PornBox.com

@eloise
tushy thread was about creative differences whereas the woodman thread is about how he does his business both are different

Eloise wrote:with nutters going mental about all kinds of crap like dwarfs, alpacas, sex with homeless people and whateverthefuckever.[/b]

Okay, I’m not gonna lie, I laughed.

Eloise wrote:Well you know what the funny thing is I can't find a 40 pages going thread on LP on the Woodman Forum or any other forum.

Just because there isn't a proper thread on LP, they bash and talk about LP/AV on various threads all over the propaganda forum. And often they don't mention LP directly, but they talk about ''bad studios in Prague'', circus etc. if you search those words there it's way more than 40 pages. I have already showed it.
On Rocco Siffredi there is a thread in the male performer section...but he talks about him in several other threads too.
The same when he talks about Juliana Grandi, doesn't need a thread to bash those who are against him(or he thinks they are against him, since he is paranoid), it means little.

If you seriously think that ''there'' they are less ''obsessed'' (to use your words) or bash less LPs and other competitors, models (with ''bad souls'' ) you are either dead wrong or blind.

and not only on his forum, he denigrates LP/AV everywhere, even on ADT.
https://forum.pornbox.com/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567&start=1520#p509434
https://forum.pornbox.com/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567&start=1520#p509447

First he is the first to bash LP, then later when someone points out something that is not in favor of his propaganda he says not to talk about LP and ignore. Clown.
So in the end what would be the problem? That there is bad talk about PW? He doesn't do it about the other competitors?
That there is a whole 40 page thread about him? Better that way, you should be happy... if you don't care you can ignore the thread.

And the ''no Tushy but Woodman is okay'' comparison doesn't stand...I don't see Tushy spending time bashing and badmouthing competitors on a forum, he's the only overly narcistic producer who do and needs that.

Eloise wrote:https://forum.pornbox.com/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13567&start=1560

I'm so glad you're chippin' in as well on this one Blue Shadow.
Now let's make this one go to 40 as well now shall we?

And I'm glad you'll be there to remind us how many pages we've reached.
But if you have anything else interesting to say let us know, but I'm not very hopeful.

It's right what you say MaximumPayne, but Liz Rainbow isn't just complaining about the piss not being consensual or saying he didn't piss in her mouth, showing just that doesn't prove anything.... she says that before the staged interview PW told her that it will be fake pissing with juice, she say what was agreed was to do fake pissing only not real so it won't be a problem for him to show that part before the interview... (he has already shown that the casting is staged with the Lara Malvo video) and he also says that he didn't pay her the extra he promised her and says that after the scene he apologized for what happened.
I wonder how he will manipulate the videos...

I got the wrong topic, I apologize...
But then again, you are the one who opened another topic to talk about Woodman...you are very interested it seems.

BlueShadow wrote:It's right what you say MaximumPayne, but Liz Rainbow isn't just complaining about the piss not being consensual or saying he didn't piss in her mouth, showing just that doesn't prove anything.... she says that before the staged interview PW told her that it will be fake pissing with juice, she say what was agreed was to do fake pissing only not real so it won't be a problem for him to show that part before the interview... (he has already shown that the casting is staged with the Lara Malvo video) and he also says that he didn't pay her the extra he promised her and says that after the scene he apologized for what happened.
I wonder how he will manipulate the videos...

Yeah, I've been reading this thread on the Woodman forum with interest Blue. It seems like Pierre's lost control of one of his flock so he's threatening to lock the thread again. I can't stand the guy, but I'm willing to see if he comes up with the goods and give him credit where credit is due. But it's good to see that at least one person on that forum is willing to stand up and make themselves known. MaximumPayne I salute you, sir.

Does anybody know where the other Woodaman thread has gone? I got an email to tell me someone posted to it only to find that it appears to have gone?