PornBox.com

magizi87 wrote:This might be a coincidence, but in all proxy directed scenes that I have noticed,
the ladies are sporting a pony tail hair style. And I have skipped all her scenes, for that reason alone

random! wrote:the last 2 weren't bad.

dap-addict wrote:Here trailer and official screencap info didnt deceive me like in Belle/Ria's Proxy scene!

Now for Inga Devil as I said DAP is really short, around 3min, but I'd still get it just for Inga. She's so relaxed and joyful here, really heart warming!
I also really like her new tattooes. Proxy presents her very well-groomed - as usually with very body conscious Inga. Some nice chemistry with Mike Angelo here!
Dont get it for Ingas DAP, though. rcdap is butchered short takes only, same for pile. Only cgdap is sort of fine, but far byond her former DAP-ability.

Daphne Klyde is less expressive, just less experienced and thats visible, but she takes it like a trooper. Almost 4min of DAP - a really good workout for her!
For both girls we get some really nice body-stocking tearing!

Now Proxy as a director:
I was hopeful after her Verona Sky (SZ1664) scene but this more difficult 4on2 was obviousely was too much of a challange for her.
Catching two girls action at once is always tricky, but here the camera several times looses focus, there are erratic moves, the worst of it pinning to Inga licking Mike's ass at the very moment of Daphnes rcdap breakin'. WTF! For me this one (39th min.) shows that Proxy didnt realize yet she is shooting porn for a men's public predominantly.
MU is also a bit too heavy here.
Body stockings might sure find some fetish lovers, not really mine either, but tearing them down was good fun!
Again we have that fun feel - and thats a fine change!

All in all I would have wished to watch Daphne's SZ DAPbreakin more focused.
Inga for a change was more relaxed working for Roxy, though. She looks quite often stressed on set.

dap-addict wrote:dap-a fetsh stats:
Daphne: 3-4mins of DAP, 2 positions, no porn orgasms, but also no apparent DAP-ability problems, DP intro for DAP
Inga: 3 min of DAP, 3 positions, good eye-contact, DP intro for DAP. Inga may have lost her high DAP-ability during her porn break and needs to train again.


Some nice simultanous DAP footage in SZ1665 by Proxy.


Btw, no apparent Proxy director assistant in this film.

dap-addict wrote:Some screencaps to illustrate some of the above review points - or just to enjoy:

dap-a cap
Inga is the first one to get fucked after the b/g bj intro. STA = bingo!


dap-a cap
Daphne goes almost straight into DP! Also very nice, but what makes that arm here? Proxy's I guess...


dap-a cap
Inga dapped to turn that workout into one of these still rare simultanous DAP scenes.


dap-a cap
Really love Ingas new tattoos and her jolly way to perform DAP now!


dap-a cap
Inga gets her body stocking torn for a better view of her body and tits. Daphne hoovering over to suck them while still getting dapped.


dap-a cap
Cgdap anchor Mike taking her ass alone fucking Inga into orgiastic spasms.


Min 39ff - Daphne in rcdap: - Is this still ment to be porn for predominantly male hetero public?

dap-a cap
DAPbreakin' while EE is anchoring. Nice facial reaction by the Ukrainian cutie.


dap-a cap
Now tearing up her body stocking while she gets full speed dapped. Just so hot!!!


dap-a cap
Proxy as director: Now lets see whats happening there... Pinning that camera on Inga licking Mikes ass. (Urrrgh! I save you that screen!)


dap-a cap
Camera goes back to Daphne, who is almost naked by now. All the tearing went missing. WTF!? (all 10 caps from SZ1665)

dap-addict wrote:Now finally the cum-shots:
For me its still a crucial part in all porn films, although I am getting less focussed on it over years of watching porn.

At gonzo we got sort of used to have small and often lackluster cum-shots. Still the arrangement of that classical porn finish is still important to me. And here Proxy fails the most visibly. Again, could be a girls POV of porn directing, just a guess, though. Anyway some common sense still should be kept, like getting both girls involved. But here again Proxy fails.

Curious how others feel about?



Anyway, some caps to explain:


1st cum-shot: Mike Angelo the lazy lad, I'd say. Mike loves this position, which is highly unfavorable in porn terms because of gravity.
Also who is interested in cum flying on his torso instead of the girl?! WTF! Had it with Verona I think, why did Proxy allow this again?



(Allged) 2nd cumshot: Creampies is the best and easiest way to hide a non-shot or use fake-cum. To avoid it any good dirctor makes the girl push it out after its done.This footage is missing. I'd say a rare zero for Ian. But who knows? - Btw, good point in fetish terms: Look at that heel on the floor! Nice detail!



3rd cum-shot: Meagre but nice eye-contact.



4th cum-shot: Quite a load for EE!


Now where was Daphne Klyde during all these 4 shots? Right, EE fucked her when Ian allegedly filled Ingas ass up. Inga even says: "I wanna fill you my ass!"LOL!
And than? I got a glimpse of her stocking on the blue sofa when Inga received her 2 facials. What would you expect now: Right, Daphne didnt get any goo directly, but Inga will share some with her now. gg fetish lovers will get some kissing etc. What does otherwise lez affine Proxy do? Camera just lingers 1-2s on Inga and than turns black. WTF?!

Cum-shots summarized: Poor Daphne!

dap-addict wrote:Daphne Klyde is less expressive, just less experienced and thats visible, but she takes it like a trooper. Almost 4min of DAP - a really good workout for her!
After her porngeek interview I expected a bit she'd get lost in this scene, but sadly not, guess due to that SZ DAPintro and maybe haveing a very expressive Inga as co-star. Anyway, Proxy should have instructed her to be a bit more vocal and at least pretend some orgasms!
For both girls we get some really nice body-stocking tearing!

Now Proxy as a director:
I was hopeful after her Verona Sky (SZ1664) scene but this more difficult 4on2 was obviousely was too much of a challange for her. (...)

kidloco2 wrote:The same major camera positioning complaint as goes to Gonzo studio:

1. The camera stays too often on the side in respect to the action, must be moved more in the center.

cam_position_01.jpg

2. The camera is too often angled (rotated) in positions where it is not really necessary / useful.

Chazzum wrote:I've been a rather harsh critic of Proxy's directing skills. I found her first scene to be a jumbled mess. I swore never to buy one of her scenes. Then, along comes Kristy Black shooting for Proxy. Well, Kristy's one of my 'must have every scene' girls so I took a chance on it: https://www.legalporno.com/watch/32612/kristy_black_dap_dap_dap_first_time_firsting_sz1743

To my surprise, it is a great scene! Proxy set up a relaxed atmosphere where everyone involved appeared to be having a good time. Her camerawork was steadier and held shots capturing the action longer for the viewer to build focus. For me, porn is all about being drawn into the scene. There shouldn't be a lot of jump cuts and camera shake as that takes me out of the scene. This was a GIANT improvement over Proxy's earliest work as a director.

Well done Proxy!

Sazz wrote:The first Holly Hendrix scene is badly directed and I'd much rather see another director doing her scenes. Doesn't even look much like LP. Why is it outside? Porn isn't about outside scenery. The camera is too close to the performers during the action. This ain't the 80s or the '90s porn with mostly close-ups. Pull back the camera a little and let the action breathe at a comfortable distance so with get the full sense of the action. Don't try to re-define LP angles or the way it looks. Fans liked it because of the way it looked before. IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT. She's trying to, and you're letting her.

mattias_nr_1 wrote:Give her some time jeez.. calm ur fkin tits already

kidloco2 wrote:

mattias_nr_1 wrote:Give her some time jeez.. calm ur fkin tits already

Or you buy a regular decent family car at renowned dealership but the car turns out
to be a complete disaster and when you complain, would it be ok if they will just say to you: "Give a manufacturer some time jeez"?