hahahahah I don't know if seriously Pierre Woodman believes the crap he says and if there is seriously anyone so unintelligent as to believe his fairytales.
Ladies and gentlemen: Pierre Woodman, the savior of abused girls (who has worked not once, but 15 times for that studio, when others make accusations against him is quick to point out that the girls have come back for other shoots as well, to back up the argument that in fact it was all right with them, so it can be applied here as well, she has worked several times with that studio,not once, not two, not three, at least 15 times, so it's all right, or does this logic only apply in one sense?)
I invite everyone, even PW fans to pause and think logically for once and then tell me if you seriously believe what he is milling about, also because if it were true it would be unprofessional conduct of the agency and the director, you don't work that way:
"She came to the casting with the firm intention of NEVER doing anal again ... and all her bookings were non-anal."
Wrong. Not all the bookings were non-anal, all except his booking, for which him has a commercial agreement with Brillbabes, and he takes advantage to do propaganda, wake up folks....or maybe we want to believe that Brillbabes, a ''serious'' agency sends a model to an anal shoot without telling in advance what kind of work it is? I ask you!!
"I was only supposed to interview her ... it was hard to convince her to do a DP"
Usual joke.
Let's say that what Mr. Pierre Woodman PUBLICLY states is true (which it is not for obvious legal reasons) is he saying that a girl sent there for work by a 'professional agency' for ONE paid interview then found herself on set doing DP without ANYTHING being agreed before with the model and the agency itself? Does Brillbabes have nothing to say or is it okay for girls to be sent there for an interview that magically
turns into a DP?
If a director stated something like that in the US he would be banned everywhere. Unbelievable that they allow to difuse this crap...crazy stuff in Budapest.
In the US there would at least be an investigation to find out what the relationship is between him and this agency and how they handle these girls jobs.
If you seriously believe that it wasn't all agreed before, even the fake interview, you are total fools, she knew well that it was an anal + DP shoot, and she knew well about the presence of the other performer.
If it were the other way around it would not ''professional,'' don't you think?
If it is true...well, then he himself confirms that something is wrong on his sets, of agencies sending these unaware girls there... LOL
reasoning outside the box, IF true what he say would be this:
"moves and activities made to convince precarious or fragile young women (he say HIMSELF that she was scared and traumatized) to shoot videos. Directors forced multiple partners on them at the last moment."
I hope you realize that it's ALL fake what he do, what he say. Just something to sell to stupid members. Otherwise....well, as above.
the only true thing is that at the agency she is not available for anal, but only with him because he pays for it, he has an agreement. And she won't do any more anal in Budapest, not because of the studio in Russia but because of PW.
Seriously, If she'd demand that he bends over to get fucked in the ass with a huge strap-on dildo, he'd do it for sure!!!! 
In the end, she is one of few girls who knows how to (continuesly) fuck him up 
