PornBox.com

Angelo's studio is now the only one here (and his own website) where I still purchase from.

However, this recent inclusion of enldess "footing" i just don't get. Fisting I love. Always have. So why not "footing"?:

1) I do have some concerns regarding toenails and internal scratching. Intense, aggressive, even (cincensually) violent sex I have no issue with but I do like to leave feeling the models were safe. With your hand you have knowledge of where your nails are and you can tuck them away. Toenails are not the same and to film such intense scenes where a girl could be cut inside quite early on in the scene worries me.

2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.

So the "100% HELL" series is a bit different and I was enjoying it..... but the trying (and failing) to awkwardly ram their foot into the girl is more of a turn-off, for me at least, than a turn-on.

Anyone else? Agree? Disagree?

I agree.
Most studs have much better control over their hands than their feet. And control is important for fisting as to not hurt the girl.
Also male feet for me look gross.

Yeah completely agree. The fisting is great but the insistence on focusing on male feet is just gross

I disagree, I absolutely love this. There's something about the dominance of the act. So hot.

The only thing is, feet need to be well groomed.

I don't buy the male foot fetish scenes, it's horribly ugly. I wish more focus on female legs. If it should be rough foot fisting, let it be a another female just like in some scenes with Francys Belle. AGO did a great footbang scene with Mia Brown and that's something I would buy again.

On the contrary, I love it. Feet need to well groomed but it's hot.

I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.

Footing is ok but only when it is performed by women. I hate to see male feet

Sir Noel wrote:2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.

I agree with this. The vaginal fisting by the studs, how it is introduced by AGO is a very nice feature. But, as mentioned above, important is that the whole hand should be inserted. Somehow the footing is less interesting as the fisting, probably for the reasons that it is just inside with the tip of the foot, and it is a really different sort of action as the fisting. I prefer seeing fisting instead of footing.

Can I get an explanation as to why my posts aren't approved? I can't seem to contact the administrator or the moderator.

Can somebody private message me and explain the issue?

I was only trying to say that personally I love footing and that it's okay how there's something for everybody. There are plenty of scenes without the footing or male feet being worshipped that one can enjoy, let these ones be. There are many of us that enjoy them!

I was being constructive, I wasn't being disrespectful which is why I don't understand why the posts aren't approved. Thanks!

paobroncix01 wrote:

Sir Noel wrote:2) Every discussion over fisting, every view I have heard, almost everyone dislikes fisting where the whole hand fails to get inserted. I love dfisting but I'd rather watch a scene without it than it not get past the knuckle and most other lovers of it seem to feel the same. This is why "footing" falls so flat for me, in that it is always a "fail": it is just a few toes and ball of the foot going in. Given that inserting the entire foot is not going to happen (a couple of very extreme webcam models and a female foot aside) I would sooner this was just left out.

I agree with this. The vaginal fisting by the studs, how it is introduced by AGO is a very nice feature. But, as mentioned above, important is that the whole hand should be inserted. Somehow the footing is less interesting as the fisting, probably for the reasons that it is just inside with the tip of the foot, and it is a really different sort of action as the fisting. I prefer seeing fisting instead of footing.

Of course the footing that Hotkinky Jo and Siswet have performed where whole foot, including heel, is inserted is the most satisfying performance.

Agree AGO videos can be better without the footing.

+1

Hate all that footing - i ruining the scenes imo

Agreed. Its ugly to see and unsafe for the girls. Angelo has so much to lear from GIO...

msndorennanff406 wrote:Agreed. Its ugly to see and unsafe for the girls. Angelo has so much to lear from GIO...

It's just that Angelo learned a lot from GG. His constant covering of women's legs in stockings, socks and knee highs and his hatred of barefoot and naked women is quite obvious. It hits you right in the eye.

SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.

Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?

liko19 wrote:

SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.

Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?

I don't. Is this the only studio in the world? Are there no other studios that cater to your interests? It's like complaining about somebody producing apples, when you want them to produce pairs. Well, find somebody that produces pairs.

Personally, I don't care about hairy asses either but there are other elements of this kind of hardcore style that I do prefer, like footing. Which is why I like their content. If I didn't like it, I wouldn't care about it.

SnowySnowastic wrote:

liko19 wrote:

SnowySnowastic wrote:I'm wondering why my post wasn't approved? Is it because I express disagreement and you want to make it seem like everybody thinks the same? Because I would really like to know the reason.

I only wanted to say that personally I love footing and male feet getting worshipped, I find it hot. Not everybody feels the same and there should be something for everybody. If you don't happen to like those kind of scenes, it's plain and simple, you can skip it. There's plenty others without that kind of content. It doesn't mean that just because you don't like it, it should not be produced at all.

Oh yeah, that silly scene-skipping talk again. Yes, if it's going to be one scene out of ten starring hairy asses and male hairy legs, then of course we can skip it. But if it's nine scenes out of ten, what do you want to skip? Then, for most users, this studio may not be in the world, when the bearable scene is once every two months. Do you get it?

I don't. Is this the only studio in the world? Are there no other studios that cater to your interests? It's like complaining about somebody producing apples, when you want them to produce pairs. Well, find somebody that produces pairs.

Personally, I don't care about hairy asses either but there are other elements of this kind of hardcore style that I do prefer, like footing. Which is why I like their content. If I didn't like it, I wouldn't care about it.

Please stop telling people what to like or not to like and what studio to choose. That's what communists like to do, they send others who don't agree with them elsewhere. And here in the Czech Republic, we are very sensitive to that. Or are you a communist? I believe not. Every studio that makes films must also accept criticism, because if it were only about admiration, they would not realize the mistakes they are making. So yes, let there be scenes that you and a small part of users like, but in most scenes it shouldn't be, because the users who clearly don't like it, as we can read here, are the majority. So if men's hairy legs and asses are in the main roles, maybe in two scenes out of ten, it's fine. But not as it is now.

liko19 wrote:Please stop telling people what to like or not to like and what studio to choose. That's what communists like to do, they send others who don't agree with them elsewhere. And here in the Czech Republic, we are very sensitive to that. Or are you a communist? I believe not. Every studio that makes films must also accept criticism, because if it were only about admiration, they would not realize the mistakes they are making. So yes, let there be scenes that you and a small part of users like, but in most scenes it shouldn't be, because the users who clearly don't like it, as we can read here, are the majority. So if men's hairy legs and asses are in the main roles, maybe in two scenes out of ten, it's fine. But not as it is now.

Lol, excuse me, are you saying that the studio's work should be open to criticism, yet your opinion should not be commented or contradicted? I think you need to check your anti-communism guidelines, as it seems very selective the way it is.

I'm not "sending" you anywhere, nor telling you which studio to choose, I'm only reminding you that there's other content out there, without the elements that seem to upset you. In fact AGO studio itself has other type of content too.

Also, for your own record, us here on the forum, we are surely not a "majority" by any means. In fact, another user posted in the other topic saying that the sales for the 100% hell series are massive, which suggests that obviously the majority likes it.