PornBox.com

It's been almost two years since we can produce Dap scenes if you noticed, because the evaluations of the boy girl scenes are the same as a dap but with the problem, that the value of the dap is low for the investment and we lose profit...now we have did the experiment with one of the best top sellers and is not normal they give me more money for boy girl scene and more less for dap...is clear that some mother fucker don't want let pruduce us the dap, but the problem now is more bad they start to pay bad also the bga piss...Sorry guys unfortunately they are trying to hinder us...but we will fight, also because we want give you more good scene

PAFstudio wrote:now we have did the experiment with one of the best top sellers and is not normal they give me more money for boy girl scene and more less for dap...

A decently shot DAP with Emily Pink would always sell better than a single anal with her.
But maybe 3 days is not enough to assess the scene's performance?
Wouldn't be 14 days better?

dap-addict wrote:

PAFstudio wrote:now we have did the experiment with one of the best top sellers and is not normal they give me more money for boy girl scene and more less for dap...

A decently shot DAP with Emily Pink would always sell better than a single anal with her.
But maybe 3 days is not enough to assess the scene's performance?
Wouldn't be 14 days better?

No friend because the value is falling, they stole $ 350 from the initial valuation ... And the scene with Sweet Mari every day they steal $ 20/40 ... There is a bastard who has been having fun doing this for years, and one of them also has a study we discovered a few weeks ago

dap-addict wrote:

PAFstudio wrote:now we have did the experiment with one of the best top sellers and is not normal they give me more money for boy girl scene and more less for dap...

A decently shot DAP with Emily Pink would always sell better than a single anal with her.
But maybe 3 days is not enough to assess the scene's performance?
Wouldn't be 14 days better?

I am having the same issue as well. When I shoot a scene with a group of guys, I am getting very low money, resulting in me losing financially, and the worst thing, this is even happening with the same girl. This site did not work this way, something as changed in the algorithm or the fans have changed, preferring the 1on1 over shooting more guys.

PAFstudio wrote:No friend because the value is falling, they stole $ 350 from the initial valuation ... And the scene with Sweet Mari every day they steal $ 20/40 ...

What?

PAF, I dont need Sheer since you know my mail.
But maybe its just time to expose here what's happening exactly?

Btw, I will always support DAP over 1on1 and apart from first 1on1 intro for years it was clear that DAP and wet sells better. All pornbox sales data show it!

Oscar Batty wrote: I am having the same issue as well. When I shoot a scene with a group of guys, I am getting very low money, resulting in me losing financially, and the worst thing, this is even happening with the same girl. This site did not work this way, something as changed in the algorithm or the fans have changed, preferring the 1on1 over shooting more guys.

If fans have changed what they buy, then I think that behaviour should show up in the "top sellers" and "most sold" lists on the website. Unless you don't trust those lists either.

If you are concerned by falling sales volumes, there are really only a few possible courses of action for you.

I think you could try to:

1. Experiment with pricing to see if higher, or lower, scene prices could move your sales numbers by enough to result in higher total revenue, and/or

2. Contact the Pornbox platform owners and try to resolve your commercial issues, or

3. Find other platforms or websites to sell your scenes, or

4. Make your own websites (but that's expensive, risky, etc.), or

5. Exit the porn business and make your money some easier way.

Oscar Batty wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

PAFstudio wrote:now we have did the experiment with one of the best top sellers and is not normal they give me more money for boy girl scene and more less for dap...

A decently shot DAP with Emily Pink would always sell better than a single anal with her.
But maybe 3 days is not enough to assess the scene's performance?
Wouldn't be 14 days better?

I am having the same issue as well. When I shoot a scene with a group of guys, I am getting very low money, resulting in me losing financially, and the worst thing, this is even happening with the same girl. This site did not work this way, something as changed in the algorithm or the fans have changed, preferring the 1on1 over shooting more guys.

I don't think it's due by fans this site is famous for scenes with multiple actors on a girl, simply having you the exact same problem on all scenes means that only some studios have to do dap and others don't

dap-addict wrote:

PAFstudio wrote:No friend because the value is falling, they stole $ 350 from the initial valuation ... And the scene with Sweet Mari every day they steal $ 20/40 ...

What?

PAF, I dont need Sheer since you know my mail.
But maybe its just time to expose here what's happening exactly?

Btw, I will always support DAP over 1on1 and apart from first 1on1 intro for years it was clear that DAP and wet sells better. All pornbox sales data show it!

We have always done dap and we have many really beautiful and rich in fantasy, but unfortunately they are not assumptions we discovered that there really is behind a plot to make our studios big ... Unfortunately they prefer to sabotage you instead of joining forces

avanfurwet wrote:

Oscar Batty wrote: I am having the same issue as well. When I shoot a scene with a group of guys, I am getting very low money, resulting in me losing financially, and the worst thing, this is even happening with the same girl. This site did not work this way, something as changed in the algorithm or the fans have changed, preferring the 1on1 over shooting more guys.

If fans have changed what they buy, then I think that behaviour should show up in the "top sellers" and "most sold" lists on the website. Unless you don't trust those lists either.

If you are concerned by falling sales volumes, there are really only a few possible courses of action for you.

I think you could try to:

1. Experiment with pricing to see if higher, or lower, scene prices could move your sales numbers by enough to result in higher total revenue, and/or

2. Contact the Pornbox platform owners and try to resolve your commercial issues, or

3. Find other platforms or websites to sell your scenes, or

4. Make your own websites (but that's expensive, risky, etc.), or

5. Exit the porn business and make your money some easier way.

We have experienced that lowering prices makes us lose money and raising too much nothing more striking happens, creating a website takes a lot of money to invest for a distant future gain ... Contacting the head of Pornbox is impossible, also the other problem is some studios manege more platforms and have privilege so no one will help you...Change bisness never, they want this I will fight for my job and for my passion,they have to understand this

PAFstudio wrote:We have always done dap and we have many really beautiful and rich in fantasy

Well, what we still see is Mambo Perv despite having the same problems releasing about 1-2 DAP per week lately. Shows me it's still viable and profitable. Maybe not with pretty high fee girls like Emily Pink or similarly popular and soon arriving Alice Trece, but you might be able to cut costs while staying fair still also for the girls, by proposing them more DAP shots for instance. Depends all on demanded girls schedule, but I'd know some girls happy to lower their fee expectations a bit for a guaranteed number of scenes, a good place to stay for free while working in Prague and tests payed by studio.

Hey PAF, are you still shooting? No releases for some time now

Dudemeister wrote:Hey PAF, are you still shooting? No releases for some time now

Hello unfortunately we had some problems... A scene just came out today with Emily Pink and Natasha Ink