ExtremePornFan wrote:I vote DAP break-in.
dap-addict wrote:...we also have to still remember that for other girls such a course is very fast, actually!
dap-addict wrote:but she lasted only for 2 bookings in 2 years.
dap-addict wrote:While I think for many girls an 1on1 anal > 2on1 DP > 4on1 DAP setup is feasible, we also have to still remember that for other girls such a course is very fast, actually!
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:We wait for as long as it is necessary to get the girl trained up for a real DAP breaking in and fucking (within reason).
dap-addict wrote:Now recently in a long porn talk with two seasoned actresses both independantly claimed asking for DAP early in forum would pressure girls not ready yet to do it and that may hurt them physically. I'm a very compassionate porn user and sure dont want these girls done any harm!
dap-addict wrote:xxxVIPERxxx wrote:We wait for as long as it is necessary to get the girl trained up for a real DAP breaking in and fucking (within reason).
That sounds ideal of course!
Problem is still how to ask our porn girls to try it without creating any pressure?
I mean if no fans ever asked about DAP then it wouldn't get produced at all because porn producers investing less money into production also risk less. At the same time DAP is a way for porn girls to really earn some very decent money.
paobroncix01 wrote:I think the NRX system is a good system in this.
When the girl gets a contract she knows that it is for the whole NRX program, and what it contains and what is expected of her. (...)
Therefore the learning curve can be steep. This way the model can perform certain difficult scenes much sooner, as other models in the past took a much longer time to build up the same skills.
dap-addict wrote:ExtremePornFan wrote:I vote DAP break-in.
All 6 first options are about DAPbreakin'
dap-addict wrote:Also please DVP and/or piss drinking lovers write in how you see it with your fetish: Is the earlier the better or rather the opposite?
dap-addict wrote:paobroncix01 wrote:I think the NRX system is a good system in this.
When the girl gets a contract she knows that it is for the whole NRX program, and what it contains and what is expected of her. (...)
Therefore the learning curve can be steep. This way the model can perform certain difficult scenes much sooner, as other models in the past took a much longer time to build up the same skills.
Yep, question is whether a 3 scenes @ GIO or a 7-10 scene @ NRX program to run up for DAPbreakin' is better. A more than 10 scenes wait is too long I think. Either a girl can do it or she simply cant and if so she better comes back to DAP 2-3 years later IF she stays so long in porn.
I lean more to the GIO 3 scene program, but indeed some recent bookings have shown that 3 scenes is too little for valid DAPbreakin' candidates like Pussycat for instance.
Important for sure is an experienced team the girl can trust. Here NRX team is more constant than the more specialized GIO BBC-white team approach.
paobroncix01 wrote:The NRX program is an all-round program and the models are learning DP, DVP an DAP. But during all videos before the DAP video there is lots of anal, even during the DP and DVP video,
so the models are building up a lot of anal experience during the program, before they get to the DAP video. More as during the three video program at Gio I recon.
dap-addict wrote:paobroncix01 wrote:The NRX program is an all-round program and the models are learning DP, DVP an DAP. But during all videos before the DAP video there is lots of anal, even during the DP and DVP video,
so the models are building up a lot of anal experience during the program, before they get to the DAP video. More as during the three video program at Gio I recon.
I wonder whether EKS will repeat their own NRX aligned Russian program in Romania once they start to import Russian rookies or scout local girls.
DblAnlFan686 wrote:DOUBLE COCK DEEPTHROATING
Users browsing this forum: matt.oxf.uk, rroper472 and 27 guests