's are treating them so roughly in the scenes is because they don't want her near them, and they just keep pushing her towards the other guys. I don't know how those studs do it - sans blindfold and a bottle of viagra strapped to be a belt.

The premise of the scenes are great. Somebody had a great idea (AGO) with the premise of the scene. But everything from the set to the clothing to the lighting to the actresses are all ... just ... yeah.

Bonus points for forcing me to stare at a dude's asshole for half the scene. The only thing that makes it passable is it gives me a break from looking at the actresses' face.

[jjwhite1985]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

[Kslvt]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

+1

I'm REALLY not a fan of AGO, but it's clear that he's unassailable when it comes to recruiting ... he literally sucks up ALL the girls from all the studios ... he's unplayable in that aspect.
As for the rest ... I think I've bought a maximum of 5 scenes from him ... I really don't like his productions, unfortunately.

[nicolas_campbell]

Thankyou AGO

I personally do like it, what tires and bores me are the damn stockings and Angelo's obvious stupid fetish for those ridiculous clothes.

[hyapet]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

It figures that today - of all days, like, literally a couple hours after I write this - AGO releases a scene with an actually natural looking girl.

https://www.analvids.com/watch/2823412/ ... es_0_pussy

You see her tits? They're natural. Like, they've got their own character.

Does she have tattoos? Unfortunately - but they're not the body-wide ones. Just a few scribbles here and there. Not the best, but miles from being the worst.

You see her face? While it looks like there's some injection work going on there, there still seems to be a touch of a natural shape to it. A touch at least. She has a natural look. Not an outstanding beauty or anything like that - but a girl next door vibe that makes watching her get fucked feel like you're actually watching an actual human being doing the fucking.

I don't want to point out the girls that I think are "all the same" - but looking at the roster - you can probably figure it out. It's not ugliness. It's not like they're real bags or anything like that. But it's ... something else entirely, really. How do I put it.

You know when there's a fad? And everybody's doing it, sort of deal? And you can tell - from a mile away - somebody who's following that fad. And they're wearing it like a costume - where, whatever meaning the original get-up had, whatever statement was attached to it, whatever panache made that look that look has been completely ignored, corporatized, and made as easily digestible as possible.

Where if you asked the original person who invented the style what everything meant - they could point to every item and or accessory they had - and give a detailed explanation to it's meaning and significance. And if you'd ask the follower - the lemming - why they were wearing it - they'd give you a mix between a blank stare and a semi-worried look. As if, somebody actually found out what they're about, and that they're just wearing this thing because everyone else is wearing the thing.

Well - for the modern day "empowered" trash can of a girl/woman - that usually signifies the following things:

Tattoos.

Plastic surgery.

A complete deviation away from anything natural or soft.

A hair-style that usually bunches all of it together into either an unnatural shape or some kind of non-free-flowing barred hold.

An attitude problem where, "You can't define who I am - I am powerful - and strong - and independent - and" oh my God, just stop. Where anything interested is replaced by a desire to do what you're not supposed to do - as if the mental fertility of the creature got stunted at the seven year old mark.

It's annoying enough to see one of them. It's absolute murder when you see a non-stop conveyor belt of these female bozos come and get tossed around whilst prompting feelings of complete indifference and boredom.

And it's not just AGO. It's pretty much all of the traditional porn studios these days. These are the girl's they've got. When you go to the top earners of OF - you see the exact opposite. Exquisite natural beauty. Unfettered softness. A grace and charm that hasn't yet been completely extinguished.

Actual femininity.

Watching (so many) of the girls who go to the traditional porn studios is like watching a fat guy in a clown suit at the circus. They've got no skills, no talents, and no personality - not to mention - no looks - but! If they put on the costume ... then all those things they lack can somehow be glossed over.

I remember when the girl's who shot dirty disgusting porn used to be cute, and gracious, and soft. Those were the days of yore, my friend, the days of yore.

These days?

Whatever the fifth wave of anti-establishment feminism taught at schools actively encouraged the girls to seek this line of work.

I'd call it airline food ... but that would be rather unfair.

Even airline food has a little something that's still real left in it.

[jjwhite1985]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

I don't want to point out the girls that I think are "all the same" - but looking at the roster - you can probably figure it out. It's not ugliness. It's not like they're real bags or anything like that. But it's ... something else entirely, really. How do I put it.

The thing is I genuinely can't, it's why I asked. I'm trying to troll you, but other than an aversion to fake tits and tattoos I'm honestly not seeing what you're seeing. When I look at AGO's releases over the last few months, the only ones who really don't do anything for me are Kaitlin Katsaros, Bella Bradley, Joanne Intense and Alice Maze. The others I find hot, some of them smokeshows even. I'm sure many will disagree with this assessment, and that's cool, it's all taste. I'd just love to know who you're expecting to walk through the doors of a porn studio, Paige Spiranac? A man can dream.

[jjwhite1985]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

I don't want to point out the girls that I think are "all the same" - but looking at the roster - you can probably figure it out. It's not ugliness. It's not like they're real bags or anything like that. But it's ... something else entirely, really. How do I put it.

The thing is I genuinely can't, it's why I asked. I'm trying to troll you, but other than an aversion to fake tits and tattoos I'm honestly not seeing what you're seeing. When I look at AGO's releases over the last few months, the only ones who really don't do anything for me are Kaitlin Katsaros, Bella Bradley, Joanne Intense and Alice Maze. The others I find hot, some of them smokeshows even. I'm sure many will disagree with this assessment, and that's cool, it's all taste. I'd just love to know who you're expecting to walk through the doors of a porn studio, Paige Spiranac? A man can dream.

Typo *not trying to troll you

[Vancouver]

"Best Ever" is very subjective and there are so many legendary series on here.

But I personally will add that i love the 100 percent Hell series. Its so wild and crazy and unique and we often get weird and unscripted moments. I find these scenes a lot of fun.

[dodonet1994]

Whatever it's the best or not I wanna see them book Marta Villalobos for one of these scenes asap

[hyapet]

I'm genuinely curious as to who all these girls are that you find so unattractive? Like specifically which ones... Because there are lots of things to complain about with AGO but the quality of the girls doesn't seem like one of them. Sure there have been a few who don't do much for me but for the most part he gets some hotties, but to each their own I guess...

I don't want to point out the girls that I think are "all the same" - but looking at the roster - you can probably figure it out. It's not ugliness. It's not like they're real bags or anything like that. But it's ... something else entirely, really. How do I put it.

The thing is I genuinely can't, it's why I asked. I'm trying to troll you, but other than an aversion to fake tits and tattoos I'm honestly not seeing what you're seeing. When I look at AGO's releases over the last few months, the only ones who really don't do anything for me are Kaitlin Katsaros, Bella Bradley, Joanne Intense and Alice Maze. The others I find hot, some of them smokeshows even. I'm sure many will disagree with this assessment, and that's cool, it's all taste. I'd just love to know who you're expecting to walk through the doors of a porn studio, Paige Spiranac? A man can dream.

I need to reiterate again that this isn't a problem that's just going down with AGO - but most European based studios.

The girl's that look like they belong in a plastic see-through toy-doll case.

Everything is just so there. Everything is just so ... understandably straightforward and plain.

Seeing the girl get undressed does nothing to whet the sexual appetite type deal. From seeing the fake tits unnaturally balloon up through the skimpy shirt she's wearing - to the body tattoos covering an anorexically thin frame - to the (fake) tan that makes them completely orange - to the stylized hair that possesses no personality or oumph - to the legs that don't like a treasure chest to be unlocked rather than a cheap gate to be rammed through ...

It's the complete lack of femininity. But here's the real issue.

I think I finally found a way of summing it up.

All of these pre-fabricated non-feminine fuck-you style looks all bleed together. Meaning - the leftist bimbo who says abortions are great on FB has the same nose ring as the half-head shaved fatso who's complaining about a man trying to save the environment who's wearing the same too-short skirt as the feminist lecturer that's got the same stomach tattoo as the porno actress who is wearing all of those things all at once.

I'm not attracted to bad-boys. Sorry. I'm not a homo. You know, as much as that Raw-meat dude pisses on everything (ironically) - I think he's hit onto a greater truth when he says that all of this shit is just so fucking gay. I'm watching women who, to their full credit, are too fucking stupid to notice it, but who are fully acting like teenaged boys used to a generation or two prior. It's fucking gay.

All of these fashions - all of these body modifications - all of this aesthetically style that seems to be derived from no one being smart enough to know what they themselves actually want to look like anymore, hence why they look like everybody else - is just so fucking gay. Like, literally. This is what rebel men used to dress up as when they wanted to "stick it to the man."

It's original purpose was non-conformity - and a statement of that was - in effect - non-attractiveness.

So - the skull and crossbones drawn by a twelve year old plastered across her chest? Fucking ugly. The short skimpy plastic dresses that, to no fault of the girl's themselves (I'm looking at the people running AGO here), make them look like ten dollar hookers? Fucking ugly. The nose rings? The short hair? The copious amounts of plastic everywhere? It's all just so fucking ugly.

And the problem is - that this style has become so uniform - that seeing any one of these things is enough to flatline a boner. Why? Because it automatically reminds you of the rest. And that reminder - of this subset of society that fucking hates the fact that you're alive for no other tenable reason than the fact that you're alive - and who have likewise made some of the poorest life choices they possible ever could have in other regards - is an actual turn off.

So - just like I don't think it's hot if a girl arrives on set dripping in pig shit - I don't think it's attractive when girl's show up with any of that shit. And that's the problem. Because all of these girls? They've got at least some of this shit going on.

And besides that - no natural beauty, really, whatsoever either. Hence the plastic.

You know someone who didn't fit into that mold? Cheyla Collins. My fucking God is she hot. Natural tits. Pure skin. And an actual personality. Little surprise - she wasn't raised in the West.

If you've seen some of her webcam shows - like before she hit Natasha Teen - holy shit. But even when she did hit Natasha Teen Studios - she was still fucking incredible.

When you see some of the girls on OF - like, the blonde hair, blue eyed, busty 18 year olds? Like ... again ... holy shit.

I know that might be an unrealistic expectation for AV/PB - but it doesn't have to be so far in the opposite direction.

All of these aesthetics - they're ugly in themselves. And they all seem to be a calling card to a greater, even uglier philosophy that gives just a fraction of it's power to these poor choices.

And it doesn't matter how many cocks you shove into those holes - it just doesn't turn me on.

[harrirov248]

Yes, for me it is an absolutely necessary series and the best there is currently.

[RUShersgapersrises]

čootijebe

[dap-addict]

Yes, for me it is an absolutely necessary series and the best there is currently.

Just for the sake of discussion and to compare let me put these 2 gifs from the opposite, sex = lust for all side, here:

Omar Galanti explaining why this kind of pussy is called roastbeaf in Italian - and later kissing Jessy Jay with that love mindset.

Omar: 'And now we have the first interaction!' - he fucked her pussy already for a short while, but that was no action and sure no interaction ofc.

This scene: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/2819374

Couldnt a mix of this and 100% Hell work better?

[xxxVIPERxxx]

I think the idea of 100% Hell scenes is novel, and innovative.
However, there are still many areas to work on and further improve such as styling/glamming up the girls in the right way.

Then there is the issue with lighting, picture quality, optimising angles.

There are many technical aspects that still need a lot of work on...for example, it still looks like a messed up, cluster-fuck.
Also, there are some sex acts that some fans are not so much in to e.g. footing, pussy fisting.

The look of the scene still has some way to go before this series can be considered a classic. However, for new innovation in 2025...there is no other series which can compete with it so far.

[mynameradio]

I really could do without the views of man feet