PornBox.com

Another scene with Ria 100% Hell has been released and again like all the previous ones she is dressed like a mummy. Riu this fanatic is obsessed with socks, stockings up to the ass and stockings style wasp, or the Bavarian peasant never allows even the slightest bit of nakedness to be shown. It is completely out of the question that he would show the amazing bare feet that Ria has, the chances of seeing it are probably such that the Vatican will invade Russia. He prefers to wrap them in white or pink sports or cycling socks. When she is already under really heavy pressure from critics for her obsessive behavior, she shoots a scene of 60 minutes, where until 54:39 ​​the actress is in stockings or shoes, and for the last 5:21 minutes, when there is only a blowjob, he graciously removes her socks. At that, his fan club led by well-known profiles immediately rushes into the discussion and they immediately start screaming to defend that it was a nude scene, because we saw the legs of the naked actress for a second at the end. So now at least he's started showing off his hideous, hairy male legs and hairy ass. It's disgusting, as is his whole obsessive style of "socks forever and ever". For those in doubt, visit his official site and check out the style of his fanatical scenes.

Whatever I don't watch gay porn. That's a series definitely targeting besexual men who enjoy watching and eating male assholes

I like 100% hell. No edits. Rough sex. No piss cleaning; leave the bitches soaked in piss while they're getting fucked to hell. I could do without all the ass licking though.

House MD wrote:Whatever I don't watch gay porn. That's a series definitely targeting besexual men who enjoy watching and eating male assholes

Agreed. Its def not aimed at straight men. So much man ass licking and shoving man feet into the girls mouth. Seems to be aimed at closeted males who hate women. I cancelled my monthly membership because they have just been releasing these Hell scenes. There's more multi girl releases on EvilAngel from Angelo that I can get. Many of those scenes haven't been released here.

ElJab78 wrote:

House MD wrote:Whatever I don't watch gay porn. That's a series definitely targeting besexual men who enjoy watching and eating male assholes

Agreed. Its def not aimed at straight men. So much man ass licking and shoving man feet into the girls mouth. Seems to be aimed at closeted males who hate women. I cancelled my monthly membership because they have just been releasing these Hell scenes. There's more multi girl releases on EvilAngel from Angelo that I can get. Many of those scenes haven't been released here.

Check out his official site. In 99% of his scenes, the actress is dressed in stockings, knee highs, shoes or at least in sports cycling socks. He is absolutely obsessed with it, I know from a friend who filmed for him that he would not allow her to take off her socks at any price in the world, even though she warned him that it bothered her and it was not sexy. He hates bare female feet.

liko19 wrote:Another scene with Ria 100% Hell has been released and again like all the previous ones she is dressed like a mummy. Riu this fanatic is obsessed with socks, stockings up to the ass and stockings style wasp, or the Bavarian peasant never allows even the slightest bit of nakedness to be shown. It is completely out of the question that he would show the amazing bare feet that Ria has, the chances of seeing it are probably such that the Vatican will invade Russia. He prefers to wrap them in white or pink sports or cycling socks. When she is already under really heavy pressure from critics for her obsessive behavior, she shoots a scene of 60 minutes, where until 54:39 ​​the actress is in stockings or shoes, and for the last 5:21 minutes, when there is only a blowjob, he graciously removes her socks. At that, his fan club led by well-known profiles immediately rushes into the discussion and they immediately start screaming to defend that it was a nude scene, because we saw the legs of the naked actress for a second at the end. So now at least he's started showing off his hideous, hairy male legs and hairy ass. It's disgusting, as is his whole obsessive style of "socks forever and ever". For those in doubt, visit his official site and check out the style of his fanatical scenes.

I totally agree, the amount of stupid stockings, heels and ridiculous lingerie is unbearable. They don't even ask for everything to be nude, but they do ask for variety, and the truth is that there is almost none!!

It's a sorry episode, isn't it? The idea that you go looking for porn that isn't explosive, wanton, lusty, volcanic or whatever other (essentially positive) adjective you want to use but is actually....hell. You know, the epitome of being horrible. That's the selling point, the concept that grips you as a consumer. Blimey. It's a bit sad that porn has come to this really but it's the net result of the last 15 years or so.

Odd thing is that I had an Evil Angel subscription lately and I did quite like the Angels Of Hardcore stuff on there. A bit too joylessly aggressive for me but better than the AGO stuff I had seen on here.

Will be swerving these like the plague though, for sure.

liko19 wrote:I know from a friend who filmed for him that he would not allow her to take off her socks at any price in the world, even though she warned him that it bothered her and it was not sexy. He hates bare female feet.

Now thats a thing really!
OP subject is not about barefoot vs. socks, though!

TheVulture wrote:It's a sorry episode, isn't it? The idea that you go looking for porn that isn't explosive, wanton, lusty, volcanic or whatever other (essentially positive) adjective you want to use but is actually....hell. (...) It's a bit sad that porn has come to this really but it's the net result of the last 15 years or so.

I'm clearly on the other side of the barricade, you know it probabely TheVulture, but I dont think it's as easy as just a net result of porn since 2009 or so. Sure porn is a reflection of society's trends and women's liberation is frightening part of male population, also the porn consuming one, and these 'hell' and 'humiliation' themed films are guided at them. They are popular because in real life women have become more free and more pushy on guys.
But 'hell' & 'humiliation' porn is only part of the porn offerings!
And also secondly, 100% Hell can be still enjoyable once you realize that all is staged and agreed upon and a lot of girls actually really like working for AGO. Thats the other side, the production BTS vs. the nice posh explosive picture with often hidden BTS stuff you dont wanna hear about!

dap-addict wrote:I'm clearly on the other side of the barricade, you know it probabely TheVulture, but I dont think it's as easy as just a net result of porn since 2009 or so. Sure porn is a reflection of society's trends and women's liberation is frightening part of male population, also the porn consuming one, and these 'hell' and 'humiliation' themed films are guided at them. They are popular because in real life women have become more free and more pushy on guys.
But 'hell' & 'humiliation' porn is only part of the porn offerings!
And also secondly, 100% Hell can be still enjoyable once you realize that all is staged and agreed upon and a lot of girls actually really like working for AGO. Thats the other side, the production BTS vs. the nice posh explosive picture with often hidden BTS stuff you dont wanna hear about!

Yeah we're not going to agree on this one. It's just a terrible image for the industry to portray. I get it....it's "hell" for the woman but heaven for the angry dude consuming it. And it's not really "hell" because there are limits, the girls have an idea in advance etc. It's just plain ugly though and worse than that, it's self-defeating, because the net result is that porn will lose its influx of new girls. For sure there will almost certainly always be desperate girls prepared to do anything for cash but if porn has based its economic model moving forward on that then it has really given up any claim to being a reputable industry outside of its obvious stigmas (which really have loosened/dissipated a lot as societies become ever more liberal and tolerant in this area).

I think calling a porn series "100% Hell" is sort of admirable in the sense that at least it's honest in a way that similarly themed porn series' of the past haven't been. That's really as near to a positive take on it that I can possibly get.

I think it's a little mad that you're invoking an Andrew Tate argument there as well. Men have been dealing with womens' lib for well over 50 years and for all that it can prove challenging for us, we haven't felt the need to film them puking and being slapped, twisted and choked to redress the balance until now. What gives? (I'm not really a liberal and hate woke shit, btw)

It also depends on which girls are shooting it...there are many girls who love that kind of sex and thrive off of it. For example for someone like KK (Kaitlyn K) she probably thrives off the 100% Hell scene/genre.