PornBox.com

I already have a few scenes from them.

Us LP costumers are very easy to please, all we want are three things:

1. Lots of anal
2. Movies at least 40 minutes long
3. Prices that aren't too crazy

It doesn't take much to make us happy, plus in all honesty the Russians have some of the cutest girls.







I particularly like how they always do many different positions, including lots of standing positions, and lifting the girls in the air because that kind of variety is what makes it hot.



I also like the use of walls, tables, stools, doors, windows, the floor, basically anything where you can put the girls against to fuck them in the ass.



Congratulations on the studio!

stratogustav wrote:
Us LP costumers are very easy to please, all we want are three things:

1. Lots of anal

Actually Pussy porn is still very popular in America, I think that we in Europe are forward in Anal porn. But of course Anal is on its winning way also there.

grey00owl wrote:Actually Pussy porn is still very popular in America, I think that we in Europe are forward in Anal porn. But of course Anal is on its winning way also there.

I'm from U.S., but I meant to say "us" LP costumers, not "U.S." LP costumers. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

I was happy to see another Whiteneko anal video, but I was disappointed it was so short. 27 minutes is not enough. 40 to 1 hour videos are best. I like many of the 50 minutes videos they have.

When the video is too short you feel like you are not getting your money worth. I know it is not true, and it is only in our heads, but it still feels that way.

stratogustav wrote:I was happy to see another Whiteneko anal video, but I was disappointed it was so short. 27 minutes is not enough. 40 to 1 hour videos are best. I like many of the 50 minutes videos they have.

When the video is too short you feel like you are not getting your money worth. I know it is not true, and it is only in our heads, but it still feels that way.

Actually overall quality, i.e. intensity, contents, engagement, setting, technical features, is much more relevant than length.

grey00owl wrote:Actually overall quality, i.e. intensity, contents, engagement, setting, technical features, is much more relevant than length.

Yeah, but if you are paying double the price for something half the length, it does mess with your head.

I find myself liking Nick's productions less and less actually. The first two scenes with Nata Paradise for example were all about showcasing the girl with good positions and camera angles: she got fucked hard in the ass and we can see her face and/or body the entire time.

Every scene I have bought since these two, that have been directed by Nick, have been a disappointment, mainly because the camera work is much worse, but also because the girl is no longer the sole focus of the scenes. Take the Baby Bamby scene for example. I find that too often the focus shifts to Nick fucking the girl instead of keeping the girl getting fucked as the only center of attention. I'm also bothered by unnecessary complex positions that never materialize into good views or good fucking. And finally; compare the amount of man-ass you get to focus on between the Nata and the Bamby scenes and you should be able to figure out where things go wrong.

I do like the complicated positions, that's the best part for me from his videos besides of course the nice girls selection.

I'm really tired of seeing cowgirl on every other studio, at least he tries to mix it up and have some inspiration like we like to do in real life, that's a good thing.

That said, I do agree that getting the girl expression on camera is a good thing too.

If you look the scenes with Parish for example the work wasn't strong, he was only doing the minimum there, but you still got to see her face feeling the cock, and that's always pleasing to watch.

I do like those shots from far though because seeing the girl getting fucked is what I am here for. If I was here just to see the girl naked I would be buying softcore stuff.

I want to see some pounding, make it sound!

I started to make some screenshot collections from the Bamby and Nata 1on1 scenes to illustrate my point about camerawork, but had to stop after the teaser section because it got too fucking depressing.

DPraved wrote:I started to make some screenshot collections from the Bamby and Nata 1on1 scenes to illustrate my point about camerawork, but had to stop after the teaser section because it got too fucking depressing.

Bamby tease 1.jpg

Nata tease 1.jpg

You make me miss Nata Paradise. She was incredible. It sucks she left.

I need to get that Bamby video, I don't have it yet, it is on my wishlist. I'll get it on the next cycle to understand what you mean.

I think Bambi looks good, but I can't see her face in those shots. If that's what you mean I agree with you, seeing the face is very important because you want to see the girl feeling the cock when it enters her ass.

stratogustav wrote:
You make me miss Nata Paradise. She was incredible. It sucks she left.

I need to get that Bamby video, I don't have it yet, it is on my wishlist. I'll get it on the next cycle to understand what you mean.

I think Bambi looks good, but I can't see her face in those shots. If that's what you mean I agree with you, seeing the face is very important because you want to see the girl feeling the cock when it enters her ass.

I miss her to, but so long as she continues with porn, I will keep hoping for her eventual trip to Prague.

Regarding the Bamby scene, my point is exactly that; the camerawork is so poor, they consistently fail to include her beautiful face and figure in the frame. I won't say that you shouldn't buy it, but I will say that you should take a look at the scene screenshots before deciding. Bamby is a gorgeous girl, so the camerawork needs to be better with girls of this quality.

I will perhaps continue with the scene comparison in another thread to keep this one on topic and not fill it with too much negativity.

DPraved wrote:I miss her to, but so long as she continues with porn, I will keep hoping for her eventual trip to Prague.

Regarding the Bamby scene, my point is exactly that; the camerawork is so poor, they consistently fail to include her beautiful face and figure in the frame. I won't say that you shouldn't buy it, but I will say that you should take a look at the scene screenshots before deciding. Bamby is a gorgeous girl, so the camerawork needs to be better with girls of this quality.

I will perhaps continue with the scene comparison in another thread to keep this one on topic and not fill it with too much negativity.

Not being able to see her face must be frustrating, yeah it is fine, you can say it here, there are no many threads anyway. Bamby looks like a nice find. At least her scene isn't short because that would really irritate me. I think I'll still buy it since it is long enough for my taste, and she is a nice girl.

DPraved wrote:Regarding the Bamby scene, my point is exactly that; the camerawork is so poor, they consistently fail to include her beautiful face and figure in the frame.

Yes, filming quality has still to be much improven. This studio shows nice features, like small stories, as well as new fresh girls, but setting, framing and lighting are often poor.

I just made a rule to myself that if it is under 40 minutes I won't buy it, and that saves me a lot of money.

Plus I already have a lot of videos saved on my wishlist for the next billing cycles each month, and that way even if they don't release anything, I still will have stuff to get later on.

Would like to see Monika Wild working with NRX. Great stories combined with wildness!

Credit for making something different and creative.

Never seen an apartment with a manhole in the floor before. Maybe it's a wine cave?

I guess they wanted to find a use for the purple gel on the lights, left over from the Halloween caper (I felt it worked better for vampires). Not sure it really makes Nikolas's apartment look like a prison. Maybe I lack imagination.

Anyway. the girls are really pretty. So thanks for making this scene.

this studio has great potential.
need to work on lighting- everything needs to look vivid and clear. youll get there people likes you, this is your moment, not tomorrow or latter. need to put up scenes daily, good luck ill be watching you. positive comments are great negative comments are better.

DPraved wrote:Regarding the Bamby scene, my point is exactly that; the camerawork is so poor, they consistently fail to include her beautiful face and figure in the frame. I won't say that you shouldn't buy it, but I will say that you should take a look at the scene screenshots before deciding. Bamby is a gorgeous girl, so the camerawork needs to be better with girls of this quality.

I will perhaps continue with the scene comparison in another thread to keep this one on topic and not fill it with too much negativity.

By the way, regarding this scene you talk about Baby Bamby. I saw it and it is my favorite NRX scene of all time.

I think you probably had problems with the aspect ratio or zoom in your projector or something.

That scene on 4K on a 120 inches screen is a sight to behold.
Seeing beautiful Baby Bamby getting fucked like that in all those positions was absolutely glorious.

Thank you NRX for making such a perfect scene, it was just an incredible debut. I regard that scene as a total treasure.

I just had to post some .GIFs of that wondeful scene:









The amount of anal prone bone was super nice. You rarely get that much anal prone bone on a scene:



He even stops inside to give her a break, and then just keeps going:



And then he mods it a bit so he can go some more:



Just look how beautiful her extended legs look laying there waiting to get more cock in the ass:



By the way that "dips" position was also very good because you get to enjoy seeing her legs trembling:



That rimming of the ass and licking of the balls was a nice bonus too:





What a fantastic scene. The 4K is also really nice to have for a scene like this. Excellent work!

Starrio wrote:

DPraved wrote:Regarding the Bamby scene, my point is exactly that; the camerawork is so poor, they consistently fail to include her beautiful face and figure in the frame. I won't say that you shouldn't buy it, but I will say that you should take a look at the scene screenshots before deciding. Bamby is a gorgeous girl, so the camerawork needs to be better with girls of this quality.

I will perhaps continue with the scene comparison in another thread to keep this one on topic and not fill it with too much negativity.

By the way, regarding this scene you talk about Baby Bamby. I saw it and it is my favorite NRX scene of all time.

I think you probably had problems with the aspect ratio or zoom in your projector or something.

That scene on 4K on a 120 inches screen is a sight to behold.
Seeing beautiful Baby Bamby getting fucked like that in all those positions was absolutely glorious.

Thank you NRX for making such a perfect scene, it was just an incredible debut. I regard that scene as a total treasure.

Thank you for returning to this topic and offering an excellent second opinion!

I have no problems with aspect ratio, it's just the tool I used to create the composed images that wasn't any good.

Regarding the scene I think I'm probably overly critical with regards to camera angles. Have you watched the Nata Paradise scene I used as reference? I'm very interested to hear how you would compare the two.

DPraved wrote:Thank you for returning to this topic and offering an excellent second opinion!

I have no problems with aspect ratio, it's just the tool I used to create the composed images that wasn't any good.

Regarding the scene I think I'm probably overly critical with regards to camera angles. Have you watched the Nata Paradise scene I used as reference? I'm very interested to hear how you would compare the two.

I have watched the Nata Paradise scene as well, but it was a while ago, so I'll have to rewatch it again, so I can properly compare it. I remember liking it a lot too because Nata is a total smokeshow in there.

Starrio wrote:

DPraved wrote:Thank you for returning to this topic and offering an excellent second opinion!

I have no problems with aspect ratio, it's just the tool I used to create the composed images that wasn't any good.

Regarding the scene I think I'm probably overly critical with regards to camera angles. Have you watched the Nata Paradise scene I used as reference? I'm very interested to hear how you would compare the two.

I have watched the Nata Paradise scene as well, but it was a while ago, so I'll have to rewatch it again, so I can properly compare it. I remember liking it a lot too because Nata is a total smokeshow in there.

Yes she is! I remember being completely blown away by that scene when I watched it the first time. Nata was a superstar and all positions and angles were great. Her second scene was also shot just as well, but her DAP and 4on1 were disappointing to me since I think everything about them is just worse, from her styling, the directing and the camerawork especially. I wonder what became of that original cameraman/director?

If you compare the screenshots for Bamby's first scene and Nata's first scene, I think it becomes quite obvious that Bamby's scene is much more crouch-focused, while Nata's has much more eye-contact. I very much prefer the latter. Unfortunately this crouch and man-ass focus has pretty much become signature for NRX with the current cameraman and with no new scenes being release with Bamby, I find myself spending my tickets on VK-scenes instead.

Love it!

Starrio wrote:

He even stops inside to give her a break, and then just keeps going:



And then he mods it a bit so he can go some more:



Just look how beautiful her extended legs look laying there waiting to get more cock in the ass:




What a fantastic scene. The 4K is also really nice to have for a scene like this. Excellent work!