Rape or Hard Sex

[artista598]

Sorry guys....

I' m a Sineplex fan since the DVD era, maybe 10 years ago when I discovered this russian company.

In that era the girls were more innocent and the sex was hard with lots anal.

Sorry, but to me some of these new scenes are very near from a rape scene to me.

I don't know maybe the actress are more professional ?! I don't know

I' still a fan of Legalporn but not as before.

[kuaheyden513]

This is not BoundGangbangs or Harcore Gangangbangs. Give me a break!

[laura.]

Each to their own but i don't see anything that even comes close to being classed as 'rapey' and if it was, i certainly wouldn't watch it. It's very hard porn of course but clearly consensual. I admit there are the occasional moments when slight liberties are taken but they are few and far between and I have no doubts whatsoever that if the girls demands to stop, they stop.

Its certainly no boundgangbangs and even that is pure fiction albeit with a totally unerotic 'rape' theme.

[dap-addict]

Looks like a troll!
Or an anti-porner clown.
Problem could be new porn viewers with little experience. In any case its important to stress that all on LP is 100% consentual and the girls can always stop!

[lokin66]

you are very wrong and just an quick porno watcher with no experience in fact gonzo and SOS really slowing down not so hard as before and there is no rape in lp

[TheVulture]

Whilst I agree that LP doesn't get near to mimicking rape, there is a wider point here that porn has undoubtedly moved away from its style of, say, 1998-2006 (believed by many to be a "golden era") into something more different and, yes, more aggressive (entirely leaving aside the strength of the actual sex). This manifests itself, quite simply, by less focus being placed on the girls and more on the guys. Whereas in that previous era the cameras always seemed to focus pretty much exclusively on the girls and the guys were there more to "do a job" and bring out the girls' sluttiness (which is not to deride the guys' role one bit - for me that is in a nutshell a porn guy's role) in a great deal of modern porn the focus seems to be more on showing the guys "hanging out" and what they're going to get up to today with whichever hot young slut has fallen into their path. It's hard to know exactly where this traces back to but you would have to think it's likely to be a Rocco thing.

Specifically this tends to mean the guys pushing a girl to her limits by way of throat grabbing, face slapping etc. and in many ways seeing if they can get her to "break". This is now seen as the classic porn scene formula I think. Parallel to this is the fact that the guy(s) should take centre stage and even provide a kind of spoken narrative during this process (Steve Holmes pretty much pioneered this and was the first real "Oh no!" male performer for me personally - I would avoid his scenes and his annoying antics as best as possible, which for a brief period in the mid 2000s became practically impossible). During this process a lot of the girls - whilst neither "breaking" nor resembling rape victims - do kind of "shrink" and the whole mood changes from one of relaxed (albeit hard) sex to a more macho, high-fiving male bonding ritual.

For that reason I do know what the poster means and I don't necessarily view him (I'm presuming he's a guy) as a troll. Nothing on LP looks like rape but most of it is overwhelmingly "macho" and "guy first" and thus not to my tastes. For me personally I'm very specific about what turns me on - it is exclusively scenes in which a girl radiates relaxed sluttiness from the outset and the guys' merely service and enhance this by way of tremendously hard sex whilst keeping their hands away from her throat, refraining from excessive slapping (when a girl's arse is red raw a scene is generally done for me) and also refraining from either talking down to her or doing that awful Bruno SX thing that some LP guys do of issuing drill sergeant type orders ("Stay stay stay" or "Push push push" are quite common and at this point I cannot find the mouse to click "x" quickly enough) and certainly not putting them in that horrible "crusher" type position when in reverse cowgirl (you know the one - hands behind the head pushing her neck forward in order that she resemble less a woman and more a rag doll). With cumshots I'm not interested if the guys' hand(s) are holding a girl in position (which means that I'm not interested in about 85% of modern cumshots, whereas I could count the number of cumshots between 1998-2006 that were of no use on 1 hand). Again, it's not "rape" or coercion (they've signed up to the cumshot, one assumes) but forced, male dominant and (IMHO) ugly and aggressive. To someone like me - and I assure you I'm not a prude or in any way "anti porn" it's often a fine line.

To end positively I'll give an example of a new scene that totally ticks all those boxes of mine - Katrin Tequila (RS252). About 75 mins of it, no less. It can still be done, for whatever reason it just rarely is.

[laura.]

^
Interesting and sensitive comment. Nice to see you back on here also:) hope life's keeping you well x