What keeps you from buying more NRX scenes?

[dap-addict]

1) Too much fake - DAP/TAP positions as well as cum.
2) Girls almost always stripped naked very soon.
3) Studio not investing into keeping a mix between rookies and old girls and thus girls I gotta like too fast gone - either to porn retirement or softcore options in Spain.

[vvvv84335]

1. Dick size isn't so much an issue, more with how deep they go.
2. Lighting could be better.
3. The angles that they shoot from could use some improvement, but they're not bad. The lighting would certainly fix some of this.
4. Too many dicks in positions that don't allow nice penetration. TVP/TAP rarely looks good unless there's a clear view of all the dicks smoshed together.

It would be better to do DVP+anal

[Ultra-Gape]

2. Lighting could be better.

I generally think the lighting looks good, and prefer it to what for me is the very bright lighting of say Gonzo or Giorgio Grandi by comparison that tends to make things look over-exposed. Although perhaps you had particular bad examples in mind?

I really like NRX scenes, with their general style (great intros and some varied settings) and models being excellent. If I were to name two negatives though it would be a tendency to shoot slightly too close at times and so just cropping off say the girls feet but with no real upside, and the fake cum-shots.

On the shooting just slightly too close front, here are a whole load of examples from Alisha Martinika's otherwise excellent first scene:

Scene: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/169297

[vvvv84335]

2. Lighting could be better.

I generally think the lighting looks good, and prefer it to what for me is the very bright lighting of say Gonzo or Giorgio Grandi by comparison that tends to make things look over-exposed. Although perhaps you had particular bad examples in mind?

I really like NRX scenes, with their general style (great intros and some varied settings) and models being excellent. If I were to name two negatives though it would be a tendency to shoot slightly too close at times and so just cropping off say the girls feet but with no real upside, and the fake cum-shots.

On the shooting just slightly too close front, here are a whole load of examples from Alisha Martinika's otherwise excellent first scene:

Scene: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/169297

You may be right, it's by no means bad. Maybe it's the color temperature? The type of lighting that's used as well as the filters on the camera must make a lot of difference... I don't know anything about film production or post-production, so I am just making an assumption here? Either way, I don't really have anything bad to say about NRX, but there is always room for improvement for any studio.

I think what NRX is doing is fine, but there are other studios I would rather buy from. This is just a personal preference and there are probably a lot of people who love the way NRX shoot their scenes. Someone could provide a screenshot from a scene with original lighting/color balance and change the lighting/color balance to what they would prefer. If we put them side by side we might be able to get a clearer picture of how it might look better? The talent in the scenes are good, so this is the only thing I could think of besides changing the zoom/angles and framing in some positions.

[Ultra-Gape]

You may be right, it's by no means bad. Maybe it's the color temperature? The type of lighting that's used as well as the filters on the camera must make a lot of difference... I don't know anything about film production or post-production, so I am just making an assumption here? Either way, I don't really have anything bad to say about NRX, but there is always room for improvement for any studio.

I think what NRX is doing is fine, but there are other studios I would rather buy from. This is just a personal preference and there are probably a lot of people who love the way NRX shoot their scenes. Someone could provide a screenshot from a scene with original lighting/color balance and change the lighting/color balance to what they would prefer. If we put them side by side we might be able to get a clearer picture of how it might look better? The talent in the scenes are good, so this is the only thing I could think of besides changing the zoom/angles and framing in some positions.

You're right there are lots of factors, and I didn't mean to suggest your preference was 'wrong' by the way but rather just that I didn't personally find the lighting/colouring was bad. On reflection I guess NRX perhaps does have a slightly warmer or more saturated colour pallete than some others but I like the overall result.

[vvvv84335]

You may be right, it's by no means bad. Maybe it's the color temperature? The type of lighting that's used as well as the filters on the camera must make a lot of difference... I don't know anything about film production or post-production, so I am just making an assumption here? Either way, I don't really have anything bad to say about NRX, but there is always room for improvement for any studio.

I think what NRX is doing is fine, but there are other studios I would rather buy from. This is just a personal preference and there are probably a lot of people who love the way NRX shoot their scenes. Someone could provide a screenshot from a scene with original lighting/color balance and change the lighting/color balance to what they would prefer. If we put them side by side we might be able to get a clearer picture of how it might look better? The talent in the scenes are good, so this is the only thing I could think of besides changing the zoom/angles and framing in some positions.

You're right there are lots of factors, and I didn't mean to suggest your preference was 'wrong' by the way but rather just that I didn't personally find the lighting/colouring was bad. On reflection I guess NRX perhaps does have a slightly warmer or more saturated colour pallete than some others but I like the overall result.

Yea I definitely don't think they're bad, but there is something about the colour pallette that feels a bit off compared to others. I guess it's just the color balance that seems different.

[Ultra-Gape]

Yea I definitely don't think they're bad, but there is something about the colour pallette that feels a bit off compared to others. I guess it's just the color balance that seems different.

I think there are other studios that are similar but that's probably getting a bit off topic for here.

[vvvv84335]

Yea I definitely don't think they're bad, but there is something about the colour pallette that feels a bit off compared to others. I guess it's just the color balance that seems different.

I think there are other studios that are similar but that's probably getting a bit off topic for here.

I think the issues with NRX scenes may be more for those multiple penetrations scenes perhaps, since they require a bit more acrobatics/wizardry form the talent x)

[drevokocur66]

Tip fucking, no ATM, ATOGM, ATP, ATOGP, horrible wet content.

[RedBaron]

I would have bought every scene with Leo Ahsoka because this girl is a stunner. But I bought no one, because of the fake cum bullshit.
Can't watch girls eating paste!

[rholbert01]

For me, 6 download limit a month. A lot of other sites are better priced.

[beklof]

Let's bring this topic up because I think the NRX level has not improved at all. The most unfathomable are the absolutely poor pissing scenes! You can't see any idea in them! Guys splashed here and there without any idea. How come these people can't do pissing scenes!?

Another thing is the boring cum in mouth scenes. Always the same track. Over and over and over again! Do these people have no imagination at all!? Doesn't it ever occur to them that hey, could we try something new and different now that we've been repeating the same fucking formula for a hundred years!

[RedBaron]

1) Too much fake - DAP/TAP positions as well as cum.
2) Girls almost always stripped naked very soon.
3) Studio not investing into keeping a mix between rookies and old girls and thus girls I gotta like too fast gone - either to porn retirement or softcore options in Spain.

There is nothing more to say.
Change this and sales will rise.

[hjohjole]

To much focus on vaginal oriented sex acts like DP and DVP. Even going as far as releasing vaginal only scenes.
Misinformation about model ages.

[ExtremePornFan]

I only have 10 NRX scenes of almost 4000. I like them OK. I think I don't buy more simply because there is usually a better option that is more suitable to my taste. If they dressed the girls different (I like them dressed like strippers ) or if they were cheaper, I would probably buy more. They are on my feed and I frequently watch their trailers. I will always give them a chance.

[molloys015]

The goddamn tattoos. And if you're gonna have a bunch of adorable little girls who are tatted up like circus sideshow freaks, at least cover them up with some kind of outfit. Or at the very least, stop getting them all dolled up just to strip them naked. Somebody's gotta snap these dumb bitches out of this mass psychosis, I don't know who or what convinced them that having a bunch of nasty black ink splotches that look like a fucking Rorschach test all over their lovely young bodies doesn't make them look like they haven't been afflicted with some God-awful skin disease. I actually think they look as stupid as they do ugly. I'd sooner take a brand new super car to the local writers and let them tag it up with a bunch of lollipop scribes, so it etches their graffito-nonsense nice and deep into the metal, than to take the virtually permanent step of inking myself up with these dumb ass tattoos. It's an absolute travesty if you ask me. It's gotten so bad that I heard Thieves in Law who did decades deep in the hole at the Black Dolphin blush when they see some of the obnoxious tattoos on these young darlings.

[Adrian_Nyszko]

I wish every studio was as good as NRX - perfect quality and cameraman's sense, I don't know better studio in world in that moment (but more than 3 dicks make chaos). Only old JulesJordan and American Anal was similarly good, but newest clips from JJ are terrible. And rest studios are terrible too - awfuls plenty filters, overexposured and stupid angles of camera. I don't know what happened

[zeusanalfreak299]

I have only a few scenes, I would buy a lot of scenes if:

- the camera lense which is wider then before will constantly be used
- if the focus of the frame will be more on the girl, because now too much men´s body are in the frame. I want to see their cocks only, not their faces, bodies, etc.
- if the setup around will change,because right now too many dark, colourful things are on the set. I would prefer a white room with a single couch, which is bright, to create a contrast to girls skin.
- if there would be a constantly mix of black and white guys

[Naaru]

Theyve been doing pretty good scenes,

but unfortunately a lot of the time compared to other stuff, or even older scenes that I just rewatch - including scenes done by Nick dont quite get there.

Usually its because the gapes are not good enough, often by the end of a scene the girls are just getting some gapes happening.
If DP is happening it should be non stop balls deep, only stopping to change or for a gape.

As others noted, its surprising there isnt so much new talent - but obviously things are complicated by real world situation now.

If you look at the scenes with Ice Di though, and come back to some of the current scenes, very clear difference in performance quality