PornBox.com • View topic - So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Page 1 of 2

So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:44 pm

by Eloise

viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567&start=1560

Treat both equal.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:48 pm

by Pineapples Studio

It’s his site.

Anyway, one thread existed to criticize Tushy on a creative level, while the other thread exists to expose Woodman for his behind the scenes antics. They’re not the same.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:23 pm

by Eloise

Mister Ananas wrote:It’s his site.

Anyway, one thread existed to criticize Tushy on a creative level, while the other thread exists to expose Woodman for his behind the scenes antics. They’re not the same.

Ah my bad I'm seeing this all wrong then.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:18 pm

by xxx

The Woodman threads are left up because they are much needed counter propaganda that no one else has the balls to do.

With that said, you are pushing your luck, "Eloise". You are very close to be deleted for your idiotic remarks in the model application thread.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 12:17 am

by BlueShadow

Ah, we're at 40 pages? I hadn't noticed that. Thank you.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 12:43 am

by netzerkaiser

All I can say is that its not nice to see good people falling out. I don't know the fucking in's & outs. But from my experience, Eloise is good intended guy / gal. He / She has been good to me. Just as I see it.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:11 am

by sexaddict251

Someone comes to your home and talks to your wife about his friend's big dick, How would you feel? But you will be ok if he's talking about his friend's tiny dick...

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:18 am

by sexaddict251

xxx wrote:The Woodman threads are left up because they are much needed counter propaganda that no one else has the balls to do.

With that said, you are pushing your luck, "Eloise". You are very close to be deleted for your idiotic remarks in the model application thread.

Eloise is a language nazi, he mocks everyone.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:53 am

by Eloise

xxx wrote:The Woodman threads are left up because they are much needed counter propaganda that no one else has the balls to do.

With that said, you are pushing your luck, "Eloise". You are very close to be deleted for your idiotic remarks in the model application thread.

So do what you have to do.
Delete and erase all the ones that really care or the quality of this website and call them "idiotic".
You'll be left with superficial tube website quality clientele in the end but it's your party.

Have at it.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:58 am

by avanfurwet

I've always thought the "Do you want to become a porn model? APPLY HERE" thread should just have the OP's announcement and any clarifications by the company, otherwise locked.

Other posts there don't seem to add anything worthwhile, and the level of petty malice and shitposting is offputting.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 5:09 pm

by Eloise

Furthermore: you can say what you want and maybe explain it to yourself in a way you even believe it but the fact alone that that Woodman thread is BY FAR the bést going thread on this entire forum should be frowned upon.
But as I already said: it's your website and it's your party.
Cheers.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:09 pm

by robin_reid

Tushy you can like it or not but they are not a women abuser nor criminals, Woodman is.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:16 pm

by Eloise

First of all you just don't know if anyone working with Tushy has or has not a criminal record and thus is or is not a criminal.
You just don't.

The next thing is even better and that is you stating Woodman being a criminal written in black and white.

I just love these kind of posts.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 11:09 pm

by dap-addict

Eloise wrote:...Woodman thread is BY FAR...

Well, Epic Prolapse Madness thread has more views.
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=15315
Or take this if you look for sth really popular!
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7602
Also my very cheerful positive porn-"love" thread is less popular, but still quite popular with well over 100'000 views.

Btw, also more popular than that PW are girls wishes threads like: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=10688
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7547

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 11:42 pm

by viewer2

dap-addict wrote:
Eloise wrote:...Woodman thread is BY FAR...

Well, Epic Prolapse Madness thread has more views.
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=15315
Or take this if you look for sth really popular!
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7602
Also my very cheerful positive porn-"love" thread is less popular, but still quite popular with well over 100'000 views.

Btw, also more popular than that PW are girls wishes threads like: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=10688
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7547

I agree.
And Epic Prolapse Madness has more views with half less posts...

In fact, Woodman's thread has a lot of views because it has been going for a long time and because it often appears first. Not because a lot of people are interested.

I wouldn't say it's "popular": always the same few people are posting.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:05 am

by Pineapples Studio

Eloise wrote:First of all you just don't know if anyone working with Tushy has or has not a criminal record and thus is or is not a criminal.
You just don't.

What the hell kind of an argument is that? You can literally say that about anyone.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:12 am

by robin_reid

Eloise wrote:First of all you just don't know if anyone working with Tushy has or has not a criminal record and thus is or is not a criminal.
You just don't.

The next thing is even better and that is you stating Woodman being a criminal written in black and white.

I just love these kind of posts.

So far the models that were abused on set, blackmailed, harrased, etc came from Woodman, not from Tushy. Who said like a sadist psycopath and in a tv show “I’m a bastard and break the will of girls” was Woodman and no one else.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 4:02 am

by Eloise

All I'm saying is before calling someone a criminal check things with your own legal department.
If they're okay with it it's all good now isn't it?
It's your website and it's your forum and it's your party here.
If you want to give mr. Woodman all this attention on a day to day basis: have at it.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:24 pm

by Jocke

I am a fan of Analvids and especially Giorgio, Yummy and Gonzo. I spend most of my money here, however I do subscribe to a number of other sites.

I created the Tushy thread because I think it is meaningful for porn consumers to compare the alternatives and to understand what makes Analvids different (better & worse).

If I owned this site I would be happy to learn about my customers preferences and how competition is viewed. It is free market research for god's sake!

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:31 pm

by sexaddict251

Eloise wrote:All I'm saying is before calling someone a criminal check things with your own legal department.
If they're okay with it it's all good now isn't it?
It's your website and it's your forum and it's your party here.
If you want to give mr. Woodman all this attention on a day to day basis: have at it.

Agree, this Guy named Eloise is a language nazi criminal, i am a victim cum witness, i have seen him abusing poor users, they left chatroom because of this asshole, delete him please.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 3:53 pm

by dap-addict

Jocke wrote:I created the Tushy thread because I think it is meaningful for porn consumers to compare the alternatives and to understand what makes Analvids different (better & worse).

First your subject title "Whats wrong" was really unfortunate to say the least.

Also you might have well done comparing both porn user offers along the lines "What LP/AV core studios can learn from Tushy" or "Can LP/AV core studios learn something from Tushy?"
This would allow forum talkers to join or avoid such a thread much easier.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 4:22 pm

by Iddaoeeok

I can see xxx's point that it's useful for him and for AV/LP to have counterbalance to the stream of garbage Woodman pours out on his own and other forums and, indeed, offline and in real life. Restricting all the Woodman stuff to one thread stops it spilling over into other threads - especially model threads - and was definitely a good idea, it also means you can ignore it unless you're in the habit of reading threads just get annoyed at them. Having said all that I have no idea what's in it for BlueShadow, is he getting paid for monitoring Woodman's activites? Doesn't he have a job and better things to do with his time?

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:02 pm

by BlueShadow

Iddaoeeok wrote:I can see xxx's point that it's useful for him and for AV/LP to have counterbalance to the stream of garbage Woodman pours out on his own and other forums and, indeed, offline and in real life. Restricting all the Woodman stuff to one thread stops it spilling over into other threads - especially model threads - and was definitely a good idea, it also means you can ignore it unless you're in the habit of reading threads just get annoyed at them. Having said all that I have no idea what's in it for BlueShadow, is he getting paid for monitoring Woodman's activites? Doesn't he have a job and better things to do with his time?

Absolutely nothing. I share my opinion on things, without needing to lick the ass of this or that, without personal interests as perhaps many are used to in this business (models, agencies etc.), amazing huh?

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 5:27 pm

by avanfurwet

Jocke wrote:I am a fan of Analvids and especially Giorgio, Yummy and Gonzo. I spend most of my money here, however I do subscribe to a number of other sites.

I created the Tushy thread because I think it is meaningful for porn consumers to compare the alternatives and to understand what makes Analvids different (better & worse).

If I owned this site I would be happy to learn about my customers preferences and how competition is viewed. It is free market research for god's sake!

I agree, but XXX owns this playground and I think sometimes he visits and just shoots from the hip. I think your well-intentioned thread was gunned down during a drive-by.

Meanwhile plenty of posters in other threads have mentioned Vixen/Tushy, Evilangel, Brazzers and other competitors, all allowed by the site owner. Just not a whole thread about them.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:07 pm

by netzerkaiser

Sorry but who or what is XXX? I thought Giorgio Grandi was boss here? I apologise if its a dumb question.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:36 pm

by Pineapples Studio

No. Giorgio is not the boss here.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:49 pm

by netzerkaiser

Mister Ananas wrote::D

No. Giorgio is not the boss here.

Thanks very much. Its just absence of name, I guess I thought it was a council of high-stake people until now. If I'm being honest, the whole thing is looking comical right now in my simple mind!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKKHSAE1gIs

Pay no heed to me, I've just a childs mind

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:53 pm

by Pineapples Studio

He’s the boss of his own studio. The site is owned by a different guy, who posts here under the name of xxx.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:56 pm

by netzerkaiser

Mister Ananas wrote:He’s the boss of his own studio. The site is owned by a different guy, who posts here under the name of xxx.

Thanks Mister Ananas!

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 10:59 pm

by Chubakka

Well, let me explain You:
T

his website is collecting and sharing the best Porn videos of different productions+ his own productions are made by different production houses which are in a contractual partnership produducing for this website.
Woodman is another guy, who has his own production and selling only his own product.Himself....
The forum. :
On this forum, You can talk about all what they have published, and normally would be the case on wcx forum as well.
But there Woodman is talking bullshit about people they didn't allowed him to talk of them, so why here we could'nt talk of those we can watch, or are related to what we're watching ?
XXX doesn't want to be much involved into this ego fight, but he must show up in front of an agressive kinda " street fighter" behaviour what Woodman push.
We're living the era of NPD egomaniacs, we have to handle. More they see You weak, more they abuse You.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 11:21 am

by Eloise

Chubakka wrote:Well, let me explain You:
T his website is collecting and sharing the best Porn videos of different productions+ his own productions are made by different production houses which are in a contractual partnership produducing for this website.
Woodman is another guy, who has his own production and selling only his own product.Himself....
The forum. :
On this forum, You can talk about all what they have published, and normally would be the case on wcx forum as well.
But there Woodman is talking bullshit about people they didn't allowed him to talk of them, so why here we could'nt talk of those we can watch, or are related to what we're watching ?
XXX doesn't want to be much involved into this ego fight, but he must show up in front of an agressive kinda " street fighter" behaviour what Woodman push.
We're living the era of NPD egomaniacs, we have to handle. More they see You weak, more they abuse You.

Great explanation.
I'm getting it all now.
So: where were you all this time?

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 8:06 pm

by Chubakka

Eloise wrote:
Great explanation.
I'm getting it all now.
So: where were you all this time?

Well I was here since first Porn forums appeared.Before LP/AV now pornbox forum..My english is'nt the best but I try to help before being sarcastic...
Only to complete:
1 more difference between XXX and Woodman...
XXX should be a private person when talking about him.
Woodman is acting ín the scenes he sell.So he can be taken as a PRODUCT and can be criticized....His family off course not.But his wife still has a Porn scene on the PB website, this mean She is also a product we can talk of...
I don't understand why he sue XXX ? He think he can make friends, or advertise his website on Court ? What's the ideea behind? Or just have extra money to spend, as he doesn't pay taxes ?
What you think Eloise ?
I feel You are more on his side, so tell me why You think, all productions in Europe should appreciate the " past " of Woodman ? A past, which created a fake image of someone today is a Nobody, more of it he is hated for his presence, without bodering too much his questionable "past".
If those old insiders would come up one by one, he would be a Weinstein,, and an Eppstein of the Porn.Probably connected to these 2 already mentioned ín some way...
But this is just an opinion of mine....

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 11:58 pm

by House MD

Eloise wrote:

viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567&start=1560

Treat both equal.

LOL
Amen to that post
Thanks to my boss for snowing me under such a heavy workload sparing me wasting time with a bunch of lazy sorry ass hyenas defending their silly crazy money business while insulting a competitor on several threads ignoring basic community rules and tossing slandering accusations without any proof... as if they're about to win their case setting their own internal trial where they are both judge and prosecutor

I guess to Western Europeans this is just the typical soviet Pravda boot-licking wheels in motion

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 12:43 am

by Pineapples Studio

Why are you even here?

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:05 am

by Eloise

Chubakka wrote:
Eloise wrote:
Great explanation.
I'm getting it all now.
So: where were you all this time?

Well I was here since first Porn forums appeared.Before LP/AV now pornbox forum..My english is'nt the best but I try to help before being sarcastic...
Only to complete:
1 more difference between XXX and Woodman...
XXX should be a private person when talking about him.
Woodman is acting ín the scenes he sell.So he can be taken as a PRODUCT and can be criticized....His family off course not.But his wife still has a Porn scene on the PB website, this mean She is also a product we can talk of...
I don't understand why he sue XXX ? He think he can make friends, or advertise his website on Court ? What's the ideea behind? Or just have extra money to spend, as he doesn't pay taxes ?
What you think Eloise ?
I feel You are more on his side, so tell me why You think, all productions in Europe should appreciate the " past " of Woodman ? A past, which created a fake image of someone today is a Nobody, more of it he is hated for his presence, without bodering too much his questionable "past".
If those old insiders would come up one by one, he would be a Weinstein,, and an Eppstein of the Porn.Probably connected to these 2 already mentioned ín some way...
But this is just an opinion of mine....

I was sarcastic with 'where were you all this time' and I'm certainly not on Woodman's side. What I just can't get is that someone gets that much attention on this website by now it's a huge compliment. That's all.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:38 am

by avanfurwet

It's not a compliment. Woodman's endless obsession with posting lies and smearing what he calls "the circus", and Rocco, and Pornodan, and everyone else, also provides free publicity to his competitors. (Almost) nobody cares.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 11:10 am

by Pineapples Studio

Well, that’s understandable. That’s how I used to think too, and it’s a normal way to react to the whole situation (the ol’ “just ignore him and he’ll go away” routine)… but unfortunately, Woodman doesn’t work that way. He doesn’t just go away if you ignore him. He spreads lies about you, sullies your reputation, and ends up blocking tons of new models. The anti-Woodman thread is kind of a necessary evil in order to establish the precedent that LP/AV will call him a liar loudly and vocally.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:13 pm

by Eloise

Well you know what the funny thing is I can't find a 40 pages going thread on LP on the Woodman Forum or any other forum.
For the few obsessive and personal light touched ones it indeed seems "necessary" and a matter of life and death.
It's pathetic.

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:14 pm

by sexaddict251

Eloise wrote:Well you know what the funny thing is I can't find a 40 pages going thread on LP on the Woodman Forum or any other forum.
For the few obsessive and personal light touched ones it indeed seems "necessary" and a matter of life and death.
It's pathetic.

Delete him already...

Re: So no Tushy but Woodman is okay for 40 pages?

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:25 pm

by Eloise

sexaddict251 wrote:
Eloise wrote:Well you know what the funny thing is I can't find a 40 pages going thread on LP on the Woodman Forum or any other forum.
For the few obsessive and personal light touched ones it indeed seems "necessary" and a matter of life and death.
It's pathetic.

Delete him already...

And why do you think that other thread "what happened to this once great website" goes like a rocket too.
Delete me TODAY I couldn't care less and I'll take a look by the end of the year how this forum is literally going
with nutters going mental about all kinds of crap like dwarfs, alpacas, sex with homeless people and whateverthefuckever.