PornBox.com

I just noticed this new tag, and after a little over a year lobbying for it one way or another, this is great news, and it really comes handy. It's great because it will be easier to identify great scenes like the one you guys just released with Natasha Teen.

By the way, that new huge monster horse dildo is excellent, what a great find:



I'm really happy you guys did prone bone on her too, that position is so great it should always be included:



I like it how she takes it completely flat like a total boss.



It is nice to see anal on a stool too which is always good:



And carrying the girl which makes DP great too:



What a great scene to have, and I also noticed the scene with Sara Bell was tagged, which is a very good scene too:





You should also add this excellent recent scene with Mina, SZ2644:



That also had great prone bone with BBC:

Thank you for bringing my attention to this, I hope more videos are tagged, makes it so much easier to find videos i will enjoy, Many thanks!

I agree 100% I hope they continue with BBCbut I don't hold my breath.i don't know why GONZO start one o. One series with freddy is mind boggling. There is alot of demons nobody lessens. At least 2 on 1 with freddy and oscar.

Titus1 wrote:Thank you for bringing my attention to this, I hope more videos are tagged, makes it so much easier to find videos i will enjoy, Many thanks!

Now we need an only White man tag to be fair.

Deeprunner wrote:

Titus1 wrote:Thank you for bringing my attention to this, I hope more videos are tagged, makes it so much easier to find videos i will enjoy, Many thanks!

Now we need an only White man tag to be fair.

You can't do that, because that... Would be racist.

Deeprunner wrote:

Titus1 wrote:Thank you for bringing my attention to this, I hope more videos are tagged, makes it so much easier to find videos i will enjoy, Many thanks!

Now we need an only White man tag to be fair.

Unironically this. I don't like movies with black performers, just a preference.

drevokocur66 wrote:You can't do that, because that... Would be racist.

Ha! You can't say that - it's hypocritical. The fact is that both "only black men" or "only white men" are of themselves racist but with the black guys I guess they don't mind as it's meant in a complimentary sense. The old thing "Waka Waka Blacks Are Coming" is definitely racist though. I dunno about the "waka waka" thing - probably a tribal reference or something and well-meaning enough - but "blacks"!!?? WTF? That should never have been allowed.

I was concerned when I saw someone talk about "Black Dicks Matter" as a heading recently. That would be grossly offensive. Fortunately I haven't seen this used officially yet. The Black Lives Matter campaign is a very serious one that everyone should support regardless of ethnicity and is not something to be trivialised or made fun of in any way. If LP or anyone else uses this then the black male performers should boycott it, plain and simple. I would not be able to buy those scenes with good conscience so wouldn't. I did with the Waka Waka ones because I assumed that the tag was a bit of a clumsy mistake rather than anything malicious (as I assume did the guys themselves) but Black Dicks Matter would not have that excuse. Please LP do not consider using that tag.

Yes to BBC scenes etc. No real problem with that and I will admit that I like seeing white girls with just black guys. But for me it's mainly about the fucking quality of the guys. I don't really see the skin colour too much.

TheVulture wrote:

drevokocur66 wrote:You can't do that, because that... Would be racist.

Ha! You can't say that - it's hypocritical. The fact is that both "only black men" or "only white men" are of themselves racist but with the black guys I guess they don't mind as it's meant in a complimentary sense. The old thing "Waka Waka Blacks Are Coming" is definitely racist though. I dunno about the "waka waka" thing - probably a tribal reference or something and well-meaning enough - but "blacks"!!?? WTF? That should never have been allowed.

I was concerned when I saw someone talk about "Black Dicks Matter" as a heading recently. That would be grossly offensive. Fortunately I haven't seen this used officially yet. The Black Lives Matter campaign is a very serious one that everyone should support regardless of ethnicity and is not something to be trivialised or made fun of in any way. If LP or anyone else uses this then the black male performers should boycott it, plain and simple. I would not be able to buy those scenes with good conscience so wouldn't. I did with the Waka Waka ones because I assumed that the tag was a bit of a clumsy mistake rather than anything malicious (as I assume did the guys themselves) but Black Dicks Matter would not have that excuse. Please LP do not consider using that tag.

Yes to BBC scenes etc. No real problem with that and I will admit that I like seeing white girls with just black guys. But for me it's mainly about the fucking quality of the guys. I don't really see the skin colour too much.

You missed the sarcasm in my post. And ALL lives matter. If they started a White lives matter organization, it would be called what it is... racist, just like BLM. If they called it Black lives matter too, I could kinda see that, but again, ALL lives matter.

drevokocur66 wrote:You missed the sarcasm in my post. And ALL lives matter. If they started a White lives matter organization, it would be called what it is... racist, just like BLM. If they called it Black lives matter too, I could kinda see that, but again, ALL lives matter.

Ha! Well I'm not going to get too deeply into this as this is a porn and not political forum but I do think you miss the point of BLM. I'm guessing you're white (same as me). So the thing is, BLM is not about us. It's about black people addressing systemic racism that has lasted centuries. Of course "all lives matter". That goes without saying. But it's a trite comment. We don't need a White Lives Matter movement, because unless I've missed something there are not countless examples of white people suffering systemic racism at the hands of black people. You could maybe find some very limited examples like white farmers in Zimbabwe under Mugabe. But that is small beer compared to the millions of black people who suffer discrimination, assault, even murder etc. This is a movement for them and it is important. Don't debase it with pithy, reductionist rhetoric.

TheVulture wrote:

drevokocur66 wrote:You missed the sarcasm in my post. And ALL lives matter. If they started a White lives matter organization, it would be called what it is... racist, just like BLM. If they called it Black lives matter too, I could kinda see that, but again, ALL lives matter.

Ha! Well I'm not going to get too deeply into this as this is a porn and not political forum but I do think you miss the point of BLM. I'm guessing you're white (same as me). So the thing is, BLM is not about us. It's about black people addressing systemic racism that has lasted centuries. Of course "all lives matter". That goes without saying. But it's a trite comment. We don't need a White Lives Matter movement, because unless I've missed something there are not countless examples of white people suffering systemic racism at the hands of black people. You could maybe find some very limited examples like white farmers in Zimbabwe under Mugabe. But that is small beer compared to the millions of black people who suffer discrimination, assault, even murder etc. This is a movement for them and it is important. Don't debase it with pithy, reductionist rhetoric.

Speaking of murder, in US, 93% of blacks, are killed by other blacks. Change comes within. Want to change the way police handles things? BECOME a policeman. It is doable. Millions of emigrants come to US EVERY year, and start from scratch. Asian, Hispanic, Non whites, and majority make a good life here. Somehow though, blacks are the only ones who are discriminated against? Racism can be found in every race, it is not a "white" trait.

Please bring Kaira Love to GONZO studio. She is hot big gape inicent no tattoos she can take BBC.arrange 3 BBC cocks Freddy, Oscar and if is possible yves.

Well this has finally happened. Latest Silvia Soprano scene billed as BLACK MEAT MATTER.

Will post something on the general forum about this.

Porn has always engaged in this deliberate stoking of racial divisions. I think you would be hard-pressed to find a company that hasn’t had a brush with it. Doesn’t make it right, but there you go.

Even the tried-and-true “BBC” and “interracial” descriptors are not exactly fantastic, and that’s not even touching on the numerous sites that market themselves explicitly along racial lines, e.g. Blacked, BBCPie, Dogfart (worst name ever), or even the more problematic names like BlackAmbush and GhettoGaggers.

How do you acknowledge race in porn without invoking these kinds of awkward conversations? From what I’ve seen, I don’t think you can. I’ve considered dropping racial tags entirely from my stuff entirely, but y’know, you’ve gotta factor in sales and all that…

Mister Ananas wrote:Porn has always engaged in this deliberate stoking of racial divisions. I think you would be hard-pressed to find a company that hasn’t had a brush with it. Doesn’t make it right, but there you go.

Even the tried-and-true “BBC” and “interracial” descriptors are not exactly fantastic, and that’s not even touching on the numerous sites that market themselves explicitly along racial lines, e.g. Blacked, BBCPie, Dogfart (worst name ever), or even the more problematic names like BlackAmbush and GhettoGaggers.

How do you acknowledge race in porn without invoking these kinds of awkward conversations? From what I’ve seen, I don’t think you can. I’ve considered dropping racial tags entirely from my stuff entirely, but y’know, you’ve gotta factor in sales and all that…

There's nothing wrong with referencing the black nature of male performers but trivialising a hugely important movement like Black Lives Matter is simply wrong. For a while now forum posters have been using the term "Black Dicks Matter" in a (sour) throwaway manner and I had hoped and expected that LP in good sense would have left the term there (ie in the margins of the forum). Sadly I was wrong.

I just hope that the male performers themselves will put pressure on LP to remove it. Surely they can't be happy with that? Most if not all of them must surely support the Black Lives Matter movement? If so it's hard to think that they wouldn't be offended by this.

TheVulture wrote:There’s nothing wrong with referencing the black nature of male performers but trivialising a hugely important movement like Black Lives Matter is simply wrong.

Au contraire. I think you would find that there are many people who take exception to referencing the black nature of male performers. Maybe not so much today, now that the pendulum has shifted toward more a overt focus on racial identity, but several years ago I will tell you that a very left-leaning female American performer (who I will not make any further steps to identifying) refused to shoot with Sineplex and cited the use of terms like “BBC” and “interracial” in marketing as her primary reason.

Seriously.

For a while now forum posters have been using the term "Black Dicks Matter" in a (sour) throwaway manner and I had hoped and expected that LP in good sense would have left the term there (ie in the margins of the forum). Sadly I was wrong.

“LP” didn’t title the scene. Giorgio did. Take up your grievance with him.

Protest the title all you want, but I will not endorse censorship.

I just hope that the male performers themselves will put pressure on LP to remove it. Surely they can't be happy with that? Most if not all of them must surely support the Black Lives Matter movement? If so it's hard to think that they wouldn't be offended by this.

I’m just gonna be real with you, and I’m saying this from personal experience, most people who get super offended about this stuff are white liberals.

Mister Ananas wrote:I’m just gonna be real with you, and I’m saying this from personal experience, most people who get super offended about this stuff are white liberals.

Don't listen to Vulture he is a recurrent troll on anything brainwashing Soros fanatism. The dude is the equivalent to Pentecostals speaking tongues, except his whole dogma, god and religious beliefs is pure political nonsense. He is the result of heavy brainwashing from open society foundations influences on all major channels, newspapers, and media in general here in the States. At least some people in Europe are still normal, don't listen to the nonsense from people like this, they are brainwashed to the bone, and they think of themselves as templar knights doing gods work, but it is all pathetic brainwashing. I use the word pathetic because he seems to like it. It is so bad that because I'm using religious references he probably believes I'm saying he is religious, that's how bad the situation with these people is.

Starrio wrote:Don't listen to Vulture he is a recurrent troll...

Vulture is not a troll at all!
He takes a lot of time to carefully watch these porn films and is posting to a lot of valid points every true porn fan at least should rather consider at some point. He fuels discussion needed more here!
This said I often dont agree with his POV, incl. with his recent Black Lives Matter stuff. He's a hopeless idealist often, but still he not a troll, but sb taking his time for valid input.


Btw, as for the new tag: I think its useful, but me, I dont care much. I'd rather know which studs are paired with the girls of each scene so that I can decide which quality the fucking will gonna be.

dap-addict wrote:Vulture is not a troll at all!

Starrio is I think a little sore because he made himself look a little silly in the arm twisting thread I started on the main forum by stating he never said something that he did (a simple requote put the matter to bed). Since then he is lashing out with this troll stuff a bit more aggressively, which is a little childish really. Interesting that he seems to assign some kind of religious angle to me as well now. Would love to know where that idea came from.

Starrio wrote:It is so bad that because I'm using religious references he probably believes I'm saying he is religious, that's how bad the situation with these people is.

Oh I only just noticed that bit. This after saying "his whole dogma, god and religious beliefs is pure political nonsense".

Does anyone have any idea what any of this means? It just sounds like Trumpian gibberish to me.

TheVulture wrote:

Starrio wrote:It is so bad that because I'm using religious references he probably believes I'm saying he is religious, that's how bad the situation with these people is.

Oh I only just noticed that bit. This after saying "his whole dogma, god and religious beliefs is pure political nonsense".

Does anyone have any idea what any of this means? It just sounds like Trumpian gibberish to me.

Exactly what I thought, dude didn't understand a thing, brainwashing at its finest.

Starrio wrote:Exactly what I thought, dude didn't understand a thing, brainwashing at its finest.

I think it's more to do with the fact that you were talking gibberish than that I've been "brainwashed".

I'd be surprised if anyone had a clue what you were going on about.

What are "open society foundations"?

Patreons of pretty much every bought / sold out media outlet on the planet, they mask themselves as human rights advocates, but once you see what they do with countries' politics you can blatantly see their hidden agendas hypocrisy and dirty influence, responsible for countless acts of violence around the world and lives wasted by inciting them to fight and protest without any regards for human freedoms and liberties.

Starrio wrote:Patreons of pretty much every bought / sold out media outlet on the planet, they mask themselves as human rights advocates, but once you see what they do with countries' politics you can blatantly see their hidden agendas hypocrisy and dirty influence, responsible for countless acts of violence around the world and lives wasted by inciting them to fight and protest without any regards for human freedoms and liberties.

That sounds sort of left wing but as you're accusing me of being a victim of that I'm confused. I have absolutely no representation of my left wing views whatsoever in the mainstream media and as a result very rarely read it. So is it right wing conspiracy theory stuff laughably at odds with the state of the world? I can only assume so.

Are you aware that pretty much every governing class around the world is right wing? This even includes Biden, where all you have is some liberalism combined with a vehemently right wing economic model and continued imperialism in Latin America in particular. And if you want to throw in the odd outlier like Cuba or Venezuela, these are not really left wing but more a form of state controlled crony capitalism (Cuba does still have a well-funded health program thanks to earlier bureaucratic communism, which I only critically support, ie not the bureaucratic bit).

So in other words, if you are spouting Trumpian right wing conspiracy guff you'll surely have to confront the fact that these mysterious organisations you're speaking of and who apparently mean you such harm (whilst apparently representing me in some weird way) aren't doing very well on any conceivable level.

This is a broadening out of the debate in this thread but it is interesting to me to build the profile of those like yourself who enjoy aggressive manhandle type porn above all other types. It's certainly no surprise to me to find that you're massively right wing and IMHO a little delusional about the political make-up of the planet we live on.

The economic policies aren't what really matter, it really comes down to social issues because that's how you brainwash people because people are religious by nature.

It is not a conspiracy either, these organizations are blatant about everything they do, and everyone knows where they are putting their money.

If you think they aren't succeeding you are living under a rock, cancel culture, SJWs, woke white knights, virtue signaling, it's a shit show everywhere.

People yelling defund the police on the streets, burning businesses, hitting and killing each other, destroying careers, homes, people's lives, making everyone feel like a victim. It's utter insanity of mass control and influence.

Starrio wrote:The economic policies aren't what really matter

Of course they are. They underpin the very fabric of our societies and create irreconcilable class divisions. Social issues are just a smokescreen around them. The right is more than capable of waging its "culture wars" on these issues and the frustration for left wingers like me is that often it's the liberals who make their work easier by taking unrealistic hardline liberal positions on areas that simply push reasonable people to the right (see: transgenderism).

You're making the mistake of viewing me as some kind of "woke" liberal. I am not that. I am on most issues fairly liberal in my views (eg multi-cultural, completely accepting of homosexuality etc.) but in some ways also socially conservative (eg nationalistic to a point, cautious about large-scale immigration, not a believer in self-identification for transgender people etc.). I am IMHO ultimately a greater threat to the global right wing consensus for these reasons but you don't really need to fear me because I have absolutely no political representation anywhere in the world. Those so-called "left wing" institutions in my own country (England) want precisely nothing to do with me as they've become so immersed in fantasy liberal identity politics as to view me as hateful for some of my straight-talking "no-nonsense" (you could say) fringe opinion so the right doesn't even need know that I exist.

Maybe you aren't such a screw up. A lot of people in Europe are still decent. People in Russia and Eastern Europe, these people are still normal.

It's here in the States were people have gone insane, and in many parts of Western Europe I imagine as well.

When I said the economic policies don't matter, I didn't mean they don't matter to us, I meant they don't matter to them. We were talking about Open Societies, what they care about is to have control of the people through social engineering.

They don't worry about economic policies because that ship has sailed already, that's stuff is already taking care of, all countries are slaves already economically speaking, so they don't care about that.

Open Societies can easily support right wing parties as long as they comply to their social engineering ideas. With U.S. is easy to explain, people like Bush, yes, people like Trump, no. If they can't control the government then that's when they step in.