Pierre Woodman: "I am a bastard and break the will of girls"

[BlueShadow]

With the greatest respect to those who find this thread frustrating, I would have to disagree with your view that it's pointless.
Since I began my crusade to make models aware of who they were going to see I've stopped 8 models from falling into his web. That's 8 models who will be able to have children and never worry about what "might" come to light, something many thousands of other models before them will never have the comfort of.
Of those 8 models, off the top of my head, at least 4 of them came here and read what was posted. If I'd stopped 1 model, that would have been a victory and worth all 117 obsessed pages.
Thanks to this thread, EVERYONE knows about Woodman's association and friendship with a multi-convicted paedophile and as a result, his membership is nosediving. Just go on his forum and look how many people (genuine people) post there now.
So yes, I know for a fact I should get more of a life I've been saying that since I rocked up here. But I believe what I'm doing here is making a difference and until I don't feel that anymore I'm going to keep being a pain in Woodman's arse. (excuse the pun). So I suggest that if you find it frustrating reading all this, then don't.

THIS.
And for sure coming here from time to time (this denotes that they eventually find something interesting...I have never entered topics about which I don't care ANYTHING, I used to bring to attention the cancer of PW even in the model threads...and they complained...we do it here...and they complain the same...) just to complain about ''us'' certainly doesn't affect PW's ''activities'' more.

[Iddaoeeok]

[So, who told you that? Your opinion... but you obviously don't know his ''work'' or don't follow him enough to notice the difference.

Did he tell you this? So this mean you believe his propaganda that all is good, enjoy family, friends, etc. Putin also says he is winning the war....
(Anyone who believes that he can seriously have friends is completely off the mark.)
Or maybe you are one of his ass-licker in disguise, thats more weird.

No, I don't follow him, you do. You spend more time on his forum than he does. You're so obsessed with this one man you've lost track of reality, and because I don't applaud your obsession then I must be on Woodman's side - that's the thinking of a fanatic. Come back when you've put Woodman in prison, then I'll applaud you, I won't be holding my breath though.

[BlueShadow]

[So, who told you that? Your opinion... but you obviously don't know his ''work'' or don't follow him enough to notice the difference.

Did he tell you this? So this mean you believe his propaganda that all is good, enjoy family, friends, etc. Putin also says he is winning the war....
(Anyone who believes that he can seriously have friends is completely off the mark.)
Or maybe you are one of his ass-licker in disguise, thats more weird.

No, I don't follow him, you do. You spend more time on his forum than he does. You're so obsessed with this one man you've lost track of reality, and because I don't applaud your obsession then I must be on Woodman's side - that's the thinking of a fanatic. Come back when you've put Woodman in prison, then I'll applaud you, I won't be holding my breath though.

No, I don't follow him, you do.

So what you claim (''having absolutely no effect'') has little credibility, you talk about things you don't know.
And yes, you said it, I follow, so I know what I'm saying, unlike you.

you've lost track of reality,

No, the problem is that I have far too much contact with reality not to notice certain manipulations and keep quiet.

I don't applaud your obsession then I must be on Woodman's side

My friend, the one who occasionally comes in here ONLY to complain about us is you (along with a couple others).
I was in the models sections and you were complaining, you had asked to comment only in the appropriate topic, we do that, but you are here complaining.
Sorry if my guess is that ''someone'' maybe feels ''touched'' by what we say on PW.
I see no other LOGICAL reason to enter in a thread that (according to you) you don't care about. You are in the WRONG here. Deal with it!


And the fact is that you can enter (I can see you being interested) but just complaining about people talking about PW in the PW thread I don't think makes a difference any more than we do.

Come back when you've put Woodman in prison

You clearly don't understand anything if it all translates to ''put PW in prison.''




And still when I get these messages it is always a victory. That's it.
You, on the other hand, what contribution can you make to the topic or in which way you make differences in his ''activities'', complain about who complain about him?
Really, you don't see the point of continuing to complain about PW (I do, because I know, and messages like that are enough, one less dealing with that creep is a win) ok, but you make even less.

[BlueShadow]

It would be easy for any person of moral integrity to decide which side to take. There is no need to stay in the middle of the fire when there is a multiple convicted for abuse on minors on one side. Idiot.

But I understand he doesn't give a damn since Dennis black magic is one of the few he has left to do business with. Other delinquent and morally questionable character like Derek hay...

[Panorama]

It would be easy for any person of moral integrity to decide which side to take. There is no need to stay in the middle of the fire when there is a multiple convicted for abuse on minors on one side. Idiot.

Yes, it would appear that Pierre has a very skewed view of not only life, but reality as a whole. Here for example, he gives his other man crush idol praise for his neolithic views on humanity.

Unfortunately for Pierre is comments and views are accepted almost as well as ex-models who he gives birthday wishes to!

At some point it's going to dawn on Woodman that supporting and being "top friends" with convicted paedophiles and dark-age political leaders isn't doing his image any favours!

Meanwhile, in other news.

Those of us who are always (and sometimes stupidly) willing to give Woodman the benefit of the doubt once again are left waiting for the so-called "evidence" that Pierre promised last week.

You've got 12 hours to produce the video you promised last week Pierre or you're going to look like a liar again. Personally, I hope you CAN produce this video because if Eva was lying she needs to be exposed for helping to make women who have suffered at your hands look less credible. However, considering that you had Stacy Bloom's video up within 24 hours I'm beginning to suspect that your Eva Berger evidence might have as much credibility as Liz Rainbows!

[BlueShadow]

It would be easy for any person of moral integrity to decide which side to take. There is no need to stay in the middle of the fire when there is a multiple convicted for abuse on minors on one side. Idiot.

Yes, it would appear that Pierre has a very skewed view of not only life, but reality as a whole. Here for example, he gives his other man crush idol praise for his neolithic views on humanity.

idiot2.jpg

Unfortunately for Pierre is comments and views are accepted almost as well as ex-models who he gives birthday wishes to!

Idiot.jpg

At some point it's going to dawn on Woodman that supporting and being "top friends" with convicted paedophiles and dark-age political leaders isn't doing his image any favours!

I seriously doubt that his followers (given how stupid they are) have realized that PW actually supports him. After all, on TW/X he just wrote voila, which means everything and nothing. If you read on the forum, on the other hand, it is clear that he supports Orban.

[BlueShadow]

You've got 12 hours to produce the video you promised last week Pierre or you're going to look like a liar again. Personally, I hope you CAN produce this video because if Eva was lying she needs to be exposed for helping to make women who have suffered at your hands look less credible. However, considering that you had Stacy Bloom's video up within 24 hours I'm beginning to suspect that your Eva Berger evidence might have as much credibility as Liz Rainbows!

For Liz Rainbow's evidence (who makes clear accusations, even talks about fake piss agreement before the interview, which would be easy to disprove showing that discussion (if it exists) without necessarily having to show the full scene) it's only been 2 years.
First he wanted to publish, then he reconsidered--who knows why, but it's us who think wrong.

[Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p]

Looks like the trick mentioning his INTERPOL connection still works for internet keyboard warrior gerbier because the kid pooped his pants....
https://www.crafters.be/contact/ &dylandefour (twit).

Bb5GLKQCQAAQ78V.jpg (35.42 KiB) Viewed 3695 times

Bb5F7_FCEAAd_Q1.jpg (10.48 KiB) Viewed 3695 times

But with Tommie on the other hand the threat made by petite brain gerbier that he is best buddies with the chef of interpol since 1984 and that tommie should watch his mouth didn't quite work LOL.....

Because all the videos on tommie's social media accounts (twit/insta/tiktok etc), and especially the video that DESTROYED gerbier's reputation in hungary has 220.000 views (and counting) in only 2 weeks is still online:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNrnGozAAQk
+ 1100 comments of angry hungarians!
Reputation DESTROYED by Tommie McDonald and INTERPOL still didn't put that man in handcuffs. How come, gerbier? Didn't you phone your top buddy since 1984??!!

Gerbier is as much as a loser like this kid threatening him like that with his real name.

[BlueShadow]

https://sendvid.com/890mn2rq

what does PW's bouncer say here??
And why the girl (whose name they don't want to mention) could have problems if it is revealed that she sent her there?
And if seriously it could create problems for her why she did that??...did this girl send that model there without getting anything in return? Or did she get a fee? Which vantage/profit she get? Who is this girl they talking about, a professional agent (I don't hink so)?



The action aimed at "exploiting" the girl is configured as a participation suitable for deriving an economic advantage, of a material or ideal nature, without just cause, that is, "without suitable titles to legitimize the profit.



Either way, it's clear from the way they talk that PW can't help but work in shady ways.
That says it all.

[isis666xxx]

pierre woodman ass must taste so good

[Iddaoeeok]

My friend, the one who occasionally comes in here ONLY to complain about us is you (along with a couple others).
I was in the models sections and you were complaining, you had asked to comment only in the appropriate topic, we do that, but you are here complaining.
Sorry if my guess is that ''someone'' maybe feels ''touched'' by what we say on PW.
I see no other LOGICAL reason to enter in a thread that (according to you) you don't care about. You are in the WRONG here. Deal with it!

The thread is nearly seven years old and 118 pages along and I don't think I've posted (not counting replies) more than 5 or 6 times, in fact the last time but one time I posted was about the decline of the forum in general and the only reason I visited this time was to see what another poster was saying on the subject. I haven't actually read anything you've posted in years because who can be bothered trawling through your repetitive obsessional screeds with their multiple screenshots. I hope you're getting paid for all the time you're spending on this! You seem to have set yourself up as some sort of cross between Mother Teresa and Superman so that anyone who doesn't bow down to your greatness is automatically on Woodman's side and that is inane and pathetic and egotistical.

[Panorama]

https://sendvid.com/890mn2rq

what does PW's bouncer say here??

Yes, it would be interesting to know what he says. However, although Woodman is quick to silence him about revealing who the mystery informant is, I think it's probably nothing more sinister than Woodman trying to protect his supply.
If the woman's name had got out it's more than likely that she would be blacklisted by other companies as Woodman himself has. Don't forget in the porn industry today Woodman's name is about as popular as syphilis in a nunnery.
Plus, if what was being said was that important or incriminating I'm sure Mr ex-policeman would have edited it out.

On a more important note. Has Woodman posted the Eva Berga BTS yet??? I've been waiting over a week now for him to "destroy" Tommy with his overwhelming evidence.

[Dickson_Pizdah]

Has Woodman posted the Eva Berger BTS yet???

He's too busy offering us his insights into world politics right now.

That is, wasting the time of his forum members with his puerile pig-ignorant Eurotrash anti-American horseshit.

(How he must envy his hero Putler today. Wouldn't he love to arrange for Tommie's plane to plunge out of the sky...)

But no, softwood, your nightmare isn't going away just because you are talking bollocks about World War Three instead of putting out the fire in your own house...

[BlueShadow]

I cut the part where he says it takes a week of work to find everything (bwahahahah) and that he has to care about his family and blah blah blah

So a person makes public accusations but says he won't show everything (after all, even in the Lara Malvo video he didn't showed everything, he edited the part where she says to stop and where she cries) he wants to keep a few things for his ''games.''
What an idiot is he? People who give him credit in his ''games'' (as he said it) are even more idiotic.

[BlueShadow]

"I will not show everything"
Bwahahah, no you either show everything or you don't show anything.
Of the usual videos edited to make it look like what it is not we don't know what to do with them.

[Panorama]

"I will not show everything"

I'm looking forward to what "evidence" you have Pierre, because if Eva has indeed lied she needs to be exposed, not only to vindicate you in this matter but because she jeopardises the credibility of every woman out there who has been genuinely abused by producers. However, although I am one of the very few who would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, your whole post here is one long excuse from beginning to end. I'm only surprised the pet dog didn't eat your old iPhone 5 along with all the other excuses you gave here!

Also, as Blue mentions, saying that you will not post everything and that you have to "edit" parts doesn't make you look very credible or sincere. The fact that everyone is "recommending you not to do it" also makes it look like there might be something in the FULL video that you don't want people to see, rather than boosting Tommy's ratings like you claim. I mean come on, how absurd does that sound? You posted Stacy Bloom's BTS in less than a day and the fact that you still haven't been as forthcoming with this video makes me VERY suspicious about your claims.

You can post this one with no cutting, no editing, and no input from yourself we don't want to hear (or care) what you have to say on the matter I only want to see Eva "allegedly" making a fool of herself IN FULL. Post the entire BTS and I'll give you credit for it. I might be one of your strongest opposers but as you know I always give you credit where that credit is due. You can't say fairer than that.

Posting something that is credible doesn't get you off being one of the most despicable people out there, but post a cut and edited BTS, or kick it into the long grass (as you've done with Liz Rainbow) and you'll just prove everything we and Tommy have always said about you.

Until the weekend.

[Stacy_Bloom]

"I will not show everything"

I'm looking forward to what "evidence" you have Pierre, because if Eva has indeed lied she needs to be exposed, not only to vindicate you in this matter but because she jeopardises the credibility of every woman out there who has been genuinely abused by producers. However, although I am one of the very few who would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, your whole post here is one long excuse from beginning to end. I'm only surprised the pet dog didn't eat your old iPhone 5 along with all the other excuses you gave here!

Also, as Blue mentions, saying that you will not post everything and that you have to "edit" parts doesn't make you look very credible or sincere. The fact that everyone is "recommending you not to do it" also makes it look like there might be something in the FULL video that you don't want people to see, rather than boosting Tommy's ratings like you claim. I mean come on, how absurd does that sound? You posted Stacy Bloom's BTS in less than a day and the fact that you still haven't been as forthcoming with this video makes me VERY suspicious about your claims.

You can post this one with no cutting, no editing, and no input from yourself we don't want to hear (or care) what you have to say on the matter I only want to see Eva "allegedly" making a fool of herself IN FULL. Post the entire BTS and I'll give you credit for it. I might be one of your strongest opposers but as you know I always give you credit where that credit is due. You can't say fairer than that.

Posting something that is credible doesn't get you off being one of the most despicable people out there, but post a cut and edited BTS, or kick it into the long grass (as you've done with Liz Rainbow) and you'll just prove everything we and Tommy have always said about you.

Until the weekend.

Let's also mention that "evidence" for me PW prepared since the past year of my public "no" on question will I work with him again or not.
So he prepared 2 hours edited "content" whole the year for me. I feel proud of myself even, one year of editing for me...
So one year more we will wait evidence for Eva and others. Editing and fantasy takes a time.

[Panorama]

Pierre has given us his word that he is going to produce evidence this weekend that proves Eva Berger is a liar.
Normally he says he is going to produce things (castings etc) that he never produces for his members and he always gets away with it because it's what they stupidly expect.
However, I've given Pierre the benefit of the doubt and I'm willing to let the man produce that evidence as he said he will this weekend. He claims he is a man of his word and he does not lie, I'm holding him to that.
If Pierre does not produce that evidence that will "destroy" Eva and Tommy by tomorrow evening, not only is he going to look incredibly stupid but he'll also look like a liar and someone as distrustful as everyone has always claimed. That holds true if he attempts to "edit" or "not show everything" because that means he doesn't want people to see the truth.

This is a BIG DEAL, because what happens between now and tomorrow evening will prove one way or the other whether Eva or Woodman are liars.

[BlueShadow]

not only is he going to look incredibly stupid but he'll also look like a liar and someone as distrustful as everyone has always claimed.

are not just claims are facts, which he himself has already proven-just one of the examples (I admire you that you still give him the benefit of the doubt when he has already proven that he is unreliable ) :


I WAS SPEAKING ALWAYS VERY KINDLY ABOUT HER (UNTIL THIS WEEK)
when he said that bullshit was August 21, 2021, as we can see.


in 2019, well before a week LOL: but maybe for PW to say there are better scenes than that and that he's in no hurry for that girl is a compliment.



And again in 2020. (a reminder: when PW said he always spoke well of Liz Rainbow it was 2021 LOL)
Surely to say that she has nothing to compare to two ''angels'' and that she is only interested in money is to speak kindly of her.





then about the evidence he had to show, he has already proven himself untrustworthy, no need for more unfulfilled words:



"I decide what to show (again, he didn't intend to show everything, but artfully editing things out LOL) after HOLIDAYS" he said... it was August 2 YEARS AGO.

And says it triumphant:
"LET ME COME BACK FROM HOLIDAYS.... Aw aw aw
FIRST WEEK OF SEPTEMBER I WILL FIX IT"

was august 2021...did you see anything? I haven't.

PS
Even if he showed the edited evidence on Eva Berger, he would still be in credit LOL I'm not the one who said "I'll fix it in september"... in 2021.
On one thing you can NEVER disprove me, that PW's words are worth ZERO. And no, there is no doubts on that.
They are simple facts.

[BlueShadow]

On one thing you can NEVER disprove me, that PW's words are worth ZERO. And no, there is no doubts on that.
They are simple facts.

and in any case, the members who are still waiting for promised updates that have never arrived for years know this better than I do.

[ValenciaCF]

We still waiting to see how he was gonna show Eva Berger to be a top liar. Hell, we still waiting for him to show Liz Rainbow was a liar too.
He doesn't have a single ounce of honour, integrity or credibility. He will always say what he doesn't do and doesn't will never do what he means. He's a liar, an untrustworthy tape recorder who just spits out bullshit constantly.

[Panorama]

not only is he going to look incredibly stupid but he'll also look like a liar and someone as distrustful as everyone has always claimed.

are not just claims are facts, which he himself has already proven-just one of the examples (I admire you that you still give him the benefit of the doubt when he has already proven that he is unreliable )

This is why I always give people the benefit of the doubt. This video is damning for Eva Berger, Tommy and ultimately us. Even though Woodman edited this and put far too much of himself in it, the facts look pretty clear to me at least that Eva Berger lied on that podcast and her accusations against Woodman are completely unfounded. I can't for the life of me work out why she would make such accusations when it was clearly obvious that they could be disproved.
This leads me to think why she would do this. Was she just incredibly stupid? Did she just want to be a part of the "Mee too" scene? Or was she paid by Woodman to stir up trouble so that he could pull this evidence and appear the victim?

I personally don't know and to be honest I don't think it really matters now. Unless Tommy comes back with something truly spectacular, this one is dead in the water. I've never been an advocate for Woodman (horrible though he is) being a rapist, but, this woman has done untold damage for those who may have thought about coming forward either about him or other bent producers.

As far as this particular video goes all it shows is that Woodman lied to his members that THIS casting was real. As this casting was (up until Eva decided to make a big show of it) just like any other casting, I think we can safely say that most if not all of his other forced "piss drinking" and slapping videos are also staged. If anyone would like to show evidence otherwise please post it.

Do I think this puts Woodman in the clear? No way. There are too many other issues that hang in Woodman's dark and shady closet, but again at the moment, it is all accusations, rumours, and speculations with no one coming forward to put the wooden spike in the beast's chest. I believe the vast majority of Woodman's sins are historical. (hence no BTS for doxxx) Somebody who can have a friend who is a multiple convicted paedophile and actually stand up for them isn't a nice person, and is quite often "guilty by association", but that's for other discussions.

On this evidence, however, I'm giving him credit where credit is due, and it's no thanks to Eva Berger.

[Panorama]

Yes "Master4SubCpl" it's most likely true of all of Pierre's "pissing" scenes where the model declined to be urinated on. Believe it or not, that is not a bad thing, (as far as I'm concerned) I can't think of anything more degrading and humiliating for anyone to be subjected to.
However, if you're into that sort of thing and you trusted Pierre for that, then I'm afraid you're out of luck just like everyone else who believed these scenes were genuine. As for whether you trust him now after clearly showing that he uses "Tropicana" well that's up to you. You know how the old saying goes "Fool me once. . . . . . . . ".

On a similar note, I have a question for anyone who knows how these things work. In the model release excerpt below it states that the model is aware that if she has sex with Pierre after the casting "or on another day" she gives him the rights to that scene. Surely that makes that release have an open end to it i.e. a model could meet him in a bar 2 years later he could have sex with her without her knowledge (or consent at that time) and film everything without being prosecuted. Am I reading that right or am I missing something? Should there not be a separate release signed for each time she works with him making the previous one extinct?

Is that a common requirement written into release forms? Also, the form is in English and it states that the form 'will be' verbally translated to the model if she cannot read English. Can that not leave the door open for him to "say" what he wants to model's such as "Don't worry I'm not going to film us" when it actually clearly states that he will do so in the release? That would actually work out really well for him to do a casting, get the model to sign a release she can't understand, talk her into letting him show her his "special system" off camera of course, and then shoot it all despite his promise all the while staying within the four corners of the contract. Or, is the form Woodman shows here just one of several one of which is in the model's own language? I'm far from being an expert but I would think that most models from Eastern Europe would have a hard time properly understanding the implications of this release form.

You've already admitted very publically that you fake your RGS and slapping scenes Pierre, that took a lot of balls on your behalf because you could lose even more members admitting that. Why not go full honesty on us and talk to us about what I've just asked? I know you don't have to and I don't expect you to, but I was true to my word and gave you credit for your Eva Berger evidence.

[BlueShadow]

yes, now we found out why he didn't shut up Liz Rainbow LOL
And that maybe she wasn't telling lies, the only one lying is PW.




Anyway you didn't need this to find out, he has already lied to you other times.

A single lie discovered is enough to create doubt in every truth expressed.

[BlueShadow]

You've already admitted very publically that you fake your RGS and slapping scenes Pierre, that took a lot of balls on your behalf because you could lose even more members admitting that. Why not go full honesty on us and talk to us about what I've just asked? I know you don't have to and I don't expect you to, but I was true to my word and gave you credit for your Eva Berger evidence.

Yep, PW, the one who talked about LP/AV's fake piss, which was just water... but he used apple juice. LOL
Chritiana Cinn also said this thing:

__________
Uh oh.

Clown!

[BlueShadow]

This is why I always give people the benefit of the doubt. This video is damning for Eva Berger, Tommy and ultimately us. Even though Woodman edited this and put far too much of himself in it, the facts look pretty clear to me at least that Eva Berger lied on that podcast and her accusations against Woodman are completely unfounded. I can't for the life of me work out why she would make such accusations when it was clearly obvious that they could be disproved.
This leads me to think why she would do this. Was she just incredibly stupid? Did she just want to be a part of the "Mee too" scene? Or was she paid by Woodman to stir up trouble so that he could pull this evidence and appear the victim?

I personally don't know and to be honest I don't think it really matters now. Unless Tommy comes back with something truly spectacular, this one is dead in the water. I've never been an advocate for Woodman (horrible though he is) being a rapist, but, this woman has done untold damage for those who may have thought about coming forward either about him or other bent producers.

Honestly about Eva Berger...seriously I don't care, in the sense...I already knew she was not that reliable, and when she went to PW she was already well more than experienced, the problem is always with newbies (even afterwards when he tries to control them!) And it is good that they stay away from this manipulator and LIAR. There is a reason Josephine Jackson basically says she was not in a position to say NO.

PW is a liar and make fool of his members, that is assured. And work in shady ways and doing business with shady people. And that is a fact!
Then sending him to ''jail'', that is another thing. But I don't care, there is also a moral part, and he is not clean. Karma...

[BlueShadow]

______________________
I agree I agree.
Like selling videos where they swallow apple juice and instead they try to tell you that is piss.
Then you are just a liar, and that's different.



__________________


__________________
I agree here, too.
But at least the liquid comes out of the dick, not the apple juice box.

[Dickson_Pizdah]

Well let us face it, the movie starring Porn-Producer-turned-Preacher Tommie as Knight in Shining Armour riding to defend co-star Eva Berger, veteran of dozens of Eastern European studios and Parisian hotels in her role of Princess Wronged Virtue... that one was never going to take off, was it?

So the Auvergne cock crows shriller than ever on the village shitheap, for a while.

Intoxicated by his ego as always, he will make lots of squeaky noise about this and other minuscule achievements, at a time when he really ought to be keeping his head down.

For whatever the merits of the Tommie story, its exposure is swelling the tide of public opinion against Budapest's tolerance of the Porn Kings. There is such a thing as bad publicity, Woodie, and you are getting plenty.

As I have always argued, if (and it remains a big if, in spite of what my Magyar mate says) the government decides to act against PW or anyone else, they will not waste time on protracted law suits with advocates watching endless doctored footage from his studio.

Orban has always had a short way with those he wishes to eliminate - not often physically like the child-murderer in the Kremlin, but effectively. Ask any of the exiles in Germany, France or the UK.

Woody, who ironically admires Thick Vic for precisely this ruthlessness, would be forced out of Hungary and would either have to choose expensive exile in Dubai or one of those brain-dead tropical atolls he likes, or in La Patrie itself, where he would feel about as comfortable and at ease as one of Robespierre's 'top friends' in 1792.

More to follow, but for now, remember that Eva Berger is only one of the girls who have told the world what a repulsive experience it is to have dealings with this sociopath piglet.

[ValenciaCF]

Hang on now dum dums. Surely you guys are not stupid enough to believe the text messages from Eva are real. Woodman is poison. Tommy lustcast just released a new video on youtube. The timeline of Eva's whereabouts at the time Woodman claimed she did a scene for him do not add up. Her commision statement also did not have Woodman as one of her arranged bookings. So the ape lied about everything and used photoshop

[Panorama]

. . . . . And it gets worse.

Oh dear!

[BlueShadow]

Trust your master!!! He said he will do it after the holidays.... of 2021

Always said he is a liar, manipulator, someone who sell fairytales, his word is worth zero. And as always in the end ... he PROVED IT HIMSELF.
Victim of his ego. Doesn't accept that there is anyone to question him. He always wants to have the last word, he is always the best LOL

Yes @Dickson_Pizdah, more to follow.
Karma.

[BlueShadow]

Predictably, he deleted those posts, after all, the author predicted that too:


Instead of reply to his member/fans on reasonable doubts he continues with manipulations (his modus operandi).
If you cannot overcome the truth. Delete it. LOL
As I said. Ego NEVER accepts the truth.




@Panorama you did that screen before it was deleted, but so did I, this is from the mobile version of his forum.


Now the August 29 5:39and6:06 PM posts is gone, replaced by one in favor.
To which, however, he replies immediately afterwards LOL
He's not afraid of anyone huh.... LOL


I guess he's going to close that topic as well-he can't delete all the posts of members who rightly ask questions and leave only those in favor for propaganda.

[BlueShadow]

Oh, I guess Magnus is silenced now , but at least we have another one who knows how PW operates and how his propaganda works on that forum.

[BlueShadow]

After deleting those Magnus posts, he is now talking to himself.


Yes, a river of apple juice.

[Panorama]

This incident reminds me of the Serenity Haze video, the one where he confidently provided "evidence" to show that he never abused her but instead showed how after she repeatedly told him that he was hurting her he just kept on pushing his fingers into her ass. His ego is so HUGE that he just doesn't see the damage he does to himself. It would appear that the older he gets the more mistakes and fuck-ups he makes, something that we've all seen in our senior citizens, it comes to us all but not quite as publically as this.
Unfortunately for Woodman, because of all the tiny little webs that the good little spider has spun over the years, he's now getting caught up in his own web of lies and deceit and for sure this video isn't going to be the last of his mistakes.

We've been telling his members for years about the scenes that don't exist, the models who refuse to talk about him, ex-models who delete his social media comments to them, and his claims of always "being the first", but they never believed us, well here it is folks confirmed by "The Master" himself.

Pierre promised you that his scenes were genuine some lesbian models even being turned straight by the great man! Did he tell you the truth?
Gabriella Tchekan (aka his sister) claims her scene with Woodman was "private" Is that the truth?
The same with Suzi Carina, her scene was "private" was that indeed the truth?
Viola Bailey's boyfriend was cuckolded by "The Master" Is that also the truth?
How many women do you "claim" to have slept with Pierre? 5,000? 6,000? Are you telling the truth about that also?
I could go on and on and on and on with the questions that you are all now asking yourselves. Is anything Pierre told us THE TRUTH?

The irony in this whole saga is that the main person in this video who is supposed to be the liar has suddenly become irrelevant because the person accusing her of this has amazingly shown himself to be EVEN WORSE!
It's been right there in front of all you Woodman members (I'm proper looking at you doxxx you fool) FOR YEARS and you kept paying subs for lies!

Personally, I think you all got what you deserved for following a false god, and Pierre. You compared yourself to Jesus in your little quote thing at the bottom of your posts. That was another mistake you made, a BIG one.


****** STILL, DON'T LET ANY OF THAT PUT YOU OFF, KEEP PAYING THOSE SUBS!******

[ValenciaCF]

Lolololol look his new post he makes about Hollywood movies. He basically dug his own grave and showed everyone what a fraud he is. He just admitted that his work is fake and deceived all his followers.
He is such a clown but remember the time he talked about actresses who act on camera and fake it are bitches. His own words but he just admitted to doung same fake things. What a lunatic!

[BlueShadow]

Viola Bailey's boyfriend was cuckolded by "The Master" Is that also the truth?

There are also old stories about how the guy you see with the blurred face in the casting of Cayenne Klein is actually just an extra pretending to be Cayenne Klein's boyfriend.
I wouldn't be surprised if Viola Bailey's fairytales with the ''unwitting'' boyfriend who then ''comes back'' to do scenes etc. ( well constructed) that he sold to the members was staged, Viola to direct questions never answered... after all if the paper they sign says that

(it argued that the camera is hidden without knowing and thi is for ''commercial purposes''...they can lie just fine for ''commercial purpose.''
Clearly he knows what the members want and what sells, the cuckold story being one of them.

Most of the videos are staged, in the remaining he take advantage of newbies.
This is PW.

[BlueShadow]

Lolololol look his new post he makes about Hollywood movies. He basically dug his own grave and showed everyone what a fraud he is. He just admitted that his work is fake and deceived all his followers.

if this thing about Tommie, Eva Berger...had not come out, he would have continued to lie, as with Christiana Cinn, Liz Rainbow... etc.

[Panorama]

Pierre. . . . . I mean "xmanx" only someone who is completely detached from reality could have written what you have below. In the last 24hrs you not only made yourself look like a liar. . . . which you are, because you actually showed it to all your adoring fans. But in the process of doing this, you also made yourself look like a fool. I know you're not a fool because you wouldn't have been around for so long and been so successful.
But what you did yesterday was that in your grandiose and ego-fueled eagerness, you completely forgot that you were making your OWN members look like fools.

That's not being a good little spider.

They now know that you have been lying to them and making them look stupid for supporting you. You deserve to have every one of them leave your site en masse. Of course, the ones who don't mind looking like fools (looking at you doxxx) will stay and believe your lies, but a lot won't. You've already had to silence one because he showed the courage to stand up to you. He's not going to be the last to leave Pierre, then there will only be you and your troll farm to listen to your own lies.

[BlueShadow]

Some idiots now so used to being treated like idiots that...

Conspiracy?? Theory??? It's a fact! Not theory anymore.
PW was lying to you even when he swore it was all true. It is a fact.
It doesn't ''negate'' the other castings...but no it doesn't even negate the fact that he fooled his members and lied to you! LOL
Where is their dignity or intellectual honesty?

"Wrestling isn't completely real, it's scripted and blah blah blah"... yes now it comes convenient to say it, too bad the maggiority of members is there for the "genuinine contents" and the very slogan of the site is 100% real!
As also seen in the site banner:


They will never wake up, they will always find something to justify.
Is something very close to Stockholm syndrome. Yes, you should also touch the grass, not smoke it.