PornBox.com

LP is an anal porn biased site, but there is an increasing number of pussy fucking only footage in gonzo scenes recently.
Not sure wheter somebody noticed this, but whereever you stand in the DP vs. DAP discussion pussy only sex hasnt been part of LP for the last time of expansion.
Its about standards and credibility!

Worst is I think when the pussy only sex is even highlighted in the trailer like here around min 1.04:
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31120/o ... _dp_sz1310

I am sure I can find easily 5 more trailers only in September with this new confusing tendency.

Not to be minunderstood, short pre-DP pussy sex pre-DP is needed in position changes of course, also in some special situations pussy fucking relaxes the girl or adds an intended cum-shot twist, I am not talking about this footage, but needless pussy fucking just making the whole film looking more vanilla.
Thats not LP standard!

I have noticed this to. And i don't like it.

Definitely agree. Way too much pussy lately.

LPs slow migration to softer porn = cheaper, and broader audience = more profit.

drevokocur66 wrote:LPs slow migration to softer porn = cheaper, and broader audience = more profit.

Not sure its that easy, DDF an Tushy are for broader ausdiences, LP build all that power by catering for the niches not the mainstream.

drevokocur66 wrote:LPs slow migration to softer porn = cheaper, and broader audience = more profit.

That makes a lot of sense i guess. You cant cling to small insignificant niches like anal sex if you want to make money. You got to put out content that hits home with the larger mainstream of consumers. You know... like interracial cuckold scenes.

Yes, I do firmly agree with the original post here. It can only harm sales and become so common that vast amounts of people don't even look anymore! That can't happen. Just feels like they are not giving Daisy Lee, Valentina Sweet, Nicole and Cindy Sweet etc the best chance to sell by illogically doing this. It is a bit baffling. Eventually, the hardened core will skip without even viewing the trailer.

I also totally disagree with a comment made that softer sex = more sales. It most certainly does not as it's clear on the biggest selling scenes every month. They always constitute dap, tp, gangbang and the like. That's a fact

There are enough outlets for such a vanilla mainstream move - also close to LP stakes.
DDF comes to mind.
Hope LP doesnt immitate them soon! Would make no sense at all businesswise.

JohnMcSpunkencock wrote:I also totally disagree with a comment made that softer sex = more sales.

There's an easy reality check:
Is it the same audience?


http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31535/blonde_super_slut_krystal_kaytlin_assfucked_again_double_anal_sz1463 (btw, that how to do an LP trailer!!)

and

http://ddfnetwork.com/model/5046/vinna-reed.html


So much about diversification and - allegedly - missing alternatives for the more feable hearted fans of our dear LP girls!

Not September but July, still why oh why?
http://www.legalporn.com/watch/31336/ria_sunn_kristy_black_anal_dp_4some_for_legal_porn_sz1396

min 0.33 (after the anal theme was set again on min 032)

JohnMcSpunkencock wrote:Yes, I do firmly agree with the original post here. It can only harm sales and become so common that vast amounts of people don't even look anymore! That can't happen. Just feels like they are not giving Daisy Lee, Valentina Sweet, Nicole and Cindy Sweet etc the best chance to sell by illogically doing this. It is a bit baffling. Eventually, the hardened core will skip without even viewing the trailer.

I also totally disagree with a comment made that softer sex = more sales. It most certainly does not as it's clear on the biggest selling scenes every month. They always constitute dap, tp, gangbang and the like. That's a fact

I'm here especially for hard action and I'm not interested with soft vanilla. There are a lot of other sites who specialize in softer content. BTW do you remember when ZZ had site pornstarspunishment? Rough stuff, hard action. Those scenes were at top sales. Unfortunately they decided from some law reasons close this project and now are doing only shitty scenes. If LP will go the same way I will pass.

Tushy and it's sister websites are beautifully photographed. Hollywood quality lighting and beautiful locations. Makes the girls look a million dollars.

IMO LP producers can certainly learn and aspire to follow the technical lead of sites like Tushy. But those glamorous scenes must cost a pretty penny to make.
I bet they need their big sales just to break even.