Page 1 of 1
What's wrong
Posted:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:15 pmby Jocke
...with Tushy?
Yes, I know, the topic is not specifically Analvids but it is not to promote another site, it is more about understanding what makes porn great and what makes porn boring.
I was happy when I found Tushy and thought that it would be where I would spend my time. I watch very little of their content in spite of it having
- all the best girls
- extremely good photo quality
- close ups
- nice gapes
- nice environment
I have some theories but first I want to know what you think is the missing attraction?
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 9:38 pmby netzerkaiser
Jocke wrote:...with Tushy?
Yes, I know, the topic is not specifically Analvids but it is not to promote another site, it is more about understanding what makes porn great and what makes porn boring.
I was happy when I found Tushy and thought that it would be where I would spend my time. I watch very little of their content in spite of it having
- all the best girls
- extremely good photo quality
- close ups
- nice gapes
- nice environment
I have some theories but first I want to know what you think is the missing attraction?
I think their focus on sexual positions is mostly not good. I have no idea of the terms for positions, 'piledrivers' or 'prone-bone' etc used on this site, I haven't a clue... but whatever, I think their positioning is very poor, way behind early 2000's / late 1990's stuff, or old LP stuff which seemed instinctively to know whzat to do, & when?
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:25 pmby Jocke
That is one clue. They often take positions and then have a static camera giving you several minutes of the same. They have the whole meaningless "story" in the beginning and then detail scripted fucking. It is like a beautiful panorama view. Nice looking but seldom exciting.
Apart from AnalVids I also love how Mike Adriano interacts and talk with the girls. No acting, just sexual attraction driving the action. Tushy have none of that.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:38 pmby Sir Noel
Tushy.... well yes, specifically, the photo quality is great but it only emphasises how awful the video quality is.
Imo the aspiration of the video quality on a porn site is that it should approach the vibrancy of the photoset.
Tush scenes look abysmal. They are washed out, poorly exposed with meagre dynamic ranges and often hideous colour casts.
Look at the photoset and then the scene and you can barely recognise the latter from the former.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 1:20 amby Jack_Jackal43
Because it’s like watching 2 people make love. Who wants to watch that shit? I can do that myself. What I want to see is a fantasy of something I don’t see or do in my regular life. That’s why I prefer Analvids to other sites.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 8:23 amby Paizal
Tushy is slow motion cookie cuter porn in its purest form. Basically, Tushy is the romantic twin of GG. The same old setting, the same old guys, the same old skinny girls. Only GG's sex is more aggresive and there are more dicks standing around.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:35 amby Jocke
Also the girls are too passive.
I like the Cherry Kiss/Anna DeVille/Stacy Bloom type of women who takes what they want and are not just subjects for desire.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pmby Starrio
Too many cowgirl positions, not enough prone bone or pile driver.
Pretty much any site that tries to look elegant promotes cowgirl too much, so that makes their sites suck.
It's like they are aiming to women. You want to see the girls getting fucked, not the other way around.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 6:15 pmby Jocke
It depends. Girls just sitting there is lame. When they actually fuck and do anal samba like Daniela Ortiz, then it is fucking great!!!
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:25 pmby netzerkaiser
At its best though, this site discussed brought out personality of great ladies; Tori Black, Jennifer White, Brett Rossi, Kinuski, Karla Kush, Michele James, AJ Applegate, Cherie DeVille, Jojo Kiss, Mazzy Grace, Daisy Stone, Riley Reyes, Julia Rain... just seems from great start to videos all seemed go downhill from there. Shame on directors side. Note the best ladies, the more developed personalities seem just that bit older in general?
Also, this Alberto Blanco guy. Were I endowed like that I question would I do porn myself?
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:49 pmby Pineapples Studio
What’s wrong with their content, or what’s wrong with Tushy behind the scenes?
Two different questions.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:45 pmby Jocke
netzerkaiser wrote:At its best though, this site discussed brought out personality of great ladies; Tori Black, Jennifer White, Brett Rossi, Kinuski, Karla Kush, Michele James, AJ Applegate, Cherie DeVille, Jojo Kiss, Mazzy Grace, Daisy Stone, Riley Reyes, Julia Rain... just seems from great start to videos all seemed go downhill from there. Shame on directors side. Note the best ladies, the more developed personalities seem just that bit older in general?
Also, this Alberto Blanco guy. Were I endowed like that I question would I do porn myself?
Alberto Blanco is one of my favorites. I am not attracted to men but I do enjoy seeing a good looking guy doing the fucking. I guess it is both more esthetic and hopefully more pleasurable for the ladies.
Well I think they managed to squash personality in Elsa-Jean who was a genuine, bubbly and fun teenager and who now is a serious bore.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:46 pmby Jocke
Mister Ananas wrote:What’s wrong with their content, or what’s wrong with Tushy behind the scenes?
Two different questions.
Please explain!
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:57 pmby Jocke
Another pet peeve.
Girls getting fucked with their eyes closed, or photo of genitals without capturing facial expressions. Watching a face and especially eyes is the communication necessary to connect with the girl, or it is just a body.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Wed Aug 11, 2021 12:23 amby Sweep11
All been said I think.
Slow, passionless love making is not what I’m looking for from porn.
Undoubtedly beautiful girls and backdrops.
But lame limp dick action too often.
Can live with the little stories if the action is intense but it rarely is.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Wed Aug 11, 2021 12:36 amby Starrio
Jocke wrote:It depends. Girls just sitting there is lame. When they actually fuck and do anal samba like Daniela Ortiz, then it is fucking great!!!
Hard to compare Colombian girls, they are on a league of their own, with how deep pounding they can take, caucasian girls are usually not on that level, there are exceptions, but rare.
It doesn't matter either way, even if the girl is completely paralyzed, if anal is what we are talking about, as long as the guy is going deep fast and furious then it's all good, she is getting pounded on her butt and that's what makes it great, seeing the girl taking the cock.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:03 pmby Pineapples Studio
Jocke wrote:Mister Ananas wrote:What’s wrong with their content, or what’s wrong with Tushy behind the scenes?
Two different questions.
Please explain!
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=34082&p=510808#p510808
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:39 amby Eloise
Tipfucking.
In this case check out the new release with King Tipfucker Christian Clay:
Literally SICK of this shit.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 12:20 amby Jocke
It must be direction because that is not how he fucked at LP.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:19 amby Eloise
Jocke wrote:It must be direction because that is not how he fucked at LP.
On the contrary.
He fucks like this everywhere.
He's on HerLimit as well for example and the same shit is happening there.
Re: What's wrong
Posted:
Fri Aug 13, 2021 1:36 amby xxx
We don't care about Tushy here. Go talk to them. Locking.