Today's porn is so boring

[mattivax]

I don't know guys what's your feeling, but I feel like today's porn is so fucking boring. I follow current porn but honestly there's nothing remarkable. I feel like something is missing. There are no stars like Sandra Romain, Tory Lane or Annette Schwarz anymore. They were sexual demons, their energy, chemistry, passion is something that I don't see in today's porn, that kind of energy is missing. Today's porn to me is like latest Netflix series: boring plot with completely no name stars. I think that we will never have porn like this again that why I'm watching same old shit all the time. Do you guys also feel like this?

[hb2002]

I can copy that. Those girls called "stars" today I would say don't have the charisma that former stars had. You have named a few, the list can be extended to quite a few more of same character.

I don't know why it is this way, even AVLP or its predecessors previously had such superstars in their films (Belle Claire, Arwen Gold, Nataly Gold, Alysa, Susan Ayn, Jolee Love to name a few; list of course is not complete). Latest development of AVLP however goes into wrong direction IMHO. The "flooding" with Latino girls (sorry, absolutely not a fan of them) is getting insane, quality of movies also decreases since a while. What is remarkable is that it is not only the quality and charisma of the girls, it is also influenced by the male actors. Very repetitive action (also that was the case before but the quality of these guys was simply much better) and simply less attractive.

[lukemoon88]

For me, porn is one of the few modern mediums that has somehow survived better than other media/art forms (along with gaming), on this website for instance I think they have some of the most mind blowing gonzo porn around, the hardest its ever been in history, though I don't suppose its any great surprise, as when you take porn for what it is, it doesn't exactly take Steven Spielberg to make decent porn haha, I do agree with you though that the whole vibe and culture behind porn is no where near as interesting as what it once was, especially, for around that 2000s time you mentioned which was amazing! You had so many interesting personalities around (Annette Schwarz, Brandon Iron, Jewel Denyle etc), now porn stars tend to be less interesting personalities, more generic etc, which I suppose is just a reflection of our modern culture in general, as well as the fact there is no where near the same amount of money to be found in the porn industry anymore, what with the tube sites becoming big and most people choosing not to pay for porn anymore, but you still have plenty of decent stars floating around, if you look around.

Now if we were talking about cinema/film, music, TV, I would absolutely agree with you, those mediums have gone the way of the Dodo, pretty much since the 'social media/smartphone' generation come into full swing and replaced all the cool mediums we originally used, to 'shout from our soapbox', there is far less interest in using art forms for individuality, artistic diversity, deeper meaning, complexity.............and all those kinds of things, now Film/Music/TV is all about quick little snippets of repetitive minimalism (just like social media)......and any kind of meaningful criticism of art is almost considered a taboo in this day and age (just look at the amount of people who get SUPER DEFENSIVE about the slightest suggestion that a certain show or artist is sub par on FB or where ever haha, I don't mean people simply disagreeing with criticism (they are more than entitled to do that) Im talking about the masses of dweebs who demonise anyone simply for raising a point and questioning the status quo, like criticism automatically designates you to being spawned out of Satan's ass .......I think thats half the reason why things got as bad as they did with a lot of the arts, it ends up looking almost normalised via social media to be superficially shallow AF, hypersensitive and as dumb as a box of hammers)

[xxxEVOxxx]

If LPAV porn starts to get boring for you...then please take a break from watching excessive amounts of porn, and to stop wanking for a while...

That is actually the best strategy, and best way to refresh yourself.

It can be that after spending too many hours, watching the best porn online...your mind and body starts to get desensitised to things.

[pornlover_holland]

Totally depends on why you are watching porn. As an anal fan porn has never been better in my opinion. There never has been so much anal sex. You can watch non stop to girls getting their assholes pounded by groups of guys. Lots of vids from this website but also enough other website are producing these kind of scenes. Girls seem to have elastic assholes and can take the hardest and longest anal poundings without any problems. That is a real heaven for anal porn fans.

[M_sicas_Candido]

Craziness! I hope you're referring (only) to the generic production out there. However, AV is at a much higher level than any other site. The girls performances here are much greater than any others. You remember the girls who don't act anymore. But look at the ones that are still active and are great: Emily Pink, Anna de Ville, Rebel Rhyder, Monika Fox, Francys Belle, Vitoria Beatriz, Kitty Li... And as it was said, the anal category is better represented than it has ever been.

Maybe the passion you have for retired actresses has blinded you and you can't see the excellent offers that there are today.

[hyapet]

What you're mentioning with "today's porn is so boring" is actually oversaturation of the market itself. Not only this - but the repetitive nature of almost all of the studios that do shoot porn.

This isn't the people who produce porn's fault. Although ... it is a little. But, really, like with all things, we've become so used to getting and having so much of it. But ... there's only so many scenarios you can play through. Ten years ago - a teenage girl getting surrounded by four black guys was pulse-pounding. These days, it's merely the 2 minute 30 second mark of the video. The amount we consume - the amount that is produced - has turned what was once a taboo art form into just another McDonalds entertainment industry.

The combination of more professional studios - where the girl's are going to get paid for a job with a contract - has taken away from the underground/grimy nature of the porn shoots of the past. Watching some normal girl get surrounded by five guys in a parking lot who absolutely fuck her into oblivion is a different more sincere energy than the girl sharing a chuckle with all the dudes who are sticking dicks into her.

And again - it goes back to taboo. Now - with OF particularly - what was once a thing you shouldn't do has been absolutely normalized. Takes a large part of the thrill out of it. Now - the mystique, the danger, the breaking of the rules has been replaced by ... by the numbers porn shoots. In fact, it's not even the female talent who gets degraded anymore, rather the male audience. It used to be you were watching something dirty and forbidden on the Internet - now you're logging in to a social network to talk to, as Giorgio put it, some fat bearded Indian guy pretending to be the girl you're watching - extracting cash from you - and turning you into a simp. Or, in the worst case scenarios, a pay pig.

Double anal used to be a gigantic "I can't even believe she did that." Now, you've got 5'1, 100 pound latina girls taking two gigantic baseball bats up their rectum like it's a normal Tuesday night, whilst, again, having a small chuckle about it.

Next - as somebody already mentioned - the homestay of really great porn - beautiful, American (or Russian), blue-eyed, blonde-haired, teenage talent - has essentially dried up. Now you're getting all these fat middle aged women shooting porn. And it's like - you can't blame the studios - all the girl's went to OF. So, you go to OF, and some girl is sitting in a messy, darkly lit bedroom, with half her body cut off, lounging back, top still on, having a chat and giggling about something, and her chat's exploding with people throwing her tons of cash. It's like - why would she try? Why would anyone? The truly great don't have to bring it - and the not-so-great really can't.

So, we're left with a dearth all around. No more stunning beauties, and those that do come, go through by the numbers porn shoots that, a decade ago would have been mind-blowing, but these days barely lift an eyebrow.

NRX had discovered a formula that breathed a lot of new life into porn. They invigorated the innocence of the girl with the intro - they had some of the most well hung performers who actually knew how to handle a shoot - they had amazing sets, music, costumes, just everything - and they ascended the breaking ladder on some truly phenomenal incredibly beautiful talents.

Now that they're gone ... well ... it is what it is.

It's not so much that porn died by one clean shot to the head - it's more like a death by a thousand cuts. It's just ... in a really languid place right now.

Honestly, some of the hottest stuff out there right now are pictures of ordinary girls with their clothes still on. Like, super hot girls that you actually have to use your imagination for. Where, it takes some actual investment, and the girl just automatically isn't proud to be this super whore who's probably unbearable to spend more than two minutes around in real life.

Degrading porn has become normalized. Wearing clothing and being naturally cute and beautiful has become the rarity.

Such as it is.

But, more importantly ...

Where can it even go?

[M_sicas_Candido]

Now - the mystique, the danger, the breaking of the rules has been replaced by ... by the numbers porn shoots. In fact, it's not even the female talent who gets degraded anymore, rather the male audience.

Well, in my vocabulary, I call this the "Netflix effect" - let's fill users with empty or random productions: because customer satisfaction no longer matters, what matters is only how much time they spend browsing the platform; after all, perhaps this could be converted into money. It seems to be quite clear that the origin of the saturation problem is the greedy media itself.

Maybe some OF enthusiasts need to delude themselves a little with this, drastically reducing their consumption of hardcore content so that their brains return to the condition of a normal person (dopamine addiction is literally degrading people!).

[hyapet]

Well, in my vocabulary, I call this the "Netflix effect" - let's fill users with empty or random productions: because customer satisfaction no longer matters, what matters is only how much time they spend browsing the platform; after all, perhaps this could be converted into money. It seems to be quite clear that the origin of the saturation problem is the greedy media itself.

Well, they aren't empty or random productions. They're some of the best shot porn we've ever gotten. Take a video that's shot these days to somebody a decade ago and they would think they were transported to the magical future of super porn. Thing is ...

It's become so normalized. The minute you get something that is a 10/10 - what was effectively a 10/10 before now becomes a 9. I'd be dumbfounded at some of the porn I just pass by without even a second look just ten years ago. Now, there's so much of it, that regardless of the actual high quality of a great deal of it, it all still feels empty and random. Not that it is - but that doesn't matter if it feels like it.

And it's not random. It's absolutely zeroed in on. Every single fetish you could ever have is being represented by someone shooting porn at Pornbox/Analvids. Every scene has a variation that has pissing. There's rimming. Puking. Gagging. Butt-roses. Fisting. Multiple fisting. Bukkake-like shots are attempted at the end of every shoot. Anal. Pussy. DVP. DAP. TVP. TAP. Amateur. Webcam. Costume/Cosplay. Facemask. Public fucking. Interracial. Bisexual. Gay. 3D porn. And this is all ...

And this is all released in a single day by the same network. It's nuts. They're not doing it out of desperation - but because enough of their audience have expressed interest in that particular kink (with their wallets) that producing said content (easy enough) makes sense for the bottom line. If it didn't - they wouldn't do it.

But with that ... comes a loss of the adventure of the whole thing. The actual randomness gets replaced by an airplane meal like experience where every single needed or wanted item is on it's own little tray - and everything you're seeing is planned. There are no more barriers to break down anymore - there are no never-been-done-befores left. It's all just milking what has been done before over and over and over again - with people just continually consuming it because ... well, it's there. It goes deeper than that, but I'm not going to get into the socio-economics of being alive these days.

Still though, what was once a perverse pleasure that you had to scour the Internet for, is now being served to you by the biggest porn houses with performers that, again, have a great big smile on their face whilst they do it. Just another day at the porn park. Want to see me put the leg end of a table up my ass? Stay tuned for next week! Same porn time - same porn channel.

Everything has the sheen of plastic wrap on it now. There are no random moments in porn anymore. Everything has been produced via a script. Everything's been agreed to. Signed off on. Career trajectories planned out years in advance. Contracts written up. It's all become just so ... sterile.

When a girl is laughing at five guys surrounding her with 15 inch dongs - then ... something's happened. The magic got removed somewhere along the way. Or, more realistically, it got consistently and constantly drained. There's only so many things you can do ... and like all things ... they get to be a little bit old hat after you've seen them for, literally, the thousandth time. For everyone involved. The watchers and the performers.

Maybe some OF enthusiasts need to delude themselves a little with this, drastically reducing their consumption of hardcore content so that their brains return to the condition of a normal person (dopamine addiction is literally degrading people!).

The biggest thing that has changed is the acceptance of porn by society. There was always an edge to porn before. There was always a ... I really shouldn't be doing this ... that pervaded the whole thing. Where you would be judged for watching it - and a thousand times more for producing it.

Now, there are hundreds of thousands of girls that host their own porn channels, with the message that doing so is "empowering" (???), and that watching porn has turned from this thing that only losers that couldn't get anyone did, to the thing that almost everyone does. Everybody that does it didn't magically turn into a winner - but the norms by which society allowed for things like meaningful relationships and happiness have eroded in time as well - meaning that for an increasing number of people - porn is all that's left.

And - what's even worse - is that you see the very same techniques that porn innovated being used in everything from commercials to music to movie action scenes. It's like - the entirety of society has become perverse. But, as a result ...

Nothing is truly perverse anymore.

And without that edge, without that danger, porn becomes just another thing to do in your day. Like laundry or your groceries. It becomes something you lose attention to whilst watching it - rather than being completely and fully absorbed.

That's no one issue that any porn house or producer can really tackle. I mean, they absolutely can, but the very nature of porn itself has become normalized. When you're seeing the same shots and close up angles in a hair-spray commercial as in your bukkake scene - in the exact same sequence and timing structure - then something has been lost.

As I said - there were people that could still innovate within those confines and produce truly fresh, new, and top of the line material. But, NRX studio is gone. And while the other producers here at AVLP are magnificent - truly - they are trapped by the circumstances as much as we are. There isn't some magic line they can cross that will make it all better again.

Ironically, I could write a porn script that would totally revitalize the scene. Give everybody something new. Something incredible. Bring back some past lessons that seemingly were forgotten - whilst giving it a modern twist that would take it to the next level. Or at least a porno scene that would totally break new ground and leave everything that came before it in the absolute dust.

Thing is - would we really want that? To have one product that shines so brightly - that everything that was a 9 before suddenly get transformed into a 7? Where everyone now wants the new thing - which takes a lot more time, effort, and care to produce - and loses interest in the older style material which did absolutely fine until this new thing came along? That's the exact thing that porn doesn't really want. And understandably so - especially from the business side perspective of things.

So ... what now, then?

Well, enjoy your hair commercials I guess. Err ...

Porn. I mean porn.

[misangrenegra2]

More than bored, it turned more selective.

Ten years ago, even more, at the end of 90's, beggining of 2000's, the industry was in their golden age, porn were mega productions, with top models, top outfits, top locations and a lot of variety.

Even with internet, the porn had a lot of big producers shooting a lot of different kind of movies, with top pornstars recognized around the world.

Since the last 7-8 years, a lot of pornsites and productions gone, still shooting the 4-5 most famous and focusing the market in online plataforms instead of DVD's.

Is true that is hard to talk about porn legends like some girls became in that era, but i guess that was the DVD magic, there weren't other kind of ways to get porn and the american production were in the top.

Currently there are top pornstars, here are shooting ones of the tops anal models with an incredible performance and passion in the set but porn seems to be stablished more in fetishes than in a general production, always the directors used to shoot different kind of movies but know the sites are quite focused in a specific sex acts.

Also the productions are more expensives and the lack of variety became something normal, in the past you had infinite kind of productions, now are more squared.

Personally about anal porn i cannot be more happy, here i find the best content with top girls able to handle hardcore and extreme anal penetrations and the best crew of guys that technically are incredible good.

In terms of other kind of porn i'm a little bit more lost, some porn became more niche and less produced.. but still there are some good productions yet.

[M_sicas_Candido]

Well, they aren't empty or random productions. They're some of the best shot porn we've ever gotten.

I assume you mean AV. However, I was referring to exactly the opposite of what AV is (at least, the main studios). Current GIO, Yummy, AGO, NTP strive to produce above average quality material; however, even they are harmed by wear and tear and the excess of what is around them. And since these studios sell their scenes in an on-demand style and not by membership, they feel the effects of the wear and tear on the industry even faster.

Every single fetish you could ever have is being represented by someone shooting porn at Pornbox/Analvids.

Well, who could have said 15 years ago that excess content would be one of the main factors that would lead to a loss of consumer interest? There is so much information thrown at us that it becomes tedious having to deal with it all. Many streaming platform subscribers say they spend more time looking for films or series than watching them. The same is happening with Pornbox. Among dozens (or even hundreds) of daily releases here, at most 3 are interesting, but they are the most expensive, and, therefore, not all of them have the sales figures they deserve, despite being good; this for a producer like Giorgio can end up being discouraging (again, due to the excess of poor quality content from horrible studies that are in competition for public attention).

In short, there is a lot of supply but not in line with users demand.

[lukemoon88]

NRX had discovered a formula that breathed a lot of new life into porn. They invigorated the innocence of the girl with the intro - they had some of the most well hung performers who actually knew how to handle a shoot - they had amazing sets, music, costumes, just everything - and they ascended the breaking ladder on some truly phenomenal incredibly beautiful talents.

Now that they're gone, well, it is what it is.

Weren't they just on hiatus until the whole court thing blew over?

As a new joiner to the forums, this was all news to me until recently, but I was reading some updated threads the other day that suggested that Erika Korti and NRX will be back producing at some point. I sure as hell hope NRX get making more scenes, for have they have been a game changer in recent years.

[Jocke]

If you are bored with the porn available (millions of videos of all sorts) it is not the porn, it is you!
Take a break.

[greenfunk727]

I completly disagree. The porn from the top studios on this website is amazing.

Example - the last Rebel Rhyder scene hard anal, drinking loads of piss and puking it all up again!!! That's porno turned up to 11 bro

[lukemoon88]

Though I agree with the comments about dopamine addiction and the OP no doubt being desensitised from overexposure (happens to the best of us haha)..........I think a number of you are missing the valid point he is trying to also make.

Did anyone actually ask if he still 'gets off' on the older porn? Now that would give the true answer to his predicament, instead of all our assumptions haha.

So my question to the OP is do you still get off on the 2000s porn? or do you find no porn at all really does it for you? (new or old)

If the 2000s stuff still does it for you, then it is not desensitisation/dopamine addiction as such, that is causing your boredom..........more likely down to the cultural change/production techniques etc

[hyapet]

I assume you mean AV. However, I was referring to exactly the opposite of what AV is (at least, the main studios). Current GIO, Yummy, AGO, NTP strive to produce above average quality material; however, even they are harmed by wear and tear and the excess of what is around them. And since these studios sell their scenes in an on-demand style and not by membership, they feel the effects of the wear and tear on the industry even faster.

I think that NRX proved that, even if you surround an absolutely amazing quality scene on the front page with lots of amateur shot garbage, that scene will sell like mad.

It's not so much about the quality - which is arguably the best it's ever been - it's about overexposure to the type of product in general. It's the same if you take "Action Movie Shoot Out!" The "Action Movie Shoot Out!" was an amazing movie. Everybody went to see it - and everybody loved it. Then they made Action Move Shoot Out 2! And then Action Movie Shoot Out 3! By the time you get to Action Movie Shoot Out 12! - people know what they're going to get.

In comparison to the original Action Movie Shoot Out! movie - Action Movie Shoot Out 12! beats it by every conceivable metric. It's just better in every single way it could be better. But ...

People have been absolutely drowned in a fire-hose worth of Action Shoot Out! movies. They're tired. They want and need something different.

That's why NRX sold as well as it did. For, as much as it borrowed from the porn that had already been created up until that point, it completely recreated almost every metric by which porn itself was created. It felt like something new. It no longer felt like Action Movie Shoot Out 2,000!

Which, in comparison, is an under-exaggeration of the number of porn scenes we've seen shot in the exact same styles by the same studios over the past ten to fifteen years. Like, think about that, 2,000 is an under-exaggeration. It doesn't exaggerate the amount of porn we've been fire-hosed with enough. It honestly doesn't even come close.

Well, who could have said 15 years ago that excess content would be one of the main factors that would lead to a loss of consumer interest? There is so much information thrown at us that it becomes tedious having to deal with it all. Many streaming platform subscribers say they spend more time looking for films or series than watching them. The same is happening with Pornbox. Among dozens (or even hundreds) of daily releases here, at most 3 are interesting, but they are the most expensive, and, therefore, not all of them have the sales figures they deserve, despite being good; this for a producer like Giorgio can end up being discouraging (again, due to the excess of poor quality content from horrible studies that are in competition for public attention).

In short, there is a lot of supply but not in line with users demand.

You hit a really good point here. It's tricky, though ...

NRX, when it first became a studio, wasn't producing the medium redefining porn it would in later years. It took some time for it to come into it's own - to really figure out what it wanted to do - and how it was going to do it. Sometimes - studios need some time to grow into their own.

But, in terms of the front page getting drowned in content, it really is horrible. You see - porn isn't just fresh for a day. A good scene should be able to sell for weeks and for months.

Problem is - the minute one day passes - there are, like you said, two hundred videos to scroll through that are absolute garbage. You have to get to the third page after one day on Analvids to see yesterday's amazing content - and it's drowned out by incredibly low cost, low talent, low quality content that's just ... not worthy to be put on the same page as the rest of the material.

I get it - this is a business. They're doing what makes money. If they find someone that sells well enough on their own - they bring them in - and maybe those sales will help bring more eyes to the other content. But the set up of content discovery on the site is hurt as a result of it. Any kind of amazing scene has literally 24 hours to last before it gets lost under a deluge of fat people masterbating in a low lit room. I'm sorry - I am - I know you're not supposed to bad mouth the talent on here, and I more than agree with that - but some things just need to be said.

Those videos lower the quality of everything else on the site. You would think the contrast would raise it, but it doesn't. It's like, "Here's some videos that are absolutely amazing - and here are some that are ... not even close to that level." So, if the rate of the videos that are "not even close to that level" are five to one of the videos that are amazing, then the site still gets a grungy feel to it.

The idea that an amazingly high quality Natasha Teen Hayek sisters scene gets driven down towards the bottom of the page as if somewhere were actively trying to hide it ... I can't see that being a good thing overall.

I remember AVLP back when they released like ... three to six scenes a day. You could go back over their content for the past month and see amazing production after amazing production. Everything was more of a knock-out than the thing that came before it. It was a truly a banquet fit for Kings. Now I'm watching two dirty unshaven fifty year olds fuck in what looks like a shipping container with light that could be best described as "mercifully low." And even if that isn't what every video is - just a couple of those types of videos being around makes the whole thing seem much cheaper and dirtier (not in a good way) than what it is.

It's like, the Hayek sisters getting BBC DAP'ed is getting back-seated for this crap? For real?

There are no easy solutions - I can't blame AVLP for trying to make money. I always understand that the agreement they have with everyone they sign on is that they get a spot on the front page every day as well. Makes absolute sense. I also get that you never know who might break out of the mold and become an absolutely front-tier industry-defining studio (NRX) and that that requires taking risks and giving the studio a chance to grow and come into it's own.

I don't disagree with any of these things. But, like you said, when you open the front page and you see five videos that may be absolutely top level tier, and then, if you want to reach the next five videos that are top level tier, you have to spend a minute and a half swimming through ... not top level tier stuff ... it gets tiring. Anything more than a week old requires you to go back like ... 12 pages to find. It's essentially lost ... forever.

I know the front page tries to reconcile that, but ... really? It features an amazing scene that was shot in the last three months - and it gets updated like once ... every three weeks?

There needs to be a mechanism to filter the truly great AVLP productions from the ... not as fabulous. You can't wait for the bus when having a boner. If somebody has to actively sit down and search through content when they want to pull one out - then something isn't working there.

I don't disagree with any of the philosophies AV/PB has at the moment. I get it. I agree with it.

But the front page end result isn't working. It seems to highlight all the issues within the industry itself.

Losing NRX was horrible for them. But they have studios that are actively trying to reach that summit. There are works that actively break new barriers in shooting porn, from camera angles, to progression of acts, to everything. There's some amazing things coming out of AV/PB.

It's just too bad it's hidden under a mountain of webcam, odd kink, and 1-on-1 porn.

[jimkkbogot]

If I had to describe todays porn and the reason it sucks so bad (AWEFUL AND BORING I AGREE) Before year 2000 porn creation had camera/studio time account for 90 percent of the total production hours and 10 percent of the producion time was devoted to edits. NOW.. its 10 percent of the time in studio /filming and 90 percent of the time in editing.. less is the editing , the better is the porn.. The editors are creating the porn essentially. THATS WHY 90 PERCENT OF PORN IS DOGSHIT

[lukemoon88]

If I had to describe todays porn and the reason it sucks so bad (AWEFUL AND BORING I AGREE) Before year 2000 porn creation had camera/studio time account for 90 percent of the total production hours and 10 percent of the producion time was devoted to edits. NOW, its 10 percent of the time in studio /filming and 90 percent of the time in editing, less is the editing , the better is the porn. The editors are creating the porn essentially. THATS WHY 90 PERCENT OF PORN IS DOGSHIT

Hmm, I both agree and disagree with what you say.

Firstly I completely get what you mean about the allure of 90s porn, the 90s was the true golden age in terms of high production value (at least in terms of money and that aura of elitism around it, it was very "Hollywood"). There was a lot of money in the industry because you had to be much more of a "specialist" or simply "know the right people" in order to be involved in porn (the tech and means of distributing porn was no where near as open to wider society like it is today), also piracy was no where near as much as an issue as tube sites didn't even exist, let alone had become established and commonplace, so lots of money was still being paid to producers for their porn. The money meant you had set designers, script writers, hired music creators. What's more, the bar in terms of performers was higher, as a lot of the girls for instance had to either be closer to having that "super model vibe", or they had to have some kind of "character/persona" that would sell. In addition the guys had to either be super studdish or be able to naturally maintain erections better, as viagra believe it or not was actually no where near as common place.

There was also cons to that time, the productions were more glitzy, but also a lot less accessible (you really had to be part of an "inner circle" to get work). The productions of the 90s were also a lot more tamer in terms of the style of porn (both for legal and cultural reasons) though I suppose there are both consumer vs ethics arguments in terms of that (at least back then kids weren't being exposed to the very extreme content via the internet like they are these days). Also much of the production companies were owned or affiliated to organised crime (or at least watered down versions of it), so a lot of the money was going to some "more than shitty" people, though that still goes on to this very day.

In terms of what you say about the "shooting to editing ratios", I think in todays "quick fire production" style gonzo market, shooting virtually matches editing, compared to back previous times. Think about it, these days the most editing a video editor has to do is probably for the trailer! A series of quick video cuts of a video that's already been filmed flashing from one scene phase to another, a one minute BG music track stuck in the background that they've found on some "open license" website that someone else has made, and if we're lucky some very basic text at the start to tell you the name of the performer. So an overuse of video editing, for me, doesn't quite cut it.

The reality of todays productions are that much less time is spent on both shooting and editing, as the producers know the only real money made in porn today is by those who own the tube sites, many of whom, started there days as extremely unethical (and now illegal in many countries) pirate streaming sites that stole content from thousands of content creators and essentially ruined them (or rather they let their users do that for them whilst coining in all the profit and doing virtually nothing to prevent it), including both PH and XVids, which both had to clean up their business ethics as cyber laws became better established or face being taken down (XVids are coincidentally owned by the owners of this very same website, AnalVids/LP).

[rroper472]

I hardly watch it these days....most of the models dont intrest me!!

[sjonesha]

For me peak porn was the Sineplex Triple Stacked series. 3 naturally pretty girls all sharing all their holes and 1 or 2 guys just sticking it in whatever hole was nearest! From a production viewpoint they all had well shot photo galleries too - I have all of them. I just wish someone could upscale or re-encode the films in 1080p or 4K. I'd much rather pay for that than all the appalling garbage that is this site today (1 or 2 scenes a month worth buying amongst thousands of junk and no decent filter).

[Navarre2033]

Modern porn is rubbish lately. No glamour whatsoever. A lot of the girls have tattoos and are full of silicone. Soulless crap. Much like Hollywood who haven't made any decent movies in years.

Old Color Climax videos are better. At least the girls look natural and wore sexy outfits

[YuriyProneBone]

It depends what you like and what you look for

American porn has a lot more of girls acting as if they are full of lust and that they can't get enough. Many women there are more tops than bottoms. I personally hate that.

European porn has more about girls giving their bodies away for guys to have fun with and penetrate them at will. Guys are supposed to take the responsibility of fucking them properly while they handle what they can. Which is why I like European porn more. I prefer women to be passive and to be bottoms.

South American porn is about destroying butts with balls deep penetration on amateur girls and bringing them to depths many women would be afraid to submit themselves to.

Japanese porn has more drama, and storytelling, revolving around using women for men's desire whether women like it or not.

But these are generalizations, there is a little bit of everything everywhere.

[Tito1981]

There is alot of good stars out there if you look at Latina teen bring alot of beautiful girls in my opinion the directors are can make it exciting unfortunately they don't take it the next level nastier dirty to watch the scenes the so called directors need to step up.

[xxxVIPERxxx]

There is alot of good stars out there if you look at Latina teen bring alot of beautiful girls in my opinion the directors are can make it exciting unfortunately they don't take it the next level nastier dirty to watch the scenes the so called directors need to step up.

They are trying to take it to the next level of nastiness, but are doing so in small, incremental steps...which is the right strategy.